Methods of Tertiary Prevention

17 Methods of Tertiary Prevention

In practice, tertiary prevention resembles treatment of established disease. The difference is in perspective. Whereas treatment is expressly about “fixing what is wrong,” tertiary prevention looks ahead to potential progression and complications of disease and aims to forestall them. Thus, although treatment and tertiary prevention often share methods, their motives and goals diverge.

Methods of tertiary prevention are designed to limit the physical and social consequences of disease or injury after it has occurred or become symptomatic. There are two basic categories of tertiary prevention. The first category, disability limitation, has the goal of halting the progress of the disease or limiting the damage caused by an injury. This category of tertiary prevention can be described as the “prevention of further impairment.” The second category, called rehabilitation, focuses on reducing the social disability produced by a given level of impairment. It aims to strengthen the patient’s remaining functions and to help the patient learn to function in alternative ways. Disability limitation and rehabilitation usually should be initiated at the same time (i.e., when the disease is detected or the injury occurs), but the emphasis on one or the other depends on factors such as the type and stage of disease, the type of injury, and available methods of treatment. This chapter discusses opportunities for tertiary prevention and provides specific clinical examples of disability limitation and rehabilitation.

I Disease, Illness, Disability, and Disease Perceptions

Although sometimes used interchangeably, there are important distinctions among disease, disability, and illness. Typically, disease is defined as the medical condition or diagnosis itself (e.g., diabetes, heart disease, chronic obstructive lung disease). Disability is the adverse impact of the disease on objective physical, psychological, and social functioning. For example, although stroke and paralytic polio are different diseases, both can result in the same disability: weakness of one leg and inability to walk. Illness is the adverse impact of a disease or disability on how the patient feels. One way to distinguish these terms is to specify that disease refers to the medical diagnosis, disability to the objective impact on the patient, and illness to the subjective impact.

Disability and illness obviously derive from the medical disease. However, illness is also powerfully influenced by patients’ perceptions of their disease, its duration and severity, and their expectations for a recovery; together, these beliefs are called illness perceptions. Disease and illness interact; a patient’s illness perceptions strongly predict recovery, loss of work days, adherence, and health care utilization.1,2 To be successful, tertiary prevention and rehabilitation must not only improve patients’ physical functioning, but also influence their illness perceptions. Although there is some evidence of effective psychological interventions on illness perceptions,3 a recent systematic review of interventions of illness perceptions in cardiovascular health found too much heterogeneity among studies to allow for general conclusions.4 Despite the mixed quality of the data, the practicing clinician should consider the patients’ illness perceptions, if only to understand which patients are at high risk of poor outcomes.

II Opportunities for Tertiary Prevention

The first sign of an illness provides an excellent opportunity to initiate methods of tertiary prevention. The sooner disability limitation and rehabilitation are begun, the greater the chance of preventing significant impairment. In the case of infectious diseases, such as tuberculosis and sexually transmitted diseases, early treatment of a disease in one person may prevent its transmission to others, making treatment of one person the primary prevention of that disease in others. Similarly, early treatment of alcoholism or drug addiction in one family member may prevent social and emotional problems, including codependency, from developing in other family members.

Symptomatic illness can identify individuals most in need of preventive efforts. In this sense, the symptoms function similar to screening, by defining individuals especially in need. When they feel well, people may not be convinced by health promotion and disease prevention messages. When they become ill, however, they may understand for the first time the value of changing their diet, behavior, or environment. For example, a person at risk for coronary artery disease who has experienced no symptoms will generally be less open to changes in diet and exercise than someone who has experienced chest pain. The onset of symptoms may provide a window of opportunity for health promotion aimed at preventing progression of the disease (“teachable moment”). Cardiovascular disease is used here to illustrate the approach to prevention after the disease has made its presence known. However, almost any hospitalization or major life event (e.g., pregnancy, birth of a grandchild) can be a teachable moment for patients, and the prognosis for most diseases improves with better diet, exercise, and adherence.

III Disability Limitation

Disability limitation includes therapy as well as attempts to halt or limit future progression of the disease, called symptomatic stage prevention. Most medical or surgical therapy of symptomatic disease is directed at preventing or minimizing impairment over the short-term and long-term. For example, both coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass are aimed at both improving function and extending life. These are attempts to undo the threat or damage from an existing disease, in this case, coronary artery disease (CAD). The strategies of symptomatic stage prevention include the following:

In this section, CAD, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus are used to illustrate how methods of disability limitation can be applied to patients with chronic diseases. The emphasis is on symptomatic stage prevention.

A Cardiovascular Disease

Cardiovascular disease encompasses coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular accident (CVA, stroke), heart failure, and peripheral artery disease (PAD). If cardiovascular disease has already occurred, the clinician’s immediate goal is to prevent death and permanent damage. Beyond that, the clinician’s goal is to slow, stop, or even reverse the progression of the disease process.

1 Risk Factor Modification

When cardiovascular disease becomes symptomatic (e.g., with a heart attack), the acute disease needs to be addressed with interventions, such as thrombolysis, rhythm stabilization, and perhaps stents or surgical bypass. When a patient is stabilized, the risk factors to be addressed to slow or reverse disease progression are generally similar to those for primary prevention, but the urgency for action is increased. The following modifiable risk factors are important to address when cardiovascular disease has already occurred: hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia, diabetes, diet, and exercise.

In practice, which risk factor to address first should be negotiated between clinician and patient. The most important risk factor to modify should be the one the patient is actually motivated and able to change. Any change there will improve risk, and successful behavior change in one area can provide motivation for further change later.


Any hypertension increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, and severe hypertension (systolic BP ≥195 mm Hg) approximately quadruples the risk of cardiovascular disease in middle-aged men.7,8 Effects of hypertension are direct (damage to blood vessels) and indirect (increasing demand on heart). Control of hypertension is crucial at this stage to prevent progression of cardiovascular disease.

Sedentary Lifestyle

It seems that at least 30 minutes of moderate exercise (e.g., fast walking) at least three times per week reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease. There is increasing evidence that sitting itself, independent of the amount of exercise, increases the risk of MI.9 The uncertainty occurs partly because it is difficult to design observational studies that completely avoid the potential bias of self-selection (e.g., people with incipient heart disease may have cues that tell them to avoid exercise). Nevertheless, there is increasing emphasis on the potential benefits of even modest physical activity, which has direct effects on lipids and also helps to keep weight down, which itself improves the blood lipid profile. Conversely, there is a growing appreciation for adverse health effects of “sedentariness.”9

Excess Weight

In people who are overweight, the risk for cardiovascular disease partly depends on how the body fat is distributed. Fat can be distributed in the hips and legs (peripheral adiposity, giving the body a pear shape) or predominantly in the abdominal cavity (central adiposity, giving the body an apple shape, more common in men than women.) Fat in the hips and legs does not seem to increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. In contrast, fat in the abdominal cavity seems to be more metabolically active, and the risk of cardiovascular disease is increased. This is not surprising, because fat mobilized from the omentum goes directly to the liver, which is the center of the body’s lipid metabolism. Centrally located body fat is implicated in the insulin resistance syndrome and is associated with increased sympathetic tone and hypertension.

Weight loss ameliorates some important cardiac risk factors, such as hypertension and insulin resistance. Some studies suggest that alternating dieting and nondieting, called weight cycling, is a risk factor in itself,10 but other studies question this conclusion.11 The most recent findings in this area suggest that weight gain and loss may result in lasting hormonal and cytokine alterations that facilitate regaining weight.12 Although weight cycling may have specific associated risks, whether any such risks are truly independent of obesity itself remains unclear.1316 At present, expert opinion generally supports a benefit from weight loss, with greater benefit clearly attached to sustainable weight loss17 ( Achieving sustained weight loss remains a considerable challenge (see Chapter 19).

B Dyslipidemia

Dyslipidemia, sometimes imprecisely called “hyperlipidemia,” is a general term used to describe an abnormal elevation in one or more of the lipids or lipid particles found in the blood. The complete lipid profile provides information on the following:

The TC level is equal to the sum of the HDL, LDL, and VLDL levels:


The “good cholesterol,” HDL, is actually not only cholesterol but rather a particle (known as apoprotein) that contains cholesterol and acts as a scavenger to remove excess cholesterol in the body (also known as reverse cholesterol transport). HDL is predominantly protein, and elevated HDL levels have been associated with decreased cardiovascular risk. LDL, the “bad cholesterol,” is likewise not just cholesterol but a particle that contains it. Elevated LDL levels have been associated with increased cardiovascular risk. A high level of certain LDL particles may be a necessary precursor for atherogenesis (development of fatty arterial plaques). Much of the damage may be caused by oxidative modification of the LDL, making it more atherogenic.12 VLDL, another “bad cholesterol,” is actually a precursor of LDL. The particle is predominantly triglyceride.

The previous formulas clarify why total cholesterol alone is not the best measure for cardiovascular risk. Cholesterol is cholesterol, but the risk for heart disease comes from how it is packaged in different VLDL, LDL, and HDL particles. Additional measures of potential interest in risk stratification are related to lipids not routinely included in the lipid panel. These include HDL subfractions, the size and density of LDL particles, and lipoprotein (a), or Lp(a) lipoprotein.

1 Assessment

A variety of index measures have been proposed to assess the need for intervention and to monitor the success of preventive measures. The most frequently used guidelines are those of the Third National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP),18 as modified based on more recent research.19 This discussion and Table 17-1 indicate the levels of blood lipids suggested by the widely accepted NCEP recommendations for deciding on treatment and follow-up. New NCEP recommendations are expected in 2012.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Aug 27, 2016 | Posted by in PUBLIC HEALTH AND EPIDEMIOLOGY | Comments Off on Methods of Tertiary Prevention

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access
%d bloggers like this: