Oncology

, David Ramirez1, 2 and Caren L. Hughes1, 2



(1)
Department of General Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

(2)
Division of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

 




Lung Cancer


NEJM 2004 350:4; NCCN Guideline 2014 version 4


Pathophysiology



CLASSIFICATION BY HISTOLOGY





  • small cell (SCLC, 15%)—mainly seen in smokers, central lesions, early metastasis compared to NSCLC


  • nonsmall cell (NSCLC, 85%)



    • adenocarcinoma (50–60%)—women, may develop in nonsmokers, peripheral lesions. Bronchoalveolar (BAC) subtype may originate distal to grossly recognizable bronchi. BAC tends to be well differentiated, grows along intact alveolar septa, and has a propensity for aerogenous and lymphatic spread. May present as diffuse infiltration on chest X-ray


    • squamous (25%)—mainly seen in smokers, central, cavitary lesions


    • large cell (15%)—peripheral lesions with prominent necrosis, slightly worse prognosis than squamous and adenocarcinoma


  • carcinoid (2%)—neuroendocrine origin. May cause airway obstruction, ectopic Cushing’s, and carcinoid syndrome


  • cystic adenoid carcinoma—locally invasive but may also metastasize


  • carcinosarcoma—localized lesion usually


RISK FACTORS





  • smoking—30× increased risk compared to nonsmokers. Smokers have 30% lifetime risk of developing lung cancer. 85–90% of all lung cancers are related to smoking. Polymorphisms in carcinogen activating enzymes (N-acetyltransferase (NAT1 and NAT2), CYP 1A1 and 2A6) and inactivating enzymes (glutathionone S-transferase S1 and M1) may contribute to individual susceptibility. The duration of smoking is a stronger risk factor than the number of cigarettes smoked. Cigar/pipe smoking (2×) and second-hand smoke (1.3×) are also risk factors


  • environmental—asbestos (7×), arsenic, silica, chromium, nickel, polycyclic hydrocarbons, radon (10×), β-carotene supplements (in heavy smokers, 2–3×)


  • diseases—tuberculosis, COPD, pulmonary fibrosis, previous radiation


  • family history


Clinical Features



LOCOREGIONAL

—cough, sputum (salty suggests bronchoalveolar), hemoptysis, dyspnea, chest pain, wheezing, dysphagia, brachial plexus (Pancoast tumour), hoarseness, Horner’s syndrome, superior vena cava syndrome


METASTATIC

—bone pain, jaundice, seizures, headaches, adrenal lesions, skin lesions


CONSTITUTIONAL

—weight loss, anorexia, fatigue


PARANEOPLASTIC SYNDROMES



























































 
SCLC

Squamous

Adenocarcinoma

Large cell

SIADH

     

Ectopic Cushing’s

     

Neurological syndromesa

     

Hypercalcemia
 

 

Clubbing or hypertrophic osteoarthropathy
 

 

Hypercoagulable state





Gynecomastia
     


aNeurological syndromes associated with SCLC include dementia, cerebellar degeneration, limbic encephalopathy, optic neuritis and retinopathy, paraneoplastic sensory neuropathy (anti-Hu antibodies), and Eaton–Lambert syndrome


Staging



STAGING FOR SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER





  • limited stage (40%)—tumor confined to the hemithorax, mediastinum, and supraclavicular nodes, which can be encompassed within a tolerable radiation therapy port


  • extensive stage (60%)—non-limited stage, including pleural effusion


Investigations



BASIC





  • labs—CBCD, lytes, urea, Cr, AST, ALT, ALP, bilirubin, LDH, INR, PTT, Ca, albumin, CEA


  • imaging—CXR (compared to old) and CT chest and upper abdomen (adrenals)


  • biopsy—bronchoscopy with lavage/wash/brushings/biopsy (if central lesion), endobronchial US (EBUS) with biopsy (if suspect nodal disease), thoracentesis (if pleural effusion), CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration (if peripheral lesion), mediastinoscopy (if any nodes on CT and potentially resectable disease, sens 90%, spc 100%), thoracotomy


SPECIAL





  • PET/CT—sens 88%, spc 85%. Usually used for staging in patients with potentially resectable disease


  • pulmonary function test—if surgical candidate


  • bone scan—if bone pain, elevated ALP or Ca, ≥N2


  • CT head or MR head—if ≥ N2 or symptomatic NSCLC, all SCLC


  • repeated sputum cytology—sens 60–80% for central lesions, 15–30% for peripheral lesions


Diagnostic and Prognostic Issues



REGIONAL LYMPH NODE CLASSIFICATION

—based on mediastinoscopy. Nodes are designated 1–14. N3 node (supraclavicular) = position 1, N2 nodes = position 2–9, and N1 nodes = position 10–14


KARNOFSKY PERFORMANCE STATUS













































PS

Function

100%

Normal, no complaints, no evidence of disease

90%

Able to carry on normal activity: minor symptoms of disease

80%

Normal activity with effort: some symptoms of disease

70%

Cares for self: unable to carry on normal activity or active work

60%

Requires occasional assistance but is able to care for needs

50%

Requires considerable assistance and frequent medical care

40%

Disabled: requires special care and assistance

30%

Severely disabled: hospitalization is indicated, death not imminent

20%

Very sick, hospitalization necessary: active treatment necessary

10%

Moribund, fatal processes progressing rapidly

0%

Dead


EASTERN CO-OPERATIVE ONCOLOGY GROUP (ECOG) PERFORMANCE STATUS





  • 0—normal. KPS 100%


  • 1—restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. KPS 80–90%


  • 2—ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. KPS 60–70%


  • 3—capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair >50% of waking hours. KPS 40–50%


  • 4—completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair. KPS 10–30%


  • 5—dead. KPS 0%


ADVERSE PROGNOSTIC FACTORS





  • general—poor performance status (ECOG >1), involuntary weight loss (>5%), advanced stage, SCLC


  • poor outcome after surgery—poor performance status, weight loss (>5%), low FEV1, low PaO2, recent history of smoking


PROGNOSIS OF SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER

—limited stage 20–40% 2-year survival, 16–24 months median survival, extensive stage <5% 2-year survival, 6–12 months median survival. Median survival post-relapse 4 months


Management



NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER





  • stage IAlobectomy/pneumonectomy. Consider stereotactic radiation if inoperable


  • stage IBlobectomy/pneumonectomy. Consider adjuvant chemotherapy (e.g. cisplatin–vinorelbine × 4) if high-risk features (e.g. >4 cm, high grade, visceral pleural involvement, vascular invasion). Consider stereotactic radiation or chemoradiation if inoperable


  • stage IIlobectomy/pneumonectomy + adjuvant chemotherapy [e.g. cisplatin–vinorelbine × 4, cisplatin-pemetrexed × 4 (if non-squamous)]


  • stage III a (N2 disease)—concurrent chemoradiation [e.g. cisplatin–etoposide × 4, carboplatin-pemetrexed × 4 (if non-squamous)], followed by either pneumonectomy/lobectomy or radiation boost


  • stage III a (unresectable) and III b—no surgery. Concurrent chemoradiation [e.g. cisplatin–etoposide × 4, carboplatin-pemetrexed × 4 (if non-squamous)] with potential chance of cure. May consider sequential chemo-radiation but may have reduced chance of cure


  • stage IV



    • Palliative radiation—should be administered before chemotherapy if patients present with symptomatic brain metastases, hemoptysis, SVC syndrome, severe bone pain or obstructive pneumonia


