Gastroenterology

Chapter 6


Gastroenterology




Background


The main function of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is to break food down in to a suitable energy source to allow normal physiological function of cells. Needless to say, the process is complex and involves many different organs. Consequently, there are many conditions that affect the GI tract, some of which are acute and self-limiting and respond well to OTC medication and others that are serious and require referral.



General overview of the anatomy of the GI tract


It is vital that pharmacists have a sound understanding of GI tract anatomy. Many conditions will present with similar symptoms and from similar locations, for example abdominal pain, and the pharmacist will need a basic knowledge of GI tract anatomy – and in particular of where each organ of the GI tract is located – to facilitate a correct differential diagnosis.









Conditions affecting the oral cavity




The physical exam


The oral cavity can easily be observed in the pharmacy provided the mouth can be viewed with a good light source, preferably a pen torch (Fig 6.1). The patient will usually present with some form of oral lesion and/or pain in a particular part of the mouth. The pharmacist should examine this area carefully, but the rest of the oral cavity should also be inspected. Checks for periodontal disease (bleeding gums) and other sites of mouth soreness should be performed.



The floor of the mouth and underside of the tongue can be viewed by asking the patient to curl the tongue toward the roof of the mouth; the buccal mucosa is best observed when the patient half opens the mouth.



Mouth ulcers






Arriving at a differential diagnosis


There are three main clinical presentations of ulcers: minor, major or herpetiform. Although it is most likely the patient will be suffering from MAU (Table 6.1) it is essential that these and other causes are recognised and referred to the GP for further evaluation.



A number of ulcer-specific questions should always be asked of the patient (Table 6.2) and an inspection of the oral cavity should also be performed to help aid the diagnosis.





Conditions to eliminate



Likely causes









Very unlikely causes



Carcinoma: In 2009, over 6000 cases of oral cancer were confirmed. It is twice as common in men than women. Incidence rates increase sharply beyond 45 years of age. In men the highest incidence is seen in those aged 60–69, and in women it peaks in the over 80s. Smoking and excess alcohol consumption are two major risk factors.


The majority of cancers are noted on the side of the tongue, mouth and lower lip. Initial presentation ranges from painless spots, lumps or ulcers in the mouth or lip area that fail to resolve. Over time these become painful, change colour crust over or bleed. The painless nature of early symptoms leads people to seek help only when other symptoms become apparent. Symptoms therefore can be present for a number of weeks before the patient presents to a health care practitioner. Urgent referral is needed as survival rates increase dramatically if the disease is diagnosed in its early stages.




Behcet’s syndrome: Most patients will suffer from recurrent, painful major aphthous ulcers that are slow to heal. Lesions are also observed in the genital region and eye involvement (iridocyclitis) is common.


Figure 6.6 will aid the differentiation between serious and non-serious conditions that cause mouth ulcers.




Evidence base for over-the-counter medication


A wide range of products are used for the temporary relief and treatment of mouth ulcers. These products contain corticosteroids, local anaesthetics, antibacterials, astringents and antiseptics. Until, recently, corticosteroids were available OTC (triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% in Orabase and hydrocortisone sodium succinate pellets) but these have been discontinued by the manufacturers. This is unfortunate as a review in BMJ Clinical Evidence found corticosteroids did reduce the duration of pain with MAU (http://exodontia.info/files/BMJ_Clinical_Evidence_2007_Recurrent_Aphthous_Ulcers.pdf; accessed 22 November 2012).





Choline salicylate


Choline salicylate has been shown to exert an analgesic effect in a number of small studies. However, only one study by Reedy (1970) involving 27 patients evaluated choline salicylate in the treatment of oral aphthous ulceration. No significant differences were found between choline salicylate and placebo in ulcer resolution but choline salicylate was found to be significantly superior to placebo in relieving pain.




Practical prescribing and product selection


Prescribing information relating to the medicines used for ulcers reviewed in the section ‘Evidence base for over-the-counter medication’ is discussed and summarised in Table 6.3; useful tips relating to patients presenting with ulcers are given in Hints and Tips Box 6.1.






Choline salicylate (Bonjela Cool)


Adults and children over 16 years old should apply the gel, using a clean finger, over the ulcer when needed, but limit this to every 3 hours. It is a safe medicine and can be given to all patient groups. It is not known to interact with any medicines or cause any side effects.


