Fig. 7.1
Aqueous humor (AH) outflow pathway (abbreviation: CE corneal epithelium, CEn corneal endothelium, SC Schlemm’s canal, TM trabecular meshwork)
Table 7.1
Classification of drugs, their target, and expected pharmacological effect used for the treatment of glaucoma
Classification | Target | Pharmacological effect | Drugs | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Beta-blockers | |||
β-1, β-2 blocker | Reduces aqueous humor (AH) production | Timolol, levobunolol, carteolol, and metoprolol | ||
β-1 selective blocker | Reduces AH production | Betaxolol | ||
2. | Alpha agonists | |||
α-1 receptor | Vasoconstriction-induced reduction in AH or enhanced outflow | Epinephrine and dipivefrin | ||
α-2 receptor (pre- and postsynaptic stimulation) | Decrease in sympathetic outflow and stimulation of Gi-mediated reduction of cAMP → decreased AH | Apraclonidine, brimonidine | ||
3. | Parasympathomimetics | |||
M3 receptors | Facilitates aqueous outflow by producing traction on scleral spur or trabecular meshwork | Pilocarpine and carbachol | ||
Inhibition of cholinesterase | Indirectly facilitates stimulation of M3 | Echothiophate and physostigmine | ||
4. | Prostaglandin analogs | |||
Prostanoid FP receptor | Facilitates uveoscleral outflow | Latanoprost, bimatoprost, travoprost, tafluprost, and unoprostone | ||
5. | Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors | |||
Systemic | Carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes (II, IV, and XII) inhibition | Reduces the fluid transport by inhibiting bicarbonate ions | Acetazolamide, methazolamide, and dichlorphenamide | |
Topical | Inhibition of carbonic anhydrase (higher affinity for type II) | Reduces the fluid transport by inhibiting bicarbonate ions | Dorzolamide and brinzolamide | |
6. | Osmotic agents | |||
Plasma osmotic pressure | Increased osmotic pressure in plasma leading to shifting of water from eye → decreased IOP | Mannitol, glycerol |
7.1.2 Concept of “Target IOP”
The concept of target intraocular pressure (IOP) arises from the fact that progression in advanced glaucoma, and occasionally in early glaucoma, may occur even at what is thought to be a “normal” intraocular pressure. The erstwhile magic figure of 21 mmHg or lower may not be low enough for many glaucomatous eyes to halt the progressive field damage.
Target IOP is defined as “a range of acceptable IOP levels within which the progression of glaucomatous neuropathy will be halted /retarded.” It is the specific level of pressure that, if achieved, will possibly prevent further optic nerve damage and is the IOP where the rate of loss of ganglion cell will equal the age-induced loss (Heijl et al. 2002; Feiner and Piltz-Seymour 2003; Hodapp et al. 1993; Jampel 1997). Further, this concept acknowledges that there may be pressure-independent factors, including aging, which may be superimposed upon the pressure-related process of glaucoma progression. This definition does not suggest that lowering IOP will completely halt progression of glaucomatous disease.
It can also be defined as the IOP at which the sum of the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) from preserved vision and the HRQOL from not having side effects from treatment is maximized.
7.1.3 Factors Influencing Target IOP
The target IOP is dependent on (Lichter et al. 2001):
(a)
IOP level before treatment (the lower the untreated IOP levels, the lower the target IOP should be)
(b)
Stage of glaucoma (the greater the preexisting glaucoma damage, the lower the target IOP should be)
(c)
Rate of progression during follow-up
(d)
Age and life expectancy (younger age requires lower target IOP)
(e)
Presence of other risk factors, e.g., exfoliation syndrome
(f)
Family history
(g)
Systemic diseases (diabetes, HT, CAD, CVD)
The initial target pressure is an estimate toward the ultimate goal of protecting the optic nerve. The target pressure is different among patients, and even in the same patient it may require recalculation in the course of the disease.
When initiating therapy, it is assumed that the measured pretreatment pressure range resulted in optic nerve damage; so, the initial target pressure selected is at least 20 % lower than the pretreatment IOP
7.1.4 Setting Up Specific Target
The specific target IOP can be set by classifying the disease based on the severity of glaucomatous damage as follows:
Mild
Glaucomatous optic nerve abnormalities with normal visual fields
For 20 % IOP reduction from baseline values, keep IOP <18 mmHg.
Moderate
Visual field abnormalities in one hemifield but not within 5° of fixation
For 30 % IOP reduction, set IOP below 15 mmHg.