    • First line systemic therapies—for non-squamous histologies, consider erlotinib, gefitinib or afatinib (if EGFR+), crizotinib (if ALK+), or chemotherapy (e.g. cisplatin–pemetrexed × 4) followed by maintenance pemetrexed, bevacizumab or cetuximab. For squamous cell carcinoma, consider doublet chemotherapy (e.g. cisplatin-paclitaxel × 4, cisplatin-gemcitabine × 4)


    • Second and further line systemic therapies—with disease progression, consider pemetrexed (non-squamous), docetaxel, paclitaxel, albumin-bound paclitaxel, vinorelbine, vinblastine, gemcitabine, erlotinib, afatinib (EGFR+), ceritinib (ALK+), mitomycin or irinotecan


SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER





  • limited stage , T1 2N0lobectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiation (if mediastinal LN involvement)


  • limited stage , > T1 2N0concurrent chemoradiation (e.g. cisplatin-etoposide × 4) + prophylactic cranial irradiation if good partial/complete response


  • extensive stagepalliative chemotherapy (e.g. cisplatin-etoposide × 4, cisplatin-irinotecan × 4) + prophylactic cranial irradiation if partial/complete response. For recurrent disease after platinum-based therapy, consider topotecan, paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, irinotecan, oral etoposide, gemcitabine or temozolimide


NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS





  • low grade ( typical carcinoid )—lobectomy


  • intermediate grade ( atypical carcinoid )—lobectomy ± adjuvant chemotherapy cisplatin-etoposide (if stage II or III)


  • high grade large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma—treat as non-small cell lung cancer


  • high grade neuroendocrine small cell carcinoma or combined histologies—treat as small cell lung cancer


Treatment Issues



SMOKING CESSATION

—for smokers of <20 pack year, the risk of developing lung cancer decreases significantly after 15 years of abstinence, but still slightly higher than non-smokers


NON-RESECTABLE DISEASE CRITERIA

(stage IIIB or greater)—distant metastasis, mediastinal LN metastasis, trachea/contralateral main bronchi involvement, SVC obstruction, malignant pleural effusion, recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, SCLC (unless very early)


CONTRAINDICATIONS TO CHEST RADIATION

—significant pre-existing lung disease, cardiomyopathy, connective tissue disease (SLE, scleroderma), prior radiation to same body region, pregnancy


CONTRAINDICATIONS TO BEVACIZUMAB

—squamous cell carcinoma, hemoptysis, uncontrolled cerebral metastases, non-healing wounds, uncontrolled hypertension/proteinuria, bleeding diatheses, recent trauma/surgery


PREDICTIVE FACTORS FOR EGFR INHIBITORS

—clinical factors include women, Asian, never smokers, and adenocarcinoma. With all 4 factors, response rate 50% (compared to 10% normally). Pathologic predictive factors include EGFR mutation and high EGFR gene copy number


Mesothelioma


NEJM 2005 353:15


Pathophysiology



CLASSIFICATION BY HISTOLOGY





  • epithelioid—tubulopapillary, glandular, or solid. 50–60%


  • sarcomatoid—spindle cells


  • biphasic—mixed with both epithelioid and sarcomatoid features


ASBESTOS AND MESOTHELIOMA

—accounts for approximately 80% of mesothelioma. Risk of mesothelioma is higher with amphiboles/blue asbestos than chrysotile/white asbestos. Asbestos fibers may irritate the pleura, sever or pierce the mitotic spindle of cells and disrupt mitosis, induce generation of iron-related reactive oxygen species, and phosphorylate MAP kinases and ERK 1 and 2. Tumor usually starts from parietal pleura and invades locally


RISK FACTORS





  • family history—rare


  • environmental—asbestos, radiation


Clinical Features



LOCOREGIONAL

—pleural (pleural effusion, pleuritic chest pain, dyspnea, SVC obstruction), peritoneal (ascites, abdominal pain, bowel obstruction), pericardial (pericardial effusion, tamponade)


METASTATIC

—miliary spread, liver, lung, bone, and/or adrenal lesions


CONSTITUTIONAL

—weight loss, anorexia, fatigue


Staging



Investigations



BASIC





  • labs—CBCD, lytes, urea, Cr, AST, ALT, ALP, bili


  • imaging—CXR, CT chest/abd, or MRI chest


  • biopsy—thoracentesis (sens 33–84%, cytology is usually inadequate), thoracoscopy with pleural biopsy


SPECIAL





  • serum mesothelinrelated protein (SMRP)—sens 75–84%


  • PET scan—if surgical candidate


Prognostic Issues



ADVERSE PROGNOSTIC FACTORS

—male, poor performance status, sarcomatoid subtype, leukocytosis, anemia, thrombocytosis, advanced stage, high PET ratios


PROGNOSIS

stage I = 16 months median survival, ≥3 adverse prognostic factors = <6 months median survival, stage IIIV = 10 months median survival


Management



STAGE I, II

(resectable disease)—surgery (pleurectomy/decortication, extrapleural pneumonectomy, debulking) is controversial and of questionable benefit. Pleurectomy/decortication should be the first option for patients with operable early stage disease and is an option for patients with locally advanced disease who are not candidates for extrapleural pneumonectomy. Extrapleural pneumonectomy should be considered for highly selected patients (age <55, performance status ≤1, stage I or II, epithelioid histology) and only after a good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, to be followed by adjuvant radiation. Otherwise, treat as unresectable disease


STAGE III, IV

(unresectable disease)—palliative chemotherapy (cisplatin–pemetrexed with vitamin B12 and folic acid supplementation or cisplatin–gemcitabine). Second-line options include repeating cisplatin–gemcitabine, cisplatin–pemetrexed, and vinorelbine. Pleurodesis or indwelling pleural catheters should be considered if recurrent effusion


Thymoma and Thymic Carcinoma



Pathophysiology



CLASSIFICATION BY HISTOLOGY





  • epithelial


  • neuroendocrine


  • germ cell


  • lymphoid


  • stromal


Clinical Features



LOCOREGIONAL

—dyspnea, cough, chest pain, hoarseness, dysphagia, superior vena cava obstruction

METASTATIC


CONSTITUTIONAL

—weight loss, anorexia, fatigue


PARANEOPLASTIC

—myasthenia gravis (30–50%, diplopia, ptosis, dysphagia, weakness, fatigue), pure red cell aplasia (5–15%), pure white cell aplasia, pancytopenia, hypogammaglobulinemia (recurrent infections, diarrhea), rheumatologic diseases, and endocrinopathies. Note that remission of thymoma does not necessarily correlate with improvement of paraneoplastic syndromes


Staging



Investigations



BASIC





  • labs—CBCD, lytes, urea, Cr, glucose, AST, ALT, ALP, bili


  • imaging—CXR, CT chest


  • biopsy


Management



STAGE I, II, III

(resectable disease)—resection (usually including adjacent lung parenchyma and pericardium) ± adjuvant radiation ± (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy [cisplatin–doxorubicin–cyclophosphamide (preferred for thymoma), carboplatin-paclitaxel (preferred for thymic carcinoma), cisplatin–etoposide]


STAGE IV

(unresectable disease)—palliative radiation ± palliative chemotherapy [cisplatin–doxorubicin–cyclophosphamide (preferred for thymoma), carboplatin-paclitaxel (preferred for thymic carcinoma), cisplatin–etoposide]


Treatment Issues



INDICATIONS FOR RADIOTHERAPY

—locally advanced or metastatic unresectable disease, residual disease post-resection, and complete resection of invasive thymoma or thymic carcinoma


Breast Cancer


NEJM 2004 350:14


Differential Diagnosis of Breast Mass



BENIGN

—cysts (obstructed collecting ducts), fibroadenoma (overgrowth of periductal stromal connective tissue within the lobules), mammary duct ectasia, intraductal papilloma, mastitis, fat necrosis


ATYPICAL HYPERPLASIA

—3–5× increased risk of breast cancer


CARCINOMA IN SITU

—ductal (DCIS), lobular (LCIS)


MALIGNANT

—breast cancer (see below for details)


Pathophysiology



CLASSIFICATION OF PRE-MALIGNANT LESIONS





  • ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)—precursor lesion to invasive cancer


  • lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS)—diffuse and can be bilateral (risk of contralateral invasive breast cancer may be as high as ipsilateral disease). Marker for increased risk of development of invasive cancer (absolute risk ~1%/year of development of invasive cancer)


CLASSIFICATION OF MALIGNANT LESIONS





  • ductal adenocarcinoma—80%


  • lobular adenocarcinoma—10%, more likely to be bilateral and multicentric. Tends to metastasize later than ductal carcinoma and spreads to unusual sites such as GI tract, peritoneum, and meninges. Most are ER+ and 20–30% have E-cadherin mutations (associated with hereditary diffuse-type gastric cancer). Clinically, more difficult to detect by palpation and by mammography


  • tubular, medullary, papillary, colloid, spindle cell, mucinous—10%, better prognosis


  • sarcoma like—phylloides, post-radiation


RISK FACTORS





  • personal—female, increased age, early age of menarche, late age of first parity, lack of breast feeding, late age of menopause, oral contraceptives (↑ risk if >4 years of use), hormone replacement, high socioeconomic status


  • family history (10%)—affected relatives, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, Li–Fraumeni syndrome, Cowden syndrome


  • environmental—alcohol, low caloric intake, low physical activity, weight gain


  • prior breast pathology—atypical hyperplasia, prior breast tumor (in situ or carcinoma)


  • gail model—used to estimate the risk of breast cancer in the Breast Cancer Detection and Demonstration Project. Includes age at menarche, age at first live birth, number of previous breast biopsies, presence of atypical hyperplasia in breast biopsy, and number of first-degree relatives with breast cancer


BRCA BREAST CANCERS

—BRCA1 is associated with basal-like subtype and triple negative (ER negative, PR negative, Her2 negative) phenotype. BRCA2 is associated with luminal subtype. Phase II data have shown that these tumors are particularly sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors due to defects in DNA homologous recombination repair from BRCA mutation


Clinical Features



RATIONAL CLINICAL EXAMINATION SERIES DOES THIS PATIENT HAVE BREAST CANCER?





  • PHYSICAL—the value of inspection is unproved. Palpation with clinical breast examination (CBE) includes proper positioning of the patient, use of a vertical strip pattern, proper position and movement of the fingers (pads of 2nd–4th fingers rolling motion), thoroughness of search, and spending at least 3 min per breast (sens 54%, spc 94%, LR+ 10.6, LR– 0.47)




  • APPROACH—“screening by both clinical breast examination and mammography is associated with decreased breast cancer mortality. Clinical breast examination alone detected between 3–45% of breast cancers that were missed by screening mammography. While clinical breast examination alone cannot rule out disease, the high specificity of certain abnormal findings significantly increases the probability of breast cancer”




  • UPDATE—US Preventive Services Task Force and the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care both discourage self-breast examination. Evidence to definitively recommend for or against routine clinical breast examination is insufficient.

JAMA 1996 282:13

The Rational Clinical Examination. McGrawHill, 2009



  • LOCOREGIONAL—breast lump (with or without pain), nipple discharge, eczema or retraction, skin erosion, erythema or edema, change in breast size, axillary adenopathy




  • METASTATIC—bone pain, seizure, headache, dyspnea, jaundice




  • CONSTITUTIONAL—fatigue, weight loss, anorexia


Investigations



BASIC





  • labs—CBCD, lytes, urea, Cr, AST, ALT, ALP, bilirubin, INR, PTT, albumin


  • imaging—mammogram (15% false negative), US breast, MRI breast (for dense breasts or those with BRCA1/2 mutations)


  • biopsy—needle core biopsy (FNA provides cytology only and cannot differentiate between invasive and in situ disease), excisional biopsy


SPECIAL





  • bone scan and CT chest / abd / pelvis—if clinical stage IIIA (T3N1M0) or above


  • tumor markers—CA 15-3 or CA27.29 if metastatic disease


Staging



TNM STAGING (7TH EDITION)





  • T stage (same clinical and pathologic staging)



    • T1 ≤ 2 cm (T1mic = microinvasion ≤0.1 cm, T1a >0.1–0.5 cm, T1b >0.5–1 cm, T1c >1–2 cm)


    • T2 > 2–5 cm


    • T3 > 5 cm


    • T4 = invades skin or chest wall (T4a = extends to chest wall, but not including pectoralis muscle; T4b = edema with peau d’orange or ulceration of the skin, or satellite skin nodules confined to the same breast; T4c = both T4a and T4b; T4d = inflammatory carcinoma)


  • N stage (axillary, internal mammary, supraclavicular)



    • N1



      • cN1 = ipsilateral mobile axillary lymph node(s)


      • pN1mi = micrometastasis 0.2–2 mm


      • pN1a = 1–3 axillary lymph node(s)


      • pN1b = internal mammary lymph nodes with microscopic disease detected by SLND but not clinically apparent


      • pN1c = N1a and N1b


    • N2



      • cN2a = ipsilateral fixed/matted axillary lymph node(s)


      • cN2b = ipsilateral internal mammary nodes in the absence of clinically evident axillary lymph node


      • pN2a = 4–9 axillary lymph nodes


      • pN2b = ipsilateral internal mammary nodes in the absence of clinically evident axillary lymph node


    • N3



      • cN3a = ipsilateral infraclavicular lymph node(s)


      • cN3b = ipsilateral internal mammary and axillary lymph node(s)


      • cN3c = ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node(s)


      • pN3a = 10 or more axillary lymph nodes or metastasis to the infraclavicular lymph nodes


      • pN3b = metastasis in clinically apparent ipsilateral internal mammary lymph nodes in the presence of one or more positive axillary node, or in >3 axillary lymph nodes and in internal mammary lymph nodes with microscopic disease detected by sentinel lymph node dissection but not clinically apparent


      • pN3c = ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node


  • M stage (lungs, liver, bones, brain)



    • M1 = distant metastasis





STAGE GROUPINGS








































Stage

TNM @ = any

5-Year survival

I

T1N0M0, T0-1N1miM0

100%

IIA

T0-1N1M0, T2N0M0

90%

IIB

T2N1M0, T3N0M0

80%

IIIA

T0-2N2M0, T3N1-2M0

70%

IIIB

T4N0-2M0

50%

IIIC

T@N3M0

40%

IV

T@N@M1

20%


Diagnostic and Prognostic Issues



MAMMOGRAPHIC FINDINGS OF BREAST CANCER

—spiculated, crab-like, puckering lesions, architectural distortion, clustered microcalcifications


