Passive and non-specific immunotherapy

35 Passive and non-specific immunotherapy




Passive immunization with antibody




Certain diseases are treated by a passive transfer of immunity, which can be life-saving


Before the introduction of antibiotics, acute infectious diseases were often treated by the injection of preformed antibody on the principle that the patient was already ill and it was too late for ‘active’ vaccination. Indeed, the demonstration that immunity to tetanus and diphtheria could be transferred to mice with serum from vaccinated rabbits was a key experiment in the discovery of antibody in the 1890    s. Subsequently, the production of antiserum for the passive treatment of diphtheria, tetanus and pneumococcal pneumonia, and against the toxic effects of streptococci and staphylococci, became an important industry, and generations of horses that had retired from active duty were kept on as the source of ‘immune serum’. The introduction of antitetanus serum in the early months of the First World War reduced the incidence of tetanus dramatically by up to 30-fold (Fig. 35.1).



The advent of penicillin and other antibiotics has, of course, changed the picture considerably, and passive immunotherapy is now used for only a select group of diseases (Table 35.1). The serum may be specific or non-specific and of human or animal origin.


Table 35.1 Specific passive immunotherapy with antibody































Infection Source of antibody Indication
Diphtheria
Tetanus
Human, horse
Human, horse
imageProphylaxis, treatment
Varicella-zoster Human Prophylaxis in immunodeficiencies
Gas gangrene
Botulism
Snake bite
Scorpion bite
Horse imagePost-exposure
Rabies Human Post-exposure (plus vaccine)
Hepatitis B Human Post-exposure
Hepatitis A
Measles
imagePooled human immunoglobulin Prophylaxis (travel)
Post-exposure

Although not so commonly used as 50    years ago, passive injections of specific antibody can still be a life-saving treatment.




Antibody in pooled normal serum can provide protection against infection


With common infections, it can be assumed that most normal people have antibody to the pathogen in their serum. The clearest proof of this is that patients with hypogammaglobulinaemia can be kept free of recurrent infection by regular injections of IgG from pooled normal serum, and that immunodeficient children can be protected against measles in the same way (Box 35.1). Immunoglobulin is prepared from batches of plasma from 1000–6000 healthy donors after screening for hepatitis B and C and HIV. With improvements in methods of preparation, intravenous injection is now preferred to intramuscular injection in most cases. Dosages for this type of therapy range from 100 to 400    mg IgG/kg per month.



In healthy individuals the probability of contracting hepatitis A in an endemic area is enormously reduced by a single injection of as little as 5    mL of IgG. The immunity conferred by mothers on their newborn infants by placental transfer of IgG and subsequently by colostral IgA (though the latter is not absorbed, but remains in the intestine) is further evidence for the protective effect of relatively small amounts of antibody.



Theoretically, the most effective therapy is provided by one or more monoclonal antibodies specific for a known target antigen


In practice, a mixture of several monoclonal antibodies mimicking just the relevant clones in a polyclonal serum might be required in situations where individual antigens are expressed in low quantities on the microbe or where binding to more than one epitope is required for full effectiveness. We have previously described the derivation of mouse monoclonal antibodies, but a serious complication is that they are highly immunogenic in humans and give rise to human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) which accelerate clearance of the monoclonal from the blood and possibly cause hypersensitivity reactions; they also prevent the mouse antibody from reaching its target and, in some cases, block its binding to antigen. Logic points to removal of the xenogeneic (foreign) portions of the monoclonal antibody and their replacement by human Ig structures using recombinant DNA technology. One refined approach is to graft the six complementarity determining regions (CDR) of a high-affinity rodent monoclonal onto a completely human Ig framework without loss of specific reactivity (Fig. 35.2). This is not a trivial exercise, however, and the objective of fusing human B cells to make hybridomas is still appealing, taking into account not only the gross reduction in immunogenicity but also the fact that, within a species, antibodies can be made to subtle differences such as major histocompatibility complex (MHC) polymorphic molecules and tumour-associated antigens on other individuals, whereas xenogeneic responses are more directed to immunodominant structures common to most subjects. Notwithstanding the difficulties in finding good fusion partners, large numbers of human monoclonals have been established.


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 9, 2017 | Posted by in MICROBIOLOGY | Comments Off on Passive and non-specific immunotherapy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access