Severe
Visual field abnormalities in either hemifield or field loss within 5° of fixation
For 50 % IOP reduction, set IOP below 13 mmHg
In addition to setting the target IOP, it is important to keep watch on the diurnal fluctuation of IOP. The maximum IOP should always be kept below 18 mmHg at all follow-up visits (AGIS study data), and the fluctuation of IOP (both diurnal and long-term variations) should be below 4 mmHg.
The adequacy of the target IOP needs to be periodically reassessed by comparing optic nerve status (quantitative assessments of the disc and nerve fiber layer and visual field tests) with previous examinations. If progression occurs at the set target pressure, the target IOP should be lowered (Heijl et al. 2002; Feiner and Piltz-Seymour 2003; Hodapp et al. 1993; Jampel 1997; Lichter et al. 2001; AAO Glaucoma 2004–2005). The target IOP is just a guideline; it is better to use a range rather than a single number. Using a range of IOP prevents unnecessary aggressive therapy.
7.1.5 Medical Therapy
The ideal antiglaucoma medication is one that is effective, has minimal side effects, is cost-effective, and is easy to comply with.
Before we proceed further, it’s important to understand that a first–choice agent is the drug chosen on medical grounds, whereas a first–line agent is selected on nonmedical (usually cost) grounds.
There are six classes of topical hypotensive medication: hypotensive lipids (prostaglandin analogues), beta-blockers, selective (alpha 2)-adrenergic agonists, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs), cholinergics, and hyperosmotics (Table 7.1). Refer Chapter 6 for the detailed pharmacology of drugs acting through autonomic receptors.
7.1.5.1 Hypotensive Lipids
Hypotensive lipids fall into three subcategories: prostaglandin analogues (PGAs) which include latanoprost (Xalatan 0.005 %) and travoprost (Travatan and Travatan Z, both 0.004 %; Izba which is travoprost 0.003 %), prostamide which includes bimatoprost (Lumigan 0.03 % and 0.01 %), and the deconsanoid class which is represented by unoprostone isopropyl (Rescula 0.15 %). They are all derivatives of prostaglandin F2 alpha, based on pioneering work by Bito, Stjernschantz, and Camras (Bito 2001; Camras et al. 1989).
PGAs increase both trabecular meshwork and uveoscleral outflow (Lim et al. 2008) and are less affected by circadian variations in aqueous production than the beta-blockers (Walters et al. 2004). Although these drugs have dual mechanism of action, most of the increased outflow facility can be attributed to their effects on the pressure-independent uveoscleral outflow pathway.
Variations in the PGF2 alpha molecule result in changes in potency and side effects. Latanoprost was the first one to be developed commercially (by Pharmacia, now Pfizer). In order to reduce the hyperemia associated with PGF2 alpha, the unsaturated (double) bond between carbons 13 and 14 was saturated. This resulted in some loss of potency, but by reducing hyperemia made the drug cosmetically acceptable to patients. Because there is no major clinical difference in IOP-lowering efficacy whether this class of drugs is dosed daytime or nighttime, it has become customary to prescribe them at bedtime, so that the majority of the immediate hyperemia associated with drug dosing occurs while the patient is asleep. These drugs do have some “chronic” hyperemia that tends to subside over several months of use. Occasionally patients prefer morning dosing, which is acceptable from an efficacy perspective. Clinical IOP-lowering efficacy is better with OD dosing rather than BID dosing (Alm and Stjernschantz 1995). Systemic half-life of the drugs is brief (e.g., latanoprost 17 min). There is little effect of the drugs on the IOP of the contralateral eye when dosed unilaterally (Sjoquist and Stjernschantz 2002).
To improve efficacy, Alcon Laboratories modified the PGF2 alpha molecule to create travoprost by adding a CF3 on the unsaturated benzene ring. This allows for a tighter bonding of the travoprost free acid to the FP receptors (Sharif et al. 2003). This results in a longer-duration, clinically useful, IOP-lowering effect of both original travoprost and the BAK-free version, Travatan Z (Gross et al. 2008). This could be important in patients who occasionally miss doses.
Most of the hyperemia associated with the HLs results from dilated conjunctival vessels in response to direct activation of FP receptors found in the vasculature muscle walls. Bimatoprost has a six- to eightfold greater concentration than other hypotensive lipids. This may be related to the clinical observation that bimatoprost causes more red eye than the other two products (Stewart et al. 2003).
