Fig. 4.1
Treatment planning for carbon ions. Reproduced from: Scholz [3]. Courtesy Prof. Dr. Thomas Friedrich on behalf of Prof. Dr. M. Scholz
Fig. 4.2
HIMAC approach. Reproduced from: Scholz [3]. Courtesy Prof. Dr. Thomas Friedrich on behalf of Prof. Dr. M. Scholz
At GSI, a local effect model is used (Fig. 4.3) [3].
Fig. 4.3
GSI approach using a local effect model (LEM). Reproduced from: Scholz [3]. Courtesy: Prof. Dr. Thomas Friedrich on behalf of Prof. Dr. M. Scholz
Next, a direct comparison of protons and carbon ions is shown, analyzing survival (in log scale) for Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells, depending on the depth. CHO cells are epithelial cells that grow adherent monolayers in culture; they are a hugely popular research tool in the molecular biology community. This is the first radiological experiment developed at HIT using protons and carbon ions and the corresponding models (Fig. 4.4).
Fig. 4.4
Carbon ions versus protons. The protons (solid blue line) and carbon ions (solid red line) obtained using the model are in good agreement with the experimental data for CHO cells. Courtesy Elsevier and Copyright Clearance Center [11]
A comparison between the NIRS and GSI data shows a 15 % difference in the clinical dose in the middle of the SOBP. It is indispensable to establish conversion between GSI and other centers to make clinical experiences referenced and help to find an optimal treatment protocol using heavy ions, since the difference in results can be as great as 15 %
4.2 The Alpha/Beta Ratio
Various mathematical models of varying degrees of complexity have been developed to define the shape of the curves for cell survival. All of the models are based on the concept of random nature deposition of energy by radiation.
The linear-quadratic model is used to describe the curve of cell survival, assuming that there are two components of cell death by radiation:
Although it has several limitations, this ratio is used in predicting clinical effects in response to radiation as one of parameters to model cell death by radiation. In radiotherapy (RT), the sensitivity to changes in fractionation can be quantified in terms of the alpha/beta ratio. For many human tumors, the ratio is high (typically 10 Gy). This ratio is obtained from isoeffect curves plotted using the survival fractions of a single cell line at different doses per fraction [4]. It is the byproduct of the linear quadratic model, which describes cell killing as a single-hit versus double-hit hypothesis: linear cell kill is expressed by the alpha component, whereas quadratic cell kill is expressed by the beta component. A high alpha/beta ratio (6–14 Gy), seen in many human tumors, suggests a predominance of alpha component, implying a decreased response to fractionation and, thus, a decreased clinical benefit of hyperfractioning. A low alpha/beta ratio (1.5–5 Gy) is usually associated with a delayed response of normal tissue and is the basis for the therapeutic gain achieved by using hypofractionation (Table 4.1).
Tissue/organ | End point | α/β ratio [Gy] | 95 % conf. lim. [Gy] | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Early reactions | ||||
Skin | Erythema | 8.8 | [6.9;11.6] | Turesson and Thames (1989) |
Erythema | 12.3 | [1.8;22.8] | Bentzen et al. (1988) | |
Desquamation | 11.2 | [8.5;17.6] | Turesson and Thames (1989) | |
Oral mucosa | Mucositis | 9.3 | [5.8;17.9] | Denham et al. (1995) |
Mucositis | 15 | [−15;45] | Rezvani et al. (1991) | |
Mucositis | ~8 | ? | Chogule and Supe (1993) | |
Late reactions | ||||
Skin/vasculature | Telangiectasia | 2.8 | [1.7;3.8] | Turesson and Thames (1989) |
Telangiectasia | 2.6 | [2.2;3.3] | Bentzsn et al. (1990) | |
Telangiectasia | 2.8 | [−0.1;8.1] | Bentzen and Overgaard (1991) | |
Subcutis | Fibrosis | 1.7 | [0.6;2.6] | Bentzen and Overgaard (1991) |
Muscle/vasculature/cartilage | Impaired shoulder movement | 3.5 | [0.7;6.2]
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channelFull access? Get Clinical TreeGet Clinical Tree app for offline access |