Overview of Grading and Staging
Cyril Fisher, MD, DSc, FRCPath
GRADING AND STAGING SYSTEMS
Grading System of French Cancer Centers
Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC)
Staging System
TNM classification of tumors 7th edition (TNM)
HISTOLOGICAL FEATURES EVALUATED IN GRADING (FNCLCC)
Differentiation
Score 1: Sarcoma histologically very similar to normal adult mesenchymal tissue
Well-differentiated examples of liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, fibrosarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), chondrosarcoma
Score 2: Sarcoma of defined histological subtype
Myxofibrosarcoma, myxoid liposarcoma, extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma
Conventional examples of fibrosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, MPNST, pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytoma with storiform pattern
Score 3: Sarcoma of uncertain type, embryonal and undifferentiated sarcomas
Synovial sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, clear cell sarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma, malignant rhabdoid tumor, epithelioid malignant schwannoma, alveolar soft part sarcoma, malignant Triton tumor, mesenchymal chondrosarcoma
Extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma
Poorly differentiated examples of fibrosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, MPNST
Pleomorphic malignant fibrohistiocytoma (MFH) without storiform pattern; giant cell and inflammatory MFH
Undifferentiated sarcoma
Mitotic Index per 10 High-Power Fields (HPF)
Score 1: 1-9 mitoses
Score 2: 10-19 mitoses
Score 3: 20 or more mitoses
Total number in 10 successive HPF in most mitotically active areas
Avoid ulcerated, necrotic, or hypocellular areas
Percentage of Microscopic Tumor Necrosis
Score 0: No necrosis
Score 1: Necrosis < 50%
Score 2: Necrosis > 50%
Tumor necrosis should be evaluated at macroscopic and microscopic levels
Macroscopic assessment should always be confirmed by microscopic evaluation
Grade
Summation of 3 scores indicates grade
Grade 1: Total score 2 or 3
Grade 2: Total score 4 or 5
Grade 3: Total score 6, 7, or 8Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree