, David Ramirez1, 2 and Caren L. Hughes1, 2
(1)
Department of General Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
(2)
Division of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Lung Cancer
NEJM 2004 350:4; NCCN Guideline 2014 version 4
Pathophysiology
CLASSIFICATION BY HISTOLOGY
small cell (SCLC, 15%)—mainly seen in smokers, central lesions, early metastasis compared to NSCLC
non–small cell (NSCLC, 85%)
adenocarcinoma (50–60%)—women, may develop in nonsmokers, peripheral lesions. Bronchoalveolar (BAC) subtype may originate distal to grossly recognizable bronchi. BAC tends to be well differentiated, grows along intact alveolar septa, and has a propensity for aerogenous and lymphatic spread. May present as diffuse infiltration on chest X-ray
squamous (25%)—mainly seen in smokers, central, cavitary lesions
large cell (15%)—peripheral lesions with prominent necrosis, slightly worse prognosis than squamous and adenocarcinoma
carcinoid (2%)—neuroendocrine origin. May cause airway obstruction, ectopic Cushing’s, and carcinoid syndrome
cystic adenoid carcinoma—locally invasive but may also metastasize
carcinosarcoma—localized lesion usually
RISK FACTORS
smoking—30× increased risk compared to nonsmokers. Smokers have 30% lifetime risk of developing lung cancer. 85–90% of all lung cancers are related to smoking. Polymorphisms in carcinogen activating enzymes (N-acetyltransferase (NAT1 and NAT2), CYP 1A1 and 2A6) and inactivating enzymes (glutathionone S-transferase S1 and M1) may contribute to individual susceptibility. The duration of smoking is a stronger risk factor than the number of cigarettes smoked. Cigar/pipe smoking (2×) and second-hand smoke (1.3×) are also risk factors
environmental—asbestos (7×), arsenic, silica, chromium, nickel, polycyclic hydrocarbons, radon (10×), β-carotene supplements (in heavy smokers, 2–3×)
diseases—tuberculosis, COPD, pulmonary fibrosis, previous radiation
family history
Clinical Features
LOCOREGIONAL
—cough, sputum (salty suggests bronchoalveolar), hemoptysis, dyspnea, chest pain, wheezing, dysphagia, brachial plexus (Pancoast tumour), hoarseness, Horner’s syndrome, superior vena cava syndrome
METASTATIC
—bone pain, jaundice, seizures, headaches, adrenal lesions, skin lesions
CONSTITUTIONAL
—weight loss, anorexia, fatigue
PARANEOPLASTIC SYNDROMES
SCLC | Squamous | Adenocarcinoma | Large cell | |
---|---|---|---|---|
SIADH | ✓ | |||
Ectopic Cushing’s | ✓ | |||
Neurological syndromesa | ✓ | |||
Hypercalcemia | ✓ | ✓ | ||
Clubbing or hypertrophic osteoarthropathy | ✓ | ✓ | ||
Hypercoagulable state | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Gynecomastia | ✓ |
Staging
STAGING FOR SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
limited stage (40%)—tumor confined to the hemithorax, mediastinum, and supraclavicular nodes, which can be encompassed within a tolerable radiation therapy port
extensive stage (60%)—non-limited stage, including pleural effusion
Investigations
BASIC
labs—CBCD, lytes, urea, Cr, AST, ALT, ALP, bilirubin, LDH, INR, PTT, Ca, albumin, CEA
imaging—CXR (compared to old) and CT chest and upper abdomen (adrenals)
biopsy—bronchoscopy with lavage/wash/brushings/biopsy (if central lesion), endobronchial US (EBUS) with biopsy (if suspect nodal disease), thoracentesis (if pleural effusion), CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration (if peripheral lesion), mediastinoscopy (if any nodes on CT and potentially resectable disease, sens 90%, spc 100%), thoracotomy
SPECIAL
PET/CT—sens 88%, spc 85%. Usually used for staging in patients with potentially resectable disease
pulmonary function test—if surgical candidate
bone scan—if bone pain, elevated ALP or Ca, ≥N2
CT head or MR head—if ≥ N2 or symptomatic NSCLC, all SCLC
repeated sputum cytology—sens 60–80% for central lesions, 15–30% for peripheral lesions
Diagnostic and Prognostic Issues
REGIONAL LYMPH NODE CLASSIFICATION
—based on mediastinoscopy. Nodes are designated 1–14. N3 node (supraclavicular) = position 1, N2 nodes = position 2–9, and N1 nodes = position 10–14
KARNOFSKY PERFORMANCE STATUS
PS | Function |
---|---|
100% | Normal, no complaints, no evidence of disease |
90% | Able to carry on normal activity: minor symptoms of disease |
80% | Normal activity with effort: some symptoms of disease |
70% | Cares for self: unable to carry on normal activity or active work |
60% | Requires occasional assistance but is able to care for needs |
50% | Requires considerable assistance and frequent medical care |
40% | Disabled: requires special care and assistance |
30% | Severely disabled: hospitalization is indicated, death not imminent |
20% | Very sick, hospitalization necessary: active treatment necessary |
10% | Moribund, fatal processes progressing rapidly |
0% | Dead |
EASTERN CO-OPERATIVE ONCOLOGY GROUP (ECOG) PERFORMANCE STATUS
0—normal. KPS 100%
1—restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. KPS 80–90%
2—ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. KPS 60–70%
3—capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair >50% of waking hours. KPS 40–50%
4—completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair. KPS 10–30%
5—dead. KPS 0%
ADVERSE PROGNOSTIC FACTORS
general—poor performance status (ECOG >1), involuntary weight loss (>5%), advanced stage, SCLC
poor outcome after surgery—poor performance status, weight loss (>5%), low FEV1, low PaO2, recent history of smoking
PROGNOSIS OF SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
—limited stage 20–40% 2-year survival, 16–24 months median survival, extensive stage <5% 2-year survival, 6–12 months median survival. Median survival post-relapse 4 months
Management
NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
stage IA—lobectomy/pneumonectomy. Consider stereotactic radiation if inoperable
stage IB—lobectomy/pneumonectomy. Consider adjuvant chemotherapy (e.g. cisplatin–vinorelbine × 4) if high-risk features (e.g. >4 cm, high grade, visceral pleural involvement, vascular invasion). Consider stereotactic radiation or chemoradiation if inoperable
stage II—lobectomy/pneumonectomy + adjuvant chemotherapy [e.g. cisplatin–vinorelbine × 4, cisplatin-pemetrexed × 4 (if non-squamous)]
stage III a (N2 disease)—concurrent chemoradiation [e.g. cisplatin–etoposide × 4, carboplatin-pemetrexed × 4 (if non-squamous)], followed by either pneumonectomy/lobectomy or radiation boost
stage III a (unresectable) and III b—no surgery. Concurrent chemoradiation [e.g. cisplatin–etoposide × 4, carboplatin-pemetrexed × 4 (if non-squamous)] with potential chance of cure. May consider sequential chemo-radiation but may have reduced chance of cure
stage IV
Palliative radiation—should be administered before chemotherapy if patients present with symptomatic brain metastases, hemoptysis, SVC syndrome, severe bone pain or obstructive pneumonia
First line systemic therapies—for non-squamous histologies, consider erlotinib, gefitinib or afatinib (if EGFR+), crizotinib (if ALK+), or chemotherapy (e.g. cisplatin–pemetrexed × 4) followed by maintenance pemetrexed, bevacizumab or cetuximab. For squamous cell carcinoma, consider doublet chemotherapy (e.g. cisplatin-paclitaxel × 4, cisplatin-gemcitabine × 4)
