Specific product requests

Chapter 10


Specific product requests




Background


Many patients will present in the pharmacy requesting a specific product rather than wanting advice on symptoms. They might have seen the product advertised on the television or been told to purchase it from their doctor. Regardless of the reason why they are asking for the product, it is the responsibility of the pharmacist to ensure that the patient receives the most appropriate therapy. This chapter therefore deals with situations where patients ask for a particular product or class of product but the pharmacist needs to elicit more information from the patient before complying with the request.



Motion sickness






Evidence base for over-the-counter medication


First generation antihistamines (cyclizine, cinnarizine, meclozine and promethazine) and anticholinergics (hyoscine and scopolamine) are routinely recommended to prevent motion sickness. All have shown various degrees of effectiveness. A Cochrane review of scopolamine identified 14 studies (n = 1025) and found scopolamine to be superior to placebo and some other treatments (metoclopramide), and as good as antihistamines (Spinks et al 2011).


Ginger has long been advocated for use as an anti-emetic. A review by Chrubasik and colleagues (2005) identified four exploratory studies of ginger in the prevention of motion sickness. The results of these studies suggested ginger was better than placebo, and similar in efficacy to other pharmacological agents. However, the studies were often in small numbers of patients, and of uncertain quality; the authors of the review concluded that further studies are required to confirm the effectiveness of ginger for motion sickness.


Non-pharmacological approaches to the prevention of motion sickness using acupressure are also available OTC. Bruce et al (1990) investigated the use of Sea Band acupressure bands versus hyoscine and placebo. Eighteen healthy volunteers were subjected to simulated conditions to induce motion sickness. The findings showed that whilst hyoscine exerted a preventative effect, Sea Bands were no more effective than placebo. Further trials have confirmed these findings, although 1 small trial by Stern et al (2001) reported positive findings. However, accurate placement of the Sea Band seems to be important, and further trials are needed as acupressure has shown positive effects for nausea and vomiting associated with pregnancy.



Practical prescribing and product selection


Prescribing information relating to medicines for motion sickness reviewed in the section ‘Evidence base for over-the-counter medication’ is discussed and summarised in Table 10.1. They are most effective when given prior to exposure and products should be selected based on matching the length of the journey with the duration of action of each medicine (see Hints and Tips Box 10.1).










Hyoscine


Hyoscine can be taken either orally (e.g. Joy Rides and Kwells) or transdermally (e.g. Scopolamine patches – although these were discontinued in September 2006). Products should be taken 20 to 30 minutes before the time of travel; because they have a short half life they have a short duration of action and the dose might therefore have to be repeated on journeys longer than 4 hours. Anticholinergic side effects are more obvious than with antihistamines and it does interact with other medicines that have anticholinergic side effects and should therefore not be co-prescribed. Because hyoscine hydrobromide crosses the blood–brain barrier it can cause sedation. It appears to be safe in pregnancy, although the manufacturers state it should be avoided.








Emergency hormonal contraception




Background


Emergency hormonal contraception (EHC) is one of only a handful of deregulated products, which targets preventative health care and fits with UK government public health policy. Like other Western countries, the UK has high teenage pregnancy rates and associated high abortion rates.


The intention of UK government policy on making EHC available through pharmacies was to improve access for patients requiring EHC at times when other providers might be closed, for example at weekends and evenings. This policy appears to have been effective. Since its launch in the UK in 2001 the percentage of EHC provided through community pharmacies has steadily increased (NHS Statistics 2011). Community pharmacists are now the main provider of EHC, and studies have consistently demonstrated that women obtain EHC more quickly from community pharmacies than from other providers. This is relevant as EHC is more effective the sooner it is taken after unprotected sex. The weekend and Mondays are particularly associated with increased demand for EHC services from community pharmacy.




Evidence base for over-the-counter medication


The effectiveness of levonorgestrel is hard to establish because many women will not become pregnant regardless if EHC is taken or not. However, trial data has found it to prevent 86% of expected pregnancies when treatment was initiated within 72 hours. Levonorgestrel is more effective the earlier it is taken after unprotected sex; it prevents 95% of pregnancies if taken within 24 hours of unprotected sex, 85% between 24 and 48 hours, and 58% if used within 48 to 72 hours.


Studies have shown that most women have heard of EHC (>90%), although their knowledge on when it can be taken and its effectiveness is lower; for example, less than half of women are aware of how long EHC remains effective and less than two-thirds are aware it was most effective the sooner it was taken after intercourse.


