Non-Hodgkin’s and Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
DEFINITION AND ETIOLOGY
Lymphomas are divided into two major groups, NHL and HL, based on a range of pathologic and clinical features. The incorporation of genetic and immunologic characteristics into lymphoma diagnosis is a recent advancement, proposed by the 1994 Revised European-American Classification of Lymphoid Neoplasms (known as the REAL classification).1 Dividing lymphomas into B cell neoplasms, T cell neoplasms, and Hodgkin’s disease, the REAL classification was validated and shown to be clinically relevant by subsequent studies. It also served as the basis for the ensuing World Health Organization (WHO) classification of lymphoid neoplasms. The many WHO subtypes of NHL are made more manageable via grouping into indolent, aggressive, or highly aggressive categories based on their natural history (Box 1). HL encompasses two main categories: classic HL (with four further subgroups) and nodular lymphocyte-predominant HL. Classic HL includes nodular-sclerosis, mixed-cellularity, lymphocyte-rich, and lymphocyte-depleted subgroups. The WHO classification, though complex and continually evolving, establishes a common language for researchers and clinicians and is key to collaborative research aimed at curing lymphoma.
PREVALENCE AND RISK FACTORS
According to the National Cancer Institute and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) SEER database, lymphoma was diagnosed in about 74,340 people in the United States in 2008, giving an age-adjusted incidence rate of 22.2 per 100,000 per year.2 In general, NHL is increasing in incidence (especially diffuse large B cell lymphoma), though mortality among those affected with NHL has decreased. HL is much less common than NHL, accounting for about one tenth of all lymphoma cases; its annual incidence is 2.8 per 100,000. The prevalence of lymphomas tends to be much higher than their incidence, given their natural history and availability of effective therapies. For example, the U.S. prevalence of HL was 156,000 (patients with HL or a history of HL) as of January 1, 2005.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND NATURAL HISTORY
Although some population studies have found a higher risk of lymphoma in first-degree relatives of probands, defining the exact inherited genetic lesions has proved difficult.3 In contrast, genetic abnormalities acquired during early lymphocyte development have been clearly implicated in lymphomagenesis. These include chromosomal translocations and the accidental mutation of bystander genes during immunoglobulin gene remodeling, a complex process providing lymphocytes the diversity needed for effective host defense. Expression of the virus’s genetic program by cell machinery (as occurs in chronic Epstein-Barr virus infection) contributes to the pathogenesis of HLs and lymphoproliferative disorders in immunosuppressed patients following organ transplant.
Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Indolent Lymphomas
Follicular lymphoma (FL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia/ small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) are the most common indolent lymphomas. Survival from diagnosis of indolent lymphoma is generally measured in years. However, although radiation therapy can cure early-stage indolent lymphomas, advanced-stage forms have classically been considered incurable. Despite initial chemosensitivity, such patients tend to face a continual pattern of relapse and treatment-related morbidity until death. Data from Stanford University published in 1984 showed that some asymptomatic patients with advanced follicular lymphoma had no decrement in survival following an initial watch-and-wait approach.4 Data from the same group have also shown a rate of spontaneous remission in up to 20% of patients with FL.
The fact that this translocation exists in a large fraction of healthy adults is evidence that further mutagenic events are crucial for lymphomagenesis. Other notable lesions in indolent lymphomas include t(11;14) in mantle cell lymphoma (causing increased cyclin D expression, and thus cell cycle progression), the deletion of chromosome 13q14 in CLL/SLL (a region containing suppressive micro-RNA that normally silences BCL2)5 and the t(11;18) in extranodal marginal zone lymphomas (producing a true fusion gene that also affects apoptosis) (Table 1). It should be noted that mantle cell lymphoma can behave in an indolent or aggressive manner, and current studies favor high-intensity induction chemotherapy for patients requiring treatment in an effort to improve poor outcomes.
Aggressive and Highly Aggressive lymphomas
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of aggressive lymphoma. About half of all patients with DLBCL achieve long-term disease-free survival after initial therapy, and relapses after more than 5 years are uncommon. Genetic errors involving BCL6 (a transcription factor), BCL2 (an antiapoptotic protein) and FAS (CD95, a TNF-family receptor), are often linked to the development and behavior of DLBCL.6 However, individual lesions fail to explain the pathologic and clinical heterogeneity of DLBCL. To investigate this variability, investigators have applied molecular tools including gene expression profiling to DLBCL tumor samples, which examines tumor mRNA expression patterns. In one study, this approach identified three groups of patients whose gene-expression patterns suggested a distinct cell of origin of their tumor.7 These groups had significantly different prognoses, and the gene-expression technique provided prognostic information surpassing that gained using the clinically based International Prognostic Index (IPI, discussed later). However, the challenges for expression profiling are to isolate true driver mutations in lymphomagenesis and to prove them valuable in guiding clinical decisions (such as selection of initial therapy) via prospective trials.