Infectious Disease Emergencies

Infectious Disease Emergencies



Infectious disease emergencies are conditions that have potential for significant harm to the patient if not recognized and treated promptly, and for which timely and appropriate intervention may significantly improve outcomes. The following is a discussion of important infectious disease emergencies.



ACUTE BACTERIAL MENINGITIS



Definition, Etiology, and Incidence


Bacterial meningitis is an inflammation of the meninges caused by bacteria. Acute meningitis is characterized by the development of meningeal signs over the course of a few hours to a few days. The important causes of bacterial meningitis are outlined in Box 1.



A passive survey conducted in the United States between 1978 and 1981 revealed an annual incidence rate for bacterial meningitis of 3.0 cases per 100,000 population.1 During this period, bacterial meningitis was predominantly a disease of children, the most common offending pathogen being Haemophilus influenzae. The introduction of routine immunization of children against H. influenzae type B in the late 1980s dramatically reduced the incidence of infection with this microorganism. A consequence was a decrease in the overall incidence of bacterial meningitis and particularly in meningitis caused by H. influenzae, so that bacterial meningitis is now a disease predominantly of adults.2



Pathophysiology


The initial event is usually nasopharyngeal colonization with a pathogenic microorganism.3 This is followed by mucosal invasion, bacteremia, and meningeal invasion.4 A marked inflammatory response occurs in the subarachnoid space, but this response is inadequate to control the infection. This inflammatory response results in increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier. This is responsible for the increased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein content seen in patients with meningitis. Progression of meningitis leads to the development of cerebral edema, resulting in increased CSF pressure. Inflammation of blood vessels traversing the subarachnoid space may lead to their thrombosis. This can result in ischemia and infarction of the underlying brain.




Diagnosis


The differential diagnosis includes viral and tuberculous meningitis, viral meningoencephalitis, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and primary amebic meningoencephalitis. Differentiation from viral meningitis on clinical grounds is usually difficult, and requires laboratory testing. Where tuberculosis is prevalent, it must be recognized that tuberculous meningitis can sometimes manifest acutely and could be mistaken for bacterial meningitis. Viral meningoencephalitis may manifest somewhat similarly with headache and fever, but patients would usually have more profound alteration in the sensorium early in the illness and neck stiffness may not be prominent. The most prominent symptom of subarachnoid hemorrhage is a severe headache with a rapid onset. Primary amebic meningoencephalitis is a rare condition with a presentation similar to that of acute bacterial meningitis, but cultures are negative and amebae can be detected in the CSF by careful microscopic examination. There is usually a recent history of swimming in a warm freshwater lake or pond.


The most important diagnostic test is a lumbar puncture, which should always be performed in all patients with suspected acute meningitis. Imaging tests do not help in making the diagnosis or identifying the cause of bacterial meningitis. It is not necessary to obtain a computed tomography (CT) scan before performing a lumbar puncture unless there are focal neurologic deficits.5 The CSF should be sent for cell count, protein and glucose levels, and Gram staining and culture. Typical CSF findings in acute bacterial meningitis are an elevated opening pressure, increased CSF white blood cell (WBC) count (100-10,000 cells/µL), usually with a predominance of neutrophils, increased CSF protein level (>50 mg/dL) and decreased CSF glucose level (<40% of simultaneously measured serum glucose level).6 Gram staining may reveal the presence of microorganisms and, if so detected, would be helpful for guiding therapy. In viral meningitis, the CSF WBC count is elevated, but the cells are usually predominantly lymphocytes, and the CSF glucose level may be normal or marginally decreased. The best way to confirm a diagnosis of viral meningitis is by specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, if available.



Treatment


The management of bacterial meningitis includes appropriate antibiotic therapy and adjunctive corticosteroids.7,8 Ideally, the lumbar puncture should be done before the administration of antibiotics. However, if there is a delay in performing the lumbar puncture for any reason, antibiotic administration should not be delayed. A lumbar puncture should be performed as soon as possible, even if antibiotics have already been administered; the possibility of being able to make a definite causative diagnosis, and its value in guiding subsequent therapy and managing possible complications, are fully worth the effort. Empirical antibiotics should be selected based on the expected pathogens. The patient’s age, presence or absence of risk factors such as middle ear or sinus disease, or recent neurosurgery provide clues about the cause and pathogenesis.


