Control of Energy Balance

Control of Energy Balance

Darlene E. Berryman, PhD, RD, Brenda M. Davy, PhD, RD and Edward O. List, PhD

A typical adult human who consumes 2,500 kcal/day will ingest nearly 1 million kcal of energy in a single year. This energy is used to fuel obligatory and regulatory metabolic processes and to provide fuel for physical activity. For an individual to maintain energy balance, therefore, the 1 million kcal ingested must be balanced by equivalent energy expended. Failure to achieve energy balance results in either an increase or decrease in body energy stores. The observation that many individuals maintain a relatively constant body weight from year to year is evidence that this system works remarkably well. Nevertheless, an error of only 1% will result in a net change of more than 1 kg body weight per year. The widespread occurrence of obesity in developed countries in recent decades illustrates the impact that environmental factors, such as food availability and the demand for physical activity, can have on the regulation of energy balance. In this chapter, basic concepts of energy and nutrient balance are described and the current understanding of the control of energy intake, energy expenditure, and their interaction are reviewed.

Energy Balance

The first law of thermodynamics states that energy can be converted from one form to another, but it can be neither created nor destroyed. Thus the energy supplied and used or stored by the body must be in balance. The following equation summarizes this concept:

Energy intake=Energy expenditure+Change in body stores of energy


Energy balance, by definition, is a state in which energy intake and energy expenditure are equivalent over the period of observation such that there is no change in stores:

Energy balance=Energy intakeEnergy expenditure=0


Energy intake includes all the usable energy consumed in the form of carbohydrate, fat, protein, and alcohol and not lost in feces or urine. Energy expenditure includes the heat released for basal metabolism, physical activity, and thermic effect of food (TEF), as more fully explained in Chapter 21. As illustrated in Figure 22-1, when energy intake is not equal to energy expenditure, the energy stored in the body must be altered to balance the equation. That is, when energy intake exceeds energy expenditure, energy balance is positive and a net gain in body energy stores occurs. Conversely, when energy expenditure exceeds energy intake, energy balance is negative and a net loss in body energy stores occurs.

Estimates of total body energy stores (dry weight) are shown in Table 22-1. When an individual is in energy balance, these stores remain stable. Energy to fuel basal metabolism and everyday activity is provided by energy-yielding nutrients in food. Short-term energy needs (e.g., between meals or during exercise) are met mainly by utilization of liver or muscle glycogen reserves and some fat. However, glycogen reserves and energy-yielding substrates in the circulation represent very small storage depots and normally are exhausted within 24 hours during a fast. During prolonged fasting or during energy restriction for weight loss, significant protein is also degraded and used for energy in addition to substantial catabolism of the fat depots. Most of the triacylglycerol stored in adipose tissue is available to the body during a prolonged fast, but not all energy contained in body protein is available for use as fuel. Body proteins serve important structural and functional purposes and therefore cannot be depleted without affecting survival of the organism.

The magnitude of change in body energy that occurs when there is an imbalance between energy intake and expenditure, of course, depends on the magnitude of the daily imbalance and the length of time for which the energy imbalance continues. Because total daily energy needs in most individuals range between 1,500 and 3,000 kcal and because the body has a large energy reserve, short-term imbalances such as those that occur from meal to meal or from day to day would not be expected to significantly change body energy stores (or body weight). However, sustained imbalances that occur over several days, weeks, or months can lead to substantial changes in body energy reserves and subsequent changes in body weight.

Gain or loss of significant amounts of body mass may in turn affect other components of the energy balance equation. Weight gain or loss is associated with gain or loss of metabolically active tissue mass, which itself results in an increase or decrease in total energy expenditure. Likewise, alterations in body mass usually affect energy intake, because food intake normally is proportional to energy expenditure. Therefore when a prolonged imbalance occurs between energy intake and energy expenditure, the resulting change in body energy stores (and body weight) is not a linear function of the energy excess or deficit; rather, it depends on the composition of the tissue mass lost or gained and the effects of those specific changes on total energy expenditure and energy intake.