Second and further line systemic therapies—with disease progression, consider pemetrexed (non-squamous), docetaxel, paclitaxel, albumin-bound paclitaxel, vinorelbine, vinblastine, gemcitabine, erlotinib, afatinib (EGFR+), ceritinib (ALK+), mitomycin or irinotecan
SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
limited stage , T1 – 2N0—lobectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiation (if mediastinal LN involvement)
limited stage , > T1 – 2N0—concurrent chemoradiation (e.g. cisplatin-etoposide × 4) + prophylactic cranial irradiation if good partial/complete response
extensive stage—palliative chemotherapy (e.g. cisplatin-etoposide × 4, cisplatin-irinotecan × 4) + prophylactic cranial irradiation if partial/complete response. For recurrent disease after platinum-based therapy, consider topotecan, paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, irinotecan, oral etoposide, gemcitabine or temozolimide
NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS
low grade ( typical carcinoid )—lobectomy
intermediate grade ( atypical carcinoid )—lobectomy ± adjuvant chemotherapy cisplatin-etoposide (if stage II or III)
high grade large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma—treat as non-small cell lung cancer
high grade neuroendocrine small cell carcinoma or combined histologies—treat as small cell lung cancer
Treatment Issues
SMOKING CESSATION
—for smokers of <20 pack year, the risk of developing lung cancer decreases significantly after 15 years of abstinence, but still slightly higher than non-smokers
NON-RESECTABLE DISEASE CRITERIA
(stage IIIB or greater)—distant metastasis, mediastinal LN metastasis, trachea/contralateral main bronchi involvement, SVC obstruction, malignant pleural effusion, recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, SCLC (unless very early)
CONTRAINDICATIONS TO CHEST RADIATION
—significant pre-existing lung disease, cardiomyopathy, connective tissue disease (SLE, scleroderma), prior radiation to same body region, pregnancy
CONTRAINDICATIONS TO BEVACIZUMAB
—squamous cell carcinoma, hemoptysis, uncontrolled cerebral metastases, non-healing wounds, uncontrolled hypertension/proteinuria, bleeding diatheses, recent trauma/surgery
PREDICTIVE FACTORS FOR EGFR INHIBITORS
—clinical factors include women, Asian, never smokers, and adenocarcinoma. With all 4 factors, response rate 50% (compared to 10% normally). Pathologic predictive factors include EGFR mutation and high EGFR gene copy number
Mesothelioma
NEJM 2005 353:15
Pathophysiology
CLASSIFICATION BY HISTOLOGY
epithelioid—tubulopapillary, glandular, or solid. 50–60%
sarcomatoid—spindle cells
biphasic—mixed with both epithelioid and sarcomatoid features
ASBESTOS AND MESOTHELIOMA
—accounts for approximately 80% of mesothelioma. Risk of mesothelioma is higher with amphiboles/blue asbestos than chrysotile/white asbestos. Asbestos fibers may irritate the pleura, sever or pierce the mitotic spindle of cells and disrupt mitosis, induce generation of iron-related reactive oxygen species, and phosphorylate MAP kinases and ERK 1 and 2. Tumor usually starts from parietal pleura and invades locally
RISK FACTORS
family history—rare
environmental—asbestos, radiation
Clinical Features
LOCOREGIONAL
—pleural (pleural effusion, pleuritic chest pain, dyspnea, SVC obstruction), peritoneal (ascites, abdominal pain, bowel obstruction), pericardial (pericardial effusion, tamponade)
METASTATIC
—miliary spread, liver, lung, bone, and/or adrenal lesions
CONSTITUTIONAL
—weight loss, anorexia, fatigue
Staging
Investigations
BASIC
labs—CBCD, lytes, urea, Cr, AST, ALT, ALP, bili
imaging—CXR, CT chest/abd, or MRI chest
biopsy—thoracentesis (sens 33–84%, cytology is usually inadequate), thoracoscopy with pleural biopsy
SPECIAL
serum mesothelin–related protein (SMRP)—sens 75–84%
PET scan—if surgical candidate
Prognostic Issues
ADVERSE PROGNOSTIC FACTORS
—male, poor performance status, sarcomatoid subtype, leukocytosis, anemia, thrombocytosis, advanced stage, high PET ratios
PROGNOSIS
—stage I = 16 months median survival, ≥3 adverse prognostic factors = <6 months median survival, stage II–IV = 10 months median survival
Management
STAGE I, II
(resectable disease)—surgery (pleurectomy/decortication, extrapleural pneumonectomy, debulking) is controversial and of questionable benefit. Pleurectomy/decortication should be the first option for patients with operable early stage disease and is an option for patients with locally advanced disease who are not candidates for extrapleural pneumonectomy. Extrapleural pneumonectomy should be considered for highly selected patients (age <55, performance status ≤1, stage I or II, epithelioid histology) and only after a good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, to be followed by adjuvant radiation. Otherwise, treat as unresectable disease
STAGE III, IV
(unresectable disease)—palliative chemotherapy (cisplatin–pemetrexed with vitamin B12 and folic acid supplementation or cisplatin–gemcitabine). Second-line options include repeating cisplatin–gemcitabine, cisplatin–pemetrexed, and vinorelbine. Pleurodesis or indwelling pleural catheters should be considered if recurrent effusion
Thymoma and Thymic Carcinoma
Pathophysiology
CLASSIFICATION BY HISTOLOGY
epithelial
neuroendocrine
germ cell
lymphoid
stromal
Clinical Features
LOCOREGIONAL
—dyspnea, cough, chest pain, hoarseness, dysphagia, superior vena cava obstruction
METASTATIC
CONSTITUTIONAL
—weight loss, anorexia, fatigue
PARANEOPLASTIC
—myasthenia gravis (30–50%, diplopia, ptosis, dysphagia, weakness, fatigue), pure red cell aplasia (5–15%), pure white cell aplasia, pancytopenia, hypogammaglobulinemia (recurrent infections, diarrhea), rheumatologic diseases, and endocrinopathies. Note that remission of thymoma does not necessarily correlate with improvement of paraneoplastic syndromes
Staging
Investigations
BASIC
labs—CBCD, lytes, urea, Cr, glucose, AST, ALT, ALP, bili
imaging—CXR, CT chest
biopsy
Management
STAGE I, II, III
(resectable disease)—resection (usually including adjacent lung parenchyma and pericardium) ± adjuvant radiation ± (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy [cisplatin–doxorubicin–cyclophosphamide (preferred for thymoma), carboplatin-paclitaxel (preferred for thymic carcinoma), cisplatin–etoposide]
STAGE IV
(unresectable disease)—palliative radiation ± palliative chemotherapy [cisplatin–doxorubicin–cyclophosphamide (preferred for thymoma), carboplatin-paclitaxel (preferred for thymic carcinoma), cisplatin–etoposide]
Treatment Issues
INDICATIONS FOR RADIOTHERAPY
—locally advanced or metastatic unresectable disease, residual disease post-resection, and complete resection of invasive thymoma or thymic carcinoma
Breast Cancer
NEJM 2004 350:14
Differential Diagnosis of Breast Mass
BENIGN
—cysts (obstructed collecting ducts), fibroadenoma (overgrowth of periductal stromal connective tissue within the lobules), mammary duct ectasia, intraductal papilloma, mastitis, fat necrosis
ATYPICAL HYPERPLASIA
—3–5× increased risk of breast cancer
CARCINOMA IN SITU
—ductal (DCIS), lobular (LCIS)
MALIGNANT
—breast cancer (see below for details)
