Chapter 7 Diagnostic cytopathology of peritoneal washings
INTRODUCTION
Involvement of serosa by cancer cells, even in the absence of effusion, correlates with poor prognosis. In this subset of cases without effusion, retrieval of a representative specimen may be achieved as washings, lavages, brushings, scrapings, and touch imprints for staging various cancers (see Chapter 1).
Peritoneal washing cytology (PWC) was first described by Keettel and Elkins1–3 in 1956 and has gained acceptance as a part of the surgical–pathologic evaluation of gynecologic malignancy. Creasman and Rutledge4 found that PWC results correlated well with prognosis in ovarian, endometrial, and cervical malignancies. Many subsequent studies reinforced the value of peritoneal washing (PW).5–10 Staging protocols for ovarian and endometrial carcinoma11 include PW interpretations that can result in a higher pathologic stage and can potentially determine whether chemotherapy or radiation therapy is initiated. More recently,12–15 there has been concern expressed that overcalls due to unrecognized benign patterns could result in overtreatment in patients with early disease. It is, therefore, of paramount importance that peritoneal washings be evaluated accurately so that patient follow-up will be appropriate.
SPECIMEN COLLECTION PROCEDURE
In order to save costs, Sharifi et al16 recommended that peritoneal washings collected during laparotomy for disease presumed to be benign be held and sent for cytology only if malignancy is subsequently diagnosed. However, abrading the mesothelial surfaces is traumatic, and delay in processing an unfixed PW specimen can result in compromised cellular detail. Presumably, a frozen section or other intraoperative pathologic consultation needed by the surgeon to plan the surgical approach would limit the delay in processing to an hour or two in the majority of cases. If this approach is contemplated, it would be wise to utilize balanced salt solution for the washings.
INTERPRETATION APPROACH
Although washing the peritoneal cavity with saline or balanced salt solution may be expected to yield a cell sample similar to ascitic fluid, there are differences that must be appreciated in order to accurately evaluate these samples. Rather than the freely desquamated cells seen in spontaneous ascitic fluid, many of the cells present in peritoneal washings have been mechanically stripped from the underlying connective tissue. In addition, cell types that are not commonly seen in ascites (probably because they are normally shed in very low numbers) may be stripped from the surfaces.13,14 The differences between ascites and peritoneal washings are shown in Table 7.1. An awareness of these differences between ascites and peritoneal washes will aid in interpretation.
Characteristic | Ascites | Washings |
---|---|---|
Collection | Spontaneous exfoliation | Cells abraded |
Aggregation | Three-dimensional groups | Two-dimensional sheets |
Cell shape | Rounded shapes | Flat mesothelial cells |
BENIGN CONDITIONS
Peritoneal washings are typically performed when there is clinical suspicion of malignancy. Particularly for ovarian lesions, the washing will be performed before a histologic diagnosis is known. It is important that benign conditions that can be confused with malignancy be understood and excluded (Table 7.2) prior to rendering a malignant interpretation in peritoneal washings. Indeed, the benign changes found in peritoneal washings are the key differences between intraoperative washings and spontaneous ascites. This difference is particularly important in cases in which a primary malignant tumor is identified but no intraperitoneal extension has been observed histologically.
Benign condition | Cytologic finding | Pitfall |
---|---|---|
Inflammatory conditions | Mixture of mesothelial patterns in the same sample | Can be confused with cancer |
Mixture of mesothelial patterns in the same sample | Can be confused with cancer | |
Adhesions | Capillary tangles | |
Detached ciliary tufts | Anucleated cytoplasmic fragments with cilia | |
Ruptured benign epithelial cyst or cystic tumor | Sheets and groups of epithelial cells | Can be confused with carcinoma |
MESOTHELIAL CELL POLYMORPHISM (see also Chapter 2)
Because the mesothelial cells in peritoneal washings are typically stripped from the underlying connective tissue, these cells are commonly present as flat sheets (Figure 7.1) of varying cell numbers.12–14,17,18 If large, these sheets are frequently folded or rolled. In general, these sheets are easily recognized as such and create little difficulty. Sometimes the sheets are squeezed together so that the nucleocytoplasmic ratio is artifactually distorted (Figure 7.2). The cells typically are arranged in a uniform honeycomb pattern. Single cells with flattened, polygonal shapes can also be seen in some cases (Figure 7.3). Nuclei are centrally placed with a round-oval, occasionally bilobed appearance (Figure 7.4). The nuclei in normal mesothelial cells can vary considerably in a single sample (Figure 7.5) (see also Chapter 2). The chromatin pattern is finely granular and a single micronucleolus is usually seen in the well-preserved mesothelial cells (Figure 7.6). The cytoplasm is thin with a polygonal shape. The staining quality of the cytoplasm is variable, although usually faintly azurophilic. Occasionally, multinucleated mesothelial cells (Figure 7.7) are present as a part of these sheets, with six or more nuclei forming a ring within the center of a giant cytoplasm. Degeneration of the mesothelial cells in peritoneal washing samples shows as paranuclear vacuoles that impinge on the nucleus (Figure 7.8). This may give the appearance of jagged, angulated nuclear contours.