It is recommended that patients be started on adjunctive dexamethasone 10 mg IV every 6 hours for 4 days with the first dose of antibiotics, because this has been shown to improve outcomes in bacterial meningitis.7 Antibiotic selection and dosing should also take into consideration the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier and achieve an effective concentration in the CSF. In adults, initial empirical treatment should provide adequate therapy for Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria meningitidis. Increasing resistance of S. pneumoniae to beta-lactam antibiotics (including ceftriaxone) has prompted recommendations to initiate empirical antibiotic therapy with a regimen consisting of vancomycin and ceftriaxone.6 If Listeria monocytogenes is a possibility (e.g., in older adults, pregnant women, and those with cellular immune deficits), ampicillin should be added. If Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a possibility, as after neurosurgical procedures, ceftazidime should be used instead of ceftriaxone. Antibiotic therapy should be adjusted once the causative microorganism has been identified. Duration of therapy for bacterial meningitis has not been adequately defined. For meningococcal meningitis, 7 days of therapy is considered adequate. S. pneumoniae should be treated for 10 to 14 days. L. monocytogenes should be treated for at least 21 days.9




ACUTE MENINGOCOCCEMIA




Pathophysiology


The pathogenesis of meningococcal infection begins with nasopharyngeal colonization. About 10% of the population has asymptomatic nasopharyngeal carriage of N. meningitidis during nonepidemic periods. A small proportion of carriers go on to develop invasive meningococcal disease. People who develop invasive disease generally do so soon after acquisition of carriage.11 Factors that facilitate invasive disease include agent factors such as virulence and transmissibility and host factors.


Deficiencies of the late components of the complement pathway place individuals at markedly increased risk of developing meningococcal infections.12 These patients have recurrent episodes of meningococcal infection. Genetic variants of mannose-binding lectin (MBL), a plasma opsonin that initiates the MBL pathway of complement activation, may also predispose to increased susceptibility to meningococcal infections.13



Clinical Presentation


Meningococcal infection may manifest in different forms: bacteremia without sepsis, meningitis (with or without meningococcemia), acute meningococcemia (with or without meningitis), a meningoencephalitic picture, or chronic meningococcemia. The most fulminant form is acute meningococcemia, in which death may ensue within hours of the onset of symptoms.


The most common manifestation of acute meningococcemia is fever with rash. The rash usually begins as a petechial rash, initially with a few discrete lesions 1 to 2 mm in diameter, which often progress and coalesce to form larger ecchymotic lesions (Fig. 1). If there is associated meningitis, meningeal signs and symptoms may also be present.



The shock state is a dominant feature in patients with acute meningococcemia, and is often accompanied by disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Meningococcemia can lead to complications such as massive adrenal hemorrhage, DIC, arthritis, heart problems such as pericarditis and myocarditis, neurologic problems such as deafness and peripheral neuropathy, and peripheral gangrene.14 In epidemic settings in third-world countries, case-fatality rates as high as 70% have been recorded. In endemic settings in industrialized countries, the mortality rate is approximately 8%, but could be as high as 19%.


Meningococcemia does not always manifest in a fulminant manner. An unusual manifestation of meningococcal infection is chronic meningococcemia, which manifests with low-grade fever, rash, and arthritis. This manifestation is identical to that of chronic gonococcemia.




Treatment


The treatment of acute meningococcemia involves appropriate antibiotic therapy, along with supportive therapy for shock, heart failure, DIC, and other complications. Early antibiotic therapy has been conclusively shown to improve outcomes in patients with meningococcal disease.18 The recommended treatment for severe meningococcal infection is a third-generation cephalosporin with good CSF penetration. Ceftriaxone, 1 g every 12 hours, is the most commonly used treatment.19 Cefotaxime and ceftazidime should be equally efficacious alternatives. Patients allergic to cephalosporins may be treated with chloramphenicol, 100 mg/kg, in four divided doses, up to a total dosage of 4 g/day.20 High doses of penicillin G should also usually be adequate; however, small numbers of resistant N. meningitidis have been reported, and penicillin G should therefore not ordinarily be the first choice of antibiotic in the absence of susceptibility data. The shock state is a dominant part of the clinical picture of meningococcemia and supportive management is important. The use of steroids for meningococcemia is controversial, and a recommendation for its routine use for treatment of this condition cannot be made.



Prophylaxis


Household contacts are at significantly higher risk of infection.21 Chemoprophylaxis is recommended for household contacts, daycare center staff and clients, and anyone exposed to the patient’s oral secretions. For health care workers, this would include persons who intubated the patient and who provided suction to clear secretions. Effective prophylactic treatments include a single 1-g dose of ceftriaxone intravenously or intramuscularly, a single 500-mg dose of ciprofloxacin, a single 500-mg dose of azithromycin, and 600 mg of rifampin every 12 hours for 2 days.18




CRANIAL SUBDURAL EMPYEMA



Definition, Etiology, and Incidence


Subdural empyema is a condition in which there is collection of pus in the region between the dura and the arachnoid. The most common causes of subdural empyema are aerobic and anaerobic streptococci (especially the S. milleri group), Staphylococcus aureus and, to a lesser extent, aerobic gram-negative bacilli.22,23 Studies have found anaerobic infections in varying proportions of infections, with high proportion of patients having anaerobic microorganisms recovered in some studies with careful culturing.24 This raises the possibility that these infections are usually polymicrobial, with anaerobic microorganisms usually present. Subdural empyemas account for 15% to 20% of all localized intracranial infections.23



Pathophysiology


Cranial subdural empyema is usually a complication of infection of the paranasal sinuses.23 Less commonly, it results from spread from the middle ear.25 It may also occur as a complication of trauma or neurosurgery. Infection spreads intracranially through the emissary veins that communicate between the veins draining the facial structures and intracranial venous channels. In a small proportion of cases, subdural empyema may occur by metastatic spread, usually from a pulmonary infection, for an unexplained reason.




