Cytogenetics
Benedict et al (1971) pointed out that a
long acrocentric chromosome was often associated with
metastatic malignant tumors, regardless of primary origin and histologic type.
Miles and Wolinska (1973) compared the sensitivity of cytogenetic studies with light microscopic diagnoses in 58 cancer patients. In 38 patients, routine cytology disclosed cancer, whereas cytogenetic studies were positive in only 24 of these patients. However, in two patients, chromosome analysis disclosed an aneuploid chromosomal component, whereas routine cytology was negative. Cytogenetic studies in this group of patients may have been handicapped by prior treatment. In general
, tissue culture technique is used to obtain a sufficient number of metaphases for cytogenetic analysis. Otherwise, a very large population of dividing cancer cells is required for a successful direct chromosomal analysis.
The apparent
exceptions to this rule are the observations by
To et al (1981) and by
Watts et al (1983) who observed abnormal chromosomal components in several ascitic fluids associated with liver cirrhosis and in one pleural effusion associated with pneumonia (see
Chap. 25). Apparently, other disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis or pulmonary embolus, may occasionally be associated with chromosomal abnormalities (summary in
Watts et al, 1983). These studies did not include chromosomal banding. It would be of great interest to confirm these observations by contemporary cytogenetic techniques.
With the introduction of
molecular probes to various chromosomes, it became possible to determine chromosomal abnormalities by the technique of
fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in interphase nuclei. The principles of this technique are discussed in
Chapter 4. The application of this technique to malignant mesotheliomas in effusions is discussed below (
Granados et al, 1994).
Florentine et al (1997) used probes to
chromosomes 3, 8, 10, and 12 to determine numerical chromosomal aberrations, and compared the results of chromosomal analysis with conventional cytology on ThinPrep (Cytyc Corporation, Boxborough, MA) slides of effusions with mixed results.
Cajulis et al (1997) specifically identified
difficult-to-classify “atypical” cells in previously stained smears in a variety of samples (including four effusions). They used the FISH technique to determine numerical aberrations
of chromosome 8. Cajulis observed chromosomal aberrations in most “atypical” cells but not in benign cells and considered the
FISH technique with chromosome 8 to have a specificity of 100% and sensitivity of 83%. The reader is cautioned that the FISH technique requires a dedicated laboratory and that the molecular probes to individual chromosomes or their centromeres are expensive. Nonetheless, the results cited are most encouraging and suggest that the technique may prove to be very useful in determining the presence or absence of cancer in difficult cases. The results of FISH technique in cells in the
urinary sediment are discussed in
Chapter 23.
A novel approach to the identification of cancer cells is the documentation of
telomerase activity. Telomeres are the structures capping the ends of normal chromosomes. With each cell division, the
telomeres become shorter, resulting in cell senescence. It is assumed that the enzyme
telomerase is capable of synthesis of telomeres, thus conferring immortality on cancer cells. Telomerase activity can be demonstrated by molecular biologic techniques or by immunochemistry using an
in situ fluorescent assay and a
telomere repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) (
Ohyashiki et al, 1997). The test results in
nuclear fluorescence in cancer cells whereas, in benign cells, the fluorescence is limited to the cytoplasm.
Dejmek et al (2001) adopted this technique to cells in 16 effusions
and claimed that the test was specific for cancer cells. Similar data were previously provided for cancer cells in the respiratory tract (
Dejmek et al, 2000) and in urinary sediment (
Ohayashiki et al, 1998). However,
Braunschweig et al (2001) denied any diagnostic value to the TRAP reaction because of frequent false-positive and false-negative results.
DNA Measurements in Effusions as Tumor Markers
Freni et al (1971) and
Krivinkova et al (1976) were apparently the first groups of investigators to recognize the
diagnostic value of DNA measurements by cytophotometry in the identification of malignant cells in effusions. The presence of cells with abnormal DNA content was well correlated with the presence of cancer.
With the introduction of
flow cytometry, the DNA measurements became more rapid and several groups of investigators reported
abnormal DNA histograms in fluids containing malignant cells (
Evans et al, 1983;
Unger et al, 1983;
Katz et al, 1985;
Croonen et al, 1988). In a study from this laboratory,
Schneller et al (1987) pointed out that static
cytophotometry may disclose abnormal DNA values in cancer cells that are not revealed by flow cytometry. Further, some malignant tumors are diploid and have a perfectly normal DNA ploidy that cannot be detected by any measurements.
Agarwal et al (1991) observed that some benign tumors have an aneuploid DNA distribution. Thus,
an abnormal DNA histogram usually (but not always) indicates the presence of cancer but a normal diploid histogram does not necessarily rule out cancer. For further discussion of cytophotometry and flow cytometry, see
Chapters 46 and
47.
Cytochemistry and Immunocytochemistry
Cells in effusions are the favored target of cytochemical and immunocytochemical investigations because of abundant cell populations and the ease with which multiple samples can be obtained in the form of smears, cytocentrifuge preparations (cytospins), cell blocks (cell buttons) or the newer methods of processing of liquid samples (ThinPrep).
There are no specific cytochemical or immunocytochemical reagents that could distinguish benign from malignant cells. The best effort along these lines was the use of an
antibody to the mutated p53 molecule that is commonly expressed in human malignant tumors and practically never in normal tissues (see
Chaps. 3 and
7).
Mullick et al (1996) applied this antibody to 103 effusions and reported positive staining in 55% of malignant tumors and none in benign controls. Otherwise, these techniques are sometimes helpful in
distinguishing from each other tumors of diverse origins and type.
The most useful cytochemical stains are
mucicarmine that are frequently helpful in differentiating cancer cells from mesothelial cells, stains for the
identification of pigments, such as melanin and some silver stains, all discussed in
Chapter 44. The number of monoclonal antibodies tested on effusions is very large and the principal observations are discussed in
Chapter 45. Hence, only a brief summary of the most useful antibodies is shown in
Table 26-2. A
multiple-well technique, which permits synchronous testing of several aliquots of cells with several monoclonal antibodies, was described by
Guzman et al (1988).
Regardless of results, the immunocytochemical observations must be considered a secondary mode of cancer cell identification that may sometimes enhance, but never replace, morphologic observations.
Immunologic Response
Another approach of current interest in the study of effusions is the relationship of various cell populations engaged in immune responses to cancer cells in effusions.
Scanning electron microscopic studies by
Domagala and Koss (1977) strongly suggested that cell
contacts between lymphocytes and macrophages and between macrophages and cancer cells may occur in effusions (
Fig. 26-7A). The latter relationship has since been confirmed in light microscopy. Cancer cells in contact with variable numbers of macrophages have been repeatedly observed (
Fig. 26-7B).
Phagocytosis of cancer cells, either by macrophages or by other cancer cells may also be observed (
Fig. 26-7C).
Domagala et al (1978,
1981) also studied the
distribution of B and T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood and in effusions of patients with metastatic carcinoma of various primary origins. In most cases, there was a
statistically significant increase of T lymphocytes in fluids with metastatic cancer. Similar observations have been made by
Djeu et al (1976).
Green and Griffin (1996) observed an
increase in the subset of lymphocytes known as natural killer cells (identified by antibodies to CD16/CD56) in 14 of 15 patients with
metastatic carcinomas in pleural effusions. However,
mesotheliomas, lymphomas and leukemias did not show this abnormality. These observations were confirmed by
Laurini et al (2000) who used flow cytometry with the same monoclonal antibodies in their studies. These reports suggest that immune mechanisms are operative in some effusions with metastatic cancer and that their further exploration may be of diagnostic and perhaps prognostic significance.