Author (year)
Nation
Number
Technique
Diagnostic yield
Levy (2006) [6]
United States
14
EUS-trucut
Diagnostic 57 % (8/14)
Suggestive 29 % (4/14)
Inconclusive 14 % (2/14)
Hirano (2009) [5]
Japan
15
Percutaneous
Diagnostic 47 % (7/15)
Suggestive 20 % (3/15)
Inconclusive 33 % (5/15)
Mizuno (2009) [7]
Japan
8
EUS-trucut
Diagnostic 50 % (4/8)
Suggestive 50 % (4/8)
Inconclusive 0 % (0/8)
Detlefsen (2009) [4]
Germany
26
Percutaneous
Diagnostic 81 % (21/26)
Denmark
Intraoperative
Suggestive 19 % (5/26)
EUS-trucut
Inconclusive 0 % (0/26)
Iwashita (2012) [9]
Japan
44
EUS-FNA (19G)a
Diagnostic 43 % (19/44)
Suggestive 43 % (19/44)
Inconclusive 7 % (3/44)
Analysis impossible 7 % (3/44)
Song (2012) [10]
Korea
54
Percutaneous
Diagnostic 72 % (39/54)
EUS-trucut
Suggestive 0 % (0/54)
Inconclusive 28 % (15/54
Fujii (2013) [11]
United States
7
EUS-trucut
Diagnostic 72 % (5/7)
Suggestive 14 % (1/7)
Inconclusive 14 % (1/7)
In order to overcome the limitation of the 19-gauge needle, a EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) device (Echotip Procore; Wilson Cook Medical Inc., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA) was developed. In a randomized trial, diagnostic sufficiency, technical performance, and safety profiles of the 22-gauge biopsy needle were comparable to those of the conventional 22-gauge aspiration needle for sampling of pancreatic mass [12]. In another prospective comparison study, the correct diagnosis rate of EUS-FNB was higher than that of EUS-FNA in the pancreatic mass group (86.8 % vs. 75 %, P = 0.046) [13]. Larghi et al. reported the prospective result of EUS-FNB in 61 patients with pancreatic masses [14]. EUS-FNB was technically feasible in 98 % of patients with a solid pancreatic mass. A suitable sample for histological evaluation was obtained in 88.5 % of the cases after only one single needle pass. However, no article was published on the yield of EUS-FNB using the new needle for AIP diagnosis. Further studies are required to assess the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNB and comparison study between EUS-TCB and EUS-FNB for the better histologic diagnosis of AIP is necessary.