Public health

13


Public health





Introduction


While pharmacists have increasingly received wide recognition for their considerable knowledge, skills and expertise in working with patients to resolve medicines-related issues, they appear to have struggled with the concept of contributing to the wider public health agenda. This is ironic, given that for many years pharmacists have addressed a range of public health issues by giving lifestyle advice, among other services, to the populations they serve on topics such as smoking cessation, diet, substance misuse, sexual health, alcohol and exercise.


However, in recent years, pharmacy has started to recognize its public health contribution, following the publication of key government strategies to develop public health pharmacy. Working with other agencies as part of a multidisciplinary team to address population-wide public health issues is a relatively new challenge that requires additional knowledge and skills, but this has provided new opportunities for pharmacists to become involved in developing and delivering new initiatives to promote healthy living. This chapter will help the reader to understand better the principles of public health and the partnerships required to deliver the public health agenda and identify what the pharmacist can contribute.



What is public health pharmacy?


There are many definitions of public health in common use but perhaps the one most widely used in the UK is:



Central to this definition is the concept that promoting public health is not solely an application of evidence-based science, such as epidemiology. For those working in public health, there is also a need to understand different sociological groupings within society and work with others to support and encourage the population or particular sectors of society to make changes that are likely to bring health benefits. To achieve this, those employed in public health typically work across organizations such as local health service bodies, local authorities and local communities in settings that range from acute hospital trusts and local health organizations to local authorities, social services and the voluntary sector. Much of the work is long term and it may take several years before any outcomes materialize that can have a lasting impact on health. Indeed, this could be viewed as being a ‘health service’, in contrast to the current healthcare system that may more closely resemble an ‘ill health service’. This is because resources are used to encourage people to adopt a healthy lifestyle and protect them from communicable diseases, rather than being primarily targeted at people who are ill.


As a corollary to the definition of public health presented above, public health pharmacy can be defined as:



This definition reflects a pragmatic approach to public health pharmacy and has proved useful to help understand what pharmacy can contribute, but it has mis-led some to believe that public health pharmacy is a discipline in its own right. Rather, public health requires a multidisciplinary team approach and pharmacy is only one of the contributors, often with a strong focus on medicines-related issues.


Pharmacy should always be in a position to make an impact on public health, even if it restricts its contribution to medicines-related issues. However, to make an optimal contribution to public health, pharmacy needs to also influence the wider determinants of health. This is more challenging and requires an appreciation that more than 70% of the factors that determine a person’s health lie outside of the domain of health services and instead in their demographic, social, economic and environmental conditions. For example, there is limited opportunity to help a patient with asthma improve their health by advising them on the correct use of their inhaler when wider public health issues also influence treatment outcome. The patient may live in poorly heated, damp, infested accommodation, have a low paid job that involves working in a dusty or dirty environment, be poorly educated, have few or no friends or family to support them and have poor mental health. In addition, they may continue to smoke cigarettes, take little exercise and eat too many foods with a high fat content. It is clear that these factors will impact on good disease management, but the influential factors are often much less obvious than described above. Being aware of the wider determinants of health is important, as each carries a significant health burden, many of which are linked to deprivation. A number of these are summarized in Table 13.1.




Wider determinants of health


Most measures of population health have shown marked improvement over the past 150 years. For example, life expectancy in England and Wales has improved in every decade since the 1840s. In 1841, life expectancy for males was 41 and this had increased to 78.7 years by 2011. The equivalent improvement for females was from 43 to 82.6 years of age. Much of the improvement seen has been the result of environmental and social changes rather than developments in medicine and health care. Despite these overall improvements, social inequalities have widened, with improvements in the health of the most disadvantaged groups being relatively small. To illustrate these inequalities, we can look at the life expectancy of those who live in the most and least deprived areas of our big cities. In Scotland, for example, people living in the most deprived districts of Glasgow have a life expectancy 12 years shorter than those in the most affluent areas. In London, boroughs a few miles apart have markedly different life expectancies. Each of the eight tube stations on the Jubilee line from Westminster to Canning Town represents a decline of one further additional year in life expectancy for the resident population.


The landmark work of Dahlgren and Whitehead in 1991 highlighted the main factors that determine the health of a given population (Fig. 13.1). The age, gender and genetic make-up of an individual clearly influence the health potential of that individual, although each is fixed and non-modifiable. Other factors that influence health and which can be modified to have a favourable impact include addressing individual lifestyle factors such as smoking, diet and physical activity. Improving interactions with friends and relatives, and developing mutual support within a community can help sustain health. Other wider influences on health include living and working conditions, food provision, access to essential goods and services, and the overall socioeconomic, cultural and environmental conditions. There are too many factors to discuss in detail here, but a number of the relevant, key determinants are outlined below. However, the simple message is that, whether attempting to evaluate mortality, morbidity or self-reported health, and regardless of whether it is income, class, house ownership, deprivation, social exclusion or a similar indicator or combination of indicators that is used as the socioeconomic indicator, those who are worse off in society have poorer health.




Employment and unemployment


Both employment and unemployment can be associated with adverse effects on health. Job security has also been recognized as important for well-being. The trend towards less secure, short-term employment affects everyone but is a particular problem for less skilled manual workers. Unemployment imposes a number of health burdens on the unemployed and some of these are summarized in Box 13.1.


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 24, 2016 | Posted by in PHARMACY | Comments Off on Public health

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access