C
CALENDULA
Other Common Name: | Marigold |
Botanical Name: | Calendula officinalis |
Family: | Compositae |
Plant Part Used: | Flower |
PRESCRIBING INFORMATION
Actions | Vulnerary, antiinflammatory, lymphatic, styptic (hemostatic), antimicrobial, antiviral (topically), antifungal (topically) | |
Potential Indications | Based on appropriate evaluation of the patient, practitioners should consider prescribing Calendula in formulations in the context of: • Internal treatment for gastric and duodenal ulcers; enlarged or inflamed lymph nodes, acne, sebaceous cysts (5) • Topical treatment for inflammation of the skin and mucosa, wounds, especially poorly healing wounds (4,5) • Topical treatment for leg ulcers, venous circulatory problems, scalds; to help control bleeding (4) | |
Contraindications | Known allergy.1 | |
Warnings and Precautions | The likelihood of Calendula preparations causing a contact allergy is low. However, people with known sensitivity to other members of the Compositae family (e.g., ragweed, daisies, chrysanthemums) should avoid topical application of Calendula or Calendula products.1 Sensitization to Calendula and allergic contact reactions have been reported.2,3 Anaphylactic shock after gargling with an infusion of Calendula has also been reported.4 | |
Interactions | None known. | |
Use in Pregnancy and Lactation | No adverse effects expected. | |
Side Effects | Allergic reaction occurs rarely following topical application.1 | |
Dosage | Dose per day* | Dose per week* |
1.5–4.5 ml of 1:2 liquid extract | 10–30 ml of 1:2 liquid extract |
* This dose range is extrapolated from the British Pharmaceutical Codex 1934, the British Herbal Pharmacopoeia 1983, and the author’s education and experience.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
1 Scientific Committee of the European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy (ESCOP). ESCOP monographs: Calendulae flos. Argyle House, Gandy Street, Exeter, Devon, EX4 3LS, United Kingdom: European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy, ESCOP Secretariat, March 1996.
2 Wrangsjo K, Ros AM, Wahlberg JE. Contact Dermatitis. 1990;22(3):148-154.
3 Hausen BM, Oestmann G. Derm Beruf Umwelt. 1988;36(4):117-124.
4 Goldman II. Klin Med. 1974;52(4):142-143.
5 British Herbal Medicine Association’s Scientific Committee. British herbal pharmacopoeia. Bournemouth: BHMA, 1983.
6 Felter HW, Lloyd JU. King’s American dispensatory, ed 18. Portland: Eclectic Medical Publications, 1905. rev 3, reprinted 1983.
7 Isaac I. Die Ringelblume: Botanik, Chemie, Pharmakologie, Toxikologie, Pharmazie und therapeutische Verwendung; Handbuch für ärzte, apotheker und andere naturwissenschaftler. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, 1992.
8 Amirghofran Z, Azadbakht M, Karimi MH. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000;72(1-2):167-172.
9 Varljen J, Liptak A, Wagner H. Phytochem. 1989;28(9):2379-2383.
10 Bezakova L, et al. Pharmazie. 1996;51:126-127.
11 Shipochliev T, Dimitrov A, Aleksandrova E. Vet Med Nauki. 1981;18(6):87-94.
12 Mascolo N, et al. Phytother Res. 1987;1:28-31.
13 Della Loggia R. Z Phytother. 2000;21:149-150.
14 Della Loggia R, et al. Planta Med. 1994;60(6):516-520.
15 Patrick KFM, et al. Phytomed. 1996;3(1):11-18.
16 Klouchek-Popova E, et al. Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg. 1982;8(4):63-67.
17 Ansari MA, et al. Indian Vet J. 1997;74(7):594-597.
18 Rao SG, et al. Fitoterapia. 1991;62(6):508-510.
19 Russo M. Riv Ital EPPOS. 1972;54:730.
20 Yatsuno AI, Belova LF, Lipkina GS. Pharmacol Toxicol SSSR. 1978;41:193-198.
21 Iatsyno AI, et al. Farmakol Toksikol. 1978;41(5):556-560.
22 Manolov P, et al. Probl Vatr Med. 1983;11:70-74.
23 Ahmad S, et al. Pak J Sci Ind Res. 2000;43(1):50-54.
24 Wojcicki J, Samochowiec L. Herba Pol. 1980;26:233-237.
25 Boucaud-Maitre Y, Algernon O, Raynaud J. Pharmazie. 1988;43:220-221.
26 Chakurski I, et al. Vutr Boles. 1981;20(6):51-54.
27 Fleischner AM. Cosmet Toiletries. 1985;100:54-55.
28 Garg S, Sharma SN. Pharmazie. 1992;47(12):924-926.
29 Gasiorowska I, et al. Czas Stomatol. 1983;36(4):307-311.
30 van der Velden EM, van der Dussen MFN. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53(1):9-12.
31 Baranov AP. Dtsch Apoth Ztg. 1999;139:61-66.
32 Lievre M, et al. Clin Trials Meta-Analys. 1992;28:9-12.
33 Corina P, et al. Oftalmologia. 1999;46(1):55-57.
34 Blumenthal M, et al, editors. The complete German Commission E monographs: therapeutic guide to herbal medicines. Austin: American Botanical Council, 1998.
CALIFORNIA POPPY
Other Common Name: | Californian poppy |
Botanical Names: | Eschscholzia californica, Eschscholtzia californica# |
Family: | Papaveraceae |
Plant Part Used: | Aerial parts |
PRESCRIBING INFORMATION
Actions | Anxiolytic, mild sedative, analgesic, hypnotic | |
Potential Indications | Based on appropriate evaluation of the patient, practitioners should consider prescribing California poppy in formulations in the context of: • Painful conditions involving the irritation or stimulation of pain fibers (similar to when morphine or codeine might be used) (5) | |
Contraindications | None known. | |
Warnings and Precautions | None required. | |
Interactions | None known. | |
Use in Pregnancy and Lactation | No adverse effects expected. | |
Side Effects | None expected if taken within the recommended dose range. Whether California poppy will interfere with standard drug tests for opiate alkaloids is unclear. However, this interference is unlikely. | |
Dosage | Dose per day* | Dose per week* |
3–6 ml of 1:2 liquid extract | 20–40 ml of 1:2 liquid extract |
* This dose range is extrapolated from traditional Western herbal medicine and the author’s education and experience.1
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Traditional Prescribing | |
Native Americans and native Hispanics used the aerial parts, leaves, or flowers of California poppy for sedative and analgesic activity, to promote sleep, and for relief of toothache, particularly in children.4 | |
California poppy was of interest to medical practitioners of the United States in the late nineteenth century, with the liquid extract entered into the Park-Davis catalog in 1890. California poppy was referred to in 1892 as an “excellent soporific (sleep inducing) and analgesic, above all harmless” and in 1893, reporting that,“…the effect produced by Eschscholtzia californica upon patients is the same as that of morphine, without the inconveniences of the latter drug.”5 | |
Pharmacologic Research | The aerial parts of California poppy contain isoquinoline alkaloids (mainly eschscholtzine and californidine, with smaller amounts of sanguinarine and chelerythrine)6 and flavonol glycosides.7 • California poppy extract inhibits the enzymatic degradation of catecholamines and the synthesis of epinephrine (adrenaline) in vitro. Preserving high levels of catecholamines may explain the sedative and antidepressant activity of California poppy.8 An extract formula containing 80% California poppy and 20% Corydalis cava has demonstrated the ability to interact with opiate receptors in vitro,9 which indicates potential analgesic activity. • Alkaloids from California poppy enhanced gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) binding to rat brain synaptic membrane receptors. This finding may indicate a benzodiazepine-like activity.10 Constituents of California poppy exhibited dose-dependent binding to benzodiazepine receptors and displaced the benzodiazepine flurazepam from the receptor.11 • A sedative effect was observed for California poppy extract after injection in experimental models in terms of both behavioral effects and promotion of sleep.12,13 At lower doses, an anxiolytic effect was observed.12 Sedative effects have also been observed after treatment with high oral doses.14 The sedative and anxiolytic effects of California poppy are most likely linked to benzodiazepine-receptor activation because they were antagonized by the benzodiazepine-receptor antagonist flumazenil in vivo (by injection).15 • Muscle relaxant and analgesic activities have been reported in vivo,11 although no muscle relaxant activity was observed in vivo in a later study. Dose-dependent peripheral analgesic activity was demonstrated for California poppy in vivo (by injection), but central analgesic activity was not recorded.15 • California poppy tincture inhibited experimentally induced contractions of isolated smooth muscle.13 • Two alkaloids isolated from California poppy, chelerythrine and sanguinarine, exhibited affinity for vasopressin receptors and demonstrated competitive inhibition of vasopressin binding in vitro.16 Substances that have this activity have been used pharmacologicly as renal agents, vasoconstricting agents, and hemostatics. |
Clinical Studies | • Single administration of a California poppy extract (equivalent to 6.7 g of herb) to volunteers resulted in a quantitative electroencephalographic (EEG) recording that was distinguishable from that obtained from placebo. Results from the self-rating assessment of alertness, however, did not differ from placebo.17 An acute sedative effect was not demonstrated, but analysis after ongoing administration may demonstrate a sedative effect. • In two controlled clinical trials, the combination of California poppy and Corydalis cava normalized disturbed sleeping behavior without evidence of carry-over effects or addiction. This preparation consisted of alcoholic extracts of California poppy (standardized for protopine) and Corydalis (standardized for bulbocapnine) in the ratio of 4:1. The dosage was not defined.14 |