Some concerns have been raised about women abusing the EHC because of its greater accessibility. However, a review of international experience with pharmacy supply of EHC found only a small proportion of women use EHC repeatedly (6.8% using it twice in 6 months, and 4.1% using it three times) (Anderson & Blenkinsopp 2006). Further, the review found improved access of the EHC through pharmacies resulted in fewer visits to Accident and Emergency, and did not result in increased transmission of sexually transmitted diseases or risky sexual behaviours.




Assessing patient suitability


Prior to any sale or supply of EHC the pharmacist has to be in a position to determine if the patient is suitable to take the medicine. To do this an assessment has to be made on the likelihood that the patient is pregnant:



• First, has the patient had unprotected sex, contraceptive failure or missed taking contraceptive pills in the last 72 hours? EHC can only be given to patients who present within 72 hours. If more than 72 hours have elapsed but less than 120 hours (5 days) then the patient can have an intrauterine device fitted or be prescribed ulipristal.


• Is the patient already pregnant? Details about the patient’s last period should be sought. Is the period late, and if so how many days late? Was the nature of the period different or unusual. If pregnancy is suspected a pregnancy test could be offered.


• What method of contraception is normally used? Patients who take combined oral contraceptives might not need EHC. Guidelines from the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (2011) state:

















A number of useful checklists have been produced and are used in practice. Many pharmacists ask patients to complete one of these forms, instead of asking potentially embarrassing questions in the pharmacy. Once the details of the form are completed, the pharmacist can decide whether EHC can be supplied to the patient.



Levonelle® One Step


Levonelle® should be taken as soon as possible after unprotected sex or contraceptive failure. The dose consists of a single tablet (levonorgestrel 1500 µg). About one in five patients experience nausea but only 1 in 20 go on to vomit. If the patient vomits within 3 hours of the first dose she should be advised that a further supply of EHC would be needed. Taking EHC can affect the timing of the next menstrual period and patients should be told that their period might be earlier or later than usual. However, if the period is different than normal or more than 5 days late then she should be advised to have a pregnancy test. A number of medicines do, theoretically, interact with Levonelle®, most notably those that are enzyme inducers and include anticonvulsants, rifampicin, griseofulvin and St. John’s Wort, although the clinical significance of the interactions appear low as only a handful of drug interaction reports have been received by the manufacturers. It seems prudent, until such time that more substantial evidence is available, that patients taking these medicines are best referred to the GP. In such circumstances, increasing the dose of Levonelle® is commonly practised (although not licensed). If this is not the preferred option then an alternative form of EHC can be given.


Advanced sale of EHC is also permitted. However, pharmacists must consider the clinical appropriateness of a supply, and should consider declining repeated requests for advance supply and advise patients to use more reliable methods of contraception. See Hints and Tips Box 10.2.







Nicotine replacement therapy





Prevalence and epidemiology


The number of smokers over the age of 16 in the UK is falling – from a high of 45% in 1974 to 21% (21% of men and 20% of women) in 2010. Smoking is most common in those aged under 35; 32% in people aged between 20 and 24, and 27% in those aged 25 to 34. It is least common (12%) in people over 60. Prevalence of smoking amongst people in the routine and manual socio-economic group continues to be greater than amongst those in the managerial and professional group (29 and 14%, respectively).


Recent legislation changes to ban smoking in public places (the first country was the Republic of Ireland in 2004, and others now include England, Scotland, Finland, Italy, Australia, New Zealand, Norway, France and Malta) has been championed as having potential positive impact on smoking rates; for example, by decreasing exposure to passive smoking and increasing quit rates. To establish any effect will take time but statistical data from Ireland has shown a fall in cigarette sales and surveys in Italy show a decrease in tobacco consumption. A study in England that compared smoking prevalence a year after legislation was passed (2007) found no significant difference in the level of smoking (http://www.ic.nhs.uk/webfiles/publications/003_Health_Lifestyles/Statistics%20on%20Smoking%202011/Statistics_on_Smoking_2011.pdf; accessed 22 November 2012).




Evidence base for over-the-counter medication


Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) has established itself as an effective treatment option. A 2008 Cochrane review (Stead et al 2008) found 111 trials (n > 40 000) comparing NRT to placebo or non-NRT treatments, and the results indicated that NRT increases rates of quitting smoking by 50-70%. It is not possible to say if one delivery system is better than another because comparative trials between delivery systems have not been conducted. Personal choice will therefore be the determining factor in which is chosen as being most suitable. In addition, the effectiveness of NRT is also affected by the level of additional support provided to the smoker and many smoking cessation services are offered through pharmacy as part of their contractual arrangements with local commissioners.


