Telemonitoring and Self-Care in Patients with IBD



Fig. 7.1
Total inflammation burden scoring appears as a traffic light consisting of a rational sum of symptoms score and calprotectin carried out at home in this case by a ulcerative colitis (UC) patient, www.​constant-care.​dk. (Data from Vinding KK [5] and Elkjaer M, Burisch J, Avnstrøm S, et al. Development of a Web-based concept for patients with ulcerative colitis and 5-aminosalicylic acid treatment. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;22:695–704. doi:10.1097/MEG.0b013e32832e0a18)



Advancement in socioeconomics that implies growing patient empowerment, resulting from improved educational levels and greater access to information, combined with increased individual interest in personal health, is resulting in growing demand for direct participation in the health care decisions .

Self-medication usually accounts for herbs and over the counter medicine but has in recent years also involved prescribed IBD medicine as suppositories and enemas [2, 6, 7] and web app guidance of short-term dosage escalation of systemic 5-ASA for less than 30 days [2]. However, no matter how much individualized guidance is received electronically; one must not forget that these solutions are only supportive of consultations at the provider’s office .



Tools for Telemonitoring


Whether in the conventional out-patient setting or in eHealth, the aims of disease monitoring are the same: the optimization of treatment for highly refined disease control and the maintenance of remission. In order to prevent bowel damage, reduce long-term disability and maintain normal quality of life in IBD patients; mucosal healing has in recent years emerged as an important therapeutic endpoint [8]. However, several aspects of monitoring—such as the distinction between IBD and noninflammatory conditions, assessment of disease activity and severity, and outcome of therapy—remain challenging for physicians in both out-patient and eHealth settings, as no single gold standard test exists. Physicians must instead rely on a combination of symptoms and diagnostic tests (e.g., biomarkers, cross-sectional imaging, and endoscopy) in order to make clinical decisions .

In telemonitoring, most of these diagnostic tools either are not feasible as they are invasive, time consuming, or for some other reason require hospital attendance, thus making disease assessment problematic. Ideally, tests for disease activity or patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as quality of life and fatigue, should be quick and easy to perform and be possible to carry out by the patients themselves while at home. In the following, some of these tests will be briefly described .


Biomarkers for Telemonitoring


Relying exclusively on presenting clinical manifestations (e.g., using clinical disease activity indices) for treatment strategies is rarely successful in modifying the course of IBD, and telemonitoring can therefore not rely on the monitoring of symptoms alone . Clinical disease activity indices are nonspecific and do not correlate well with endoscopic activity [9]. Conventional blood tests (including hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation) are used frequently in the diagnostics and disease assessment of IBD. However, the sensitivity of these tests is insufficient to detect intestinal inflammation [10], limiting their use in telemonitoring .

Currently, FC is the most suitable biomarker for intestinal inflammation to be used for telemonitoring. FC is a noninvasive biomarker found in stool that can detect histological inflammation despite endoscopic remission [1113]. Calprotectin levels in patients with sustained deep remission during treatment with infliximab remained very low (median < 40 mg/kg at all time points). Patients who flared had significantly higher FC levels (median > 300 mg/kg) 3 months before the flare. Two consecutive FC measurements of > 300 mg/kg within a 1-month interval were identified as the best predictor of flare (61.5 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity) [14]. FC constitutes about 60 % of the total protein in the cytosol of neutrophil granulocytes and levels correlate with the influx of neutrophils into the intestine [15]. Importantly, FC is stable in feces for up to 7 days at room temperature and can be accurately measured in small stool samples by several commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) [1619]. Recently, smart phone tests for FC have been developed, thus offering the possibility for home analysis of FC by patients [5, 20]. Home-testing of FC takes 18 min to carry out (Fig. 7.2) and has surprisingly high sensitivity and specificity. Coefficient of variation was between 4 and 12, with less than 10 being considered a useful and fair laboratory test [5] .