SCREENING

—if average risk population, mammogram q2 years starting age 50 (may begin annual mammogram screening earlier at age 40); if high risk, annual clinical breast examination and mammography (starting 5-10 years younger than age of onset for youngest proband if strong family history)


POOR PROGNOSTIC FACTORS

—young age, advanced stage (especially nodal status and tumor size), high grade, Her2/neu+, ER–, PR–, lymphatic/vascular invasion


Management



DCIS





  • resection—breast-conserving surgery plus adjuvant radiation, or mastectomy


  • adjuvant hormonal—tamoxifen may be considered after breast-conserving surgery for selected individuals if ER/PR positive


LCIS





  • resection—observation, breast-conserving surgery or bilateral mastectomy for selected individuals


  • hormonal—tamoxifen or raloxifene may be used for prevention of invasive breast cancer in selected individuals


STAGE I AND II



1.

resection—breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy, plus sentinel node biopsy. Axillary lymph node dissection if clinically node positive and biopsy proven. If sentinel lymph node positive, proceed to axillary dissection

 

2.

adjuvant systemic therapy—taxane ± anthracycline ± trastuzumab

 

3.

adjuvant radiation—always give adjuvant radiation after breast-conserving surgery. Adjuvant radiation should be considered after mastectomy if large tumor, skin involvement, muscle involvement, positive nodes, positive margins, or lymphovascular invasion

 

4.

adjuvant hormonal therapy—give if ER/PR positive

 


STAGE III



1.

neoadjuvant / Adjuvant systemic therapy—taxane ± anthracycline ± trastuzumab ± pertuzumab (only approved in neoadjuvant setting, not adjuvant). Adjuvant therapy if tumor resectable upfront

 

2.

resection—breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy, plus axillary lymph node dissection

 

3.

adjuvant radiation—almost always given for stage III disease

 

4.

adjuvant hormonal therapy—give if ER/PR positive

 


STAGE IV



1.

er / pr− , her2− ( triple negative ) disease—chemotherapy choices include anthracyclines (doxorubicin, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin), taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel, albumin-bound paclitaxel), anti-metabolites (gemcitabine, capecitabine), microtubule inhibitors (vinorelbine, eribulin, ixabepilone), platinums (carboplatin, cisplaitin), or various combinations (e.g. doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide, gemcitabine-carboplatin)

 

2.

er / pr +, her2 disease—if not rapidly progressive/symptomatic and no significant visceral involvement, consider endocrine therapy such as tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, or fulvestrant. In premenopausal women, the use of aromatase inhibitors and fluvestrant require either oophorectomy or LHRH agonists. Otherwise, consider single agent or combination chemotherapy (see triple negative disease)

 

3.

er / pr +, her2 + disease—if not rapidly progressive/symptomatic and no significant visceral involvement, consider HER2-directed therapy in combination with endocrine therapy. Otherwise, pertuzumab-trastuzumab-docetaxel (or paclitaxel) is first line therapy. Other options include ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), lapatinib-based combinations (with capectiabine or trastuzumab), or single agent or combination chemotherapy (see triple negative disease) plus trastuzumab

 

4.

er / pr -, her2 + disease—pertuzumab-trastuzumab-docetaxel (or paclitaxel) is first line therapy. Other options include ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), lapatinib-based combinations (with capectiabine or trastuzumab), or single agent or combination chemotherapy (see triple negative disease) plus trastuzumab

 

5.

palliative radiation—for symptomatic control of localized disease (e.g. bone metastasis, painful skin lesions)

 

6.

bone metastases—if bone metastasis, pamidronate 90 mg IV over 2 h q4w, or zoledronate 4 mg IV over 15 min q4w (dose based on creatinine clearance) for up to 2 years. Denosumab 120 mg SC q4wk represents an alternative to bisphosphonates

 


LOCAL RECURRENCE

—biopsy to try to distinguish recurrence from new primary, metastatic workup. If isolated local recurrence, resection/completion mastectomy ± radiation. Hormonal and/or chemotherapy may also be considered


Breast Surgery Overview



COMPLETE SURGERY

—modified radical mastectomy, radical mastectomy. Indications for mastectomy include multicentric disease, diffuse malignant appearing microcalcifications on mammography, prior breast radiation, and pregnancy. Relative indications include large tumor (>5 cm), connective tissue disease (radiation contraindicated), and patient preference. Poorer cosmesis compared to breast-conserving surgery


BREAST CONSERVING SURGERY

—excisional biopsy, lumpectomy, partial mastectomy, quadrantectomy, wide local excision


SURGICAL MARGIN

—positive margin is defined as tumor touching ink and would require re-excision


AXILLARY LYMPH NODE DISSECTION (ALND)

—used in all invasive carcinoma. May be avoided if sentinel lymph node negative


SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY

—indicated for clinically node negative tumors. Contraindications include locally advanced breast cancer, any palpable lymph nodes, multifocal cancers, previous disruptive breast procedures, and adverse reactions to dyes. Proceed to ALND if positive nodes or unable to identify sentinel node


Hormonal Therapy Overview



HORMONAL REGIMENS





  • ovarian ablation (premenopausal only)—oophorectomy, radiation, or LHRH agonists (goserelin 3.6 mg IM every month, leuprolide). Consider combining with tamoxifen (in adjuvant or metastatic settings) or aromatase inhibitors (in metastatic setting only) for maximal effect


  • selective estrogen receptor modulators (premenopausal or postmenopausal)—tamoxifen 20 mg PO daily. Side effects include hot flashes, mood swings, vaginal discharge, thromboembolism, and endometrial cancer. Protective effect with bones and lipids


  • aromatase inhibitors (for postmenopausal women or premenopausal women after ovarian ablation as suppress peripheral estrone production only)—inhibit aromatase, an enzyme in skin, adipose tissue, and breast that converts androstenedione (from the adrenals) to estrone and estradiol. Steroidal (exemestane 25 mg PO daily), nonsteroidal (letrozole 2.5 mg PO daily, anastrozole 1 mg PO daily). Side effects include hot flashes, mood swings, vaginal dryness, myalgia/arthralgia, headache, osteoporosis, dyslipidemia, weight gain, and potentially CAD


  • antiestrogenfulvestrant 500 mg IM loading dose on days 1 and 15, then 500 mg monthly


  • othersmegestrol acetate 160 mg PO daily, methyltestosterone


PREDICTIVE FACTORS FOR HORMONAL THERAPY

—degree of response to tamoxifen varies (ER + PR+ > ER + PR– > ER–PR+ > ER–PR–). Hormonal therapy is not given to patients with ER- and PR- cancers. Her2+ may also interfere with ER pathways


APPROACH IN THE ADJUVANT SETTING

—for premenopausal women, consider tamoxifen × 5-10 years. For postmenopausal women, consider one of the following: anastrozole × 5 years, letrozole × 5 years, tamoxifen × 2–3 years followed by exemestane or anastrozole to complete 5 years of adjuvant hormonal therapy, tamoxifen × 5 years followed by letrozole × 5 years, or tamoxifen × 10 years. Consider aromatase inhibitors as first hormonal agent if >10% risk of relapse in first 2 years (e.g. ≥4 positive nodes, low ER or grade 3 disease)