Numerous intervention strategies have been used involving NRT. These include nurse-led services, workplace interventions, GP services and pharmacy-based services. A Cochrane review (Sinclair et al 2004) of pharmacy intervention assessed two trials that met the authors’ inclusion criteria. Findings suggested that trained community pharmacists, providing a counselling and record keeping support programme may have a positive effect on smoking cessation rates. A 2012 review, which included the Cochrane review, reported that there was good evidence that community pharmacists can deliver effective smoking cessation campaigns, and that structured interventions and counselling were better than opportunistic intervention (Brown et al 2012).


It should be noted that relapse is a normal part of the quitting process, and occurs on average three to four times. If a smoker has made repeated attempts to stop and failed, or has experienced severe withdrawal, or has requested more intensive help, then referral to a specialist smoking cessation service should be considered.



Practical prescribing and product selection


Prescribing information relating to medicines for NRT reviewed in the section ‘Evidence base for over-the-counter medication’ is discussed and summarised in Table 10.3.



Prior to instigation of any treatment it is important that the patient does want to stop smoking. Work has shown that motivation is a major determinant for successful smoking cessation and interventions based on the transtheoretical model of change put forward by Prochaska and colleagues have proved effective (Fig. 10.1). The model identifies six stages, progress through which is cyclical, and patients need varying types of support and advice at each stage.



Most patients who ask directly for NRT will be at the preparation stage of the model and ready to enter the action stage. However, a small number of patients may well be buying NRT to please others and are actually in the precontemplation stage and do not want to stop smoking. Several studies have shown that approximately two-thirds of current smokers want to give up smoking, with three-quarters having tried to give up smoking at some point in the past.


NRT is formulated as gum, lozenges, patches, nasal spray, inhalator and sublingual tablets; therefore there should be a treatment option to suit all patients. When first deregulated, product licence restrictions did not allow OTC sale to certain patient groups such as those with heart disease, diabetes or pregnancy. However, in 2006, the Department of Health decided to lift the restrictions on NRT to these patient groups and people over the age of 12. The recommendation, according to the DoH, was based on strong evidence that it is ‘far more harmful’ for these groups to continue smoking than to use NRT. For those people under 18 years old treatment is generally limited to no more than 12 weeks, after which they should seek medical advice if treatment is still needed.


A number of approaches to NRT regimens are advocated. In general, the strength of the formulation is tailored to the number of cigarettes smoked and one form of NRT is tried at a time. However, it is possible for patients to use both patches and nicotine gum together, and there is evidence that this produces better results in patients with a high level of dependence. Additionally, patients can now use NRT to ‘cut down’ on the number of cigarettes smoked.


Side effects with NRT are rare and are either normally limited to gastrointestinal (GI) problems associated with accidental ingestion of nicotine when chewing gum, or local skin irritation and vivid dreams associated with patches. Headache, nausea and diarrhoea have also been reported. NRT appears to have no significant interactions with other medicines.



Nicorette


Nicorette is available as gum (2 and 4 mg), inhalation cartridge (10 and 15 mg), microtab (2 mg), nasal spray (10 mg) patches (5, 10 and 15 mg or ‘invisipatches’ 10, 15 and 25 mg) mouth spray (1 mg/spray) lozenge (2 mg) and combination packs (patch and gum).




Inhalation cartridge: The inhalator can be particularly helpful to those smokers who still feel they need to continue the hand-to-mouth movement. Each cartridge is inserted into the inhalator and air is drawn into the mouth through the mouthpiece. Inhalators can be used to either reduce the number of cigarettes smoked or as part of a quit attempt. For the 10 mg inhalator a maximum of 12 cartridges per day can be used. Each cartridge can be used for approximately four sessions, with each cartridge lasting approximately 20 minutes of intense use. For the 15 mg inhalator a maximum of six cartridges can be used. Each cartridge can be used for approximately eight 5-minute sessions, with each cartridge lasting approximately 40 minutes of intense use.


The amount of nicotine from a puff is less than that from a cigarette. To compensate for this it is necessary to inhale more often than when smoking a cigarette.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Feb 16, 2017 | Posted by in PHARMACY | Comments Off on Specific product requests

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access