Pathophysiology
CLASSIFICATION OF PRE-MALIGNANT LESIONS
ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)—precursor lesion to invasive cancer
lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS)—diffuse and can be bilateral (risk of contralateral invasive breast cancer may be as high as ipsilateral disease). Marker for increased risk of development of invasive cancer (absolute risk ~1%/year of development of invasive cancer)
CLASSIFICATION OF MALIGNANT LESIONS
ductal adenocarcinoma—80%
lobular adenocarcinoma—10%, more likely to be bilateral and multicentric. Tends to metastasize later than ductal carcinoma and spreads to unusual sites such as GI tract, peritoneum, and meninges. Most are ER+ and 20–30% have E-cadherin mutations (associated with hereditary diffuse-type gastric cancer). Clinically, more difficult to detect by palpation and by mammography
tubular, medullary, papillary, colloid, spindle cell, mucinous—10%, better prognosis
sarcoma like—phylloides, post-radiation
RISK FACTORS
personal—female, increased age, early age of menarche, late age of first parity, lack of breast feeding, late age of menopause, oral contraceptives (↑ risk if >4 years of use), hormone replacement, high socioeconomic status
family history (10%)—affected relatives, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, Li–Fraumeni syndrome, Cowden syndrome
environmental—alcohol, low caloric intake, low physical activity, weight gain
prior breast pathology—atypical hyperplasia, prior breast tumor (in situ or carcinoma)
gail model—used to estimate the risk of breast cancer in the Breast Cancer Detection and Demonstration Project. Includes age at menarche, age at first live birth, number of previous breast biopsies, presence of atypical hyperplasia in breast biopsy, and number of first-degree relatives with breast cancer
BRCA BREAST CANCERS
—BRCA1 is associated with basal-like subtype and triple negative (ER negative, PR negative, Her2 negative) phenotype. BRCA2 is associated with luminal subtype. Phase II data have shown that these tumors are particularly sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors due to defects in DNA homologous recombination repair from BRCA mutation
Clinical Features
RATIONAL CLINICAL EXAMINATION SERIES DOES THIS PATIENT HAVE BREAST CANCER?
PHYSICAL—the value of inspection is unproved. Palpation with clinical breast examination (CBE) includes proper positioning of the patient, use of a vertical strip pattern, proper position and movement of the fingers (pads of 2nd–4th fingers rolling motion), thoroughness of search, and spending at least 3 min per breast (sens 54%, spc 94%, LR+ 10.6, LR– 0.47)
APPROACH—“screening by both clinical breast examination and mammography is associated with decreased breast cancer mortality. Clinical breast examination alone detected between 3–45% of breast cancers that were missed by screening mammography. While clinical breast examination alone cannot rule out disease, the high specificity of certain abnormal findings significantly increases the probability of breast cancer”
UPDATE—US Preventive Services Task Force and the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care both discourage self-breast examination. Evidence to definitively recommend for or against routine clinical breast examination is insufficient.
JAMA 1996 282:13
The Rational Clinical Examination. McGraw–Hill, 2009
LOCOREGIONAL—breast lump (with or without pain), nipple discharge, eczema or retraction, skin erosion, erythema or edema, change in breast size, axillary adenopathy
METASTATIC—bone pain, seizure, headache, dyspnea, jaundice
CONSTITUTIONAL—fatigue, weight loss, anorexia
Investigations
BASIC
labs—CBCD, lytes, urea, Cr, AST, ALT, ALP, bilirubin, INR, PTT, albumin
imaging—mammogram (15% false negative), US breast, MRI breast (for dense breasts or those with BRCA1/2 mutations)
biopsy—needle core biopsy (FNA provides cytology only and cannot differentiate between invasive and in situ disease), excisional biopsy
SPECIAL
bone scan and CT chest / abd / pelvis—if clinical stage IIIA (T3N1M0) or above
tumor markers—CA 15-3 or CA27.29 if metastatic disease
Staging
TNM STAGING (7TH EDITION)
T stage (same clinical and pathologic staging)
T1 ≤ 2 cm (T1mic = microinvasion ≤0.1 cm, T1a >0.1–0.5 cm, T1b >0.5–1 cm, T1c >1–2 cm)
T2 > 2–5 cm
T3 > 5 cm
T4 = invades skin or chest wall (T4a = extends to chest wall, but not including pectoralis muscle; T4b = edema with peau d’orange or ulceration of the skin, or satellite skin nodules confined to the same breast; T4c = both T4a and T4b; T4d = inflammatory carcinoma)
N stage (axillary, internal mammary, supraclavicular)
N1
cN1 = ipsilateral mobile axillary lymph node(s)
pN1mi = micrometastasis 0.2–2 mm
pN1a = 1–3 axillary lymph node(s)
pN1b = internal mammary lymph nodes with microscopic disease detected by SLND but not clinically apparent
pN1c = N1a and N1b
N2
cN2a = ipsilateral fixed/matted axillary lymph node(s)
cN2b = ipsilateral internal mammary nodes in the absence of clinically evident axillary lymph node
pN2a = 4–9 axillary lymph nodes
pN2b = ipsilateral internal mammary nodes in the absence of clinically evident axillary lymph node
N3
cN3a = ipsilateral infraclavicular lymph node(s)
cN3b = ipsilateral internal mammary and axillary lymph node(s)
cN3c = ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node(s)
pN3a = 10 or more axillary lymph nodes or metastasis to the infraclavicular lymph nodes
pN3b = metastasis in clinically apparent ipsilateral internal mammary lymph nodes in the presence of one or more positive axillary node, or in >3 axillary lymph nodes and in internal mammary lymph nodes with microscopic disease detected by sentinel lymph node dissection but not clinically apparent
pN3c = ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node
M stage (lungs, liver, bones, brain)
M1 = distant metastasis
STAGE GROUPINGS
Stage | TNM @ = any | 5-Year survival |
---|---|---|
I | T1N0M0, T0-1N1miM0 | 100% |
IIA | T0-1N1M0, T2N0M0 | 90% |
IIB | T2N1M0, T3N0M0 | 80% |
IIIA | T0-2N2M0, T3N1-2M0 | 70% |
IIIB | T4N0-2M0 | 50% |
IIIC | T@N3M0 | 40% |
IV | T@N@M1 | 20% |
Diagnostic and Prognostic Issues
MAMMOGRAPHIC FINDINGS OF BREAST CANCER
—spiculated, crab-like, puckering lesions, architectural distortion, clustered microcalcifications
SCREENING
—if average risk population, mammogram q2 years starting age 50 (may begin annual mammogram screening earlier at age 40); if high risk, annual clinical breast examination and mammography (starting 5-10 years younger than age of onset for youngest proband if strong family history)
POOR PROGNOSTIC FACTORS
—young age, advanced stage (especially nodal status and tumor size), high grade, Her2/neu+, ER–, PR–, lymphatic/vascular invasion
Management
DCIS
resection—breast-conserving surgery plus adjuvant radiation, or mastectomy
adjuvant hormonal—tamoxifen may be considered after breast-conserving surgery for selected individuals if ER/PR positive
LCIS
resection—observation, breast-conserving surgery or bilateral mastectomy for selected individuals
hormonal—tamoxifen or raloxifene may be used for prevention of invasive breast cancer in selected individuals
STAGE I AND II
1.