Local anaesthetics (lidocaine e.g. Anbesol range, Iglu gel, Medijel) and benzocaine (e.g. Oralgel & Oralgel Extra Strength).


All local anaesthetics have a short duration of action; frequent dosing is therefore required to maintain the anaesthetic effect. They are thus best used on a when needed basis although the upper limit on the number of applications allowed does vary depending on the concentration of anaesthetic included in each product. They appear to be free from any drug interactions, have minimal side effects and can be given to most patients. A small percentage of patients might experience a hypersensitivity reaction with lidocaine or benzocaine; this appears to be more common with benzocaine.







Oral thrush






Aetiology


It is reported that Candida albicans is found in the oral cavity of 30–60% of healthy people in developed countries (Gonsalves et al 2007). Prevalence in denture wearers is even higher. It is transmitted directly between infected people or via objects that can hold the organism. Changes to the normal environment in the oral cavity will allow C. albicans to proliferate.



Arriving at a differential diagnosis


Oral thrush is not difficult to diagnose provided a careful history is taken and an oral examination performed. It is the role of the pharmacist to eliminate underlying pathology and exclude risk factors. A number of other conditions need to be considered (Table 6.4) and specific questions asked of the patient (Table 6.5). After questioning the pharmacist should inspect the oral cavity to confirm the diagnosis.





Clinical features of oral thrush


The classical presentation of oral thrush is of creamy-white soft elevated patches that can be wiped off revealing underlying erythematous mucosa (Fig. 6.7). Pain, soreness, altered taste and a burning tongue can be present. Lesions can occur anywhere in the oral cavity but usually affect the tongue, palate, lips and cheeks. Patients sometimes complain of malaise and loss of appetite. In neonates, spontaneous resolution usually occurs but can take a few weeks.




Conditions to eliminate




Unlikely causes





Other forms of ulceration (e.g. major and herpetiform ulcers, herpes simplex): These are covered in more detail on page 135 and the reader is referred to this section for differential diagnosis of these from oral thrush.



Very unlikely causes



Leukoplakia: Leukoplakia is a predominantly white lesion of the oral mucosa that cannot be characterised as any other definable lesion and is therefore a diagnosis based on exclusion (Fig. 6.8). It is often associated with smoking and is a precancerous lesion, although epidemiological data suggests that annual transformation rate to squamous cell carcinoma is approximately 1%. Patients present with a symptomless white patch that develops over a period of weeks on the tongue or cheek. The lesion cannot be wiped off, unlike oral thrush. Most cases are seen in people over the age of 40; it is more common in men. Suspected cases require referral.




Squamous cell carcinoma: Squamous cell carcinoma is covered in more detail on page 137 and the reader is referred to this section for differential diagnosis of these from oral thrush.


Figure 6.9 will aid the differentiation of thrush from other oral lesions.






Practical prescribing and product selection


Prescribing information relating to Daktarin Oral gel reviewed in the section ‘Evidence base for over-the-counter medication’ is discussed and summarised in Table 6.6; useful tips relating to the application of Daktarin are given in Hints and Tips Box 6.2.




The dose of gel varies dependent on the age of patient. For adults and children over 6 years, the gel should be applied four times a day and those under six the dose is twice a day. The gel should be applied directly to the area with a clean finger. In May 2008 Jansen-Cilag, the manufacturers of Daktarin, chose to vary the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) to recommend that it is not used in infants under 4 months and only with care below the age of 6 months. This change appears to originate from a published report (De Vries et al 2006) documenting a 17-day-old baby who choked when exposed to miconazole oral gel.


It can occasionally cause nausea and vomiting. The manufacturers state that it can interact with a number of medicines, namely mizolastine, cisapride, triazolam, midazolam, quinidine, pimozide, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and anticoagulants. However, there is a lack of published data to determine how clinically significant these interactions are except with warfarin. Co-administration of warfarin with miconazole increases warfarin levels markedly and the patient’s (internationalised normalised ratio) INR should be monitored closely. The manufacturers advise that Daktarin should be avoided in pregnancy but published data does not support an association between miconazole and congenital defects. It appears to be safe to use whilst breastfeeding.






