Laboratory Evaluation of Rheumatic Diseases

Laboratory Evaluation of Rheumatic Diseases



The diagnosis of rheumatologic diseases is based on clinical information, blood and imaging tests, and in some cases on histology. Blood tests are useful in confirming clinically suspected diagnosis and monitoring the disease activity. The tests should be used as adjuncts to a comprehensive history and physical examination.


The value of a test in diagnosing a certain condition depends on its pretest probability. A positive test result with high pretest probability helps to make a diagnosis, but a negative test result with low pretest probability helps to rule out the diagnosis. However, clinicians cannot rely heavily on blood tests in making the diagnosis of rheumatologic diseases, except for certain tests that are highly specific for certain diseases. Improper application of these tests leads to misdiagnosis, inappropriate therapy, and unnecessary health care expenses. This chapter discusses blood tests that are useful in evaluating various rheumatologic diseases.



ACUTE-PHASE REACTANTS


Acute-phase reactants are proteins whose plasma concentration increases (positive acute-phase proteins) or decreases (negative acute-phase proteins) by at least 25% during inflammatory states.1 Box 1 lists positive and negative acute-phase reactants. The effect of inflammatory molecules such as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interferon gamma (IFN-γ), and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) causes a change in hepatic protein synthesis collectively known as acute-phase response. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are the most widely measured acute-phase reactants in clinical practice.



ESR is a measure of the height of erythrocytes that fall through plasma in a Westergen or a Wintrobe tube over a period of 1 hour. ESR can be greatly influenced by the shape and number of red blood cells as well as other plasma constituents like fibrinogen, globulins, and albumins. It can be spuriously high in the absence of inflammation, as in anemia, nephritic syndrome, and hypergammaglobulinemia, and it can be spuriously normal in cryoglobulinemia and hemoglobinopathy. ESR increases steadily with age, and the upper limit varies with sex; hence, ESR is difficult to interpret compared to CRP.


The concentration of CRP in serum is more sensitive than ESR to evaluate and monitor inflammation, and it is independent of factors that affect ESR. It correlates better with disease activity, and the rise in CPR level is seen much earlier than that of other acute-phase reactants, usually 4 to 6 hours after tissue injury.


Both ESR and CRP levels can be elevated in a wide variety of conditions including trauma, infection, infarction, neoplasms, and inflammatory arthritis. Usually ESR and CRP levels correlate well, but in some patients levels may be discordant for reasons that are unclear. They are very useful in monitoring disease activity in rheumatologic conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica,2 and giant cell arteritis. Some studies have shown that the pretreatment ESR value is of some prognostic value in polymyalgia rheumatica. Most patients with active lupus have normal or minimally elevated CRP levels, and markedly elevated concentrations of CRP in SLE should raise a suspicion of bacterial infection. Other causes for elevated CRP in SLE patients include serositis, synovitis, and vasculitis.



ANTINUCLEAR ANTIBODIES


Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) directed against a variety of nuclear antigens have been detected in the serum of patients with many rheumatic and nonrheumatic diseases as well as in healthy persons. Various immunochemistry techniques are used to detect and characterize these ANAs. These methods include immunofluorescence microscopy, hemagglutination, immunodiffusion, complement fixation, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).


Immunofluorescent microscopy performed on human epithelial-2 (Hep-2) cells is widely used for initial screening. It is a highly sensitive test and is often abnormal in patients with ANA-associated diseases, but the specificity is low and the test has many false-positive results. It is reported as positive or negative and includes a titer. ANA testing performed using ELISA technology is very sensitive and has a high incidence of false-positive results (Fig. 1).




Clinical Applications


ANA testing is very useful in establishing a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Nearly all patients with SLE have a positive ANA test, with a sensitivity of 93% to 95% and a specificity of 57%.3 However, even healthy persons can have a positive ANA test at lower titers. About 25% to 30% of healthy persons have a positive test with a titer of 1 : 40, 10% to 15% at a titer of 1 : 80, and 5% at a titer of 1 : 160 or greater. The frequency increases with age, particularly in women. ANA titer of 1 : 40 is seen in 25% to 30% of relatives of patients with rheumatologic disorders.3


A positive ANA in a patient with low pretest probability is often of unclear significance. Due to the low prevalence of SLE (40-50/100,000), most people with positive ANA do not have lupus (positive predictive value [PPV], 11%). However, a high ANA titer (>1 : 640) should increase the suspicion for an autoimmune disorder, although not diagnostic of a disease, and patients with high titers should be carefully followed for the development of connective tissue disorder. ANA titer is not routinely used for assessing the disease activity in lupus, and serial ANA testing is therefore not useful.