The three hypotensive lipids lower IOP on average between 25 and 30 %. These drugs have relatively flat IOP curves over 24 h, demonstrating both low circadian IOP fluctuation and, unlike the beta-blockers, effective diurnal and nocturnal IOP control (Konstas et al. 2005). They do not evidence short-term escape or long-term drift (Goldberg 2001; Cohen et al. 2004; Bayer et al. 2004).
Latanoprost is subject to deterioration when exposed to heat over 100 °F for longer than 8 days (Xalatan package insert, Pfizer, NY). The other hypotensive lipids seem to be somewhat more stable at temperatures likely to be found in most natural settings. All agents may deteriorate at an accelerated pace when exposed to direct sunlight.
7.1.5.2 Beta-Blockers
Topical beta-blockers were considered the gold standard initial treatment for open-angle glaucoma for nearly two decades, from 1978 to 1996, when the first prostaglandin analogue was granted approval by the FDA. Hypotensive lipids (prostaglandin analogues) are more potent IOP-lowering drugs than timolol and other beta-blockers. However, this fact does not mean that beta-blockers cannot be used as a first-line agent. This class of medication still remains efficacious, tolerated, and cost-effective.
Beta-blockers antagonize beta 1 and beta 2 receptors in the ciliary body’s nonpigmented epithelium and thereby reduce secretion of the aqueous humor through an incompletely understood mechanism, which in turn lowers IOP. Action on the ciliary microvasculature may reduce the ultrafiltration component of aqueous secretion.
One drop of timolol maleate 0.25 or 0.50 % has its peak effect, 2 h following administration, and may last for 24 h. Some residual effect of timolol on IOP may be detected for as long as 2–3 weeks, and beta blockade can be detected up to 1 month after discontinuation of the drug.
Nonselective beta-blockers lower IOP 20–30 %. However, IOP reduction may be as high as 50 % and last greater than 24 h in some individuals. In up to 20 % of cases, the initial IOP reduction can be lost within 2–3 weeks. This has been called short-term escape and most likely reflects an upregulation in the number of ocular beta receptors after initial complete blockade (Boger 1983). For this reason, it is recommended to wait at least 4 weeks following initiation of therapy before assessing IOP effect.
Beta-blocker treatment can maintain control of IOP for years. However, in some patients IOP control may be lost after many years of therapy or even within 3 months (Gieser et al. 1996). This phenomenon is called long-term drift and may be the result of drug tolerance or progression of the trabecular meshwork outflow problems.
Selective beta 1 blockers are less potent at reducing IOP than their nonselective counterparts, which can make them less attractive in patients who need a bigger IOP reduction.
The advantage of selective beta 1 blockers is that they have less effect on the beta 2 receptors found predominantly in the pulmonary system, making them more tolerable in patients with the potential for bronchospasm. Among nonselective beta-blockers, there are no differences in terms of IOP-lowering efficacy.
Patients under treatment with systemic beta-blockers may experience a reduced effect of topical administration and increased side effects (Allingham et al. 2005).
There are ocular, cardiovascular, pulmonary, metabolic, and central nervous system side effects. In general, beta-blockers are well tolerated when applied topically; however, there are reports of ocular discomfort due to burning, hyperemia, toxic keratopathy, punctate keratopathy, periocular contact dermatitis, and dry eye (Dunham et al. 1994).
Chronic administration of benzalkonium chloride (BAK) used as preservative in most beta-blocker solutions may play a role in ocular toxicity. The use of preservative-free timolol may help identify preservative as the source of local side effects. Timolol is available as a solution and in a gel-forming preparation. Gel-forming preparations allow longer permanence on the ocular surface for a sustained effect, and the once-daily administration can lead to fewer side effects. Gel-forming solution is also less likely to reach the nasolacrimal duct, lessening the potential for systemic side effects.
Beta-blockers are absorbed via the nasolacrimal system by the nasal and oral mucosa, thus bypassing the first-pass effect in the liver (Sharif et al. 2003). Direct access to the blood stream explains many systemic side effects and contralateral IOP lowering. Systemic side effects must be thoroughly searched for by a careful medical history since patients often overlook their eyedrops as a potential cause of systemic symptoms.
Beta 1 receptor blockade lowers blood pressure and heart rate, which can cause severe bradycardia, especially in patients with advanced age or underlying medical conditions, such as greater than first-degree heart block (a contraindication for the use of beta-blockers). They also cause decrease myocardial contractility, which is a relative contraindication for beta-blockers in patients affected by heart insufficiency. Exercise-induced tachycardia may be blocked in healthy individuals.
Beta-2 receptor blockade may cause severe asthma attacks. Nonselective beta-blockers are contraindicated in asthmatic patients. They also may exacerbate airway disease in a previously controlled asthma patient or trigger airway disease in a previously undetected or asymptomatic patient. Betaxolol, a beta 1-receptor blocker, has been successfully used in patients with pulmonary disease, but it is not entirely free of potential side effects (Fechtner 1999). A trial of once-daily dosing at the lowest available concentration of an agent (preferably in one eye) would be a good way to start. Only then, if indicated, should the frequency and concentration be increased.
Beta-blockers have been observed to alter the blood lipid profile negatively and could increase the risk of coronary heart disease. They may also mask the symptoms of hypoglycemia, such as tachycardia, in diabetics.
Central nervous system side effects are often subjective in nature and rarely attributed to eyedrops by patients. It is prudent to directly question patients about symptoms of fatigue, lethargy, confusion, memory loss, sleep disturbance, and dizziness. If present, a lower dosage of beta-blocker or replacement with another class of drug should be discussed.
7.1.5.3 Alpha Agonists
The selective alpha-agonist agents used to treat glaucoma are modifications of the clonidine molecule (similar to the development of the hypotensive lipids that were derived from PGF2 alpha).
Two topical alpha-adrenergic agonists are available for glaucoma therapy, apraclonidine which is relatively nonselective for alpha 1 and alpha 2 receptors and brimonidine (Alphagan and generic) that is more selective for alpha 2 than alpha 1 receptors. These drugs work by preventing the release of norepinephrine at presynaptic terminals. They both decrease aqueous production, and they may have some effect on episcleral venous pressure as well as uveoscleral outflow (Reitsamer et al. 2006; Toris et al. 1999). Brimonidine may also affect conventional outflow in a positive manner. These drugs lower IOP between 20 and 25 %.
Apraclonidine (a) does not lower IOP in about 1/3 of patients, (b) has extreme tachyphylaxis (loss of effect) within about 90 days in about 1/3 of patients, and finally (c) causes blepharoconjunctivitis with red eyes, conjunctival follicles, pruritus, and periorbital dermatitis in about 1/3 of patients. Pupil dilation and lid retraction may also occur in a significant fraction of patients (Yuksel et al. 1992).
The newer lower concentrations of Alphagan-P, which contain the preservative purite instead of BAK, seem to be better tolerated, with a decreased incidence of allergy and almost as good intraocular pressure control as with the higher (0.2 %) concentration of the original drug (Whitson et al. 2006).
The pharmacokinetics of topically administered brimonidine requires that it be dosed three times per day, similar to the topical CAIs.
Brimonidine must be used with caution in neonates, young children, and the frail and elderly. With very young patients, brimonidine has resulted in apnea and coma (Mungan et al. 2003). Brimonidine can cause fatigue in elderly. Patients should specifically be queried about the presence of this important side effect. In these groups of patients, the drug seems to cross the blood–brain barrier in sufficient concentration to cause these severe side effects.
Alpha-adrenergic agonists should not be used in patients taking monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) because they may precipitate a hypertensive crisis. They are also contraindicated in patients taking tricyclic antidepressants because of an increased risk of central nervous system (CNS)-mediated depression (Schuman 2002). These drugs cause symptoms of dry mouth (and dry nose) when drained through the nasolacrimal duct into the throat.
7.1.5.4 Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors (CAIs)
There are at least 14 known varieties of the alpha-carbonic anhydrases (a-CA) whose main function is the hydration of CO2 to bicarbonate (HCO−). Two of these enzymes are important for the production of the aqueous humor by the epithelium of the ciliary processes, cytoplasmic CA II and membrane-bound CA IV (Matsui et al. 1996). Part of aqueous production involving active secretion relies on the formation of bicarbonate by these enzymes to correct the imbalance caused by the ATPase-fueled transport of sodium into the space between the nonpigmented ciliary epithelial cells.
Patients should be specifically asked about breathing difficulties and skin reactions (Turtz and Turtz 1958), which are the most common form of allergic manifestations to sulfonamide antibiotics.
CAIs can be used topically or systemically. Topical CAIs are remarkably free from side effect and effective. They are the most effective class to use in combination with a prostaglandin analogue (Scozzafava and Supuran 2014). Systemic CAIs are also effective, but should be used with full knowledge of the frequency and severity of their side effects.
Topical CAIs
Approximately 80 % of the volume of topically administered eyedrops is absorbed systemically within 15–30 s of instillation. Topical dorzolamide is absorbed through the nasopharyngeal mucosa into the systemic circulation. Chronic administration of dorzolamide leads to its accumulation in erythrocytes. Hepatic metabolism of dorzolamide produces N-desmethyl metabolite which also binds to red blood cells but inhibits carbonic anhydrase I more than carbonic anhydrase II. Approximately 24–32 % of systemically absorbed dorzolamide is bound to plasma proteins. Urine is the major route of excretion for both parent and metabolite drugs. There is a rapid decline of dorzolamide from red blood cells, on discontinuation of the medication. This is followed by a gradual decline due to an elimination-phase half-life of approximately 4 months.
Brinzolamide 0.1 % (Azopt, Alcon Laboratories) is a suspension that allows buffering to a more neutral pH compared with dorzolamide. This seems to improve tolerance of the topical medication.
In 2013, Simbrinza (Alcon), a beta-blocker-free, fixed-combination therapy, was approved by the FDA. It combines brinzolamide 0.1 % and brimonidine tartrate 0.2 %.
CAIs have been reported to improve ocular blood flow profile by causing ocular vasodilation through metabolic acidosis via elevated carbon dioxide levels (Siesky et al. 2008).
Oral CAIs
Oral CAIs are powerful agents for lowering IOP (between 25 and 30 %) (Friedland et al. 1977) and may do very well when other medical therapies are unable to reach the target IOP in chronic glaucomas or to temporarily bring IOP to safe levels in acute emergent situations.
Paresthesias of the fingers, toes, and nose are common with oral CAIs, less so with methazolamide at lower doses. Paresthesias may diminish over time. Patients are less likely to be concerned about these symptoms if they are discussed before the drugs are prescribed.
Patients may suffer from abdominal cramps, nausea, and in some cases severe diarrhea. Symptoms may improve as time passes, but some patients need to discontinue oral CAIs because of the gastrointestinal intolerance. The oral CAIs cause a strange metallic taste with foods and carbonated beverages – patients should be warned this is likely to occur.
Patients taking oral CAIs, usually after several months, can have an unexpected onset of a malaise-syndrome complex involving (to varying degrees) tiredness, lack of appetite (with/without weight loss), and even severe depression (Alward 1998).
Salicylates interact with oral CAIs. Patients taking high-dose aspirin can get tinnitus, increased respiratory rate, and even confusion and coma (Sweeney et al. 1986).
CAIs in the kidney promote the absorption of bicarbonate through the renal tubules. CAIs cause alkalinization of the urine along with increased micturition, both day and night, and potassium excretion. Patients prescribed with chronic oral CAIs should have their electrolytes monitored, especially if taking other potassium-wasting drugs such as thiazide diuretics and oral corticosteroids (Bateson and Lant 1973).
One important feature of both topical and oral CAIs is that they work to suppress the aqueous and lower IOP throughout the 24-h day, both in the diurnal and nocturnal time periods.
The topical CAIs lower IOP about 20 % (similar to betaxolol) and the oral CAIs closer to 30 %. Further, patients receiving a full dose of oral CAIs are unlikely to see any additional pressure lowering by also using topical dorzolamide or brinzolamide.
Acetazolamide is the most commonly used and is supplied in 125- or 250-mg tablets or 500-mg sustained-release capsules. It may be dosed up to 250 mg four times daily or 500-mg SR capsules twice a day. CAIs are not the first-line choices for treatment, despite impressive IOP-lowering effects, due to their numerous adverse effects.
The use of oral CAIs is contraindicated in patients with a history of kidney stones or other renal disease, liver disease, cardiac disease, Addison’s disease, and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and in patients with sulfonamide allergy out of concern for sulfa cross-reactivity.
7.1.5.5 Miotics
The parasympathomimetic medications are the oldest form of eyedrops used to treat glaucoma. Since they all act on the iris sphincter muscle to make the pupil smaller, we shall use the simpler name “miotics” when referring to these agents. The miotics are subdivided into two classes based on mechanism of action, the direct-acting cholinergic agents like pilocarpine and carbachol and the indirect-acting anticholinesterase agents like echothiophate iodide.
< div class='tao-gold-member'>
Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register a > to continue