Features of Explosive Fragments Induced Injury and Management


Event

Explosive injury

Gunshot injury

Blade injury

Contusion injury

Burn injury

Frost bite

Concussion

Poisoning

Other

Anti-Japanese War

30.1

52.8

4.0

10.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.8

War of Liberation

58.9

36.9

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.5

0.0

3.6

Korean War

62.2

17.2

0.2

6.1

1.6

10.5

0.3

0.4

1.5

Sino-Vietnam War

57.7

37.1

0.2

2.8

0.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

1.3

Second World War

55.0

32.4

0.2

12.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Battle of Vi Xuyen

53.7

6.7

2.2

22.7

4.2

0.0

1.1

0.0

9.4

Afghanistan War

60.0

38.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.0

Vietnam War (American Casualties)

57.1

42.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.8

Vietnam War (Vietnamese Casualties)

45.0

19.0

0.0

0.0

9.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

27.0

First World War

35.3

64.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Falklands War

55.8

31.8

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

12.4

Gulf War

81.0

19.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0



A416921_1_En_6_Fig1_HTML.gif


Fig. 1
Different factors causing personal injury in successive wars


Analyzing the relationship between different injury factors from explosive weaponry and biological causes of death, a combination of explosive fragments and blast shockwaves are the main cause of fatal injury, followed by incidents caused solely by exposure to explosive fragments. Different injury factors and their relation to biological death types are illustrated in Table 2 and Fig. 2.


Table 2
Different injury factors and related biological death rates
































Cause of death

Explosive fragments + blast shockwaves

Explosive fragments

Blast shockwaves

Burn injuries

Total deaths

Number

31

30

5

2

68

Incidence rate (%)

45.6

44.1

7.4

2.9
 


A416921_1_En_6_Fig2_HTML.gif


Fig. 2
Different injury factors and related biological death rates



1.2 Explosive Fragment Injury and Effects on Different Parts of the Body


Amongst modern warfare injuries, the majority are explosive fragment injuries. At the same time, because of differences in their exposed area and anatomical position, injury incidence rates for different parts of the body are also different.

Amongst war injuries, craniocerebral wounds have a high rate of incidence. In the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars, there were 1255 cases of brain injuries, of which 774 involved fragment penetration and 481 blunt trauma. An analysis of 10 years of recent American army injuries demonstrates that the majority of early deaths before arrival at military hospital are the result of craniocerebral wounds. Amongst injuries affecting different parts of the body, craniocerebral wounds account for 42.3 % of injuries causing immediate or early death (Table 3).


Table 3
Proportion of immediate and early deaths for different injured parts of the body












































Injury type

Immediate deaths (1619)

Early deaths (1624)

Total (3243)

Craniocerebral injury

38.3 % (620)

53.0 % (753)

42.3 % (1373)

High spinal cord injury


9.2 % (131)

4.0 % (131)

Limb severance

31.6 % (512)


15.8 % (512)

Chest injury

23.6 % (383)

21.8 % (310)

21.4 % (693)

Pelvic injury


6.5 % (93)

2.9 % (93)

Other

6.5 % (104)

9.5 % (134)

7.3 % (238)


The early period after injury can include anytime from several minutes to several hours before arrival at hospital

Maxillofacial fragment injury is a common injury in the firearm wound class. According to reports [4], head and facial injuries accounted for 13 % of injuries in the Soviet-Afghan war and 19 % of injuries in the Chechen conflict. During 1991s Operation Desert Storm, 17.3 % of injuries sustained by the US military were head and face injuries and 4.3 % neck injuries. Israeli war statistics demonstrate that 24 % of its military injuries were head and face injuries and 12 % neck injuries. From July 1998 to March 1999, during US military operations in Mogadishu, Somalia, head and facial wounds accounted for 36 % of all injuries.

Because of the increased use of explosive weaponry in modern warfare, eye wounds have also increased in incidence (Table 4). Artillery shell fragments and blast shockwaves can cause eye and adnexal lesions, with more than 70 % of eye injuries caused by penetration from explosive fragments. These injuries often result in the loss or damage of the eye and treatment is very difficult.


Table 4
Modern wars and eye injury causes






















































Event

Firearm injury

Explosive fragment injury

Other

World War 1

62.00

12.00

26.00

World War 2

65.80

15.00

19.20

Korean War (US military)

72.00

4.50

23.50

Egypt and Israel War

78.70

4.80

13.50

Sino-Vietnam Border War

74.00

13.00

13.00

Winter War (Russia-Finland)

72.00

12.00

16.00

Great Patriotic War (Russia-Germany)

85.00

11.00

4.00

Korean War (Russian military)

66.50

3.20

30.30

With regards to colorectal war wounds, data demonstrates 35 % of these were caused by explosive fragmentation, 5 % by vehicle accidents, 1 % by falls and 1 % by blunt trauma (Table 5).