APPROACH IN THE METASTATIC SETTING

—patients with slowly progressive disease, no visceral involvement, and minimal symptoms may be best served with a trial of endocrine therapy. For premenopausal women, consider tamoxifen or ovarian ablation + tamoxifen → aromatase inhibitor 1 → aromatase inhibitor 2 → fulvestrant → megestrol. For postmenopausal women, aromatase inhibitor 1 → tamoxifen → aromatase inhibitor 2 → fulvestrant → megestrol. Time to progression is 8 months with tamoxifen and 10 months with aromatase inhibitors


Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Chemotherapy Overview



WHO SHOULD GET ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY: THE NCCN GUIDELINE





  • all histologic subtypes except tubular or colloid cancers—adjuvant chemotherapy should be given if ≥1 cm or node positive. Consider chemotherapy if 0.6–1 cm and high grade or lymphovascular invasion. Add trastuzumab if Her2/neu positive


  • tubular or colloid cancers—adjuvant chemotherapy should be given if ≥3 cm or node positive. Consider chemotherapy if 1–2.9 cm


ONCOTYPE Dx

—the 21-gene recurrence score is a validated prognostic assay. It is applicable only to pathologically node-negative, hormone receptor-positive, and Her2-negative tumors to help with the decision of adjuvant chemotherapy. A score of <18, 18-30, and >31 defines the low (no chemotherapy recommended), intermediate (chemotherapy should be considered) and high risk (chemotherapy recommended) groups, respectively


ADJUVANT! ONLINE

(www.​adjuvantonline.​com)—this web-based program determines both recurrence risk and probability of survival with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, it does not account for Her2 status


NEOADJUVANT/ADJUVANT REGIMENS





  • first generation—CMF PO, AC × 4, FEC50 × 6


  • second generation—CAF × 6, FAC × 6, CEF × 6, FEC100 × 6, AC × 4 + D × 4, DC × 4


  • third generation—DAC × 6, FEC100 × 3 + D × 3, AC × 4 + T × 4 (dose dense), FEC × 4 + T × 8


  • note—for Her2 positive add trastuzumab plus pertuzumab to neoadjuvant regimens as clinically indicated, and trastuzumab alone to adjuvant regimens. Abbreviations: A = doxorubicin, C = cyclophosphamide, D = docetaxel, E = epirubicin, F = 5-fluorouracil, M = methotrexate, T = paclitaxel


ESTIMATED BENEFITS OF ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY





RELATIVE RISK REDUCTION FOR MORTALITY























 
Postmenopausal

Premenopausal

1st gen.

8% ER+, 15% ER−

30%

2nd gen.

26% ER+, 32% ER−

44%

3rd gen.

40% ER+, 45% ER−

55%




RELATIVE RISK REDUCTION FOR RECURRENCE























 
Postmenopausal

Premenopausal

1st gen.

12% ER+, 23% ER−

37%

2nd gen.

30% ER+, 38% ER−

50%

3rd gen.

43% ER+, 50% ER−

59%


ADVERSE EFFECTS OF ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY





  • alopecia—anthracycline or taxane regimens (100%), CMF (50%)


  • febrile neutropenia—DAC (40%) and dose dense regimens require GCSF. CEF > FEC; FAC > FEC; ACT > AC/CMF


  • nausea and vomiting—CMF > anthracyclines


  • other acute side effects—fatigue and weight gain. With taxanes, may experience myalgia, arthralgia, and neuropathy (motor, sensory)


  • premature ovarian failure—CMF > CEF/FEC > AC; DAC > FAC


  • other longterm side effects—cardiotoxicity (dose dependent and increases with age, ~1% with anthracycline doses used in adjuvant regimens), secondary cancers (AML, MDS with alkylating agents, ~1–2% depending on regimen)


PREDICTIVE FACTORS FOR ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY BENEFIT

—younger age, high grade, ER negative, Her2 positive (possibly for anthracycline and taxane-based regimens)


APPROACH IN THE ADJUVANT SETTING

—chemotherapy usually starts 4–10 weeks after surgery. Consider anthracycline followed by taxane (e.g. AC × 4 and weekly T × 12) for intermediate/high risk or node-positive breast cancer; anthracycline ± taxane + trastuzumab for Her2 positive breast cancer; CMF or DC if anthracycline contraindicated or preexisting heart disease


Palliative Chemotherapy Overview



PALLIATIVE REGIMENS

—single agent choices include anthracyclines (doxorubicin, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin), taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel, albumin-bound paclitaxel), anti-metabolites (gemcitabine, capecitabine), microtubule inhibitors (vinorelbine, eribulin, ixabepilone), and platinums (carboplatin, cisplaitin). Doublet regimens include doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide, carboplatin-gemcitabine, doxorubicin-paclitaxel, capecitabine-docetaxel, docetaxel-gemcitabine, and paclitaxel-gemcitabine


APPROACH IN THE METASTATIC SETTING

—patients with rapidly growing disease, especially involvement of visceral organs such as lung or liver may benefit more from chemotherapy compared to hormonal therapy due to a more rapid response. The choice of first line palliative chemotherapy depends on prior adjuvant chemotherapy, disease-free interval, patient’s performance status, and willingness/ability to tolerate side effects. Doublet regimens are associated with higher response rate, while single agents are better tolerated and are particularly appropriate for patients who are elderly or have poor performance status. Consider doublet regimens in patients that need a rapid response to relieve tumor-related symptoms. At eventual disease progression, change chemotherapy to non-cross-resistance single agents


Biological Therapy Overview



HER2/NEU STATUS

—15–20% positive. Her2 positivity is a poor prognostic factor, but predicts response to trastuzumab, pertuzumab, ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), and lapatinib


APPROACH

—Her2 positive disease should be treated with chemotherapy plus trastuzumab in the adjuvant/neoadjuvant settings. Do not give concomitantly with anthracyclines. In the metastatic setting, give chemotherapy and then maintenance trastuzumab until progression


ADVERSE EFFECTS

—infusion reactions (40%, usually with first administration), cardiotoxicity, and pulmonary (rare)


Management of Brain Metastases



APPROACH

—steroids, resection plus radiation, or radiation alone if resection not possible. Principles are similar for CNS recurrence



  • surgery—consider resection if solitary lesion or primary lesion causing neurological complications. Surgery plus radiation is associated with better overall survival than radiation alone for eligible candidates (10 vs. 6 months)


  • radiation—may be re-irradiated if over 1 year from first whole brain radiation


  • stereotactic radiation—less generalized toxicity. If <3 lesions and all <3 cm [<1.2 in.]


