Role of Bacteria in Pathogenesis of Lower Leg Ulcers


Bacilli

Cocci

Gram positive

Gram negative

Gram positive

Corynebacterium 5

Pseudomonas 1

Staphylococcus aur 5

Acinetobacter 1

Staphylococcus

Coagulase –ve 10

E. coli 1

Enterococcus 2

Aerococcus 1

Micrococcus 2




Table 9.2
Numerical frequency of bacterial isolates from toe web skin (n = 12 patients)


















Bacilli Gram negative

Cocci Gram positive

Citrobacter 2

Micrococcus 2

Proteus 2

Staphylococcus

Coagulase –ve 20


Could bacteria be present in and around the varicose veins?

The exact etiology of varicose vein formation and development of ulcer is still full of questions. Are these two entities linked with each other? Could dormant persister bacteria in leg subcutaneous tissue be responsible for vein wall destruction and subsequently ulcer formation?

We tried to detect bacteria in the varicose veins and subcutis using two techniques. Biopsy material was homogenized and cultured in routine media, and in another method, it was placed on bacteriological culture plates and observed for 3 weeks. In this last technique, tissue environment for bacteria was preserved and plate contained erythrocytes (iron). This mimicked a normal tissue situation. In addition, bacterial 16sRNA was identified in specimens [4] .



9.4.2 Bacterial Isolates in Varicose Veins


In our studies, varicose veins specimen stage 4 (CEAP classification) revealed presence of bacterial isolates in 40 %, whereas controls taken from healthy cadaveric organ donors contained live bacteria in only 4 % (Table 9.3). Disinfected skin specimens from the sites of varicectomy showed presence of microbes in 4 %. The dominant isolates from vein specimens were Staphylococci, preponderantly coagulase negative; however, in a few cases Enterococcus faecium was also detected. Staphylococci were highly sensitive to antibiotics except of penicillin (Table 9.4). Thirty-three percent of isolates were methicillin resistant. The 16sRNA was detected in 69 % of specimens, evidently higher than the percentage of live bacterial cells.

Bacterial culture on the Hemoline plates revealed microbes migrating from the outer aspect of varices, adjacent fat but not muscles (Fig. 9.1).

A327068_1_En_9_Fig1_HTML.jpg


Fig. 9.1
Fragments of tissue harvested from ischemic upper calf. (1) Bone marrow, (2) popliteal vein, (3) subcutaneous fat, (4) popliteal artery, (5) fat adjacent to artery, (6) skin bacteria migrate from subcutis. Confluent bacterial colonies of coagulase-negative Staphylococci formed around the specimens. Interestingly, bone marrow contained hemolytic bacteria



Table 9.3
Bacteriology of varices of great saphenous veins (GSV)











































































Varicose GSV

Control GSV and femoral vein

Staphylococci: Coagulase neg

22
 

 Epidermidis

13
 

 Hominis

4
 

 Hemolyticus

2
 

 Capitis

1
 

 Warneri

1
 

 Intermedius

1
 

S. aureus

10

1

Micrococcus spp.

2
 

Branhamella catarrhalis

1
 

Aerococcus viridans

1
 

Enterococcus faecium

3

1

Acinetobacter

1
 

Gemella morbil

1

1

Strept. mitis

1
 

Pseudomonas
 
1



Table 9.4
Sensitivity to antibiotics of bacterial isolates from varicose fragments of the great saphenous vein



































































































































 
Staph. coagulase negative

Staph. aureus

Penicillin

32

27

Cotrimoxazole

95

91

Gentamicin

95

82

Erythromycin

68

63

Clindamycin

74

73

Tetracyclines

68

73

Minocycline

100

100

Vancomycin

100

100

Teicoplanin

100

100

Rifampicin

100

100

Nor/quinolones

74

91

Fusidic acid

79

91

Nitrofurantoin

84

91

Quinupristin

100

100

Oxacillin

73

67

Penicillin

32

27

Cotrimoxazole

95

91

Gentamicin

95

82

Erythromycin

68

63

Clindamycin

74

73

Tetracyclines

68

73

Minocycline

100

100

Vancomycin

100

100

Teicoplanin

100

100

Rifampicin

100

100

Nor/quinolones

74

91

Fusidic acid

79

91

Nitrofurantoin

84

91

Quinupristin

100

100

Oxacillin

73

67


n = 40 specimens (in %)