Nutrient Balance

In a practical sense, people do not eat “energy”; they eat nutrients in the form of food, and the nutrients are oxidized by the body to provide energy. The predominant energy-yielding nutrients in the human diet are the macronutrients: protein, carbohydrate, and fat. Alcohol, if ingested, is also a source of energy. Because there is little net conversion of either protein or carbohydrate into fat in humans unless large excesses of protein or carbohydrate are ingested, achieving balance between energy intake and energy expenditure generally means achieving a balance for intake and oxidation of each macronutrient (Flatt and Tremblay, 2004). As illustrated in Figure 22-2, nutrient and energy balance in the adult occurs when the intake of protein, carbohydrate, and fat (and alcohol) is equivalent to the body’s oxidation of each. When energy and nutrient balance are achieved, the following result:

In a typical carbohydrate-rich diet, the carbohydrate will serve as the main source of oxidizable energy. Because the body’s capacity to store carbohydrate is limited, there must be a tight control to balance overall carbohydrate oxidation with carbohydrate consumption. Protein intake and protein oxidation are also typically balanced, with protein stores only significantly increasing in response to growth stimuli. Alcohol cannot be stored, so ingested alcohol must be oxidized. Thus acute changes in intake of carbohydrate, protein, or alcohol are rapidly balanced by changes in oxidation of each; the more of these nutrients you consume, the more you will oxidize.


Energetic Equivalent of Body Tissues: Implications for Weight Loss

The energetic equivalent of a given amount of body mass either gained or lost depends on its composition. Lean tissue such as muscle is about 80% water, with the remaining 20% largely consisting of protein with smaller amounts of fat and carbohydrate. In contrast, adipose tissue is only approximately 15% water, and the remainder (85%) is storage lipid with a very small amount of protein contributing to the cell structure and intracellular enzymes. Given these differences in the composition of body tissues, the amount of energy represented by a kilogram of body weight will differ accordingly.

A rough estimate of the energy provided by oxidation of fat or protein stores can be made using caloric equivalents for oxidation of stored fuels. The available energy values of stored fuels are higher than those of ingested fuels because there are no losses due to inefficient digestion and absorption nor costs related to assimilation (see Table 21-1). For example, the available energy obtained when a kilogram of muscle is broken down would be roughly 840 kcal (200 g × 4.2 kcal/g for protein). This is less than the energy that would be released by burning 1 kg of muscle tissue in a flame because some of the total chemical energy in the muscle protein is lost as incompletely oxidized organic compounds in the urine when muscle is catabolized in vivo. Urea is the major energy-containing compound excreted in the urine. Urea formation is a necessary process when amino acids from either protein stores or dietary protein are used as fuels. Urea excretion in the urine results in the loss of about 280 kcal of potential energy per 1 kg of muscle tissue that is catabolized.

Loss of a kilogram of adipose tissue (85% lipid) represents a body energy loss of about 7,905 kcal (850 g × 9.3 kcal/g). In contrast to protein, essentially all of the energy represented by stored fat can contribute to net fuel energy. Therefore a kilogram of body fat can provide nearly 10 times the amount of energy provided by a kilogram of lean tissue (7,905 kcal/kg for fat compared to 840 kcal/kg for lean tissue). The higher energy value of a kilogram of adipose tissue as compared to muscle tissue results from the lower water content of adipose tissue, the higher energy value of fat than of protein, and the absence of a need to excrete nitrogen when fat is the fuel.

These figures provide some perspective on weight loss claims appearing in the popular press. Take the example of a claim touting a 2.5-kg weight loss in a week by simply following a new diet (i.e., no exercise involved). If the weight lost was really all adipose tissue, as hoped by the dieter, the loss would represent 19,760 kcal of body energy. For the average sedentary individual only about 2,500 kcal per day, or 17,500 kcal per week, are needed to maintain body weight. It is therefore impossible to lose 2.5 kg of fat in a week by dieting alone—to lose 2.5 kg of fat, the individual would have to eat nothing for more than a week or increase energy expenditure by about 2,820 kcal/day (or some combination of the two), and this assumes that it would be possible to lose fat without an accompanying loss of muscle! Typically, loss of 1 kg of adipose tissue is accompanied by loss of 1 kg of lean body mass during prolonged starvation. To lose adipose tissue without an accompanying loss of lean body mass, a more modest restriction of calories along with increased exercise is recommended.

In contrast to the other macronutrients, fat can be stored in large amounts and fat intake is not tightly coupled to fat oxidation. As a consequence, fat stores serve as an energy buffer, and positive or negative energy balances are largely conditions of positive or negative fat balance. When excess calories are consumed in the form of a mixed diet, carbohydrate and protein that are not used to replace glycogen or body proteins will be preferentially oxidized. In contrast, any fat not oxidized will be stored in adipose tissue. For a given individual, the major factors that influence fat balance are overall caloric intake (i.e., the amount and composition of food eaten) and the total energy expenditure, especially the amount of physical activity (Peters, 2003).