resection—breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy, plus sentinel node biopsy. Axillary lymph node dissection if clinically node positive and biopsy proven. If sentinel lymph node positive, proceed to axillary dissection
2.
adjuvant systemic therapy—taxane ± anthracycline ± trastuzumab
3.
adjuvant radiation—always give adjuvant radiation after breast-conserving surgery. Adjuvant radiation should be considered after mastectomy if large tumor, skin involvement, muscle involvement, positive nodes, positive margins, or lymphovascular invasion
4.
adjuvant hormonal therapy—give if ER/PR positive
STAGE III
1.
neoadjuvant / Adjuvant systemic therapy—taxane ± anthracycline ± trastuzumab ± pertuzumab (only approved in neoadjuvant setting, not adjuvant). Adjuvant therapy if tumor resectable upfront
2.
resection—breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy, plus axillary lymph node dissection
3.
adjuvant radiation—almost always given for stage III disease
4.
adjuvant hormonal therapy—give if ER/PR positive
STAGE IV
1.
er / pr− , her2− ( triple negative ) disease—chemotherapy choices include anthracyclines (doxorubicin, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin), taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel, albumin-bound paclitaxel), anti-metabolites (gemcitabine, capecitabine), microtubule inhibitors (vinorelbine, eribulin, ixabepilone), platinums (carboplatin, cisplaitin), or various combinations (e.g. doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide, gemcitabine-carboplatin)
2.
er / pr +, her2 – disease—if not rapidly progressive/symptomatic and no significant visceral involvement, consider endocrine therapy such as tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, or fulvestrant. In premenopausal women, the use of aromatase inhibitors and fluvestrant require either oophorectomy or LHRH agonists. Otherwise, consider single agent or combination chemotherapy (see triple negative disease)
3.
er / pr +, her2 + disease—if not rapidly progressive/symptomatic and no significant visceral involvement, consider HER2-directed therapy in combination with endocrine therapy. Otherwise, pertuzumab-trastuzumab-docetaxel (or paclitaxel) is first line therapy. Other options include ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), lapatinib-based combinations (with capectiabine or trastuzumab), or single agent or combination chemotherapy (see triple negative disease) plus trastuzumab
4.
er / pr -, her2 + disease—pertuzumab-trastuzumab-docetaxel (or paclitaxel) is first line therapy. Other options include ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), lapatinib-based combinations (with capectiabine or trastuzumab), or single agent or combination chemotherapy (see triple negative disease) plus trastuzumab
5.
palliative radiation—for symptomatic control of localized disease (e.g. bone metastasis, painful skin lesions)
6.
bone metastases—if bone metastasis, pamidronate 90 mg IV over 2 h q4w, or zoledronate 4 mg IV over 15 min q4w (dose based on creatinine clearance) for up to 2 years. Denosumab 120 mg SC q4wk represents an alternative to bisphosphonates
LOCAL RECURRENCE
—biopsy to try to distinguish recurrence from new primary, metastatic workup. If isolated local recurrence, resection/completion mastectomy ± radiation. Hormonal and/or chemotherapy may also be considered
Breast Surgery Overview
COMPLETE SURGERY
—modified radical mastectomy, radical mastectomy. Indications for mastectomy include multicentric disease, diffuse malignant appearing microcalcifications on mammography, prior breast radiation, and pregnancy. Relative indications include large tumor (>5 cm), connective tissue disease (radiation contraindicated), and patient preference. Poorer cosmesis compared to breast-conserving surgery
BREAST CONSERVING SURGERY
—excisional biopsy, lumpectomy, partial mastectomy, quadrantectomy, wide local excision
SURGICAL MARGIN
—positive margin is defined as tumor touching ink and would require re-excision
AXILLARY LYMPH NODE DISSECTION (ALND)
—used in all invasive carcinoma. May be avoided if sentinel lymph node negative
SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY
—indicated for clinically node negative tumors. Contraindications include locally advanced breast cancer, any palpable lymph nodes, multifocal cancers, previous disruptive breast procedures, and adverse reactions to dyes. Proceed to ALND if positive nodes or unable to identify sentinel node
Hormonal Therapy Overview
HORMONAL REGIMENS
ovarian ablation (premenopausal only)—oophorectomy, radiation, or LHRH agonists (goserelin 3.6 mg IM every month, leuprolide). Consider combining with tamoxifen (in adjuvant or metastatic settings) or aromatase inhibitors (in metastatic setting only) for maximal effect
selective estrogen receptor modulators (premenopausal or postmenopausal)—tamoxifen 20 mg PO daily. Side effects include hot flashes, mood swings, vaginal discharge, thromboembolism, and endometrial cancer. Protective effect with bones and lipids
aromatase inhibitors (for postmenopausal women or premenopausal women after ovarian ablation as suppress peripheral estrone production only)—inhibit aromatase, an enzyme in skin, adipose tissue, and breast that converts androstenedione (from the adrenals) to estrone and estradiol. Steroidal (exemestane 25 mg PO daily), non–steroidal (letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily, anastrozole 1 mg PO daily). Side effects include hot flashes, mood swings, vaginal dryness, myalgia/arthralgia, headache, osteoporosis, dyslipidemia, weight gain, and potentially CAD
antiestrogen—fulvestrant 500 mg IM loading dose on days 1 and 15, then 500 mg monthly
others—megestrol acetate 160 mg PO daily, methyltestosterone
PREDICTIVE FACTORS FOR HORMONAL THERAPY
—degree of response to tamoxifen varies (ER + PR+ > ER + PR– > ER–PR+ > ER–PR–). Hormonal therapy is not given to patients with ER- and PR- cancers. Her2+ may also interfere with ER pathways
APPROACH IN THE ADJUVANT SETTING
—for premenopausal women, consider tamoxifen × 5-10 years. For postmenopausal women, consider one of the following: anastrozole × 5 years, letrozole × 5 years, tamoxifen × 2–3 years followed by exemestane or anastrozole to complete 5 years of adjuvant hormonal therapy, tamoxifen × 5 years followed by letrozole × 5 years, or tamoxifen × 10 years. Consider aromatase inhibitors as first hormonal agent if >10% risk of relapse in first 2 years (e.g. ≥4 positive nodes, low ER or grade 3 disease)
