Obstetric Ultrasonography

CHAPTER 172 Obstetric Ultrasonography



Ultrasound is defined as the range of sound waves with frequencies greater than 20,000 cycles per second (Hz), and they are undetectable by the human ear. Most ultrasound scanners use frequencies of from 1 to 10 MHz; 3 to 5 MHz are the most common for obstetric transabdominal examinations, although 2 to 2.25 MHz may be needed for obese patients. According to natality data, ultrasonography is being used more commonly in the United States. In 2002, 67% of mothers who had live births underwent ultrasonographic scanning during pregnancy, compared with 48% in 1989.


To evaluate the use of ultrasonography as a routine screening procedure during pregnancy, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) sponsored a landmark Consensus Development Conference in 1984. The consensus was that routine screening was not justified and that ultrasonography should be used only for specific indications. Those indications have remained fairly constant and are similar to those listed in the Indications section. This consensus was further supported by evidence from the large RADIUS study (N = 15,151), published in 1993 (Ewigman and colleagues), although there continues to be controversy regarding this study, specifically over whether the study population is generalizable (e.g., 93% of women in the study were white, 71% had at least some college education). The current position of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) allows the clinician and patient to opt for screening, but does not recommend routine use. As it turns out, the majority of women will develop one of the indications listed by the Consensus Development Conference during pregnancy.


The U.S. consensus regarding screening is not a worldwide consensus. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the European Committee for Ultrasound Radiation Safety endorse routine prenatal ultrasonographic examinations. Ultrasonography is routinely used in several European countries, including Sweden and Germany. The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care finds fair evidence for routine ultrasonographic screening in the second trimester, even in women without clinical indications. Many U.S. insurers, including managed care organizations, now reimburse for routine obstetric ultrasonographic screening. The advent of three- (3D) and four-dimensional (4D) ultrasonography (3D imaging is three-dimensional in appearance; 4D is 3D imaging in real time) has conferred some proprietary advantages in terms of the quality of fetal features appreciated (recent literature cites improved diagnosis of facial anomalies, skeletal malformations, and neural tube defects with 3D and 4D ultrasonography).


EDITOR’S NOTE: Routine first-trimester scanning in a high-risk population to confirm gestational age is very helpful (investigators have proven it more accurate than last menstrual period), especially when later managing intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) or postdate pregnancies (in two studies, postdate deliveries and inductions were reduced by more than 50%). Such accurate dating may also alter the method of pregnancy termination; conversely, its use may improve maternal bonding.


Obstetric ultrasonography can be performed transabdominally, transvaginally, or transperineally (or a combination), with transabdominal and transvaginal scanning being used much more frequently than transperineal. Transvaginal scanning is performed predominantly in the first trimester and usually facilitates visualization of fetal structures 1 week earlier than with transabdominal scanning. Transvaginal and transperineal scanning may also be useful during the second and third trimesters for scanning the cervix and endocervical areas in cases of preterm labor, incompetent cervix, and placenta previa.


Ultrasonography can detect 35% to 50% of major fetal malformations, but its sensitivity is very technician or clinician dependent. It is important for the clinician performing the examination to have adequate training and equipment and a willingness to seek appropriate consultation for complicated cases. Although a complete survey of fetal anatomy can often be performed by the end of the first trimester, the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) suggests that such a survey is best if performed after 18 weeks.


Obstetric ultrasonographic studies are classified in three different ways: for billing purposes, radiologically, and by training requirements. For billing purposes, a standard (survey), a limited (e.g., in emergencies, to evaluate a single organ, to guide a procedure, to answer a clinical question [e.g., “Is there fetal heart activity,” or “Is there a placenta previa?”]), or a follow-up (to a standard scan) scan has been performed. Radiologically, a standard (also termed basic), a limited, or a specialized (targeted) scan is performed (the terms level I and level II scans are outdated). A limited scan is a goal-directed search for a problem or finding, and in most cases is appropriate only when a prior standard scan is already in the medical record (exceptions include women with no prenatal care). A specialized evaluation is done to identify, characterize, or exclude fetal anomalies, often based on an abnormal history, maternal serum screening results, or an abnormal standard scan, and is usually performed by individuals with special expertise. The American Academy of Family Physicians, the Advanced Life Support in Obstetrics (ALSO) advisory board, and others classify ultrasonographic applications as either basic or extended. With basic applications (e.g., most of the intrapartum indications), practicing clinicians with a base of knowledge in maternal–fetal anatomy and physiology can usually master scanning in a 1-day workshop. For extended applications, significant additional study and supervised practice are needed such as can be obtained in residency or other training programs. More advanced applications, such as measurement of Doppler velocimetry, require specialized training and are beyond the scope of this chapter.



