Patient related factors
Presence of multiple injuries
Unconsciousness
Intubation
Intoxication/drugs
Language barrier
Examiner related factors
Inexperience
Presence of life-threatening injuries
Time-pressure
Incomplete examination
Technical errors
The introduction of Advanced Trauma Life Support provide standardized clinical assessment of severely injured patients [1–3]. Mortality rates have been shown to decrease after the implementation of ATLS protocols [4, 5]. However, some reports indicate that relevant injuries are still undetected even after the primary and secondary surveys [6–9]. Enderson et al. [10] described the importance of the tertiary survey in order to minimize the incidence of hidden injuries.
This chapter summarizes the clinical appearance of missed injuries in trauma patients and their typical anatomical locations and clinical consequences. Moreover, strategies are reviewed to minimize the clinical appearance of undetected injuries.
Limitations of the Current Practice
Multiple factors are associated with missed injuries and treatment errors. The majority of errors occur in the Emergency Department [11–13], the Intensive Care Unit [11, 13] and the Operating Room [13]. Typical treatment errors were incorrect haemorrhage control (28 %), airway management (16 %), management of unstable patients (14 %) and prophylaxis (11 %) [11]. In particular, severely injured patients with associated head injury [8, 14, 15], a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or lower [7, 16], and a high Injury Severity Score [6–9, 14, 16–18] are more likely to have missed injuries or delayed diagnoses. Studies demonstrate that musculoskeletal injuries commonly escape detection. A widespread distribution (1.3–39 %) of incidence rates for musculoskeletal missed injuries and delayed diagnoses appears to occur [19]. The incidence of unrecognized injuries in all studies mentioned above is approximately 9 % in mean [19]. This difference may be a result of inconsistent definitions of what constitutes a missed injury (Table 6.2). Another possibility is that many authors limited their investigations to a particular subset of missed injuries (Table 6.3). Several studies focused on missed injuries in multiple trauma patients [6, 16, 20, 21], others describe unrecognized injuries in patients with abdominal [22] and orthopaedic trauma [23–26]. Study design also affects the incidence rates. Enderson et al. [10] reported that prospective studies show a higher incidence of missed injuries as compared with retrospective reviews.
Table 6.2
List of definitions used in the literature
Definition of the missed injury type |
---|
Minor injuries: Hand, wrist, foot, ankle, forearm, uncomplex soft tissue injuries and fractures, rupture of ligaments, muscles and tendons were defined as minor injuries |
Major injuries: Skull injuries, neurological and arterial lesions, liver, spleen, and intestinal lacerations, femoral, humeral, pelvic, and spine fractures and dislocations were defined as major injuries |
Life threatening injuries: Injuries of main vessels in thorax, Hemothorax and Pneumothorax were defined as life threatening injuries |
Table 6.3
Definition of missed injuries
Missed injuries |
Injuries that were not identified by primary and secondary survey. All diagnoses made in tertiary survey (24 h). [6 studies] |
Injuries detected after the admission to the ICU (24 h). [4 studies] |
Injuries found after complete assessment and diagnostics, and are directly related to the injury. [4 studies] |
Injuries that were missed within 6–12 h. [2 studies (12 h time point) 1 study (6 h time point)] |
Clinically significant missed injuries |
Missed injuries that are associated with high morbidity and mortality. [2 studies] |
Missed injuries that require additional procedures and alterations of therapy. [1 study] |
Missed injuries with significant pain, complications, residul disability and death. [1 study] |
Anatomic sites that are among the typically missed include the extremities, most commonly wrist and hand fractures, fractures of the foot, elbow fractures, posterior shoulder dislocations and epiphyseal plate injuries (Table 6.4) [19, 21, 29–31]. These injuries do not have a great influence on respiratory or hemodynamic stability of the patients, however, long-term investigations demonstrate the importance of these injuries on long-term outcome and rehabilitation [32, 33]. In the initial stage the identification of life threatening injuries within the thorax, abdomen and pelvis are of immense importance. These injuries are less frequently missed (up to 8 % of all missed injuries), however, these may be responsible for hymodynamic or respiratory instability. Rib fractures are important indicators for the presence of life-threatening thoracic or abdominal injuries [8, 34]. In unconscious and intubated patients extended diagnostics (e.g. CT scans) in addition to plain radiographs are recommended to exclude those injuries.
Table 6.4
Incidence of missed musculoskeletal injuries in trauma patients
Published Articles | Pat.# In study | Foot/ankle (%) | Leg (%) | Hip/pelvis (%) | Wrist/hand (%) | Arm (%) | Spine (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Buduhan et al. [16] | 567 | Extremities: 33.3 | 7.9 | Extremities: 33.3 | 7.9 | ||
Guly [27] | 934 | 25.8 | 4.3 | 4.9 | 17.2/21.7 | 15.1 | 3.4 |
Houshian et al. [14] | 876 | 12.8 | 8.1 | 8.1 | 8.1 | 11.6 | 5.8 |
Vles et al. [8] | 3,879 | 12.2 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 4.1 | 12.2 | 8 |
Soundappan et al. [28] | 76 | Lower limb: 31 | – | Upper limb: 23 | 15 | ||
Kalemoglu et al. [7] | 709 | Extremities: 38.2 | 9.3 | Extremities: 38.2 | 9.3 |
A comparatively small number of studies have distinguished between clinically significant missed injuries and missed injuries in general (Table 6.5) [9, 14, 16, 17]. Patients with clinically significant missed injuries have been reported to make up 15–22.3 % of the total number of patients with missed injuries. In these studies different definitions were used to determine clinical significance. Some studies focused on those missed injuries that were associated with high morbidity and mortality as a result of a delayed diagnosis [14, 16]. Others defined missed injuries as those that required additional surgical procedures [6].
Table 6.5
Presence of clinically significant missed injuries in trauma patients
Reference | Pat. # | Clinically sign. missed injuries (%) |
---|---|---|
Buduhan et al. [16] | 567 | 15.2 |
Houshian et al. [14] | 786 | 15.4 |
Rozoli et al. [17] | 432 | 20.3 |
Janjua et al. [9] | 206
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channelFull access? Get Clinical TreeGet Clinical Tree app for offline access |