  • chemotherapy—limited role with high-dose methotrexate and possibly capecitabine


Esophageal Cancer


NEJM 2003 349:23


Pathophysiology



CLASSIFICATION BY HISTOLOGY





  • adenocarcinoma—75% in distal esophagus


  • squamous—evenly distributed between upper, middle, and lower thirds of esophagus


  • melanoma


  • leiomyosarcoma


  • lymphoma


  • carcinoid





RISK FACTORS































































 
Squamous

Adeno

Barrett’s esophagus


>8×

Reflux symptoms


4–8×

Obesity


2–4×

Smoking

4–8×

2–4×

Alcohol Use

4–8×


Caustic injury to esophagus

>8×


Achalasia

4–8×


Poverty

2–4×


History of H&N cancer

>8×


History of breast cancer with radiation

4–8×

4–8×

Plummer–Vinson syndrome

>8×


Non-epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma

>8×


Frequent hot beverages

<2×



Clinical Features



LOCAL

—dysphagia (74%), odynophagia (17%), upper GI bleed, epigastric pain


REGIONAL

—dyspnea, cough, hoarseness, pain (retrosternal, back, RUQ)


METASTATIC

—Virchow’s node, hepatomegaly, pleural effusion


CONSTITUTIONAL

—anorexia, fatigue, weight loss


Related Topics

Barrett’s Esophagus (p. 127)

Esophageal Dysphagia (p. 124)

Gastric Cancer (p. 217)


Staging



TNM STAGING (7TH EDITION)





  • T stage



    • T1 = invades lamina propria, muscularis mucosa, or submucosa


    • T2 = invades muscularis propria


    • T3 = invades adventitia


    • T4 = invades into adjacent structures (pleura, pericardium, diaphragm, aorta, vertebral body, trachea, mediastinum)


  • N stage (cervical paraesophageal, right recurrent laryngeal, left paratracheal, upper and lower paraesophageal, infraaortic, infracarinal and lower posterior mediastinal regions)



    • N1 = 1-2 regional lymph nodes


    • N2 = 3-6 regional lymph nodes


    • N3 = 7 or more regional lymph nodes


  • M stage (spreads rapidly and early. Over 50% unresectable/metastatic disease at presentation)



    • M1 = distant metastasis





STAGE GROUPINGS

























































Stage

Squamous TNM @ = any

Adeno TNM @ = any

5-year survival

0

TisN0M0

TisN0M0

>95%

IA

T1N0M0G1

T1N0M0G1-2

50–80%

IB

T1N0M0G2-3

T2-3N0M0G1 lower eso.

T1N0M0G3

T2N0M0G1-2
 

IIA

T2-3N0M0G1 upper/mid

T2-3N0M0G2-3 lower eso.

T2N0M0G3

30–40%

IIB

T2-3N0M0G2-3 upper/mid

T1-2N1M0G@

T3N0M0G@

T1-2N1M0G@

10–30%

IIIA

T1-2N2M0G@

T3N1M0G@

T4aN0M0G@

T1-2N2M0G@

T3N1M0G@

T4aN0M0G@

10–15%

IIIB

T3N2M0G@

T3N2M0G@

IIIC

T4aN1-2M0G@

T4bN@M0G@

T@N3M0G@

T4aN1-2M0G@

T4bN@M0G@

T@N3M0G@

IV

T@N@M1G@

T@N@M1G@

<5%


Investigations



BASIC





  • labs—CBCD, lytes, urea, Cr, AST, ALT, ALP, bilirubin, INR, PTT, albumin, lipase, CEA


  • imaging—CXR, barium swallow, CT chest and abd, endoscopic US (excellent for staging), PET scan (preoperative workup)


  • biopsy—gastroscopy ± laparoscopy


Diagnostic and Prognostic Issues



SCREENING

(for Barrett’s)—consider screening gastroscopy in patients with risk factors (age ≥50, male, white race, chronic GERD >5 years, hiatal hernia, high BMI or intra-abdominal fat distribution, ±tobacco use, ±nocturnal reflux)


SURVEILLANCE

(for Barrett’s)—endoscopic surveillance with four-quadrant biopsies q3-5 years (if no dysplasia on biopsy), q6-12 months (low-grade dysplasia), q3 months (high-grade dysplasia without eradication therapy)


POOR PROGNOSTIC FACTORS

—weight loss >10%, dysphagia, large tumors, advanced age, lymphatic micrometastases


Management



NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT

—dietician consult. Consider supplemental feeding if significant weight loss, but only if benefits greater than risk


RESECTABLE





  • surgical resection (right transthoracic approach, transhiatal approach)—surgery only for T1N0 disease. Add preoperative chemoradiation (weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel, or 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin, 4140–5040 cGy) if T2-4 or N+ disease. Endoscopic resection is a reasonable alternative to surgery, particularly for older individuals, medically inoperable patients


  • definitive chemoradiation—weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel, or 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin, 4140-5040 cGy may be a reasonable alternative to surgery, particularly for older individuals, medically inoperable patients, and cervical esophageal carcinoma (difficult resection)


  • magic regimen—ECF × 3 (E = epirubicin, C = cisplatin, F = infusional 5-fluorouracil) + surgical resection followed by ECF × 3 similar to treatment for gastric cancer if GE junction involved, good performance status, and not dysphagic


  • immediate resection followed by postoperative chemoradiation—if unsuitable for preoperative therapy


LOCALLY ADVANCED, UNRESECTABLE

(T3–4, N1, 65%, median survival 12–14 months)



  • adenocarcinoma—primary chemoradiation if localized. See also metastatic, unresectable cancer


  • squamous cell carcinoma—chemoradiation (weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel, or 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin, 4140-5040 cGy). Palliative surgical resection may be considered for selected patients (increased local control), although squamous cell carcinomas are very sensitive to chemoradiation, and thus surgery may not be needed


METASTATIC, UNRESECTABLE

(M1, 15%, median survival 9–12 months)



  • palliative chemotherapy—similar to gastric cancer. Standard regimens include ECF, DCF (C = cisplatin, D = docetaxel, E = epirubicin, F = 5-fluorouracil), ECX and EOX, EOF (X = capecitabine, O = oxaliplatin). For patients with poor performance status, consider CF, FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil–leucovorin–oxaliplatin), FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil–leucovorin–irinotecan), or 5-fluorouracil or irinotecan alone. No standard for second line, which may include FOLFIRI, irinotecan alone, or taxane alone. Response rate 10–30% for single agents and 30–50% for combination therapy


  • palliative radiation—brachytherapy, external beam radiation


  • palliative procedures—dilatation and endoluminal stent if obstruction, phototherapy, G-tube insertion


Treatment Issues



FOLLOW-UP

—no agreed upon surveillance program. Clinical assessment every 3 months during the first year, then every 6 months for a total of 5 years. Endoscopy as clinically indicated


Gastric Cancer



Pathophysiology



CLASSIFICATION BY HISTOLOGY





  • adenocarcinoma (95%)—diffuse, intestinal, or mixed type


  • leiomyosarcoma (5%)


  • lymphoma—mucosal-associated lymphoma


  • carcinoid


  • GI stromal


PATHOLOGIC SUBTYPES









































 
Diffuse type

Intestinal type

Location

Proximal

Distal

Age of onset

Younger

Older

Gender

F > M

M > F

Risk factors

Hereditary

Endemic

H. pylori

32%

89%

Metastasis

Peritoneal

Hepatic

Outcome

Worse

Better


LINITIS PLASTICA

(15%)—diffuse disease involving the entire stomach. Very poor prognosis; slightly better with superficial/expansive type (5–10%)


LOCATION

—35% proximal, 25% body, 40% distal


RISK FACTORS





  • ethnicity—Asian origin (Japanese and Chinese)


  • family history—affected relatives (L), HNPCC, FAP, Li–Fraumeni, Peutz–Jeghers syndrome, hereditary diffuse gastric cancer


  • environmental—nitrite consumption (pickled, salted, and cured foods), alcohol (U), smoking (U), lower socioeconomic status (L)


  • diseasesH. pylori (L), EBV, hiatus hernia (U), pernicious anemia (3–18×), chronic gastritis, gastric polyps, previous partial gastrectomy where U = upper stomach, L = lower stomach


Clinical Features



LOCOREGIONAL

—epigastric pain, nausea and vomiting, dysphagia, upper GI bleed (melena, hematemesis), anemia, abdominal mass