APPROACH IN THE METASTATIC SETTING
—patients with slowly progressive disease, no visceral involvement, and minimal symptoms may be best served with a trial of endocrine therapy. For premenopausal women, consider tamoxifen or ovarian ablation + tamoxifen → aromatase inhibitor 1 → aromatase inhibitor 2 → fulvestrant → megestrol. For postmenopausal women, aromatase inhibitor 1 → tamoxifen → aromatase inhibitor 2 → fulvestrant → megestrol. Time to progression is 8 months with tamoxifen and 10 months with aromatase inhibitors
Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Chemotherapy Overview
WHO SHOULD GET ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY: THE NCCN GUIDELINE
all histologic subtypes except tubular or colloid cancers—adjuvant chemotherapy should be given if ≥1 cm or node positive. Consider chemotherapy if 0.6–1 cm and high grade or lymphovascular invasion. Add trastuzumab if Her2/neu positive
tubular or colloid cancers—adjuvant chemotherapy should be given if ≥3 cm or node positive. Consider chemotherapy if 1–2.9 cm
ONCOTYPE Dx
—the 21-gene recurrence score is a validated prognostic assay. It is applicable only to pathologically node-negative, hormone receptor-positive, and Her2-negative tumors to help with the decision of adjuvant chemotherapy. A score of <18, 18-30, and >31 defines the low (no chemotherapy recommended), intermediate (chemotherapy should be considered) and high risk (chemotherapy recommended) groups, respectively
ADJUVANT! ONLINE
(www.adjuvantonline.com)—this web-based program determines both recurrence risk and probability of survival with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, it does not account for Her2 status
NEOADJUVANT/ADJUVANT REGIMENS
first generation—CMF PO, AC × 4, FEC50 × 6
second generation—CAF × 6, FAC × 6, CEF × 6, FEC100 × 6, AC × 4 + D × 4, DC × 4
third generation—DAC × 6, FEC100 × 3 + D × 3, AC × 4 + T × 4 (dose dense), FEC × 4 + T × 8
note—for Her2 positive add trastuzumab plus pertuzumab to neoadjuvant regimens as clinically indicated, and trastuzumab alone to adjuvant regimens. Abbreviations: A = doxorubicin, C = cyclophosphamide, D = docetaxel, E = epirubicin, F = 5-fluorouracil, M = methotrexate, T = paclitaxel
ESTIMATED BENEFITS OF ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY
RELATIVE RISK REDUCTION FOR MORTALITY
Postmenopausal | Premenopausal | |
---|---|---|
1st gen. | 8% ER+, 15% ER− | 30% |
2nd gen. | 26% ER+, 32% ER− | 44% |
3rd gen. | 40% ER+, 45% ER− | 55% |
RELATIVE RISK REDUCTION FOR RECURRENCE
Postmenopausal | Premenopausal | |
---|---|---|
1st gen. | 12% ER+, 23% ER− | 37% |
2nd gen. | 30% ER+, 38% ER− | 50% |
3rd gen. | 43% ER+, 50% ER− | 59% |
ADVERSE EFFECTS OF ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY
alopecia—anthracycline or taxane regimens (100%), CMF (50%)
febrile neutropenia—DAC (40%) and dose dense regimens require GCSF. CEF > FEC; FAC > FEC; ACT > AC/CMF
nausea and vomiting—CMF > anthracyclines
other acute side effects—fatigue and weight gain. With taxanes, may experience myalgia, arthralgia, and neuropathy (motor, sensory)
premature ovarian failure—CMF > CEF/FEC > AC; DAC > FAC
other long–term side effects—cardiotoxicity (dose dependent and increases with age, ~1% with anthracycline doses used in adjuvant regimens), secondary cancers (AML, MDS with alkylating agents, ~1–2% depending on regimen)
PREDICTIVE FACTORS FOR ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY BENEFIT
—younger age, high grade, ER negative, Her2 positive (possibly for anthracycline and taxane-based regimens)
APPROACH IN THE ADJUVANT SETTING
—chemotherapy usually starts 4–10 weeks after surgery. Consider anthracycline followed by taxane (e.g. AC × 4 and weekly T × 12) for intermediate/high risk or node-positive breast cancer; anthracycline ± taxane + trastuzumab for Her2 positive breast cancer; CMF or DC if anthracycline contraindicated or preexisting heart disease
Palliative Chemotherapy Overview
PALLIATIVE REGIMENS
—single agent choices include anthracyclines (doxorubicin, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin), taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel, albumin-bound paclitaxel), anti-metabolites (gemcitabine, capecitabine), microtubule inhibitors (vinorelbine, eribulin, ixabepilone), and platinums (carboplatin, cisplaitin). Doublet regimens include doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide, carboplatin-gemcitabine, doxorubicin-paclitaxel, capecitabine-docetaxel, docetaxel-gemcitabine, and paclitaxel-gemcitabine
APPROACH IN THE METASTATIC SETTING
—patients with rapidly growing disease, especially involvement of visceral organs such as lung or liver may benefit more from chemotherapy compared to hormonal therapy due to a more rapid response. The choice of first line palliative chemotherapy depends on prior adjuvant chemotherapy, disease-free interval, patient’s performance status, and willingness/ability to tolerate side effects. Doublet regimens are associated with higher response rate, while single agents are better tolerated and are particularly appropriate for patients who are elderly or have poor performance status. Consider doublet regimens in patients that need a rapid response to relieve tumor-related symptoms. At eventual disease progression, change chemotherapy to non-cross-resistance single agents
Biological Therapy Overview
HER2/NEU STATUS
—15–20% positive. Her2 positivity is a poor prognostic factor, but predicts response to trastuzumab, pertuzumab, ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), and lapatinib
APPROACH
—Her2 positive disease should be treated with chemotherapy plus trastuzumab in the adjuvant/neoadjuvant settings. Do not give concomitantly with anthracyclines. In the metastatic setting, give chemotherapy and then maintenance trastuzumab until progression
ADVERSE EFFECTS
—infusion reactions (40%, usually with first administration), cardiotoxicity, and pulmonary (rare)
Management of Brain Metastases
APPROACH
—steroids, resection plus radiation, or radiation alone if resection not possible. Principles are similar for CNS recurrence
surgery—consider resection if solitary lesion or primary lesion causing neurological complications. Surgery plus radiation is associated with better overall survival than radiation alone for eligible candidates (10 vs. 6 months)
radiation—may be re-irradiated if over 1 year from first whole brain radiation
stereotactic radiation—less generalized toxicity. If <3 lesions and all <3 cm [<1.2 in.]
