Legal Considerations

Chapter 3 Legal Considerations





LEGAL PITFALLS IN SURGICAL CARE BEFORE ENTERING THE OPERATING ROOM


Let us start by emphasizing the key point of this chapter—informed consent is a process. It is not a hospitalgenerated form. Surgeons make a critical error when they assume that getting a patient to sign the hospital’s consent forms means that they have complied with the requirements of informed consent. This error can be quite costly to your practice and to your reputation.


Consent is a process that requires communication between the surgeon and the patient. Usually, it is a two-step process that starts during the office visit and continues at the hospital before surgery. The office visit is your opportunity to take the time to explain the proposed surgery, the risks and alternatives, and the consequences of not proceeding. Thus, patients have time to reflect on all the information you have given them and can really make an informed decision to proceed with the surgery you suggest.


The time for having that discussion is not in the hallway of the same-day surgery unit while you are trying to get in the first case of the day. That is not fair to you or to the patient and is certainly not the best use of your time. Patients can feel pressured to agree and will often say they were so worried about the surgery that they did not even listen or that they signed the forms just to get things moving without having time to ask questions or to reflect on the complex decision they were asked to make.


In most hospitals, the surgical consent form is executed right before surgery. This is a good practice because it provides some evidence that the patient consented to surgery. However, in most states, that form alone is not sufficient to establish that you met your duty to your patient.


We have both seen surgeons mismanage their relationship with their patient and their family in ways that have led to medical errors, an omission through miscommunication, or claims from patients that the surgeon failed to provide them with sufficient information to make an informed decision about surgery: Here are three ways we have observed: (1) the surgeon acted as an all-knowing being; (2) no office notes were kept about the consent discussion or the refusal of care; (3) the surgeon did not tell the patients about who would assist with their surgery.



Surgeon as All-Knowing Being


If you have this aura and express it to your patients, then this is what they will expect. If you tell the patients what surgery they need and just assure them that “everything will be fine,” then you have taken complete responsibility for the decision making as well as the outcome. No wonder the patient (and the jury) will want to hold you 100% responsible for any negative outcome.






Practice Pointer.

Communication and decision making are a two-way street. Patients have responsibilities along with their rights. Share these responsibilities with the patient. Make the patient part of your health care team. Here are some ways to do that:





Jun 21, 2017 | Posted by in GENERAL SURGERY | Comments Off on Legal Considerations

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access