A328335_1_En_7_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 7.2
Home monitoring of fecal calprotectin (FC) using a smartphone can be performed in 15 min by patients. (Data from Vinding KK [5])

Of particular interest for the telemonitoring IBD patients is the ability of FC to differentiate IBD from irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) [2123], assess IBD activity, and predict a relapse [14, 24, 25]. IBD patients often report symptoms referable to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, without objective evidence of ongoing disease activity and 25–50 % of the IBD patients in clinical remission have symptoms compatible with a diagnosis of IBS [26]. A meta-analysis of the diagnostic precision of FC in distinguishing between IBD and non-IBD found that using a cutoff level of 50 μg/g gave a pooled sensitivity of 89 % and pooled specificity of 81 %. Even higher diagnostic precision was reported for a cutoff value of 100 μg/g [27]. FC can therefore be used to prevent excessive treatment of IBS-like symptoms and reduce the need for endoscopy [28] .

Furthermore, FC is able to differentiate well between active and inactive IBD. FC correlates significantly with endoscopic disease activity [10; 12, 29] and normalization of FC levels is a surrogate marker for mucosal healing [30, 31]. In UC, FC correlates with disease extent and disease severity [12]. FC is also able to differentiate endoscopically inactive disease from mild, moderate, and severely active disease [11]. In CD , FC also correlates with endoscopic disease activity [29, 30]. In a study of 126 patients with IBD (87 patients with CD and 39 patients with UC), FC >  250 μg/g gave a sensitivity of 71 % and a specificity of 100 % (PPV 100 %, NPV 47 %) for active mucosal disease activity in UC. The same study also found that in CD, FC ≤ 250 μg/g predicted endoscopic remission with 94 % sensitivity and 62 % specificity (PPV 49 %, NPV 97 %) [12]. A recent meta-analysis combined the results of 13 studies on the diagnostic accuracy of FC in differentiating between patients with active IBD and those in remission; it found that a cutoff of 250 μg/g in IBD resulted in a pooled sensitivity of 80 % and a specificity of 82 % [32] .

Finally, increasing levels of FC can predict clinical relapse in CD and UC patients, especially for colonic and ileocolonic CD . A meta-analysis used data from six prospective studies investigating the predictive ability of FC and found a pooled sensitivity and specificity of FC to predict relapse of quiescent IBD of 78 and 73 %, respectively [33]. FC cutoff values ranged from 150 to 250 μg/g.

Thus, FC is a reliable biomarker for intestinal inflammation. Periodic testing of FC for guidance of IBD treatment and disease monitoring—especially with FC testing being compatible with eHealth solutions that can be used in the patient’s home [5]—is a promising alternative to current standard care [34] .


Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs) in Telemedicine


PROs capture the patient’s illness experience in a structured format and may help the physicians to better understand symptoms from the patient’s perspective [35] . PROs measure any aspect of health directly reported by the patient (e.g., physical, emotional, or social symptoms) and may help to direct care and improve clinical outcomes [36]. Currently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is moving away from using disease activity indices as clinical trial endpoints and towards PROs when assessing the patient’s experience of symptoms and objective measures of disease [37].

The ultimate PRO is improvement in HRQoL. HRQoL is a subjective measure of a person’s physical and psychological well-being and represents a patient’s assessment of how a particular disease or intervention has affected their life. Patients with IBD experience an impaired HRQoL when compared with a healthy background population [3840]. Disease course and activity [41, 42], perceived quality of care delivered, and the individual’s psychological status and social support [43, 44], are important factors affecting HRQoL .