chemotherapy—limited role with high-dose methotrexate and possibly capecitabine
Esophageal Cancer
NEJM 2003 349:23
Pathophysiology
CLASSIFICATION BY HISTOLOGY
adenocarcinoma—75% in distal esophagus
squamous—evenly distributed between upper, middle, and lower thirds of esophagus
melanoma
leiomyosarcoma
lymphoma
carcinoid
RISK FACTORS
Squamous | Adeno | |
---|---|---|
Barrett’s esophagus | – | >8× |
Reflux symptoms | – | 4–8× |
Obesity | – | 2–4× |
Smoking | 4–8× | 2–4× |
Alcohol Use | 4–8× | – |
Caustic injury to esophagus | >8× | – |
Achalasia | 4–8× | – |
Poverty | 2–4× | – |
History of H&N cancer | >8× | – |
History of breast cancer with radiation | 4–8× | 4–8× |
Plummer–Vinson syndrome | >8× | – |
Non-epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma | >8× | – |
Frequent hot beverages | <2× | – |
Clinical Features
LOCAL
—dysphagia (74%), odynophagia (17%), upper GI bleed, epigastric pain
REGIONAL
—dyspnea, cough, hoarseness, pain (retrosternal, back, RUQ)
METASTATIC
—Virchow’s node, hepatomegaly, pleural effusion
CONSTITUTIONAL
—anorexia, fatigue, weight loss
Related Topics
Barrett’s Esophagus (p. 127)
Esophageal Dysphagia (p. 124)
Gastric Cancer (p. 217)
Staging
TNM STAGING (7TH EDITION)
T stage
T1 = invades lamina propria, muscularis mucosa, or submucosa
T2 = invades muscularis propria
T3 = invades adventitia
T4 = invades into adjacent structures (pleura, pericardium, diaphragm, aorta, vertebral body, trachea, mediastinum)
N stage (cervical paraesophageal, right recurrent laryngeal, left paratracheal, upper and lower paraesophageal, infraaortic, infracarinal and lower posterior mediastinal regions)
N1 = 1-2 regional lymph nodes
N2 = 3-6 regional lymph nodes
N3 = 7 or more regional lymph nodes
M stage (spreads rapidly and early. Over 50% unresectable/metastatic disease at presentation)
M1 = distant metastasis
STAGE GROUPINGS
Stage | Squamous TNM @ = any | Adeno TNM @ = any | 5-year survival |
---|---|---|---|
0 | TisN0M0 | TisN0M0 | >95% |
IA | T1N0M0G1 | T1N0M0G1-2 | 50–80% |
IB | T1N0M0G2-3 T2-3N0M0G1 lower eso. | T1N0M0G3 T2N0M0G1-2 | |
IIA | T2-3N0M0G1 upper/mid T2-3N0M0G2-3 lower eso. | T2N0M0G3 | 30–40% |
IIB | T2-3N0M0G2-3 upper/mid T1-2N1M0G@ | T3N0M0G@ T1-2N1M0G@ | 10–30% |
IIIA | T1-2N2M0G@ T3N1M0G@ T4aN0M0G@ | T1-2N2M0G@ T3N1M0G@ T4aN0M0G@ | 10–15% |
IIIB | T3N2M0G@ | T3N2M0G@ | |
IIIC | T4aN1-2M0G@ T4bN@M0G@ T@N3M0G@ | T4aN1-2M0G@ T4bN@M0G@ T@N3M0G@ | |
IV | T@N@M1G@ | T@N@M1G@ | <5% |
Investigations
BASIC
labs—CBCD, lytes, urea, Cr, AST, ALT, ALP, bilirubin, INR, PTT, albumin, lipase, CEA
imaging—CXR, barium swallow, CT chest and abd, endoscopic US (excellent for staging), PET scan (preoperative workup)
biopsy—gastroscopy ± laparoscopy
Diagnostic and Prognostic Issues
SCREENING
(for Barrett’s)—consider screening gastroscopy in patients with risk factors (age ≥50, male, white race, chronic GERD >5 years, hiatal hernia, high BMI or intra-abdominal fat distribution, ±tobacco use, ±nocturnal reflux)
SURVEILLANCE
(for Barrett’s)—endoscopic surveillance with four-quadrant biopsies q3-5 years (if no dysplasia on biopsy), q6-12 months (low-grade dysplasia), q3 months (high-grade dysplasia without eradication therapy)
POOR PROGNOSTIC FACTORS
—weight loss >10%, dysphagia, large tumors, advanced age, lymphatic micrometastases
Management
NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT
—dietician consult. Consider supplemental feeding if significant weight loss, but only if benefits greater than risk
RESECTABLE
surgical resection (right transthoracic approach, transhiatal approach)—surgery only for T1N0 disease. Add preoperative chemoradiation (weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel, or 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin, 4140–5040 cGy) if T2-4 or N+ disease. Endoscopic resection is a reasonable alternative to surgery, particularly for older individuals, medically inoperable patients
definitive chemoradiation—weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel, or 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin, 4140-5040 cGy may be a reasonable alternative to surgery, particularly for older individuals, medically inoperable patients, and cervical esophageal carcinoma (difficult resection)
magic regimen—ECF × 3 (E = epirubicin, C = cisplatin, F = infusional 5-fluorouracil) + surgical resection followed by ECF × 3 similar to treatment for gastric cancer if GE junction involved, good performance status, and not dysphagic
immediate resection followed by postoperative chemoradiation—if unsuitable for preoperative therapy
LOCALLY ADVANCED, UNRESECTABLE
(T3–4, N1, 65%, median survival 12–14 months)
adenocarcinoma—primary chemoradiation if localized. See also metastatic, unresectable cancer
squamous cell carcinoma—chemoradiation (weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel, or 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin, 4140-5040 cGy). Palliative surgical resection may be considered for selected patients (increased local control), although squamous cell carcinomas are very sensitive to chemoradiation, and thus surgery may not be needed
METASTATIC, UNRESECTABLE
(M1, 15%, median survival 9–12 months)
palliative chemotherapy—similar to gastric cancer. Standard regimens include ECF, DCF (C = cisplatin, D = docetaxel, E = epirubicin, F = 5-fluorouracil), ECX and EOX, EOF (X = capecitabine, O = oxaliplatin). For patients with poor performance status, consider CF, FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil–leucovorin–oxaliplatin), FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil–leucovorin–irinotecan), or 5-fluorouracil or irinotecan alone. No standard for second line, which may include FOLFIRI, irinotecan alone, or taxane alone. Response rate 10–30% for single agents and 30–50% for combination therapy
palliative radiation—brachytherapy, external beam radiation
palliative procedures—dilatation and endoluminal stent if obstruction, phototherapy, G-tube insertion
Treatment Issues
FOLLOW-UP
—no agreed upon surveillance program. Clinical assessment every 3 months during the first year, then every 6 months for a total of 5 years. Endoscopy as clinically indicated
Gastric Cancer
Pathophysiology
CLASSIFICATION BY HISTOLOGY
adenocarcinoma (95%)—diffuse, intestinal, or mixed type
leiomyosarcoma (5%)
lymphoma—mucosal-associated lymphoma
carcinoid
GI stromal
PATHOLOGIC SUBTYPES
Diffuse type | Intestinal type | |
---|---|---|
Location | Proximal | Distal |
Age of onset | Younger | Older |
Gender | F > M | M > F |
Risk factors | Hereditary | Endemic |
H. pylori | 32% | 89% |
Metastasis | Peritoneal | Hepatic |
Outcome | Worse | Better |
LINITIS PLASTICA
(15%)—diffuse disease involving the entire stomach. Very poor prognosis; slightly better with superficial/expansive type (5–10%)
LOCATION
—35% proximal, 25% body, 40% distal
RISK FACTORS
ethnicity—Asian origin (Japanese and Chinese)
family history—affected relatives (L), HNPCC, FAP, Li–Fraumeni, Peutz–Jeghers syndrome, hereditary diffuse gastric cancer
environmental—nitrite consumption (pickled, salted, and cured foods), alcohol (U), smoking (U), lower socioeconomic status (L)
