U

U


U’d pad see Table P1, Figure P1


UKPDS see United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study


ulcer non-healing, chronic wound showing concomitant tissue repair and tissue breakdown, chronic inflammation and deposition of fibrous tissue in surrounding/underlying soft tissues, and threat of secondary infection; caused by loss of/breakdown/infection of epidermal/dermal tissues, with subcuticular tissue and deeper structure involvement; characterized by pain (unless in neuropathic tissues), chronic inflammation, fibrosis of underlying and local peripheral tissue, fluid exudation and proneness to infection predisposing factors include arterial, venous, lymphatic, neurological and immune compromise (see Table W1); presence of foreign body (including necrotic material) within the wound, repeated microtrauma, and concurrent systemic disease and drug regimes contribute to non-healing; normal healing events (i.e. healing by secondary intention [inflammation, epithelialization, wound contraction, connective tissue maturation]) are prolonged, disrupted and often non-sequential (Table U1); healing is promoted by addressing the cause of tissue breakdown and concomitant factors that interrupt normal healing, together with measures to promote systemic wellness (Table U2; see Table H14), including rest (e.g. use of a full contact cast to allow non-weight-bearing ambulation), regular wound care (and dressings appropriate to phase of healing to optimize wound environment; see Table D10 and Box D3), antibiotics (to control infection Table A12), pressure bandaging and/or diuretics (to control or reduce foot/limb oedema), vascular surgery (to improve arterial supply/venous return) and tight glycaemic control (see Tables H13, H14 and N5 and Box N2)













Table U1 Phases in the progression of an ulcer to healing



















Ulcer phase Characteristics Comment
Active phase Wound dimensions increase (undermined wound edges)
Exudation
Formation of slough
Periwound oedema and induration of edges
Dissolution and degradation of devitalized tissue ± infection
Macrophage and enzyme activity
Accumulation of degraded tissue and dead macrophages
Chronic, non-resolving inflammation ± collagen deposition
Proliferative phase Wound begins to infill (wound dimensions reduce)
Epithelialization (saucerization) of margins
Formation of granulation tissue
Recruitment of fibroblasts; collagen formation
Epidermal cells at margins mitose and spread out to begin to close wound
Maturation phase Wound contraction
Wound closure
Scar formation
Myofibrils within fibroblasts contract
Epithelialization is complete
Devascularization of fibrotic tissue that forms scar

Table U2 Examples of ulcer classification systems































Classification system Details Comments
Wagner Grade 0: local deformity or callosity but no open lesions
Grade 1: partial or full skin thickness, superficial ulcer
Grade 2: deep ulcer without osteomyelitis, but extending to ligament, tendon, bone, joint capsule or deep fascia
Grade 3: deep ulcer with associated cellulitis, abscess formation and/or osteomyelitis and/or joint sepsis
Grade 4: gangrene localized to the forefoot or heel
Grade 5: extensive gangrene
Widely recognized and used system
Rather generalist and non-specific
Ignores neuropathy and lesion size, and thus their effects of choice of treatment/lesion management
S SAD S = size of lesion (area; depth)
S = sepsis (presence/absence)
A = arteriopathy (ischaemia)
D = denervation (sensory/autonomic/motor neuropathy)
Builds on from the Wagner system (above), introducing additional categories, each awarded 0 (normal), 1 (mild change), 2 (moderate change), 3 (severe change) subclassification
RYB R = red wound (pale pink–beefy red ulcer base, proliferating/inflammatory ulcer)
Y = yellow wound (moist, exudating ivory/ green/brownish sloughy wound)
B = black wound (dry wound with black/ brown/tan hard eschar)
Wound assigned colour grading
A limited classification that focuses solely on wound appearance and ignores other factors (e.g. distal sensory neuropathy, peripheral ischaemia, cellulitis, size/depth of lesion, phase of progression of lesion)
PEDIS P = perfusion of limb/foot
E = extent of wound (size of lesion)
D = depth of lesion/tissue loss
I = infection
S = sensation (perception of light touch, vibration, contact of 10 g monofilament, hot/cold discrimination)
Each subcategory is graded 1–4, where 1 = normal/absence and 4 = severe
Useful research tool allowing indepth assessment of lesion progression over time, and comparison of lesions subjected to varying treatment modalities
DEPA D = depth of lesion
E = extent of bacterial colonization
P = phase of ulcer (Table U1)
A = associated aetiology (e.g. trauma, neuropathy, ischaemia, infection, diabetes mellitus)
DEPA <6 = low-grade wound (i.e. local debridement, oral antibiosis as necessary, glycaemic control measures)
DEPA 7–9 = moderate-grade wound (i.e. debridement, parenteral antibiosis, insulin therapy, wound-healing promotion agents, pressure relief)
DEPA 10–12 = high-grade wounds (i.e. parenteral antibiosis, insulin therapy, wound-healing promotion agents, vascular reconstruction)
Each subcategorization is graded 1–3 to reflect increasing levels of severity
Validated system
Score 6 = wound likely to heal in time
Score 10: great difficulty in healing
Score 11–12 (especially heel wounds): prognostic of lower-limb amputation
University of Texas system Tier 1
Wound graded 0–3 according to wound depth/tissue involvement:
0 = pre-/postulcer with intact epithelium
1 = superficial ulcer not involving bone/tendon
2 = ulcer penetrates to tendon/joint capsule
3 = ulcer penetrates to bone/joint
Tier 2
Wound graded A–D according to wound burden/tissue status
A = non-infected/non-ischaemic
B = infected/non-ischaemic
C = non-infected/ischaemic
D = infected/ischaemic
Multisite validated system
Two-tier wound classification (tier 1 = ulcer; tier 2 = wound burden/tissue status, e.g. 1C = no current ulcer; ischaemic foot) gives risk assessment
Useful wound management ‘road map’
Should be used in conjunction with other markers of limb status (e.g. degree of sensory neuropathy, autonomic function; ankle–brachial pressure index, Buerger’s test, presence of critical ischaemia, skin condition, local foot/toes deformity, subtalar joint range of motion)

ulcer assessment see Tables H12 and H14


ulcer classification Table U2


ulcer management see Table H15


ulcer phase Table U1


ultrasonic high-frequency, inaudible sound energy waves (>30 000 Hz) above range of normal hearing


ultrasonic bath small tank filled with distilled water (and non-ionic detergent), connected to an ultrasound-emitting unit; used to clean hand instruments before steam sterilization (instruments immersed in the water bath are cleansed by water agitation induced by ultrasound vibration, following manufacturer’s advice on method of operation; ultrasound baths are a potential source of cross-contamination


ultrasonography; echography location/measurement/image creation/delineation of deep structures by ultrasound wave deflection/transmission


ultrasound, diagnostic; DUS transmission of ultrasound waves (3–10 MHz) to create images of deep tissues/structures; skin is lubricated with water gel, or body part is immersed in water prior to ultrasound examination (ultrasound waves travel best through a fluid medium, and are very poorly transmitted through air); anechogenic tissues show as black areas; other tissues are varyingly echogenic, e.g. bone, tendon and muscle, showing as varying shades of grey; DUS is useful in the diagnosis of Morton’s neuroma and other soft-tissue pathologies


ultrasound therapy; UST application of ultrafrequency sound waves (1–3 MHz) to tissues in order to promote healing and reduce pain and swelling


Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 12, 2017 | Posted by in ANATOMY | Comments Off on U

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access