chapter 11 Connectedness: the role of social support
SOCIAL ISOLATION AND STRESS
Social isolation is painful, so much so that it figures prominently among the top 10 stressors in the Holmes and Rahe scale.1 Top among stressors is the grief associated with the loss of a family member. Next come a range of issues related to marriage and workplace stress. Conflict at work is also among the most stressful events in most people’s lives. Most of us will wish, at various times, to shun social connection, but the pain associated with feeling socially isolated indicates that the need for connection is part of human nature. As such, it is expressed in many ways, including physical illness, anxiety, depression, low productivity, substance abuse and domestic violence.
SOCIAL ISOLATION AND ILLNESS
Social isolation, being a considerable stressor, has a significant impact upon our emotional state and therefore on our physical state. The chapter on mind–body medicine (Ch 8) gives a more detailed account of this. Some of the illnesses and problems associated with social isolation include:
Although social isolation can contribute to various illnesses, it should equally be noted that these illnesses can contribute to people becoming socially isolated. As risk factors, social isolation and socioeconomic factors make a major contribution to many common illnesses.2,3 They are as important as smoking, being overweight or hypercholesterolaemia. Equally, connectedness is protective against the same illnesses. Some examples:
Some factors that are particularly important include being married, having contact with family and friends, group affiliation and church membership. Even if someone has a chronic illness such as heart disease, the progression of the illness is significantly slowed or accelerated depending on the level of connectedness. The effects are especially significant for the elderly, with the risk of death among those who were isolated being increased fourfold in the months after a heart attack.8 Such findings are largely independent of access to medical care.
THE SOCIAL GRADIENT
Research, conducted largely through the work of Michael Marmot and colleagues, has consistently demonstrated that one’s social position or class has a significant effect on health outcomes.9 This is not explainable simply in terms of access or lack of access to health resources, particularly in countries with a good standard of universal health cover. It is also not just related to occupational exposure and unhealthier lifestyle, which are more common in lower socioeconomic groups. Other explanations for the findings include:
CONNECTEDNESS AND MENTAL HEALTH
Study findings have suggested that, of young people who present to a general practitioner for any reason, over 20% will have had suicidal ideation in the preceding fortnight.10 In addressing issues such as youth suicide, much attention has been given to identifying risk factors and intervening with at-risk individuals. Risk factors for suicide include:
Such statistics, along with the almost ubiquitous presence of risk factors, can contribute to the creation of a sense of fear and a tendency to overreact to the ordinary vicissitudes of adolescence. Risk factors generally come in multiples and when they do, they have a synergistic effect, making the risk of suicide much greater. Equally important in a positive sense are protective factors. Protective factors, such as employment or connectedness at home, help to neutralise the effects of risk factors. Always thinking of risk rather than protection is not only symbolic of our community’s concentration on illness rather than wellness, but also leads to an atmosphere of negativity. A major study of the effect of connectedness on adolescents showed it to be tremendously protective not just against youth suicide and emotional distress but also against substance use and violence.11 The protective effect was significant regardless of ethnic or socioeconomic background. Connectedness at home and at school were the two most important factors. The effect of multiple risk factors in the absence of protective factors is enormous, but the effect of multiple protective factors, even in the presence of multiple risk factors, is to reduce risk to near normal. The most protective aspect of family connectedness was having a parental presence in the house at important times in the day, such as on waking, after school, at dinner and at bedtime. Having shared activities between parents and their children was also very important. A lack of parental presence, especially where the child had access to drugs and guns at home, was associated with a range of risk-taking behaviours.