Fig. 8.1
Satisfactory specimen, negative for intraepithelial lesion (NILM) (LBP, SurePath). Benign intermediate type squamous cells, squamous metaplasia, and rectal columnar cells are present
Fig. 8.2
Negative for intraepithelial lesion (LBP, ThinPrep). Several round squamous metaplastic cells with dense cytoplasm are present
Fig. 8.3
Negative for intraepithelial lesion (LBP, ThinPrep). Benign squamous cells and anucleated squames. Nuclear karyorrhexis is present
Fig. 8.4
Unsatisfactory specimen (conventional preparation). Particularly on conventional anal smears, bacteria and fecal material can predominate and obscure cellular detail
Fig. 8.5
Unsatisfactory specimen (LBP, ThinPrep). Anucleated squames only. On ThinPrep anal cytology, an average of 1–2 nucleated squamous cells per high-power field are needed for adequacy
8.6 Interpretation
Terminology, morphologic criteria, and guidelines for the evaluation of anal cytologic specimens parallel those for cervical cytology. Bethesda terminology is used to report anal cytology and includes a cytologic interpretation and a statement of specimen adequacy. The Bethesda System is modified to reflect the particulars of this body site. For example, on the cytology report, rectal columnar cells are substituted for endocervical cells as a measure of transformation zone sampling.
8.6.1 Negative for Intraepithelial Lesion or Malignancy (Figs. 8.1 – 8.3, and 8.6)
A spectrum of benign findings can be seen on anal cytology; some are similar to cervical cytology, others are different. While reactive changes, such as tight perinuclear halos and small nucleoli, are frequently seen, typical reparative changes are not (Fig. 8.6). Keratotic changes are common on anal cytology since the keratinized and nonkeratinized portions of the anal canal are juxtaposed. Cytologic samples from the keratinized portion of the anal canal and hyperkeratosis due to a variety of causes both manifest as anucleated squames and are not distinguishable on anal cytology. Parakeratosis can be seen in both reactive changes and HPV-associated lesions. Atypical parakeratosis is abnormal and may be associated with cytologic interpretations ranging from ASC-US to SIL to cancer, depending on the degree of accompanying abnormalities.
Fig. 8.6
Squamous cells with reactive nuclear changes including nuclear enlargement, hypochromasia, and nucleoli. Other cells have narrow perinuclear halos
8.6.2 Organisms (Figs. 8.7 – 8.10)
A variety of organisms can be encountered on anal cytology including viruses, protozoa, fungi, and helminthes. Some are identical to those encountered on Pap tests, such as Candida (Fig. 8.7) and herpes virus (Fig. 8.8). Others are unique to the gastrointestinal tract and are rare on gynecologic cytology. A large number of species of ameba can parasitize the human intestinal tract. Both amebic cysts and trophozoites are seen (Fig. 8.9a). All but Entamoeba histolytica are thought to be nonpathogenic commensals. The range of pathogens may be larger in immunocompromised patients who are at risk for opportunistic infections. Numerous macrophages can sometimes be seen on anal cytology, particularly in patients after ablative treatment (Fig. 8.9b). These need to be distinguished from amebic organisms. Various other intestinal parasites can be seen, including pinworms and their eggs (Fig. 8.10). The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) provides helpful information on the comparative morphology of intestinal parasites [36].