METASTATIC

—hepatomegaly, Virchow’s node (left supraclavicular LN), Irish’s node (left axillary LN), dyspnea, sister Mary Joseph nodule (umbilicus), Krukenberg tumor (ovaries)


CONSTITUTIONAL

—anorexia, fatigue, weight loss


PARANEOPLASTIC

—acanthosis nigricans, seborrheic keratosis (Leser–Trelat sign), inflammatory myositis, circinate erythema, cerebellar ataxia, thromboembolism, Cushing’s, carcinoid


Staging



TNM STAGING (7TH EDITION)





  • T stage



    • T1 = invades lamina propria, muscularis mucosa or submucosa


    • T2 = invades muscularis propria


    • T3 = penetrates subserosa without invasion of serosa (visceral peritoneum)


    • T4 = invades serosa (visceral peritoneum) or adjacent structures (esophagus, small bowel, transverse colon, spleen, liver, pancreas, adrenal gland, kidney, diaphragm, abdominal wall, retroperitoneum)


  • N stage (around stomach and along left gastric, common hepatic, splenic, celiac arteries)



    • N1 = 1-2 LN


    • N2 = 3-6 LN


    • N3 = 7 or more LN


  • M stage (liver, lung, peritoneum, left supraclavicular LN, left axillary LN, umbilicus, ovary)



    • M1 = distant metastasis




STAGE GROUPING















































Stage

TNM @ = any

Freq

5-year survival

IA

T1N0M0

10%

78%

IB

T2N0M0, T1N1M0

58%

IIA

T3N0M0, T2N1M0, T1N2M0

20%

34%

IIB

T4aN0M0, T3N1M0, T2N2M0, T1N3M0

IIIA

T4aN1M0, T3N2M0, T2N3M0

40%

8–20%

IIIB

T4bN0-1M0, T4aN2M0, T3N3M0

IIIC

T4bN2-3M0, T4aN3M0

IV

T@N@M1

30%

7%


Investigations



BASIC





  • labs—CBCD, lytes, urea, Cr, AST, ALT, ALP, bilirubin, INR, PTT, albumin, lipase, CEA, CA 19–9


  • imaging—CXR, barium swallow, endoscopic US, CT abd, US abd, PET/CT


  • biopsy—gastroscopy (biopsy with H. pylori testing), laparotomy


Diagnostic and Prognostic Issues



SCREENING

—screening program in Japan may have contributed to the improved survival in that population through early detection of resectable gastric cancer. Not recommended outside countries with a high gastric cancer burden


POOR PROGNOSTIC FACTORS

—advanced stage, high grade, proximal location


Related Topics

Dyspepsia (p. 125)

Leser-Trelat Sign (p. 418)

MALT (p. 197)

Melena (p. 131)


Management



STAGE IA

gastrectomy (total or subtotal) with D2 dissection


STAGE IB, II, III





  • option 1neoadjuvant ECF × 3 (epirubicin, cisplatin, infusional 5-fluorouracil) + surgery + adjuvant ECF × 3; 43% of patients able to complete treatment


  • option 2gastrectomy (total or subtotal) with D2 dissection + adjuvant chemoradiation (5-fluorouracil)


  • insufficient evidence—adjuvant radiation alone, adjuvant chemotherapy alone, and neoadjuvant radiation


STAGE IV (T1-4N1–3M0)

—same treatment approach as stage III if resectable disease. Otherwise, same treatment approach as metastatic disease


STAGE IV (M1, MEDIAN SURVIVAL 10 MONTHS)





  • palliative chemotherapy—standard regimens include ECF (E = epirubicin, C = cisplatin, F = infusional 5-fluorouracil), DCF (D = docetaxel, C = cisplatin, F = 5-fluorouracil), ECX, EOX, EOF (X = capecitabine, O = oxaliplatin). For patients with poor performance status, consider CF, FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil–leucovorin–oxaliplatin), FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil–leucovorin–irinotecan), 5-fluorouracil alone, or irinotecan alone. Second line therapy may include paclitaxel plus ramucirumab, FOLFIRI, irinotecan alone, or taxane alone. Findings from the TOGA trial demonstrate improved survival with the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy in HER2-positive gastric cancer (positivity rate 15–20%)


  • palliative radiation—for bony metastasis or bleeding tumors


  • palliative surgery—gastrojejunostomy, partial gastrectomy to bypass obstruction


Treatment Issues



VITAMIN B12 DEFICIENCY

—may develop after a few years in patients who received subtotal or total gastrectomy


LYMPH NODE RESECTION





  • D1 dissection—removal of the stomach and less and greater omentum with the associated N1 perigastric lymph nodes


  • D2 dissection—D1 dissection, plus removal of N2 lymph nodes, including a splenectomy and distal pancreatectomy


FOLLOW-UP

—no agreed upon surveillance program. q3month for first year, then every 6 months for a total of 5 years. Endoscopy as clinically indicated


Colorectal Cancer


NEJM 2005 352:5


Pathophysiology



CLASSIFICATION BY HISTOLOGY





  • adenocarcinoma—mucinous subtype, signet-ring cells, adenosquamous, medullary


  • carcinoid—mostly involving appendix and rectum, less malignant


  • rare—squamous cell, small cell, undifferentiated


  • adenomatous polyp—pre-malignant


RISK FACTORS





  • personal—age


  • family history—affected relatives (2×), hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer/Lynch syndrome (HNPCC: mutation in MSH-2, MLH-1, PMS-1, PMS-2, or MSH-6 genes responsible for mismatch repair, 6% of all colon cancers), familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP: 1% of all colon cancers related to mutation in APC gene, all affected will have colon cancer by age 40), Peutz–Jeghers syndrome, juvenile polyposis, Gardner’s syndrome, Turcot’s syndrome, flat adenoma syndrome


  • environmental—decreased fiber intake


  • diseases—prior colon cancer, polyps, ovarian, breast, endometrial cancer, Crohn’s, ulcerative colitis (1%/year after 10 years), diabetes, obesity


LOCATION

—50% rectosigmoid, 18% descending colon, 11% transverse colon, 20% in the ascending colon and cecum


DISTINGUISHING FEATURES BETWEEN COLON AND RECTAL CANCER





























 
Colon cancer

Rectal cancer

Frequency

2/3

1/3

Location

>12 cm [>4.7 in.] from anal verge or above peritoneal reflection

<12 cm [<4.7 in.] from anal verge or below peritoneal reflection

Metastasis

Liver

Liver and lung

Adjuvant treatments

Chemo

RT and chemo


MOLECULAR SEQUENCE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF COLON CANCER

—the Vogelstein model of carcinogenesis developed based on analysis of FAP lesions. Normal epithelium → loss of 5q (e.g. APC, β-catenin) over decades → adenoma development → loss of 18q (e.g. k-ras) over 2–5 years → late adenoma → loss of 17p (e.g. p53) over 2–5 years → early cancer → loss of 8p → late cancer


MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY

(MSI)—may either be inherited as in HNPCC or spontaneous (15% of sporadic colon cancers). MSI is characterized by a decreased response to 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy but improved prognosis


K-RAS MUTATION

—about 40% of colon cancer has mutation in KRAS, which plays a key role in signal transduction downstream of EGFR. Tumors with wildtype K-ras have been shown to be more responsive to EGFR-based therapy (panitumumab, cetuximab) compared to mutant. This makes biologic sense as a mutated KRAS could continue to activate cell proliferation despite inhibition of EGFR