Gingivitis






Aetiology


Following tooth brushing, the teeth soon become coated in a mixture of saliva and gingival fluid, known as pellicle. Oral bacteria and food particles adhere to this coating and begin to proliferate forming plaque; subsequent brushing of the teeth removes this plaque build up. However, if plaque is allowed to build up for 3 or 4 days, bacteria begin to undergo internal calcification producing calcium phosphate better known as tartar (or calculus). This adheres tightly to the surface of the tooth and retains bacteria in situ. The bacteria release enzymes and toxins that invade the gingival mucosa, causing inflammation of the gingiva (gingivitis). If the plaque is not removed the inflammation travels downwards, involving the periodontal ligament and associated tooth structures (periodontitis). A pocket forms between the tooth and gum and, over a period of years, the root of the tooth and bone are eroded until such time that the tooth becomes loose and lost. This is the main cause of tooth loss in people over 40 years of age.


A number of risk factors are associated with gingivitis and periodontitis; these include diabetes mellitus, cigarette smoking, poor nutritional status and poor oral hygiene.



Arriving at a differential diagnosis


Gingivitis often goes unnoticed because symptoms can be very mild and painless. This often explains why a routine check-up at the dentist reveals more severe gum disease than patients thought they had. A dental history needs to be taken from the patient, in particular details of their tooth brushing routine and technique, as well as the frequency of visits to their dentist. The mouth should be inspected for tell-tale signs of gingival inflammation. A number of gingivitis-specific questions should always be asked of the patient to aid in diagnosis (Table 6.7).





Conditions to eliminate






Evidence base for over-the-counter medication


Put simply, there is no substitute for good oral hygiene. Prevention of plaque build-up is the key to healthy gums and teeth. Twice daily brushing is recommended to maintain oral hygiene at adequate levels. Brushing teeth, with a fluoride toothpaste, to prevent tooth decay, should preferably take place after eating. Flossing is recommended, three times a week, to access areas that a toothbrush might miss. A Cochrane review (Robinson et al 2005) concluded that powered tooth brushes (with rotation oscillation action – where brush heads rotate in one direction and then the other) are more effective than manual brushing at plaque removal.


There is a plethora of oral hygiene products marketed to the public. These products should be reserved for established gingivitis or in those patients who have poor toothbrushing technique.


Mouthwashes contain chlorhexidine, hexetidine and hydrogen peroxide. Of these, chlorhexidine in concentrations of either 0.1 or 0.2% has been proven the most effective antibacterial in reducing plaque formation and gingivitis (Ernst et al 1998). In clinical trials it has been shown to be consistently more effective than placebo and comparator medicines, and there appears to be no difference in effect between concentrations. It has even been used as a positive control.



Practical prescribing and product selection


Prescribing information relating to the medicines used for gingivitis reviewed in the section ‘Evidence base for over-the-counter medication’ is discussed and summarised in Table 6.8; useful tips relating to products for oral care are given in Hints and Tips Box 6.3.




All mouthwashes, have minimal side effects and can be used by all patient groups. They are rinsed around the mouth between 30 seconds and 1 minute then spat out.







Further reading



Brecx, M, Brownstone, E, MacDonald, L, et al. Efficacy of Listerine, Meridol and chlorhexidine mouthrinses as supplements to regular tooth cleaning measures. J Clin Periodontol. 1992;19:202–207.


Hase, JC, Ainamo, J, Etemadzadeh, H, et al. Plaque formation and gingivitis after mouthrinsing with 0.2% delmopinol hydrochloride, 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate and placebo for 4 weeks, following an initial professional tooth cleaning. J Clin Periodontol. 1995;22:533–539.


Jones, CM, Blinkhorn, AS, White, E. Hydrogen peroxide, the effect on plaque and gingivitis when used in an oral irrigator. Clin Prev Dent. 1990;12:15–18.


Kelly, M. Adult Dental Health Survey: Oral Health in the United Kingdom 1998. London: TSO; 2000.


Lang, NP, Hase, JC, Grassi, M, et al. Plaque formation and gingivitis after supervised mouthrinsing with 0.2% delmopinol hydrochloride, 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate and placebo for 6 months. Oral Dis. 1998;4:105–113.


Maruniak, J, Clark, WB, Walker, CB, et al. The effect of 3 mouthrinses on plaque and gingivitis development. J Clin Periodontol. 1992;19:19–23.