Diagnosis


The diagnosis should be considered in any patient who presents with features suggestive of meningitis and a focal neurologic deficit or rapid deterioration in the level of consciousness. If recognized, lumbar puncture should not be performed because of the risk of cerebral herniation.23 CSF findings would be nonspecific, with an elevated opening pressure, neutrophilic pleocytosis, and elevated protein level. Gram staining and culture of CSF are usually negative. The diagnostic procedure of choice is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). If not available, CT scanning with contrast should be done. CT is inferior to MRI in detecting empyemas at the base of the brain and in the posterior fossa.




NECROTIZING SOFT TISSUE INFECTIONS



Definition, Etiology, and Incidence


This term encompasses several specific clinical entities characterized by disease processes that produce necrosis of subcutaneous tissue, muscle, or both that progress rapidly and require a combined emergent surgical and medical approach for optimum outcomes. These entities include necrotizing fasciitis, streptococcal necrotizing myositis, clostridial myonecrosis (gas gangrene), and nonclostridial crepitant myositis.


Type I necrotizing fasciitis is a mixed infection caused by an anaerobic bacterium (usually Bacteroides or Propionibacterium) in association with a facultative anaerobic microorganism, such as a streptococcus or a member of the Enterobacteriaceae. Type II necrotizing fasciitis, hemolytic streptococcal gangrene, is caused by group A streptococci. Other microorganisms may be present in the mix. Community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA) has recently been described as a cause of necrotizing fasciitis.27


Clostridial myonecrosis, also commonly known as gas gangrene, and streptococcal necrotizing myositis, as their names imply, are caused by Clostridium spp. and by group A streptococci, respectively. The latter can rarely be caused by groups B, C, or G streptococci.


Nonclostridial crepitant myositis encompasses several clinical entities that may result from mixed infection caused by anaerobic streptococci, along with the following: group A streptococci or S. aureus (anaerobic streptococcal myonecrosis); a mixture of anaerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms (synergistic nonclostridial anaerobic myonecrosis, or Meleney’s bacterial synergistic gangrene); Proteus spp., Bacteroides spp., and anaerobic streptococci in devitalized limbs (infected vascular gangrene); Vibrio vulnificus; and Aeromonas hydrophila.


As a group, these illnesses are uncommon but not rare, and prompt recognition and appropriate management will significantly affect outcomes.




Clinical Presentation


Necrotizing fasciitis is usually an acute process, with severe infection of the superficial and deep fascia. It most commonly occurs in the extremities. The affected area becomes erythematous, swollen, warm, and painful. It typically progresses rapidly, with the skin becoming darker, and over a few days bullae and skin breakdown develop. In the polymicrobial form, crepitations may be felt subcutaneously, indicating the presence of gas. Development of anesthesia over an erythematous area may precede development of skin breakdown and may serve as a warning sign that the disease process is more serious than cellulitis. Pain out of proportion to the skin changes also may be an indicator of a more serious infection. On palpation, the affected area has a woody hard feel. Increasing tissue edema may lead to the development of compartment syndrome.


Necrotizing myositis or myonecrosis may occur without overt findings on the skin surface. The predominant symptom is intense muscle pain, usually accompanied by fever. Patients usually appear more ill than would be expected from the physical findings. Gas gangrene and other syndromes of necrotizing myositis caused by anaerobic microorganisms will also have crepitations because of the presence of subcutaneous gas.


At initial presentation, it may not be possible to make a clinical distinction between necrotizing fasciitis and necrotizing myositis. Indeed, both processes may occur simultaneously, especially with streptococcal infection. Lack of involvement of the overlying skin does not exclude the presence of an underlying necrotizing process.


Streptococcal necrotizing soft tissue infections are usually associated with the toxic shock syndrome. This is discussed separately (see later). Acute vascular compromise from trauma or embolic occlusion leads to tissue infarction and may progress to infected vascular gangrene if the appropriate microorganisms gain access to the devitalized tissues.




Treatment


It is not always obvious whether a skin or soft tissue infection is a necrotizing infection. When considered a possibility, aggressive management is important. It is not always possible to predict the causative microorganism from the clinical features accurately. A prudent approach would be to treat with antibiotics that are effective against group A streptococci, S. aureus, enteric gram-negative bacteria, and anaerobic microorganisms. The antibiotics of choice for initial empirical therapy are clindamycin plus ampicillin-sulbactam plus ciprofloxacin.29 If there is reason to suspect MRSA infection, vancomycin may be added. Antibiotic therapy should be modified when culture and susceptibility data become available. A lack of response to a reasonable trial of antibiotics should prompt emergent surgical intervention. Prompt and aggressive fasciotomy and débridement of devitalized tissue are necessary to gain control of the infection. Early surgical intervention reduces mortality.28 If infection is advanced, amputation may be necessary, and lifesaving.


Jul 18, 2017 | Posted by in GENERAL SURGERY | Comments Off on Infectious Disease Emergencies

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access