It is important to recognize that mesothelial cells in washings can have a variety of appearances in the same sample, particularly in cases in which there is an inflammatory component such as pelvic inflammatory disease,12,13 preoperative rupture of an ovarian cyst,13,14 or cystic neoplasm.13,14 Inflammatory lesions of the gastrointestinal tract such as diverticulitis or appendicitis can have a similar effect. Healing of intraperitoneal inflammatory conditions is accompanied by adhesion formation in which a fibrinous exudate is replaced by mesothelial-lined fibrovascular connective tissue. Vascular tangles (Figure 7.9) composed of longitudinal capillaries wrapped in tangled fibrillar material can be seen in peritoneal washings as the cytologic residua of lysed adhesions.13
In some cases with large benign tumors, such as uterine leiomyomas or ovarian fibrothecomas (Figure 7.10), the benign mesothelial cells can be highly reactive and raise concerns for malignancy. This is particularly true in cases with Meigs’ syndrome13 in which ovarian fibrothecomas are associated with benign ascites. In such cases, there is a rather uniform distribution of reactive changes in the mesothelial cells, so that there is a spectrum of reactive changes in a single population rather than two discrete patterns (see Chapters 2 and 3). Correlation with the surgical pathology specimen will generally help to clarify the nature of the process. Rarely, we have seen malignant cells from extragenital malignancies in peritoneal washings from women undergoing surgery for benign female genital tract disease.13,14 In these cases, the malignant cells were unequivocal and did not merge into the spectrum of reactive mesothelial cells.
Epithelial cells from ruptured cystic endometriosis, benign cystic ovarian tumors, and bowel mucosa have been described in peritoneal washings.13 Although cytologically bland, these cells are clearly foreign to the peritoneal cavity and, therefore, can cause concern. Rupture of benign cystic tumors can also spill three-dimensional epithelial cell groups into the peritoneal washings.13 Discussion with the surgeon or review of the operative note can clarify this issue in problematic cases.
MESOTHELIAL SURFACE REACTIONS
The peritoneal surface in women has been referred to as the ‘secondary müllerian system’ because of its embryologic relationship with the müllerian ducts and because of the müllerian-derived lesions that appear to develop de novo in the peritoneum.19 It is important that anyone who examines peritoneal washings be familiar with these lesions so as not to interpret cells from these lesions as malignant.
Endosalpingiosis
Endosalpingiosis can be described as ectopic fallopian tube epithelium20–23 involving pelvic structures and lymph nodes. It is seen as cystic invaginations or papillary formations on the surfaces of the ovaries, paratubal tissues, and omentum as well as within pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes. Microcalcifications and psammoma bodies are frequent (Figure 7.11). Some authors attribute this entity to mesothelial metaplasia,23 although others have suggested that it results from the implantation of inflamed epithelium from the fallopian tubes.21 The major significance of endosalpingiosis is the need to distinguish this benign process from metastatic carcinoma.13,14,20,22,24–29
Cytologically, endosalpingiosis has been described as small aggregates and papillary fragments of cells characterized by cylindrical cell shapes with oval nuclei set in scant basophilic cytoplasm.12,13,24,25,27,28 In some cases, cilia and psammoma bodies can be seen.13,19–29 The epithelial cells surrounding psammoma bodies often have a scalloped appearance (see Figure 7.11). Nuclear features are usually bland, with round-oval nuclei, finely distributed chromatin and single round micronucleoli.27–29 The necessity and occasional difficulty in distinguishing endosalpingiosis from serous neoplasia has been described in several reports.13,14,22,25,27–30 This problem is compounded by the fact that endosalpingiosis and benign and malignant serous neoplasms will coexist in some patients.13,14,22,28–30 In endosalpingiosis, cell groups with the typical features are present only sparsely in the peritoneal washing. When there are many cell groups and/or large cell clusters that suggest endosalpingiosis, the possibility that they represent a serous neoplasm should be considered. Correlation with histology can be very helpful in these instances.
Endometriosis
Endometriosis is defined as ectopic functional endometrium composed of glands and stroma.23 It is found on the mesothelial surfaces of the pelvis, especially ovaries, fallopian tubes, uterus, and posterior cul-de-sac (between the uterus and rectum). The pathogenesis remains unclear. Endometriosis is associated with peritoneal adhesions and frequently forms hemorrhagic cysts due to the cyclic bleeding associated with the menstrual cycle, with subsequent fibrosis. Occasionally, cystic ovarian endometriosis may be large enough to suggest an ovarian tumor clinically.23
Endometriotic epithelial cells and stroma have occasionally been reported in peritoneal washings.13,31–33 In our experience, this is a rare event that usually correlates with rupture of an endometriotic cyst.13 Epithelial cells from ruptured endometriosis can sometimes cause concern for malignancy13,17 until correlated with histology. More typically, hemosiderin-laden macrophages are seen, but these must be considered a non-specific finding as they can be found in any situation in which intraperitoneal bleeding has occurred.