Giving feedback

Chapter 40


Giving feedback




Introduction and background


Feedback is an essential component of the teaching and learning process. Constructive feedback from the teacher gives the learner insight into his or her actions and their consequences. Feedback allows the learner and teacher to successfully achieve both personal and course or programme objectives. The ideas and strategies in this chapter are intended to help make feedback a more productive experience for both the teacher and the learner.




Formative feedback versus summative assessment


Formative feedback and summative assessment are different. The teacher should tell the learner in advance which one he or she is providing.



• Feedback. The purpose of feedback is formative: to provide insights that help the learner make mid-course adjustments in performance and demonstrate improvement. The language of feedback is descriptive and neutral. Formative feedback should be task-orientated and given frequently and as soon as feasible after the performance so the learner has time to make changes. (Perera et al 2008).


• Summative assessment. Summative assessment occurs at the conclusion of a course of study and communicates a decision about performance. This assessment should follow formative feedback and subsequent remedial actions and should express a judgement about whether the learner has achieved the expected outcomes. Summative assessment is often given as a grade or the learner’s ranking in comparison to other learners or to a standard, for example, 4.2/5 on clinical skills.



The intent of a feedback session


Feedback sessions can vary:



• Brief ongoing feedback. Brief feedback sessions (5–10 minutes) occur frequently, in the context of regular work activities, while the learner is demonstrating findings on physical examination or during the presentation of the patient’s history. On these occasions, the teacher might say, ‘I’d like to give you some pointers about another way to examine the spleen’.


• Formal mid-course feedback. A formal feedback session is scheduled in advance, and both learner and teacher plan ahead. The session may last from 10–30 minutes and addresses the teacher’s observations over a period of time. This allows for improvement prior to the summative evaluation.


• End-of-course feedback. Summative assessment should be accompanied by feedback, reflection, and mentoring to help the learner improve (Krackov & Pohl 2011).



Why is feedback important?


Ericsson (2004) maintains that the ‘acquisition of expert performance requires engaging in deliberate practice and that “continued deliberate practice is necessary for maintenance of many types of professional performance’. Feedback is an essential component of the deliberate practice concept. In Ericsson’s framework, the following conditions lead to improvement through deliberate practice:



Feedback plays a critical role for the learner, the teacher and the educational programme.



For the learner


Feedback helps the learner achieve course or programme goals. It reinforces good performance and provides a basis for correcting mistakes. Feedback serves as a reference point for summative assessment. It offers insights into actual performance and demonstrates commitment to the learner as a person (Box 40.1)



Learners value teachers who facilitate their learning by giving constructive feedback that is adapted to their professional needs. King (1999) asked learners for their views on feedback.


Negative feedback experiences are characterized by:



Positive feedback experiences involve:





For the educational programme


Making feedback a regular part of the educational experience encourages the development of expertise (Ericsson 2004, Krackov & Pohl 2011). A culture that accepts and promotes feedback supports a feeling of positive improvement in the school or training programme.


Feedback is also a requirement. Medical schools and post-graduate training programmes are accountable to external agencies. These agencies foster the belief that the institutions should build the learner’s competence instead of penalizing learners who have not achieved the objectives that have been set out.


In the United States and Canada, the agency with responsibility for the accreditation of medical schools, the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME), establishes standards for the structure and function of the school:



In the UK, the General Medical Council (GMC) plays an important role in defining educational standards:




Why is giving feedback difficult to do?


Both learners and teachers recognize the importance of feedback; yet most learners say their feedback is inadequate and many people have difficulty giving feedback, particularly when it centres on problem areas.



Barriers


Despite the acknowledged importance of feedback, a wide range of impediments may prevent or limit the giving or receiving of feedback:



• Time and place. The teacher and learner are ‘too busy’ for a feedback session; this can lead to an excessive delay before feedback is given or prevent it from happening at all. There may be no appropriate space for a feedback session in the area where the teacher and learner interact.


• Knowledge base. Both teacher and learner may be unclear about the purpose or use of feedback. The teacher may lack first-hand data about the learner’s performance or may not be certain what feedback is appropriate in a given situation.


• Ability. The teacher may not know how to give feedback or have had little practice giving feedback.


• Affective factors. A variety of elements play a role:



• Different perceptions about feedback. Learners and teachers differ in their perceptions about feedback. Teachers believe they provide feedback more frequently than learners say they received it.


• The culture. The traditional culture of medicine requires that the learner acquire extensive knowledge and skills in a highly structured hierarchical environment. It promotes a one-way flow of information from teacher to learner and can form an experience in which the learner feels like a ‘victim’ rather than a partner in a collegial activity. In this culture, the learner may consider negative feedback as an overall assessment of worth.




Principles of effective feedback:


Attention to important principles of effective feedback will help set the stage for an effective session (Ende 1983, Hesketh & Laidlaw 2002, Pendleton et al 1984).



• A culture that values constructive improvement. The educational climate should foster constructive improvement in an atmosphere of trust and concern. Both learner and teacher should expect feedback to be a regular and frequent occurrence. From the outset it should be clear that they will work together toward a common goal of improving performance. Providing feedback about the course and instructors should be an expected responsibility of learners. The learner might also be asked to provide feedback to the teacher in the context of the feedback session. All of this will foster a climate of mutual trust.


• Attention to time and location. Formal feedback sessions should be scheduled so they are mutually convenient for the teacher and the learner and both should have adequate time to prepare. Either the teacher or the learner can initiate a feedback session. The session should take place in a private setting where the learner will feel more relaxed and comfortable discussing sensitive issues.


• Use of standards. The learner’s performance should be measured against well-defined outcome goals and objectives.


• First-hand observation. Whenever possible, the teacher should observe the behaviours first-hand and not relate feedback observed by somebody else. Passing along feedback based on data collected from another person may send mixed messages and produce defensiveness.


• Use of positive communication strategies. Giving effective feedback requires attention to a range of dynamics: some observable and others unseen.



image Communicating effectively. Feedback involves active listening, asking open-ended reflective, facilitative questions and responding. These key skills help the learner gain insight into strengths and weaknesses.


image Making it a two-way process. The teacher should treat the learner as an ally who is expected to participate in the feedback session. The learner should take an active part in the feedback process by initiating and responding to questions.


image Using precise, descriptive and objective language. The information given should be specific, be nonevaluative and contain real examples. Global statements do not help build ability. ‘Your history was complete and you showed a concern for Mr Wench’s struggle with his weight’ is preferable to ‘You did a great job!’


image Focusing on the behaviour, not the person. It is easier to change behaviours than personalities. ‘You were standing, a position of power, which may have made the patient uncomfortable’, instead of ‘You tend to act superior with patients.’


image Monitoring the learner’s background, temperament, personality and response. It is important to be aware of the learner’s mores, perspectives and responses. ‘I noticed that you did not take part in the group’s discussion of coronary artery disease. Were you uncomfortable? I’d like to help you increase your participation.’


image Being selective. Limit the feedback to what the learner can absorb in one session. ‘Today, I think we should concentrate on your examination of the chest.’

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 9, 2016 | Posted by in GENERAL & FAMILY MEDICINE | Comments Off on Giving feedback

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access