CHAPTER 10 Competent patients and end-of-life decisions
10.1 Death
[10.1.1] What is the definition of death?
Re A [1992] 3 Med LR 303 concerned a child who had no brain stem function. The trial judge found that even though the child’s autonomous functions were being carried on by artificial means, the child had died when his brain stem had ceased to function.
In South Australia and Western Australia, if a person’s respiration and circulation are being maintained by artificial means post-mortem taking of tissues can only occur if that person has total cessation of brain function. This would appear to coincide with the other jurisdictions’ definitions of death.
The relevant legislation in the states and territories is listed in table 10.1.1.
Table 10.1.1 Legislation defining death
ACT | Transplantation & Anatomy Act 1978 s 45 |
NSW | Human Tissue Act 1983 s 33 |
NT | Human Tissue Transplant Act 1979 s 23 |
Qld | Transplantation & Anatomy Act 1979 s 45 |
SA | Transplantation & Anatomy Act 1983 s 24 |
Tas | Human Tissue Act 1985 s 27A |
Vic | Human Tissue Act 1982 s 41 |
WA | Human Tissue & Transplant Act 1982 |
[10.1.3] When should deaths be reported to the coroner?
The office of the coroner was discussed in [3.4.4].
Legislation dealing with reportable deaths is listed in table 10.1.3.
Table 10.1.3 Reportable deaths: legislation and grounds for reporting
10.2 Competent patients and refusal of life-sustaining treatment
[10.2.1] Do competent patients have a right to refuse treatment when that will lead to their deaths?
The test for competence is discussed in [7.1.1]–[7.1.8].
Adults are presumed to be competent, and an adult’s decision concerning treatment is binding even if others do not regard it as reasonable or sensible. Apart from the situations described in [10.2.2]–[10.2.3], decisions to refuse treatment must be respected even when the person may die as a result of its being withheld or withdrawn.
B v NHS Trust [2002] EWHC 429 (Fam) concerned a quadriplegic and ventilator-dependent patient who, after several months without improvement, requested that the ventilation be withdrawn, having created an advance directive to that effect. Part of the treatment team argued that she was depressed and hence incompetent, with the result that her wishes could be ignored and treatment continued.
[10.2.2] Are there patients who cannot refuse treatment?
Patients regulated by mental health legislation may also be subject to orders requiring them to accept treatment: see [13.3.1].
Prisoners and detainees may also be forcibly tested and treated in some jurisdictions. For example, s 77 of the Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW) allows prison authorities to order compulsory treatment when it is necessary to save a prisoner’s life or prevent serious damage to their health.
Children also have limited rights to refuse treatment: see [9.4.1].
[10.2.3] Are there limits to the right to refuse treatment?
Suicide and attempted suicide are not crimes, but some jurisdictions nevertheless provide protection to people who use force to prevent a person committing suicide. The relevant laws are listed in table 10.2.3.
Table 10.2.3 Legislation relating to the prevention of suicide
ACT | Crimes Act 1900 s 18 |
NSW | Crimes Act 1900 s 574B |
SA | Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 s 13 |
Vic | Crimes Act 1958 s 463B |
Re Kinney (unreported, VSC, Fullagar J, 23 December 1988) concerned a man who had unsuccessfully attempted suicide after allegedly murdering his mother-in-law. His wife sought a court order to prevent medical treatment being administered so that he could die in accordance with his suicide note. Fullagar J refused to prevent the treatment on the grounds that it would be tantamount to aiding and abetting a suicide attempt.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