Relative Stability of Body Weight

Body weight and body composition remain quite stable over long periods (years) in most individuals. This might suggest that body weight, body composition, or perhaps energy balance itself, is regulated much like other homeostatic systems in biology, such as plasma glucose concentration. Indeed, there are multiple overlapping physiological systems that maintain body energy homeostasis in response to variations in the supply of food energy and inconsistent patterns of energy expenditure. Two theories are commonly used to describe this tendency of adults to maintain a relatively stable body weight; these are the set point theory and the settling point theory.

Set Point Theory

The set point theory is based on the recognition that humans tend to maintain stable body weight over long periods, and they defend this weight against conditions that would otherwise promote weight gain or loss. For example, when humans are overfed to force weight gain, upon cessation of overfeeding they spontaneously lose weight and return toward their starting condition. Although these individuals lose weight when no longer overfed, the weight loss often is not sufficient to return them to their exact starting point (Bouchard et al., 1996). Likewise, when individuals are subjected to a weight-reducing regimen for a prolonged period, they lose weight, but they rapidly regain the lost weight when the condition of negative energy balance is relieved (Sims and Horton, 1968).

These observations in humans support the concept of a body weight set-point, such that the energy balance system in an individual is programmed to defend a particular body weight. Studies in experimental animals have also provided strong evidence of a physiological mechanism that defends a particular body weight under conditions of energy deficit or surplus (Keesey and Corbett, 1984). To alter this apparent body weight set-point, a change in the fundamental central nervous system (CNS) mechanisms regulating food intake and energy expenditure is required. For example, early animal studies showed that destruction of the ventromedial hypothalamus in the brain, the so-called satiety center, caused animals to overeat and reach a new higher body weight, which the animal then defended (i.e., a new set-point). Alternatively, destruction of the lateral hypothalamus, the so-called feeding center, resulted in reduced food intake, weight loss, and a new lower body weight or set-point that was defended. Recent studies have refined our understanding of the brain mechanisms affecting energy balance, and a number of specific hypothalamic neural networks and signaling systems that control different elements of energy intake, expenditure, and storage have been identified.

The Settling Point Theory

Yet body weight often does not remain fixed throughout adult life, despite many years during which relative constancy is achieved. In an individual, changes in body weight over time can be in either direction. Therefore it could be more accurate to designate a particular body weight that an individual defends at a particular point in time as a settling point rather than a set-point. Settling points are determined by the different physiological, psychological, and environmental circumstances the individual may experience. For example, declining levels of physical activity encourage positive energy balance, weight gain, and thus a new, higher settling point (Hill et al., 2003). Similarly, an increase in body weight occurs in many women around the time of menopause (Sowers et al., 2007). Regardless of whether the set-point or settling point construct seems more appealing, the existence of a physiological control system that defends body weight cannot be denied based on the available evidence.

Biological Bias Toward Body Weight Gain

Although body weight is defended in response to challenges that either decrease or increase energy stores, this defense appears to be asymmetrical. That is, the body’s defense against a gain in energy stores appears to be weaker than that protecting against a loss of energy stores. This is borne out by years of clinical experience in treating obese individuals; although a high percentage can achieve weight loss, only about 17% of individuals maintain weight losses of 10% or more (Kraschnewski et al., 2010). The bias in the energy balance control system toward promoting weight gain is also apparent in the growing prevalence of obesity among both adults and children. Today, more than one third of the U.S. population is obese, up from 25% just a decade ago, and an additional one third of the population is overweight (Flegal and Troiano, 2000; Flegal et al., 2010). The relatively weak defense against positive energy balance appears to exist whether the energy gain is provoked by increased energy intake, decreased physical activity, or both. In experimental overfeeding studies, it has been shown that the body has a limited capacity to burn off excess energy, and most of the excess is stored (Horton et al., 1995; Klein and Goran, 1993; Levine et al., 1999).

Behavioral Aspects of Control of Energy Intake and Energy Expenditure

Energy intake is controlled by a complex system involving both behavioral and biological components. These components are interrelated in as much as food intake itself is a behavior and the biological components of the system must respond to, and indeed may be forced to adapt to, the consequences of this behavior. Ultimately, eating behavior involves the interaction and integration of genetics, neurobiology, metabolism, learning history, physical activity, and the context (e.g., physical, social, and emotional environment) in which eating takes place.

Human eating behavior is a learned habitual behavior (Savage et al., 2007). Food intake in any given circumstance is influenced by the learning history of the individual as it relates to that circumstance. Learning begins in early childhood, at which time the child develops food preferences through experience with different foods. Properties of the food itself (e.g., orosensory properties), energy content and density, and the social and cultural context in which the food is consumed can all be associated with the metabolic effects of the food to yield a learned, conditioned response.

The taste (e.g., sweet, sour), energy density, and variety of foods offered to children have been found to shape children’s food preferences. Infants and young children display an innate preference for the sweet taste, and young children demonstrate preferences for foods that are energy dense (Savage et al., 2007). Offering children a wide variety of foods to choose from increases the spectrum of foods they come to prefer. All of these factors appear to contribute to ensuring that the child consumes adequate energy and sufficient essential nutrients to support proper growth and development. As the child grows older, learned food acceptance patterns and eating habits are continually reinforced and extended, so that by adulthood there is a rich experiential background that affects eating behavior at any given meal.

At any given eating occasion, the amount and composition of food an individual consumes are affected by the immediate context of consumption superimposed on the underlying biology (i.e., mechanisms controlling food intake and energy balance) and the learning history. As described earlier in the chapter, the two primary determinants of energy balance are energy intake and energy expenditure. Yet many factors influence energy intake and energy expenditure, both at individual and environmental levels. A list of some factors believed to influence energy balance behaviors is provided in Table 22-2. For example, the cost of food acquisition, the variety of foods present, food form (i.e., solid or liquid), energy density, portion size, and the number of other people present are just a few of the factors that affect short-term food and energy intake (Wansink, 2004; Rolls, 2009; Flood-Obbagy and Rolls, 2009; Herman and Polivy, 2008). With respect to energy expenditure, the design of neighborhoods and communities (i.e., the “built environment”) may influence an individual’s physical activity level (Saelens and Handy, 2008). Socioeconomic status and cognitive factors also play important roles in energy balance behaviors, such as an individual’s perceived control over diet and physical activity behaviors and social norms (Kremers et al., 2005; Stringhini et al., 2010).

Much current research is focused on understanding the relative contribution of the modern environment to the growing prevalence of obesity in both children and adults (Cohen, 2008). Among the factors under investigation are the impacts of portion size and food advertising on food selection and intake. Short-term food and energy intake is increased when there are many palatable foods from which to choose and when the food is served in large portions (Wansink, 2004). Likewise, aggressive advertising of high-calorie foods and increased participation in sedentary behaviors have been highlighted as environmental pressures that promote excessive eating, reduced energy expenditure, and, consequently, increased risk for excessive weight gain (Peters et al., 2002). Research is also directed at investigating interrelationships between biology and energy balance behaviors. For example, the association of food intake and food reward (Neary and Batterham, 2010), decision making about food intake in an environment where many constraints on availability and many costs associated with obtaining food have been removed (Rowland et al., 2008), and sex differences in regulation of food intake induced by physical activity (Hagobian and Braun, 2010) are topics of recent investigations.

Biological Control of Energy Intake and Energy Expenditure

Underlying the complex behavioral elements are the biological mechanisms that coordinate energy intake to meet energy needs.

Regulation of Energy Homeostasis

The CNS (brain and spinal cord) orchestrates the control of energy balance via a complex homeostatic pathway that has three main parts. As illustrated in Figure 22-3, the central part of this system involves specific regions within the CNS that detect and integrate signals reflecting changes in energy availability and mediate appropriate modifications of energy intake and expenditure. Inputs or afferent signals that provide information about the periphery, including status of energy intake, energy expenditure, and available energy stores, feed into the CNS. Afferent signals can be neural or humoral. The final part involves the outputs or efferent signals from the brain that direct a coordinated response to alter energy intake and energy expenditure or change partitioning of nutrients to achieve energy homeostasis. These afferent and efferent signal pathways constitute the essential elements of a feedback scheme, conceptually similar to the functional elements of a common household heating system in which a temperature sensor is linked to a system that adjusts heat output to maintain a specific temperature.

Central Role of the Hypothalamus and Brainstem

Although the regulation of energy balance is complex and involves many brain centers and neuronal circuits, the hypothalamus and brainstem (Figure 22-4) play critical roles in relaying afferent signals from the peripheral tissues as well as processing efferent signals that modulate food intake and energy expenditure.

Feb 26, 2017 | Posted by in PHARMACY | Comments Off on Control of Energy Balance

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access
%d bloggers like this: