Bedside teaching

Chapter 11


Bedside teaching




Introduction


Clinical teaching at the bedside epitomizes the classical view of medical training. Students are motivated by the stimulus of clinical contacts, but the traditional, consultant-teaching ward round has not been without its shortcomings. Students may feel academically unprepared or inexperienced in the learning style required in an unfamiliar environment (Seabrook 2004). Inappropriate comments, late starts and cancellations may discourage and alienate students so that the value of the experience is dissipated. Finally, today’s teaching hospitals may paradoxically have fewer patients appropriate for bedside teaching despite there being larger student groups attending than before.



Despite these problems, ward-based teaching provides an optimal opportunity for the demonstration and observation of physical examination, communication skills and interpersonal skills and for role modelling a holistic approach to patient care. Not surprisingly, bedside teaching and medical clerking have been rated the most valuable methods of teaching. Despite this, bedside teaching has been declining in medical schools since the early 1960s as clinical acumen becomes perceived as being of secondary importance to clinical imaging and hi-tech investigations (Ahmed 2002).




Preparation



Patients


Patients should be invited to participate without coercion and have the opportunity to decline to take part without feeling intimidated. Some institutions may require formal documentation of informed consent before patients can participate. They should be adequately briefed so that they know what will be expected of them, feel a part of the discussion and feel empowered to participate in the teaching session. They may be required to give some simple feedback to students afterwards. Usually patients enjoy the experience and feel they have contributed to student learning.


Depending on the model of ward teaching used, a variety of patients will be required for varying lengths of time, but consideration should be given to patients’ needs and the possibility that other healthcare staff and visitors may need to see them.



Students


It is initially valuable for junior students to have had access to simulated patients who provide valuable learning opportunities for the examination of normal anatomy and physiology. This prepares them well for seeing patients in clinical situations. Between two and five students is probably the optimal number for bedside teaching. Students should comply with the medical school’s directives on appropriate appearance and behaviour and, if unaccompanied by a clinical tutor, should introduce themselves to staff and patients, clearly stating the purpose of their visit.


Some may feel intimidated by an unfamiliar environment and the proximity of nursing staff and be embarrassed when putting personal questions to a stranger. They may feel anxious if unsure of their knowledge base or clinical abilities and fearful of consultant criticism of any inadequacies. As a result, some students position themselves towards the back of the group round the bedside to avoid participation, while more confident colleagues monopolize conversations with patients and tutors. An observant tutor will be aware of this behaviour and be able to redress the balance and ensure that all students have the opportunity to participate and that anxieties are allayed.



Tutors


Tutors for ward-based teaching may be consultant staff, junior hospital doctors (Busan et al 2003), nurses or student peers. Kilminster et al (2001) describe teaching by specialized, ward-based tutors as helpful in developing student history-taking and examination skills.


Whether they appreciate its significance or not, tutors are powerful role models for students, especially for those in the early years of the course, so it is most important that they demonstrate appropriate knowledge, skills and attitudes (Cruess et al 2008). Prideaux and colleagues (2000) describe good clinical teaching as providing role models for good practice, making good practice visible and explaining it to trainees.




Appropriate knowledge


Experienced clinical teachers are soon able to assess the patient’s diagnosis and requirements as well as the students’ level of understanding. This ability to link clinical reasoning with instructional reasoning enables them to quickly adapt the clinical teaching session to the needs of the students (Irby 1992).



Six domains of knowledge have been described which an effectively functioning clinical tutor will apply (Irby 1994):



• Knowledge of medicine: integrating the patient’s clinical problem with background knowledge of basic sciences, clinical sciences and clinical experience


• Knowledge of patients: a familiarity with disease and illness from experience of previous patients


• Knowledge of the context: an awareness of patients in their social context and at their stage of treatment


• Knowledge of learners: an understanding of the students’ present stage in the course and of the curriculum requirements for that stage


• Knowledge of the general principles of teaching, including:



• Knowledge of case-based teaching scripts: the ability to present the patient as representative of a certain clinical problem; the specifics of the case are used but added to from other knowledge and experiences in order to make further generalized comments about the condition.





Hospital ward


The educational environment of the ward may be affected by many factors which impact on student behaviour and satisfaction (Seabrook 2004). Often district general hospitals appear more valued than teaching hospitals (Parry et al 2002). However, with some thought, some simple problems can be avoided.


Ward teaching should not take place when meals, cleaners or visitors are expected. It helps if the staff and patients are expecting the teaching session at a certain time so that X-rays and case notes can be ready and patients do not have to be retrieved from the day room or X-ray department.


The use of a side room for pre- or post-ward round discussion provides a useful alternative venue for discussion once the patients have been seen. Occasionally, a member of the nursing staff may be present in the teaching session to add multiprofessional input to the patient care discussion. Stanley (1998) suggests that systematic planning and preparation, especially with increased use of pre- and post-round meetings, would provide more effective and structured training for postgraduate hospital doctors.


A teaching ward round deals with patients, not diseases. It develops students’ thinking processes and introduces an approach to patients that they will follow for the rest of their working lives as doctors.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 9, 2016 | Posted by in GENERAL & FAMILY MEDICINE | Comments Off on Bedside teaching

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access