Informal mentoring
Formal mentoring
Simpler to execute due to lower expectations
Greater workforce, monitoring, communication & administration
May be less successful despite high satisfaction levels
Training is not necessary
Support and expert training is mandatory
Social exclusion – more confident and dominating individuals attain the successful mentors
Understanding roles and responsibilities of each individual simpler, with assistance from organization
Trusting and respectful relationship
Once the mentor-mentee relationship has been created, support is then given
Empathy and friendship are of greater importance
Aims and objectives are not pre-determined
Clear rationale which allows both the mentor and mentee to have specific aims for the relationship
Both the mentors and mentees are personally chosen resulting in more effective cooperation in the pairing
Mentor-mentee relationship pre-planned
May be difficult due to low availability of mentors
For task-based learning in the short term, this type may prove to have greater benefits
Clearly outlined mentoring programme
Modality | Advantages | Disadvantages | Best suited uses |
---|---|---|---|
Virtual reality simulation | Reusable, data capture, objective performance evaluation, minimal setup time | Cost, maintenance, down-time, lack of real instruments, poor 3-D view, poor face validity | Basic skills and familiarisation, cognitive training |
Bench-top/ Synthetic models | Portable, reusable, minimal risks, use of real instruments | Low-fidelity: acceptance by trainees, poor face validity High-fidelity: cost | Dependent upon fidelity: low-fidelity best for part-task training, high-fidelity best for procedural simulation |
Animal tissue | Cost-effective, minimal set-up time | Special facilities for storage, single use, anatomical differences | Basic surgical skills and Part-task training |
Live animals | High fidelity, higher face validity, full procedures | Cost, special facilities and personnel needed, ethical concerns, single use, anatomical differences | Advanced procedural knowledge, procedures in which blood flow is important, dissection skills |
Human cadavers | High fidelity, highest face validity, full procedures | Cost, availability, single use, compliance of tissue, infection risk | Advanced procedural knowledge, dissection, continuing medical education |
Full immersion simulation | Cost-effective, reusable, minimal setup time, portability | Limited realism | Team training, crisis management |
High-fidelity simulation | Reusable, high fidelity, data capture, interactivity | Cost, maintenance, and down-time; limited “technical” applications | Team training, crisis management |
Table 28.3
Contemporary assessment tools for technical and non-technical skills
Technical skills |
Observational tools |
OSCE – based (Objective structured clinical examination) |
Objective Structural Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS), |
Global assessment of operative skills, |
Generic and procedure specific checklists, |
End-product analysis. |
Error – analysis based |
Human Reliability Assessment – HRA |
Non-observational tools |
Virtual reality simulators |
Motion analysis systems |
Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device (ICSAD) |
McGill Inanimate System for Training and Evaluation of Laparoscopic Skills (MISTELS) |
Non-technical skills |
Non-technical skills for surgeons (NOTSS) |
Situation Awareness |
Decision Making |
Task Management |
Communication & Teamwork |
Leadership |
Observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS) |
Communication |
Co-operation |
Co-ordination |
Shared-leadership and monitoring |
Non-technical skills (NOTECHS) |
Cooperation |
Leadership and Managerial Skills |
Situation Awareness and Vigilance |
Decision Making |
Communication |
Physical simulators use models to simulate operative experiences. They usually require a trained observer/mentor to assess the trainee’s performance. Various types of physical simulator exist, including synthetic “bench” model simulators, usually made of latex or plastic to represent the operative anatomy. Biological models such as animals, both ex-vivo and in-vivo, and human cadavers are often used for complex training. Virtual reality simulators use computers to generate a representation of the procedure and are becoming increasingly popular as technology improves. As they can provide in-built feedback on performance, trainees can use them in their own time without the need for an expert mentor to provide feedback [33].
Non-Technical Skills Training
Non-technical skills training is becoming increasingly emphasised in training curricula [8, 32], as appropriate use of these skills has been recognised as a key factor in the prevention of surgical errors [30]. Non-technical skills include social skills (communication, teamwork and leadership) as well as cognitive skills (decision-making and situational awareness). Other skills include personal resource factors such as ability to cope with stress and fatigue. Training for these skills is particularly hard in the real operative environment for several reasons. For example, teaching skills that are more abstract in nature than technical skills is even harder for mentors and proctors to teach while focusing on the procedure itself. Non-technical skills training can also utilise simulation to increase competence outside the operating theatre while preserving patient safety. This can be achieved by human performance simulation.
Human performance simulation may take place in real operating theatres with the whole surgical team. This can provide to be very useful for team training but is associated with significant costs and is dependent on availability of such facilities [2]. A cheaper and more feasible alternative is full immersion simulation (see Fig. 28.3), which is a blow-up simulated environment with theatre staff and equipment to replicate the operating theatre as a whole [11]. Simulated procedures can be carried out under specific scenarios to help trainees develop their non-technical skills in an observed and safe environment, where detailed feedback can be given afterwards. Full immersion simulation has been shown to be a feasible, valid and cost-effective means of training for non-technical skills [21, 22, 23].
Fig. 28.1
An overview of lifelong learning and regular assessment
Fig. 28.3
Full immersion simulation (Photo with kind permission from Abdullatif Aydin and Oliver Brunckhorst)