diseases—H. pylori (L), EBV, hiatus hernia (U), pernicious anemia (3–18×), chronic gastritis, gastric polyps, previous partial gastrectomy where U = upper stomach, L = lower stomach
Clinical Features
LOCOREGIONAL
—epigastric pain, nausea and vomiting, dysphagia, upper GI bleed (melena, hematemesis), anemia, abdominal mass
METASTATIC
—hepatomegaly, Virchow’s node (left supraclavicular LN), Irish’s node (left axillary LN), dyspnea, sister Mary Joseph nodule (umbilicus), Krukenberg tumor (ovaries)
CONSTITUTIONAL
—anorexia, fatigue, weight loss
PARANEOPLASTIC
—acanthosis nigricans, seborrheic keratosis (Leser–Trelat sign), inflammatory myositis, circinate erythema, cerebellar ataxia, thromboembolism, Cushing’s, carcinoid
Staging
TNM STAGING (7TH EDITION)
T stage
T1 = invades lamina propria, muscularis mucosa or submucosa
T2 = invades muscularis propria
T3 = penetrates subserosa without invasion of serosa (visceral peritoneum)
T4 = invades serosa (visceral peritoneum) or adjacent structures (esophagus, small bowel, transverse colon, spleen, liver, pancreas, adrenal gland, kidney, diaphragm, abdominal wall, retroperitoneum)
N stage (around stomach and along left gastric, common hepatic, splenic, celiac arteries)
N1 = 1-2 LN
N2 = 3-6 LN
N3 = 7 or more LN
M stage (liver, lung, peritoneum, left supraclavicular LN, left axillary LN, umbilicus, ovary)
M1 = distant metastasis
STAGE GROUPING
Stage | TNM @ = any | Freq | 5-year survival |
---|---|---|---|
IA | T1N0M0 | 10% | 78% |
IB | T2N0M0, T1N1M0 | 58% | |
IIA | T3N0M0, T2N1M0, T1N2M0 | 20% | 34% |
IIB | T4aN0M0, T3N1M0, T2N2M0, T1N3M0 | ||
IIIA | T4aN1M0, T3N2M0, T2N3M0 | 40% | 8–20% |
IIIB | T4bN0-1M0, T4aN2M0, T3N3M0 | ||
IIIC | T4bN2-3M0, T4aN3M0 | ||
IV | T@N@M1 | 30% | 7% |
Investigations
BASIC
labs—CBCD, lytes, urea, Cr, AST, ALT, ALP, bilirubin, INR, PTT, albumin, lipase, CEA, CA 19–9
imaging—CXR, barium swallow, endoscopic US, CT abd, US abd, PET/CT
biopsy—gastroscopy (biopsy with H. pylori testing), laparotomy
Diagnostic and Prognostic Issues
SCREENING
—screening program in Japan may have contributed to the improved survival in that population through early detection of resectable gastric cancer. Not recommended outside countries with a high gastric cancer burden
POOR PROGNOSTIC FACTORS
—advanced stage, high grade, proximal location
Related Topics
Dyspepsia (p. 125)
Leser-Trelat Sign (p. 418)
MALT (p. 197)
Melena (p. 131)
Management
STAGE IA
—gastrectomy (total or subtotal) with D2 dissection
STAGE IB, II, III
option 1—neoadjuvant ECF × 3 (epirubicin, cisplatin, infusional 5-fluorouracil) + surgery + adjuvant ECF × 3; 43% of patients able to complete treatment
option 2—gastrectomy (total or subtotal) with D2 dissection + adjuvant chemoradiation (5-fluorouracil)
insufficient evidence—adjuvant radiation alone, adjuvant chemotherapy alone, and neoadjuvant radiation
STAGE IV (T1-4N1–3M0)
—same treatment approach as stage III if resectable disease. Otherwise, same treatment approach as metastatic disease
STAGE IV (M1, MEDIAN SURVIVAL 10 MONTHS)
palliative chemotherapy—standard regimens include ECF (E = epirubicin, C = cisplatin, F = infusional 5-fluorouracil), DCF (D = docetaxel, C = cisplatin, F = 5-fluorouracil), ECX, EOX, EOF (X = capecitabine, O = oxaliplatin). For patients with poor performance status, consider CF, FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil–leucovorin–oxaliplatin), FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil–leucovorin–irinotecan), 5-fluorouracil alone, or irinotecan alone. Second line therapy may include paclitaxel plus ramucirumab, FOLFIRI, irinotecan alone, or taxane alone. Findings from the TOGA trial demonstrate improved survival with the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy in HER2-positive gastric cancer (positivity rate 15–20%)
palliative radiation—for bony metastasis or bleeding tumors
palliative surgery—gastrojejunostomy, partial gastrectomy to bypass obstruction
Treatment Issues
VITAMIN B12 DEFICIENCY
—may develop after a few years in patients who received subtotal or total gastrectomy
LYMPH NODE RESECTION
D1 dissection—removal of the stomach and less and greater omentum with the associated N1 perigastric lymph nodes
D2 dissection—D1 dissection, plus removal of N2 lymph nodes, including a splenectomy and distal pancreatectomy
FOLLOW-UP
—no agreed upon surveillance program. q3month for first year, then every 6 months for a total of 5 years. Endoscopy as clinically indicated
Colorectal Cancer
NEJM 2005 352:5
Pathophysiology
CLASSIFICATION BY HISTOLOGY
adenocarcinoma—mucinous subtype, signet-ring cells, adenosquamous, medullary
carcinoid—mostly involving appendix and rectum, less malignant
rare—squamous cell, small cell, undifferentiated
adenomatous polyp—pre-malignant
RISK FACTORS
personal—age
family history—affected relatives (2×), hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer/Lynch syndrome (HNPCC: mutation in MSH-2, MLH-1, PMS-1, PMS-2, or MSH-6 genes responsible for mismatch repair, 6% of all colon cancers), familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP: 1% of all colon cancers related to mutation in APC gene, all affected will have colon cancer by age 40), Peutz–Jeghers syndrome, juvenile polyposis, Gardner’s syndrome, Turcot’s syndrome, flat adenoma syndrome
environmental—decreased fiber intake
diseases—prior colon cancer, polyps, ovarian, breast, endometrial cancer, Crohn’s, ulcerative colitis (1%/year after 10 years), diabetes, obesity
LOCATION
—50% rectosigmoid, 18% descending colon, 11% transverse colon, 20% in the ascending colon and cecum
DISTINGUISHING FEATURES BETWEEN COLON AND RECTAL CANCER
Colon cancer | Rectal cancer | |
---|---|---|
Frequency | 2/3 | 1/3 |
Location | >12 cm [>4.7 in.] from anal verge or above peritoneal reflection | <12 cm [<4.7 in.] from anal verge or below peritoneal reflection |
Metastasis | Liver | Liver and lung |
Adjuvant treatments | Chemo | RT and chemo |
MOLECULAR SEQUENCE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF COLON CANCER
—the Vogelstein model of carcinogenesis developed based on analysis of FAP lesions. Normal epithelium → loss of 5q (e.g. APC, β-catenin) over decades → adenoma development → loss of 18q (e.g. k-ras) over 2–5 years → late adenoma → loss of 17p (e.g. p53) over 2–5 years → early cancer → loss of 8p → late cancer
MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY
(MSI)—may either be inherited as in HNPCC or spontaneous (15% of sporadic colon cancers). MSI is characterized by a decreased response to 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy but improved prognosis
K-RAS MUTATION
—about 40% of colon cancer has mutation in KRAS, which plays a key role in signal transduction downstream of EGFR. Tumors with wildtype K-ras have been shown to be more responsive to EGFR-based therapy (panitumumab, cetuximab) compared to mutant. This makes biologic sense as a mutated KRAS could continue to activate cell proliferation despite inhibition of EGFR
Clinical Features
LOCOREGIONAL