In addition to lupus, ANA testing is helpful in diagnosing other rheumatic diseases such as systemic sclerosis and Sjögren’s syndrome (Table 1). The sensitivity of ANA in diagnosing systemic sclerosis is 85% and the specificity is 54%.3 Although ANA is not included in the 2002 classification criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome, it is found in 80% of patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome and at high titers (>1 : 320) in nearly one half of the patients.4 Patients presenting with Raynaud’s phenomenon should also have ANA testing because a positive ANA test indicates an increased risk of developing an associated systemic rheumatic disease from 19% to 30%, whereas a negative test indicates a risk of 7%.5 Additionally, ANA testing helps to stratify the risk of uveitis in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.


Table 1 Sensitivity and Specificity of Antinuclear Antibody in Various Connective Tissue Diseases







































Disease Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
Systemic lupus erythematosus 93-95 57
Scleroderma 85 54
Polymyositis, dermatomyositis 61 63
Rheumatoid arthritis 41 56
Sjögren’s syndrome 48 52
Raynaud’s phenomenon 64 41
Juvenile chronic arthritis 57 39
Juvenile chronic arthritis with uveitis 80 53



Types


There are different types of ANAs based on their target antigen, including single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), nuclear histone and nonhistone nuclear proteins, and RNA protein complexes. The staining pattern seen on indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) gives some indication of the specificity of the antibodies in the sample (Table 2 and see Fig. 1). Identification of the specificity for extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) is warranted because this can further differentiate between the distinct types of autoimmune connective tissue diseases. Hence, a positive ANA test should be followed by an anti-DNA antibodies assay.


Table 2 Identifying Antinuclear Antibodies

















































Antigen Disease Association
Homogenous and Diffuse
DNA-histone complex (nucleosome)

Peripheral Rim
dsDNA SLE
Speckled
RNA polymerase types II and III Systemic sclerosis
RNP MCTD (100%)
Scl-70 Systemic sclerosis (15%-70%)
Sm SLE (25%-30%)
SS-A

SS-B

Nucleolar
Nucleolar RNA, RNA polymerase 1 Systemic sclerosis
Pm-scl Polymyositis
Centromere
CENP Limited scleroderma

MCTD, mixed connective tissue disease; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.



Anti-DNA Antibodies


Antibodies to dsDNA are often measured in SLE and are commonly referred to as anti-DNA antibodies. They are very useful in the diagnosis of SLE and assessment of disease activity, and they are associated with lupus nephritis.


The most commonly used techniques for measuring anti-dsDNA antibodies are ELISA and immunofluorescence (e.g., using Crithidia luciliae as substrate). Radioimmunoassay (e.g., the Farr assay) is still available but its use has declined. The hemoflagellate Crithidia luciliae contains in its kinetoplast pure dsDNA, not complexed to proteins. Serially diluted serum samples are added to the slide carrying Crithidia cells. Binding of antibodies is visualized by fluorescinated anti-immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibodies. This method can be used to confirm the presence of anti-dsDNA antibodies when the ELISA results are discrepant.


The sensitivity of anti-dsDNA antibody for diagnosis of SLE is 57.3% and the specificity is 97.4%.6 These antibodies are present at some time in the course of the disease as the levels fluctuate and may be absent at times. Anti-DNA antibodies have been reported in patients with a variety of other rheumatologic and nonrheumatologic diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren’s syndrome, scleroderma, drug-induced lupus, Raynaud’s phenomenon, mixed connective tissue disease, discoid lupus, myositis, chronic active hepatitis, uveitis, Graves’ disease, and anticardiolipin antibody syndrome and in women with silicone breast implants. Not all patients with SLE have positive anti-dsDNA antibodies; therefore, a negative test does not exclude the diagnosis of SLE. The prevalence of patients with a positive anti-DNA assay despite a negative ANA has been reported to be 0% to 0.8%. Therefore, unless there is a reasonable suspicion that the ANA is falsely negative, anti-DNA antibody testing is not generally indicated in ANA-negative patients.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 18, 2017 | Posted by in GENERAL SURGERY | Comments Off on Laboratory Evaluation of Rheumatic Diseases

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access