Fig. 8.7
Candida (LBP, ThinPrep). Fungal pseudohyphae are threading through the cluster of squamous cells
Fig. 8.8
HSV (LBP, SurePath). Molded nuclei with “ground-glass” appearance are present
Fig. 8.9
(a) Numerous amebic cysts are present (LBP, ThinPrep). Internal structure and refractile cyst wall help differentiate ameba from HSIL. (b) Macrophages (LBP, ThinPrep) may be seen on anal cytology, particularly after ablative treatment and need to be distinguished from ameba. Note the cytoplasmic cellular debris
Fig. 8.10
Pinworm eggs (LBP, ThinPrep)
8.6.3 Squamous Cell Abnormalities (Figs. 8.11 – 8.19)
8.6.3.1 Atypical Squamous Cells (ASC) (Figs. 8.11 and 8.12)
Fig. 8.11
ASC-US (LBP, ThinPrep). Atypical squamous cells with enlarged but smooth nuclear contours with smudgy chromatin and narrow perinuclear clearing. One cell is binucleated
Fig. 8.12
ASC-H (LBP, ThinPrep). Small immature squamous metaplastic cells with dark but smudgy nuclear chromatin
The cytomorphologic criteria used for the evaluation of HPV-associated anal lesions are analogous to those seen on cervical cytology for ASC-US (Fig. 8.11), ASC-H (Fig. 8.12), LSIL (Figs. 8.13 and 8.14), and HSIL (Figs. 8.15, 8.16, 8.17, 8.18, and 8.19). Degenerative changes with nuclear karyorrhexis (Fig. 8.14) are more frequent than in cervical specimens. Squamous lesions with prominent orangeophilic cytoplasmic keratinization are common on anal cytology (Fig. 8.17).
8.6.3.2 LSIL (Figs. 8.13 and 8.14)
LSIL is the cytologic manifestation of active HPV replication in superficial and intermediate type squamous cells. Similar to gynecologic cytology, both nuclear and cytoplasmic changes are observed. Nuclear changes include nuclear enlargement, hyperchromasia, and nuclear chromatin or membrane irregularities. Bi- and multinucleation are common. Cytoplasmic changes include broad perinuclear halos (koilocytosis) and keratinization.
Fig. 8.13
LSIL (LBP, ThinPrep). Criteria for interpretation of SIL are similar to cervical specimens
Fig. 8.14
LSIL with karyorrhectic nuclei (LBP, SurePath)
8.6.3.3 HSIL (Figs. 8.15 – 8.19)
HSIL is a potential cancer precursor. The abnormal cells have a high nucleus-to-cytoplasmic ratio. Nuclear changes are similar to those seen in LSIL – enlargement, hyperchromasia, and nuclear chromatin and/or membrane irregularities – however, cytoplasm is scant, and it may be metaplastic or keratinized. The presence of a mixture of both LSIL and HSIL on the same sample is frequently seen on anal cytology, especially in the high-risk populations (Fig. 8.18). The presence of distinct nucleoli raises the possibility of invasive carcinoma (Fig. 8.19).
Fig. 8.15
HSIL (LBP, ThinPrep). Hyperchromatic group with altered chromatin pattern and irregular nuclear contours
Fig. 8.16
HSIL (LBP, SurePath). Dysplastic cells with metaplastic cytoplasm and irregular nuclear contours
Fig. 8.17
HSIL (LBP, ThinPrep). High-grade keratinizing dysplasia
Fig. 8.18
Both HSIL and LSIL are present in this figure (LBP, ThinPrep). Note the cytoplasmic keratinization, a feature that is often more prominent in squamous lesions of the anal canal than in cervical lesions
Fig. 8.19
HSIL (LBP, ThinPrep). Loose cluster of cells with dysplastic nuclei. Several nuclei have distinct nucleoli raising the possibility of an invasive process
8.6.3.4 Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) (Figs. 8.20 – 8.22)
The cytologic diagnosis of anal squamous cell carcinoma can be challenging. Both keratinizing (Fig. 8.20) and nonkeratinizing SCC (Fig. 8.21) can be seen. Tumor diatheses may not be prominent and can be difficult to distinguish from fecal material. On liquid-based preparations, the diathesis is most apparent “clinging” to the malignant cells (Fig. 8.22).
Fig. 8.20
SCC, keratinizing (LBP, ThinPrep). Marked pleomorphism of cell size and shape. Two tumor cells show cytoplasmic keratinization
Fig. 8.21
Squamous cell carcinoma, nonkeratinizing. Pleomorphic cell cluster (LBP, ThinPrep). Some tumor cells have prominent nucleoli. A tumor diathesis is not prominent in this field
Fig. 8.22
SCC with “clinging” diathesis (LBP, ThinPrep)