Table 5
Incidence rates for different areas of injury concurrent with colorectal injury












































Injured area

Concurrence with colon injury (%)

Concurrence with rectal injury (%)

Difference in the incidence of colorectal injury P value

Head and neck

9.9

9.2

0.79

Face

0

6

<0.0001

Chest

22.1

10

<0.0001

Abdomen

68.2

57

0.003

Limbs

39.3

69.3

<0.0001

Skin and soft tissue

5.5

8

0.20


1.3 Recovery Rates and Mortality Rates for Fragmentation Injuries


In wars from the last decade, the two main causes of injury, accounting for nearly 75 % of wounds, have been penetrative explosive fragmentation injuries and penetrative gunshot wounds. During this period the survival rate from such wounds reached an historical record of 90 %. During the Vietnam War the survival rate from penetrative injuries was 84 % and in World War 2 80 %.

In the period from October 2001 to June 2011, 4596 cases of war injury deaths were retrospectively analyzed and in 73.7 % of cases the cause of death was identified as explosive fragmentation injury, in 21.1 % of cases the cause was gunshot wounds and in 4.2 % of cases the cause was other injuries including vehicle accident injuries. 87.3 % of deaths occurred before arriving at the medical treatment facility (MTF), of which 35.2 % (1619 cases) were instant deaths and 52.1 % (2397 cases) were deaths occurring several minutes to several hours subsequent to the incident but prior to MTF arrival. Only in 12.7 % of cases (580) did death occur after arriving at the medical treatment facility (Fig. 3). In addition, amongst fatal wounds, the injury severity score (ISS) was recorded as between 25–50 points in 61.2 % of cases (Fig. 4).

A416921_1_En_6_Fig3_HTML.gif


Fig. 3
Death rates from combat injuries before or after arrival at the medical treatment facility


A416921_1_En_6_Fig4_HTML.gif


Fig. 4
Injury severity score (ISS) rates for fatal combat injuries



2 Types of Explosive Fragmentation


The main cause of fatal injury from fragmentation is explosive weaponry, namely the fragmentation warhead or shell. The fragmentation warhead is one of the main types of warheads, detonating high explosives to release a large quantity of high-speed fragments to destroy targets by way of such fragments’ impact, and incendiary and explosive effects. These can be used to fatally injure biological creatures (humans, animals) and damage unarmored or light-armored vehicles, aircraft, radars, missiles and other armored equipment. According to their means of generating fragments , fragmentation warheads can be divided into three types: natural, controlled and pre-fragmentation. The grenade shell is a typical example of the pre-fragmentation type.

Natural fragmentation is caused by the shell expanding and breaking after detonation. Such shells are characterized by the casing not only acting as a container, but for the way the container itself also degrades into potentially deadly fragments. Such fragments are of an uneven, irregular shape but typically decelerate quickly in flight and have a limited range in causing fatal injury.

Controlled fragmentation employs a housing groove or lining for the explosive materials, or uses some other technical measures to partially weaken the shell and control its breaking points thereby producing fragments. Such warheads are characterized by broken pieces of uniform size and shape.

Pre-fragmentation warheads are molded to house a predetermined design and quantity of steel balls, steel arrowheads, tungsten balls, tungsten pellets or similar materials that can be fitted either on the inside or outside surface of the warhead or shell. These pre-made fragments and the natural fragments from the casing together create a field of deadly fragments (Figs. 5 and 6). Furthermore, because the pre-made fragments are designed to have uniform air resistance when flying they have a more efficient killing effect within a specified range, and the lethality of the whole warhead improves greatly.

A416921_1_En_6_Fig5_HTML.gif


Fig. 5
Small tungsten alloy balls used as pre-made fragments


A416921_1_En_6_Fig6_HTML.gif


Fig. 6
Grenade shell capable of producing deadly fragments


3 Injury Characteristics from Explosive Fragmentation



3.1 General Characteristics of Fragment Wounds [68]


Projectile injuries to the body usually involve two forces. First, the forward momentum propelling the projectile along the projection axis directly causes penetrative or blind wound damage to body tissues and results in permanent wound tracts that are the main cause of fatal laceration injuries. In addition, the moment the high-speed projectiles strike the body’s surface the projectile’s forward momentum can produce a strong shockwave intensifying the damage to body tissue. Second, the lateral momentum of the projectile relative to the vertical wound means pressure waves can increase the size of the wound tract. Under a strong pressure wave, lateral momentum has a ripple effect producing transient cavities that can damage the surrounding soft tissue and bone tissue.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 26, 2017 | Posted by in GENERAL SURGERY | Comments Off on Features of Explosive Fragments Induced Injury and Management

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access