Subtotal Gastrectomy for Cancer



Subtotal Gastrectomy for Cancer


Vikas Dudeja

Patrick G. Jackson

Waddah B. Al-Refaie





PATIENT HISTORY AND PHYSICAL FINDINGS


Presentation



  • In United States, gastric cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage and nearly 65% of patients harbor nodepositive disease.1,2 The most common symptoms are weight loss, anorexia, and early satiety. Some of these symptoms overlap with those of benign peptic ulcer disease. Patients with distal gastric cancer may present with symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction, including postprandial vomiting and weight loss. Patients may also present with progressive abdominal distension secondary to malignant ascites.



    • Special attention should be paid to weight loss. Although this may reflect metastatic disease or gastric outlet obstruction, in patients with resectable disease, it signifies a need for preoperative nutritional optimization. Specifically, patients with more than 10% weight loss are at increased risk of perioperative complications.


    • Attention to pretherapy performance status is critical, as this correlates well with ability to tolerate various oncologic therapies including major surgical resection and systemic therapy.


  • Patients presenting with gastric outlet obstruction may have dehydration and electrolyte imbalances. Placement of a nasogastric (NG) tube, volume replacement (initially with normal saline), and correction of electrolyte imbalance is paramount.


Physical Findings



  • Most patients with early stage disease will have a normal physical examination. However, signs of malnutrition, cachexia, and jaundice should be sought. Patients with advanced stage disease may present with supraclavicular lymphadenopathy, pleural effusion, abdominal mass, hepatomegaly, malignant ascites, or drop metastases in the cul-de-sac known as “Blumer’s shelf.” Presence of any of these physical findings suggest unresectability.


IMAGING AND OTHER DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES


Laboratory Tests



  • A baseline hemoglobin will assess whether iron deficiency anemia is present. Patient’s renal function and hydration status should be assessed by measuring serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine in preparation for cross-sectional imaging. Evaluation and correction of abnormalities in electrolytes are important in patients with gastric outlet obstruction. Serum albumin and prealbumin are essential tools for assessing nutritional status.


Diagnostic Studies and Staging Evaluation



  • The evaluation of any upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptomatology begins with an upper GI endoscopy, especially if gastric cancer is suspected. Endoscopy provides histopathologic diagnosis as well as guidance toward the location and extent of the gastric tumor (FIG 1A,B). For example, the endoscopist needs to comment on the location of the tumor as well as the relationship to the first portion of the duodenum. Additionally, it is important to exclude the presence of linitis plastica by insufflating the stomach and evaluating its distensibility, as patients with linitis plastica carry a higher risk of metastatic disease and a median survival of approximately only 14 to 16 months.


  • Endoscopic ultrasound performed at the time of or subsequent to diagnostic endoscopy provides the most accurate estimation of the tumor depth (T stage) and needle biopsy of surrounding lymph nodes can be performed.3


  • Pretherapy cross-sectional imaging (contrast computed tomography [CT] scan or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] of abdomen and pelvis) is important to exclude distant metastatic disease to the liver or omentum (FIG 2A). In patients with proximal gastric cancer, the addition of chest crosssectional imaging is helpful to exclude the presence of metastases to the lung. The presence of bulky adenopathy adds prognostic value but should not preclude resection unless it is outside the area of resection, such as the periportal area or mesenteric vessels. Fewer than 15% of patients present with locally advanced disease extending to the pancreas. In these patients, we perform staging laparoscopy to exclude M1 disease and then recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy.






    FIG 1 • Esophagogastroduodenoscopy helps with histologic diagnosis as well as provides information about extent of tumor. A. Biopsy-proven poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with signet cell features in the antral/prepyloric region of stomach. B. Fungating adenocarcinoma of the distal third of the stomach in a 75-year-old male who presented with iron deficiency anemia.







    FIG 2 • Cross-sectional imaging in the form of CT and CT/PET helps to evaluate for distant metastatic disease as well as extent of locoregional disease. A. CT scan in a patient with gastric cancer demonstrates thickening of the gastric antrum with nodularity in the gastrocolic ligament suggestive of direct spread to the transverse colon. B. PET/CT corroborated with CT scan to suggest involvement of gastrocolic ligament. No metastatic disease was observed.


  • Positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scan has evolved as a noninvasive radiographic staging modality to exclude the presence of metastatic disease (FIG 2B).


  • Staging laparoscopy: Due to the natural history of gastric cancer, up to a third of patients who have localized disease on staging evaluation have unsuspected hepatic and/or peritoneal disease.4 Thus, all patients should undergo staging laparoscopy to detect “subradiologic” disease. Staging laparoscopy is typically performed in a reverse TNM fashion. The operating surgeon should inspect the intraabdominal cavity for presence of peritoneal, omental, or hepatic metastases. The addition of peritoneal washing for cytology is an area of debate.5,6 It may have a place in patients at risk of undeclared metastatic disease or suboptimal performance status, as patients with positive peritoneal cytology have unfavorable overall prognosis.6 In the absence of concerning radiographic features, staging laparoscopy is typically performed at the time of the intended resection.


SURGICAL MANAGEMENT



  • Margin-negative resection along with an adequate lymphadenectomy are the most critical components of the surgical resection.


Preoperative Planning



  • Addressing preoperative malnutrition: Gastric outlet obstruction caused by tumor as well as anorexia associated with malignancy contribute to malnutrition. As such, these patients may benefit from a placement of a preoperative nasojejunal tube and enteral nutrition. In patients presenting with malignant distal gastric obstruction, an endoscopic transpyloric stent may address the gastric outlet obstruction and thus help in optimizing the nutrition. Staging laparoscopy and placement of a feeding jejunostomy tube is another option.


  • Evaluation of the patient’s functional status: A careful review and optimization of underlying comorbidities (e.g., cardiac, pulmonary, diabetes) and performance status should be performed. A subset of high-risk individuals may benefit from preoperative admission to optimize the nutrition, electrolytes imbalance, and improve performance status (e.g., physical therapy) in preparation for the oncologic resection.


  • Preoperative antibiotics: Patients should have preoperative first- or second-generation cephalosporins prior to incision to reduce the risk of wound infection.


  • Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis: All patients should have a sequential compression device applied during the procedure. Use of subcutaneous heparin/low-molecularweight heparin is initiated on postoperative day 1 and continued throughout the hospitalization unless contraindicated.


Positioning



  • The patient is placed in supine position with both arms out at 90 degrees. Nipples to upper thigh should be prepped and draped in the operative field.

Jul 24, 2016 | Posted by in GENERAL SURGERY | Comments Off on Subtotal Gastrectomy for Cancer

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access