—bowel habit Δ, hematochezia, paradoxical diarrhea, tenesmus, abdominal pain, iron deficiency anemia
METASTATIC
—RUQ pain, dyspnea
CONSTITUTIONAL
—weight loss, anorexia, fatigue
OTHER
—Streptococcus bovis bacteremia and Clostridium septicum sepsis; colorectal cancer in 16–32% of patients with S. bovis bacteremia
Staging
TNM STAGING (7TH EDITION)
T stage
T1 = invades submucosa
T2 = invades muscularis propria
T3 = invades subserosa or non-peritonealized pericolic tissues
T4 = perforation of visceral peritoneum or directly invades into adjacent structure (bowel, bladder, uterus, pelvic wall)
N stage (mesenteric → supraclavicular)
N1 = 1–3 LN
N1a = 1 LN
N1b = 2–3 LN
N1c = tumor deposit(s) in the subserosa, mesentery, or nonperitonealized pericolic or perirectal tissues without regional nodal metastasis
N2 = ≥4 LN
N2a = 4–6 LN
N2b = 7 LN
M stage (liver, lung, bone, brain)
M1 = distant metastasis
STAGE GROUPING
Stage | TNM @ = any | Freq | 5-year survival |
---|---|---|---|
I | T1-2N0M0 | 15% | 77% |
IIA | T3N0M0 | 20% | 67% |
IIB | T4aN0M0 | 61% 46% | |
IIC | T4bN0M0 | ||
IIIA | T1-2N1M0, T1N2aM0 | 40% | 65–74% 52–58% 13–42% |
IIIB | T3-4aN1M0, T2-3N2aM0, T1-2N2bM0 | ||
IIIC | T4aN2aM0, T3-4aN2bM0, T4bN1-2M0 | ||
IV | T@N@M1 | 25% | <10% |
Investigations
BASIC
labs—CBCD, lytes, urea, Cr, AST, ALT, ALP, bilirubin, INR, PTT, albumin, lipase, CEA, CA19–9
imaging—barium enema, CT abd, CXR, MRI, and endorectal US in rectal cancer
biopsy—colonoscopy with biopsy, laparoscopy, laparotomy
Management of Colon Cancer
STAGE I
—surgical resection only
STAGE II
—surgical resection. Adjuvant chemotherapy (capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil–leucovorin, consider FOLFOX if high risk) may be given if adverse prognostic features (T4, perforation, obstruction, poorly differentiated, signet ring cell and mucinous histology, lymphovascular invasion, inadequate LN sampling <12)
STAGE III
—surgical resection + adjuvant chemotherapy (FOLFOX is the first choice. Other possibilities include capecitabine, 5–fluorouracil-leucovorin, infusional 5-fluorouracil if patient is not fit or has contraindications to oxaliplatin)
STAGE IV
—if metastasis limited to liver and potentially resectable, consider liver resection plus perioperative chemotherapy. Radiofrequency ablation could be considered if patient unfit for surgery. If non-resectable disease, palliative chemotherapy (FOLFIRI ± bevacizumab, FOLFOX ± bevacizumab, or regorafenib. capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil/LV if patient unfit. Raltitrexed if 5-fluorouracil intolerant. Cetuximab–irinotecan or single-agent panitumumab in third line if KRAS wild type)
Related Topics
Cancer Screening (p. 240)
Chemotherapy-Induced Diarrhea (p. 257)
Oral Mucositis (p. 256)
Hematochezia (p. 134)
Hereditary Cancers (p. 243)
Management of Rectal Cancer
HIGHLY RESECTABLE
(stage I)—transanal excision only if T1, <30% circumference, <3 cm [<1.2 in.], margins >0.3 cm [>0.12 in.], mobile, within 8 cm [3.1 in.] of anal verge, no lymphovascular or perineural invasion, well or moderately differentiated tumor, and no evidence of lymphadenopathy on pretreatment imaging. Otherwise, total mesorectal excision via low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection
RESECTABLE
(stage II and some stage III with no high risk feature (not fixed, not low <5 cm [2 in.], not bulky)—neoadjuvant radiation (short course, 1 week) + total mesorectal excision + adjuvant chemotherapy based on pathologic stage: FOLFOX × 12 if pathologic node positive (i.e. node positive); capecitabine × 8 if pathologic node negative. The type and the number of cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy are, however, not well established. Local guideline may vary. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is also an appropriate option for these patients
POSSIBLY RESECTABLE
(locally advanced disease, particularly if tethered to rectum or low-lying tumor <5 cm [<2 in.] from anus)—neoadjuvant chemoradiation (long course, 5 weeks, 5040 cGy plus infusional 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine) + total mesorectal excision + adjuvant chemotherapy for 4 months. Capecitabine or FOLFOX may be considered depending on the extent of downstaging with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and the pathologic stage
METASTATIC
(stage IV)—see management for stage IV colon cancer
NOTE: FOLFOX = 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin; FOLFIRI = 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan; 5-fluorouracil/LV = 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin
Treatment Issues
ESTIMATED BENEFITS OF ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR STAGE III COLORECTAL CANCER
RELATIVE RISK REDUCTION FROM ADJUVANT ONLINE
Recurrence | Death | |
---|---|---|
5–FU benefit | ||
Node –ve | 20% | 18% |
Node +ve | 43% | 38% |
FOLFOX benefit | ||
Node –ve | 39% | 24% |
Node + ve | 59% | 48% |
COLORECTAL CANCER SURVEILLANCE
—for patients with stage II and III disease who would be candidate for salvage treatment if recurrence, surveillance includes medical visit with history, physical examination and CEA every 3–6 months × 2 years, then every 6 months for the next 3 years. CT chest/abd (+ CT pelvis for rectal cancer) yearly × 5 years. Colonoscopy at 1 year and 3 years after initial diagnostic colonoscopy, then every 5 years. Proctosigmoidoscopy every 6 months for 5 years if rectal cancer but radiation not given
MODULATORS OF 5-FLUOROURACIL ACTIVITY
—leucovorin (LV) promotes formation of a stable ternary complex with thymidylate synthetase, permitting prolonged inhibition of the enzyme by 5-fluorouracil
LIVER RESECTION CRITERIA
resectable disease—involvement of <70% of liver and <6 segments, no involvement of major vessels including SMA, SMV, hepatic vein, hepatic artery, portal vein, and no metastases elsewhere. An evaluation by a hepatobiliary surgeon should always be considered
operable candidate—relatively young, no major comorbidities, performance status 0–1
predictive factors of recurrence post–liver metastasectomy—tumor >5 cm [>2 in.], >1 liver lesion, lymph node involvement, relapse-free survival <1 year, CEA >200 μg/L within 1 month post-surgery
Carcinoid Tumors
NEJM 1999 340:11
Pathophysiology
CLASSIFICATION OF NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS
high grade—poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, small cell-like tumors
low grade—carcinoid tumors, pancreatic islet tumors (VIPoma, glucagonoma, gastrinoma, insulinoma, somatostatinoma), paragangliomas, pheochromocytomas, medullary thyroid carcinomas
CLASSIFICATION BY LOCATION
foregut carcinoid—lungs, bronchi, stomach
midgut carcinoid—small intestine, appendix, proximal large bowel
hindgut carcinoid—distal colon, rectum, genitourinary tract
SPECIFIC DETAILS BY LOCATION
lungs and bronchi—derived from epithelial endocrine cells
well–differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (typical carcinoid, 67%)—more indolent. May secrete corticotrophin but rarely secretes serotonin; 90% 5-year survivalStay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree