Chapter 34 Liver and biliary tract
Pharmacokinetic changes in liver disease
Hepatic blood flow and metabolism
• Drugs metabolised rapidly with high extraction in a single pass through the liver. Clearance is limited normally by hepatic blood flow, but in severe liver disease less drug is extracted from blood passing through the liver because of poor hepatocyte function and portosystemic shunts that allow blood to bypass the liver. The predominant kinetic change for drugs given orally is increased systemic availability. The initial and maintenance doses of such drugs should be reduced. With severe liver impairment the t½ of drugs in this class may lengthen.
• Drugs metabolised slowly with poor extraction in a single pass through the liver. The rate-limiting factor for elimination of this type of drug is metabolic capacity and the major effect of liver disease is prolongation of t½. Consequently, the interval between doses may need to be lengthened and the time to reach steady-state concentration in the plasma (5 × t½) is increased.
Prescribing for patients with liver disease
• Impaired hepatic synthetic function (hypoalbuminaemia, increased INR).
• Current/recent hepatic encephalopathy.
• Fluid retention and renal impairment.
For drugs with significant hepatic metabolism, a reasonable approach is to reduce the dose to 25–50% of normal and monitor responses. Specific examples include:
Drug-induced liver damage
The spectrum of hepatic abnormalities caused by drugs is broad (Table 34.1). Drugs tend to injure specific hepatocyte components, e.g. plasma membrane, biliary canaliculi, cytochrome P450 enzymes or mitochondria.
Type of reaction | Effect on cells | Examples of drugs |
---|---|---|
Hepatocellular | Direct effect on production by enzyme–drug combination leads to cell and membrane dysfunction | Isoniazid, trazodone, diclofenac, nefazodone, venlafaxine, lovastatin |
Immune mediated | Cytotoxic lymphocyte response directed at hepatocyte membranes altered by drug metabolite ± additional autoimmune component | Nitrofurantoin, methyldopa, lovastatin, minocycline, halothane |
Cholestasis | Injury to canalicular membrane and transporters | Chlorpromazine, oestrogen, erythromycin and its derivatives |
Granulomatous | Macrophages, lymphocytes infiltrate hepatic lobule | Diltiazem, sulfa drugs, quinidine |
Microvesicular fat | Altered mitochondrial respiration, β-oxidation leads to lactic acidosis and triglyceride accumulation | Didanosine, tetracyclines, acetylsalicylic acid, valproic acid |
Steatohepatitis (fatty liver) | Multifactorial | Amiodarone, tamoxifen |
Fibrosis | Activation of stellate cells | Methotrexate, excess vitamin A |
Vascular collapse | Causes ischaemic or hypoxic injury | Nicotinic acid, cocaine, methylenedioxymethylamfetamine (MDMA) |
Oncogenesis | Encourages tumour formation | Oral contraceptives, androgens |
Mixed | Cytoplasmic and canalicular injury, direct damage to bile ducts | Amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, carbamazepine, herbs, ciclosporin, methimazole, troglitazone |
• C-17α-substituted steroids impair bilirubin excretion into hepatic canaliculi. These include synthetic anabolic steroids and oestrogens in oral contraceptives; jaundice due to the latter is rare with current formulations. Many have genetic susceptibility with mutations in ABC cassette biliary transporter proteins.
• Rifampicin impairs hepatic uptake and excretion of bilirubin; unconjugated and conjugated bilirubin levels may be raised within 3 weeks.
• Fusidic acid interferes with hepatic bilirubin excretion, causing conjugated hyperbilirubinaemia, particularly with sepsis.
Diagnosis and management of drug-induced liver injury
• Always consider the possibility. Take careful drug histories, including over-the-counter, complementary, illicit and alternative medicines.
• Consider a viral aetiology with hepatitis.
• Consider other causes of cholestatic disease.
• Underlying liver disease can cause diagnostic confusion.
• Liver biopsy is often helpful, but eosinophil infiltration, often thought to be specific for drug reaction, has many causes.
• Diagnostic challenge is dangerous, may precipitate life-threatening liver disease and is never justified.
• Monitoring liver function in the early weeks of therapy is wise in detecting early reactions to drugs with hepatotoxic potential, e.g. isoniazid. Minor abnormalities (serum transaminase levels less than twice normal) are often self-limiting and progress should be monitored. For increases exceeding three-fold, consider drug withdrawal, even in asymptomatic patients.