9.4.3 Bacterial Isolates on Ulcers


Bacterial phenotypes on ulcer exudate remain similar to those identified on adjacent skin; however, the numerical distribution of strains becomes different (Table 9.5). Strains of Gram-negative Bacilli dominate over others, and the number of colonies is tripled (Tables 9.6 and 9.7). This may be the result of more favorable environmental conditions on the granulation tissue for some strains or less favorable for others. Interestingly, bacteria cultured from the ulcer surface revealed increasing resistance to antibiotics compared with the flora taken from normal leg skin (Tables 9.8 and 9.9).


Table 9.5
Numerical frequency of bacterial isolates from varicose ulcer (n = 56 patients)



















































































 
Bacilli Gram negative

Cocci Gram positive
 

Aeromonas

1

Staphylococcus aur

19

Citrobacter

2

Staphylococcus coagulase – ve

9

Acinetobacter

6

Streptococcus

4

Pseudomonas

18

Enterococcus

16

Klebsiella

3
   

Providencia

6
   

Enterobacter

1
   

E. coli

2
   

Serratia

2
   

Proteus

9
   

Pasteurella

1
   

Morganella

2
   

Alcaligenes fec

4
   

Gram-positive Corynebacterium

8
   



Table 9.6
Prevalence of bacterial strains isolated from leg varicose ulcers and calf skin surface of normal subjects

































 
Cocci

Staphylococcus coag-ve

Staphylococcus aureus

Streptococcus

Enterobacter

Gram (−) cocci, bacilli, coryneforms

Varicose ulcer

1a

32

11

15

41

Normal calf skin

37b

37

0b

0b

24b


18 patients with varicose ulcer, 30 normal subjects

aPercent of isolates

b p < 0.05



Table 9.7
Frequency of bacteria isolates on perineal skin, calf skin, toe web, and varicose ulcer (in %)


























































Site of isolation

Strains/patient

Cocci

Bacilli

Gram positive

Gram negative

Spore forming

Spore nonforming

Gram positive

Gram positive

Gram negative

Perineum

2.40

66.7

0

0

13.9

19.4

Calf skin

1.47

68.2

4.5

9.1

4.5

13.7

Toe web

2.16

84.6

0

0

0

15.4

Venous ulcer

4.84a

38.9a

0

0

7.9

53.2a


a p < 0.05



Table 9.8
Sensitivity to antibiotics of bacterial isolates from 18 varicose ulcers and leg skin of 30 normals








































































Antibiotic

Gram (−) cocci, bacilli, coryneforms

Varicose ulcer
 
Normals

+++

+

+++

+

Penicillin

14b

0
 
25

4

Kanamycin

0

33

a

100

0

Tobramycin

66

33
 
100

0

Gentamicin

66

16

a

100

0

Tetracycline

16

0

a

100

0

Erythromycin

33

33
 
45

8

Cotrimoxazole

32

16

a

80

0


a p < 0.05

bPercent of sensitive isolates



Table 9.9
Sensitivity to antibiotics of bacterial isolates from 18 leg varicose ulcers and calf skin of 30 normal controls

















































































































Antibiotic

Cocci

Varicose ulcer
 
Normals

+++

+

+++

+

Penicillin

31b

12
 
28

2

Oxacillin

55

0

a

73

0

Kanamycin

25

8

a

44

8

Tobramycin

29

35

a

75

15

Gentamicin

48

22

a

85

4

Tetracycline

28

42
 
61

2

Minocycline

16

16

a

100

0

Erythromycin

43

13
 
59

8

Lincomycin

37

12

a

69

6

Pristinamycin

70

20
 
100

0

Fosfomycin

45

8
 
77

0

Rifampicin

77

14
 
91

9

Fusidic acid

63

27
 
77

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 13, 2017 | Posted by in GENERAL SURGERY | Comments Off on Role of Bacteria in Pathogenesis of Lower Leg Ulcers

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access