Documentation


Adequate documentation for every ultrasonographic study is essential. This should include a permanent written report, complete with the ultrasonographic images incorporating measurement parameters and anatomic findings. Figure 172-1 is an example of an ultrasonography report form. Suggested documentation (adapted from the AIUM guidelines) for first-trimester, second- and third-trimester, and intrapartum scans is discussed in the following sections. Only standard obstetric ultrasonographic studies are discussed here, and they should include the elements described in the following sections.





Second- and Third-Trimester Standard Scan Documentation












Indications













Suspected fetal death (see Chapter 225, Emergency Department, Hospitalist, and Office Ultrasonography [Clinical Ultrasonography])


Intrauterine contraceptive device localization (see Chapter 225, Emergency Department, Hospitalist, and Office Ultrasonography [Clinical Ultrasonography])




















Preprocedure Patient Preparation


If the pregnancy is more than 20 weeks along, the bladder should be empty if performing transabdominal scanning. The patient’s bladder should be empty or only slightly full for transvaginal or transperineal scanning. Patients should know about the necessary position (recumbent or semirecumbent for transabdominal or transperineal; dorsal lithotomy for transvaginal or optionally for transperineal scanning), and to expect the insertion of a probe for transvaginal scanning.


Issues to be discussed with patients who undergo obstetric ultrasonography include the following:






After many years, no study of safety has ever indicated more than a theoretical risk to the fetus from routine ultrasonographic scanning (see the Complications section). AIUM is a not-for-profit national professional organization that continues to monitor ultrasonography safety. They have never noted any safety problems (for mother or child) with ultrasonography. However, the clinician should comment that ultrasonographic examinations are generally performed in the United States only for indications and that the least amount of ultrasound that is necessary will be used to obtain the needed information.


When asked why they think an ultrasonographic examination is being performed, patients commonly state “to make sure the baby is okay.” It may be important to explain that the examination is being performed to answer a particular clinical question, not for general screening. They should be aware, especially if a limited study is being performed, that no ultrasonographic study can ensure a perfect infant. Patients also frequently request ultrasonography to determine the sex of the infant. They should be informed that national guidelines (NIH or otherwise) do not list this as an indication for ultrasonography. After providing this information, it is the clinician’s choice as to whether to attempt to determine the sex of the infant.


A handout for the patient to review before scanning can be quite helpful (see the sample patient education form available online at www.expertconsult.com). After scanning, giving the patient a picture of the fetal hand profile, the facial profile, or even the genitalia should enhance bonding with minimal legal hazard.



Technique


















Measurements


NOTE: Newer ultrasonography machines calculate many of these values for the sonographer based on the formulas given in the text. Many also use nomograms for making estimates; estimates on age or weight are most accurate when multiple parameters are used and the nomograms have been derived from fetuses of the same ethnic or racial background living at similar altitude.


The BPD, abdominal circumference, and femur length are measured as the basis of most obstetric ultrasonographic evaluations. Early in pregnancy, CRL and gestational sac measurements are also important. Certain early developmental landmarks, if noted, may also provide worthwhile information for estimating gestational age (Table 172-1).



2 Gestational sac (GS) diameter



The in utero presence of a normal gestational sac, complete with contents (Fig. 172-4), usually confirms an intrauterine pregnancy and indirectly excludes ectopic gestation. In some cases, however, it may be difficult to differentiate between the gestational sac seen with an early intrauterine pregnancy and the pseudogestational sac sometimes seen with an ectopic pregnancy (see the First-Trimester Standard Scan Documentation section, and Chapter 225, Emergency Department, Hospitalist, and Office Ultrasonography [Clinical Ultrasonography]).


NOTE: This method of exclusion of ectopic pregnancy may not be helpful for patients taking ovulation induction medications for fertility (see the First-Trimester Standard Scan Documentation section).




May 14, 2017 | Posted by in GENERAL & FAMILY MEDICINE | Comments Off on Obstetric Ultrasonography

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access