Clinical Features



LOCOREGIONAL

—bowel habit Δ, hematochezia, paradoxical diarrhea, tenesmus, abdominal pain, iron deficiency anemia


METASTATIC

—RUQ pain, dyspnea


CONSTITUTIONAL

—weight loss, anorexia, fatigue


OTHER

Streptococcus bovis bacteremia and Clostridium septicum sepsis; colorectal cancer in 16–32% of patients with S. bovis bacteremia


Staging



TNM STAGING (7TH EDITION)





  • T stage



    • T1 = invades submucosa


    • T2 = invades muscularis propria


    • T3 = invades subserosa or non-peritonealized pericolic tissues


    • T4 = perforation of visceral peritoneum or directly invades into adjacent structure (bowel, bladder, uterus, pelvic wall)


  • N stage (mesenteric → supraclavicular)



    • N1 = 1–3 LN



      • N1a = 1 LN


      • N1b = 2–3 LN


      • N1c = tumor deposit(s) in the subserosa, mesentery, or nonperitonealized pericolic or perirectal tissues without regional nodal metastasis


    • N2 = ≥4 LN



      • N2a = 4–6 LN


      • N2b = 7 LN


  • M stage (liver, lung, bone, brain)



    • M1 = distant metastasis




STAGE GROUPING















































Stage

TNM @ = any

Freq

5-year survival

I

T1-2N0M0

15%

77%

IIA

T3N0M0

20%

67%

IIB

T4aN0M0

61%

46%

IIC

T4bN0M0

IIIA

T1-2N1M0, T1N2aM0

40%

65–74%

52–58%

13–42%

IIIB

T3-4aN1M0, T2-3N2aM0, T1-2N2bM0

IIIC

T4aN2aM0, T3-4aN2bM0, T4bN1-2M0

IV

T@N@M1

25%

<10%


Investigations



BASIC





  • labs—CBCD, lytes, urea, Cr, AST, ALT, ALP, bilirubin, INR, PTT, albumin, lipase, CEA, CA19–9


  • imaging—barium enema, CT abd, CXR, MRI, and endorectal US in rectal cancer


  • biopsy—colonoscopy with biopsy, laparoscopy, laparotomy


Management of Colon Cancer



STAGE I

surgical resection only


STAGE II

surgical resection. Adjuvant chemotherapy (capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil–leucovorin, consider FOLFOX if high risk) may be given if adverse prognostic features (T4, perforation, obstruction, poorly differentiated, signet ring cell and mucinous histology, lymphovascular invasion, inadequate LN sampling <12)


STAGE III

surgical resection + adjuvant chemotherapy (FOLFOX is the first choice. Other possibilities include capecitabine, 5–fluorouracil-leucovorin, infusional 5-fluorouracil if patient is not fit or has contraindications to oxaliplatin)


STAGE IV

—if metastasis limited to liver and potentially resectable, consider liver resection plus perioperative chemotherapy. Radiofrequency ablation could be considered if patient unfit for surgery. If non-resectable disease, palliative chemotherapy (FOLFIRI ± bevacizumab, FOLFOX ± bevacizumab, or regorafenib. capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil/LV if patient unfit. Raltitrexed if 5-fluorouracil intolerant. Cetuximab–irinotecan or single-agent panitumumab in third line if KRAS wild type)


Related Topics

Cancer Screening (p. 240)

Chemotherapy-Induced Diarrhea (p. 257)

Oral Mucositis (p. 256)

Hematochezia (p. 134)

Hereditary Cancers (p. 243)


Management of Rectal Cancer



HIGHLY RESECTABLE

(stage I)—transanal excision only if T1, <30% circumference, <3 cm [<1.2 in.], margins >0.3 cm [>0.12 in.], mobile, within 8 cm [3.1 in.] of anal verge, no lymphovascular or perineural invasion, well or moderately differentiated tumor, and no evidence of lymphadenopathy on pretreatment imaging. Otherwise, total mesorectal excision via low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection


RESECTABLE

(stage II and some stage III with no high risk feature (not fixed, not low <5 cm [2 in.], not bulky)—neoadjuvant radiation (short course, 1 week) + total mesorectal excision + adjuvant chemotherapy based on pathologic stage: FOLFOX × 12 if pathologic node positive (i.e. node positive); capecitabine × 8 if pathologic node negative. The type and the number of cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy are, however, not well established. Local guideline may vary. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is also an appropriate option for these patients


POSSIBLY RESECTABLE

(locally advanced disease, particularly if tethered to rectum or low-lying tumor <5 cm [<2 in.] from anus)—neoadjuvant chemoradiation (long course, 5 weeks, 5040 cGy plus infusional 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine) + total mesorectal excision + adjuvant chemotherapy for 4 months. Capecitabine or FOLFOX may be considered depending on the extent of downstaging with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and the pathologic stage


METASTATIC

(stage IV)—see management for stage IV colon cancer

NOTE: FOLFOX = 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin; FOLFIRI = 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan; 5-fluorouracil/LV = 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin


Treatment Issues



ESTIMATED BENEFITS OF ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR STAGE III COLORECTAL CANCER





RELATIVE RISK REDUCTION FROM ADJUVANT ONLINE



































 
Recurrence

Death

5FU benefit
   

Node –ve

20%

18%

Node +ve

43%

38%

FOLFOX benefit
   

Node –ve

39%

24%

Node + ve

59%

48%


COLORECTAL CANCER SURVEILLANCE

—for patients with stage II and III disease who would be candidate for salvage treatment if recurrence, surveillance includes medical visit with history, physical examination and CEA every 3–6 months × 2 years, then every 6 months for the next 3 years. CT chest/abd (+ CT pelvis for rectal cancer) yearly × 5 years. Colonoscopy at 1 year and 3 years after initial diagnostic colonoscopy, then every 5 years. Proctosigmoidoscopy every 6 months for 5 years if rectal cancer but radiation not given


MODULATORS OF 5-FLUOROURACIL ACTIVITY

—leucovorin (LV) promotes formation of a stable ternary complex with thymidylate synthetase, permitting prolonged inhibition of the enzyme by 5-fluorouracil


LIVER RESECTION CRITERIA





  • resectable disease—involvement of <70% of liver and <6 segments, no involvement of major vessels including SMA, SMV, hepatic vein, hepatic artery, portal vein, and no metastases elsewhere. An evaluation by a hepatobiliary surgeon should always be considered


  • operable candidate—relatively young, no major comorbidities, performance status 0–1


  • predictive factors of recurrence postliver metastasectomy—tumor >5 cm [>2 in.], >1 liver lesion, lymph node involvement, relapse-free survival <1 year, CEA >200 μg/L within 1 month post-surgery


Carcinoid Tumors


NEJM 1999 340:11


Pathophysiology



CLASSIFICATION OF NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS





  • high grade—poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, small cell-like tumors


  • low grade—carcinoid tumors, pancreatic islet tumors (VIPoma, glucagonoma, gastrinoma, insulinoma, somatostatinoma), paragangliomas, pheochromocytomas, medullary thyroid carcinomas


CLASSIFICATION BY LOCATION





  • foregut carcinoid—lungs, bronchi, stomach


  • midgut carcinoid—small intestine, appendix, proximal large bowel


  • hindgut carcinoid—distal colon, rectum, genitourinary tract


SPECIFIC DETAILS BY LOCATION



Mar 26, 2017 | Posted by in GENERAL & FAMILY MEDICINE | Comments Off on Oncology

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access