Several different instruments exist for the assessment of HRQoL in IBD [45]. Disease-specific questionnaires for HRQoL—derived from and validated in the relevant disease groups—are the most sensitive indicators of change over time or with treatment. Generic instruments, on the other hand, are used to show similarities or differences among groups or populations; however, they may not be sensitive to changes over time or subsequent to treatment in groups of patients with specific diseases [46]. Until recently, most eHealth trials have used the disease-specific Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) [47, 48], with or without the generic short form (SF-36 or SF-12) [49] questionnaire. The IBDQ instrument comprises 32 items that measure the following broad domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. The patient’s answers are scored on a seven-point Likert scale, in which “7” corresponds to the highest level of functioning . A cumulative score above 170 points represents good QoL, with scores ranging from 32 to 224. The s-IBDQ is a shorter version of the original instrument (comprised only ten questions, but representing all four domains) that may be more convenient for use in the clinical setting as well as in eHealth applications. The range of scores of the SIBDQ is 10–70 points with a score of 50 comparable to 170 in IBDQ [48, 50].

The SF-36 is a generic HRQoL questionnaire containing 36 items. Thirty-five of the items are grouped into eight multi-item scales: physical function, social function, role limitations due to physical problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/vitality, mental health, bodily pain, and general health perception. It also contains a one-item measure of self-evaluated change in health status (health transition) over the previous year. For each question, the raw score is coded and transformed into a percentage, with 0 indicating the least favorable possible health status and 100 indicating the most favorable. The 12-Item SF-12 is a short form survey derived from the SF-36 instrument and developed to reduce respondent burden while achieving minimum standards of precision for purposes of group comparisons involving multiple health dimensions [49, 51] .


Telemonitoring Systems


Different approaches to telemonitoring of IBD patients have been tested in clinical trials. While some have used Internet communication for distance consultations between patients and physicians or between physicians [52, 53], the most innovative systems have implemented the regular monitoring of patient-reported symptoms and PROs.

The home telemanagement in UC (UC HAT) [54] system has been developed to aid patients with self-managed care through remote clinical monitoring of symptoms , HRQoL, and adherence to therapy. This system is comprised a patient unit (laptop and electronic weighing scale for weekly self-testing), a decision support server, and a web-based clinician portal. It also includes an integrated disease-specific education curriculum. Besides recording the data, the system is able to send alerts to the clinician portal-based on remarkable responses, thereby enabling each side to act accordingly. The mobile Health PROMISE Platform [55] is a newly developed PRO and decision support platform. Using the application, patients can track their HRQoL (e.g., sIBDQ) and symptoms, and providers can use the visual data in real time, integrated with eHealth records, to provide better care to their entire patient population.

The Constant Care application [2, 5659], on the other hand, combines web-based disease monitoring with an eHealth algorithm that actively provides treatment advice and is able to aid patients in treatment adherence and individual dosing of medication. It consists of a patient education package (eLearning and educational video clips further illustrating the information contained on the website, medication, and the study conditions) and a web-based disease monitoring package. Using the disease monitoring package, patients are able to record their disease activity as well as their FC levels, the latter being measured using a smart phone application and home testing kit of FC. Based on these results, disease activity is visualized according to a “traffic light” system of green, yellow, or red color, to illustrate inflammatory activity. The Constant Care application then directs individualized treatment for the patient (Fig. 7.1). The administrator part of the web application, which is only accessible to the investigators, allows the treating physician to monitor the patients .

A promising validated mobile Health Index for remote monitoring of IBD disease activity revealed good receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and will in future be tested for usability and feasibility in clinical practice [60]. Web applications in eHealth care have to follow the rules of the European Union (EU) and nationally for database constructions, and to protect the patients by anonymous data registration, login, and unique password [61]. Conformité Européenne (CE) marking is mandatory in the EU in accordance with regulation for database [62] .


Web Applications Hosted by Healthcare Platforms


Many systems systems exists among which Epic offers an integrated suite of health care software and their applications support functions related to patient care, including registration and scheduling; clinical systems for doctors, nurses, emergency personnel, and other care providers; systems for lab technologists, pharmacists, and radiologists; and billing systems for insurers.

Due to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, sharing health data from other software is possible as rules were produced in a 10-year vision and agenda to achieve healthcare interoperability in 2014.

EPIC provides electronic records systems for many academic medical centers in the USA. In Europe, EPIC has been installed in several countries including the UK, the Netherland, and Denmark. In Denmark, installation of EPIC is in progress at a cost of 840,000,000 DKK (Approx. 140,000,000$) [63] in all hospitals in the capital region and whole of the Zealand where the capital Copenhagen is situated covering with its 2.5, 5 million people about 1/2 of the Danish population. A feature in the Epic system is the possibility for telemedicine applications to be integrated into the electronic record system. In Denmark this feature will be included 2016 in accordance with the overall ambition to make telemonitoring available for all patients with chronic diseases.


Ehealth Influencing Natural Disease Course of IBD


Mucosal healing is a goal of treatment that minimizes bowel damage in CD and UC [6466]. Mucosal healing has no clear definition but can imply remission by clinical scoring, surrogate endpoint markers such as CRP or FC, histopathological remission or even immunological remission as assessed by the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) levels in mucosa biopsy specimens [67]. Telemonitoring has been shown to detect symptoms of a flare sooner than standard care resulting in less time in relapse (Fig. 7.3) [6, 7]. In a large eHealth trial in UC, time to remission was reduced to a median of 17 days using monthly or on-demand eHealth screening using clinical activity index compared to 77 days in the standard care group [2].

A328335_1_En_7_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 7.3
Lead time in eHealth home-monitoring by patients is influencing time to obtain remission. Future long-term trials will show if there is a change of disease course as consequence of optimization and control of disease damage. (Adapted from Burisch J, Munkholm P. The epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Scand J Gastroenterol 2015;50:942–51 with permission)

A diminished inflammation burden or area under the activity curve is achieved by screening for disease activity with the total inflammation burden score (TIBS) as an accumulation of disease activity and FC (Fig. 7.4).

A328335_1_En_7_Fig4_HTML.jpg


Fig. 7.4
Standard care verses eHealth webcare shows a decreased total inflammation burden scoring, appearing in the traffic light colors, consisting of a rational sum of symptoms score, and calprotectin. The screening by home testing catches the relapse early on and individualize the medical therapy in accordance resulting in shorter time in relapse. (Data from Elkjaer M [2]; Elkjaer M. [6]; Pedersen N. [7]; Pedersen N [57]; Pedersen N [58]; Pedersen N [59])


Future Aspects


The advantages of eHealth applications and telemonitoring are obvious, and include giving the patient quick and easy access to medical care and providing them with more individualized treatment. Furthermore, self-management strategies promote patient engagement and empowerment, support patient adherence to treatment, and represent a unique opportunity for a selected group of patients with IBD that require life-long follow-up and treatment. Physicians can access a large clinical population, as well as patients in rural and remote areas. Patients with less aggressive disease courses or in maintenance of remission can be followed-up primarily using eHealth, thus unburdening practitioners by allowing for better and more effective allocation of their time.

Yet the potential of eHealth lies beyond the mere practical advantages. EHealth in IBD patients has made it possible to transfer knowledge about disease course patterns gained from epidemiological studies of inception cohorts [6870] into clinical practice. In recent years, eHealth has been introduced as an important “adjuvant” to medical therapy that can improve adherence to medication among IBD patients [2], time in remission [2, 59], and HRQoL [2, 6]. A recent meta-analysis showed that distance management (including telemedicine and web-based intervention) significantly decreases the number of clinic visits and can improve quality of life in certain groups of patients [71]. Furthermore, eHealth disease management was validated in another meta-analysis of telemedicine in IBS and IBD. Generally speaking, improvement of HRQoL, adherence to therapies, knowledge about the disease, reduction of healthcare costs for IBD, and quicker time to remission, were all shown [72].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 9, 2017 | Posted by in GENERAL & FAMILY MEDICINE | Comments Off on Telemonitoring and Self-Care in Patients with IBD

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access