Dyspepsia




Background


Confusion surrounds the terminology associated with upper abdominal symptoms and the term dyspepsia is used by different authors to mean different things. It is therefore an umbrella term generally used by healthcare professionals to refer to a group of upper abdominal symptoms that arise from five main conditions:



These five conditions represent 90% of dyspepsia cases presented to the GP.


In August 2004, The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) issued clinical guidance on the management of dyspepsia in adults in primary care (see web sites at end of section). This guidance has specific information on pharmacist management of dyspepsia. This is still current (July 2012) and specific reference is made to this guidance.




Aetiology


The aetiology of dyspepsia differs depending on its cause. Decreased muscle tone leads to lower oesophageal sphincter incompetence (often as a result of medicines or overeating) and is the principal cause of GORD. Increased acid production results in inflammation of the stomach (gastritis) and is usually attributable to Helicobacter pylori infection, or acute alcohol indigestion. The presence of H. pylori is central to duodenal and gastric ulceration – H. pylori is present in 95% of duodenal ulcers and 80% of gastric ulcers. The exact mechanism by which it causes ulceration is still unclear but the bacteria does produce toxins that stimulate the inflammatory cascade. Increasingly common are medicine induced ulcers, most notably NSAIDs and low-dose aspirin.


Finally, when no specific cause can be found for a patient’s symptoms the complaint is said to be non-ulcer dyspepsia. (Some authorities do not advocate the use of this term, preferring the term ‘functional dyspepsia’.)



Arriving at a differential diagnosis


Overwhelmingly, patients who present with dyspepsia are likely to be suffering from GORD, gastritis or non-ulcer dyspepsia (Table 6.9). Research has shown that even those patients who meet NICE guidelines for endoscopical investigation are found to have either gastritis/hiatus hernia (30%), oesophagitis (10–17%) or no abnormal findings (30%). It has also been reported that a medical practitioner with an average list size will only see one new case of oesophageal cancer and one new case of stomach cancer every four years. Despite these statistics, a thorough medical and drug history should be taken to enable the community pharmacist to rule out serious pathology. ALARM symptoms (see Trigger points for referral), which would warrant further investigation are surprisingly common and it is important that patients exhibiting these symptoms are referred. A number of dyspepsia specific questions should always be asked of the patient to aid in diagnosis (Table 6.10).




image Table 6.10


Specific questions to ask the patient: Dyspepsia






























Question Relevance
Age The incidence of dyspepsia decreases with advancing age and therefore young adults are likely to suffer from dyspepsia with no specific pathologic condition, unlike patients over 50 years of age, in which a specific pathologic condition becomes more common
Location Dyspepsia is experienced as pain above the umbilicus and centrally located (epigastric area). Pain below the umbilicus will not be due to dyspepsia
Pain experienced behind the sternum (breastbone) is likely to be heartburn
If the patient can point to a specific area of the abdomen then it is unlikely to be dyspepsia
Nature of pain Pain associated with dyspepsia is described as aching or discomfort. Pain described as gnawing, sharp or stabbing is unlikely to be dyspepsia
Radiation Pain that radiates to other areas of the body is indicative of more serious pathology and the patient must be referred. The pain might be cardiovascular in origin, especially if the pain is felt down the inside aspect of the left arm
Severity Pain described as debilitating or severe must be referred to exclude more serious conditions
Associated symptoms Persistent vomiting with or without blood is suggestive of ulceration or even cancer and must be referred
Black and tarry stools indicate a bleed in the GI tract and must be referred
Aggravating or relieving factors Pain shortly after eating (1 to 3 hours) and relieved by food or antacids are classic symptoms of ulcers
Symptoms of dyspepsia are often brought on by certain types of food, for example caffeine containing products and spicy food
Social history Bouts of excessive drinking are commonly implicated in dyspepsia. Likewise, eating food on the move or too quickly is often the cause of the symptoms. A person’s job is often a good clue to whether these are contributing to their symptoms



Conditions to eliminate



Unlikely causes



Peptic ulceration: Ruling out peptic ulceration is probably the main consideration for community pharmacists when assessing patients with symptoms of dyspepsia. Ulcers are classed as either gastric or duodenal. They occur most commonly in patients aged between 30 and 50, although patients over the age of 60 account for 80% of deaths even though they only account for 15% of cases. Typically the patient will have well localised mid-epigastric pain described as ‘constant’, ‘annoying’ or ‘gnawing/boring’. In gastric ulcers the pain comes on whenever the stomach is empty, usually 30 minutes after eating and is generally relieved by antacids or food and aggravated by alcohol and caffeine. Gastric ulcers are also more commonly associated with weight loss and GI bleeds than duodenal ulcers. Patients can experience weight loss of 5 to 10 kg and although this could indicate carcinoma, especially in people aged over 40, on investigation a benign gastric ulcer is found most of the time. NSAID use is associated with a three- to fourfold increase in gastric ulcers.


Duodenal ulcers tend to be more consistent in symptom presentation. Pain occurs 2 to 3 hours after eating and pain that wakes a person at night is highly suggestive of duodenal ulcer. If ulcers are suspected referral to the GP is necessary as peptic ulcers can only be conclusively diagnosed by endoscopy.





Very unlikely causes





Atypical angina: Not all cases of angina have classical textbook presentation of pain in the retrosternal area with radiation to the neck, back or left shoulder that is precipitated by temperature changes or exercise. Patients can complain of dyspepsia-like symptoms and feel generally unwell. These symptoms might be brought on by a heavy meal. In such cases antacids will fail to relieve symptoms and referral is needed.


Figure 6.10 will aid differentiation of the causes of dyspepsia.





Evidence base for over-the-counter medication


In accordance with NICE guidelines the group of patients that should be treated by pharmacists are classed as having ‘uninvestigated dyspepsia’ (i.e. those that have not had endoscopical investigation). OTC treatment options consist of antacids, H2 antagonists and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Before treatment is instigated lifestyle advice should be given where appropriate. Although there is no strong evidence that dietary changes will lessen dyspepsia symptoms, a general healthier lifestyle will have wider health benefits. The patient should be assessed in terms of diet and physical activity:



It might also be possible to identify factors that precipitate or worsen symptoms. Commonly implicated foods that precipitate dyspepsia are spicy or fatty food, caffeine, chocolate and alcohol. Bending is also said to worsen symptoms.



Antacids


Antacids have been used for many decades to treat dyspepsia and have proven efficacy in neutralising stomach acid. However, the neutralising capacity of each antacid varies dependent on the metal salt used. In addition, the solubility of each metal salt differs, which affects their onset and duration of action. Sodium and potassium salts are the most highly soluble, which makes them quick but short acting. Magnesium and aluminium salts are less soluble so have a slower onset but greater duration of action. Calcium salts have the advantage of being quick acting yet have a prolonged action.


It is therefore commonplace for manufacturers to combine two or more antacid ingredients together to ensure a quick onset (generally sodium salts e.g. sodium bicarbonate) and prolonged action (aluminium, magnesium or calcium salts).




H2 antagonists


Two H2 antagonists are currently available OTC in the UK; ranitidine and famotidine. Cimetidine was also available OTC but withdrawn by the manufacturer and nizatidine has exemption from POM control but currently there is no marketed product.


H2 antagonists are effective at POM doses but OTC licensed indications use lower doses. The question is, at these lower doses are they still effective? There is a paucity of publicly available trial data supporting their use at non-prescription doses. Famotidine appears to have the greatest body of accessible trial data. A number of trials have been conducted in patients suffering from heartburn and who regularly self-medicate with antacids. Famotidine was shown to be more effective than placebo and equally effective to antacids. No trials involving ranitidine could be found on public databases that involved patients taking OTC doses.


However, the inhibitory effects of OTC doses of ranitidine on gastric acid have been investigated in healthy volunteers. Trials showed conclusively that ranitidine, and its comparator drug famotidine, did significantly raise intragastric pH compared to placebo, although antacids (calcium carbonates) had a significantly quicker onset of action but with shorter duration.



Proton pump inhibitors


A number of trials have compared PPIs with H2 antagonists for non-ulcer dyspepsia and GORD-like symptoms (Moayyedi et al 2006; Talley et al 2002; van Pinxteren 2006). Results indicate that PPIs, even at half the standard POM dose, are generally superior to H2 antagonists in treating dyspeptic symptoms.


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Feb 16, 2017 | Posted by in PHARMACY | Comments Off on Gastroenterology

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access