1 Bartram T. Encyclopedia of herbal medicine, ed 1. Dorset, England: Grace Publishers, 1995.
2 Felter HW, Lloyd JU. King’s American dispensatory, ed 18. Portland: Eclectic Medical Publications, 1905. rev 3, reprinted 1983
3 Cheney RH. Quart J Crude Drugs. 1963;3:413-416.
4 Brinker FJ. Eclectic dispensatory of botanical therapeutics, vol 2 . Eclectic Medical Publications, Sandy, Oregon, 1995.
5 Davis GS. The pharmacology of the newer materia medica. Davis, Detroit, 1892. Bender GA. Pharm Hist. 1980;22(2):49-59.
6 Tome F, Colombo ML, Caldiroli L. Phytochem Anal. 1999;10:264-267.
7 Beck MA, Haberlein H. Phytochem. 1999;50(2):329-332.
8 Kleber E, et al. Arzneim Forsch. 1995;45(2):127-131.
9 Reimeier C, et al. Arzneim Forsch. 1995;45(2):132-136.
10 Kardos J, Blasko G, Simonyi M. Arzneim Forsch. 1986;36(6):939-940.
11 Rolland A. Doctoral thesis, University of Metz, France, 1988. Cited in Schafer HL et al. Arzneim Forsch. 1995;45(2):124-126.
12 Rolland A, et al. Planta Med. 1991;57(3):212-216.
13 Vincieri FF, et al. Pharmacol Res Commun. 1988;20(suppl 5):41-44.
14 Schafer HL, et al. Arzneim Forsch. 1995;45(2):124-126.
15 Rolland A, et al. Phytother Res. 2001;15:377-381.
16 Granger I, et al. Planta Med. 1992;58(1):35-38.
17 Schulz H, Jobert M, Hubner WD. Phytomed. 1998;5(6):449-458.
CASCARA
Other Common Name: | Cascara sagrada |
Botanical Names: | Rhamnus purshiana, Rhamnus purshianus,# Frangula purshiana# |
Family: | Rhamnaceae |
Plant Part Used: | Bark |
PRESCRIBING INFORMATION
Actions | Laxative | |
Potential Indications | Based on appropriate evaluation of the patient, practitioners should consider prescribing cascara in formulations in the context of: • Dyspepsia,* stimulating gastric secretion, loss of appetite, asthenia, postprandial bloating, coated tongue, itching of skin, in combination with gentian, rhubarb, and boldo (3) • Conditions other than constipation in which easy defecation with a soft stool is desirable, such as with hemorrhoids and anal fissure (5) | |
Contraindications | Intestinal obstruction,1 intestinal inflammation, such as Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, and appendicitis; abdominal pain of unknown origin. Children under 12 years of age should not be prescribed cascara.2 | |
Warnings and Precautions | Although short-term use of anthraquinone glycoside–containing laxatives is generally regarded as safe, long-term use is not recommended.3 Stimulating laxatives should not be used over an extended period (more than 2 weeks) without medical advice. Using stimulating laxatives longer than is recommended can lead to intestinal sluggishness, although concurrent intake of fiber in sufficient quantities of water can counteract this condition. Cascara should be used only if no benefit can be obtained through change of diet or use of bulk-forming products.2 As with all laxatives, cascara should not be prescribed when any undiagnosed acute or persistent abdominal symptoms are present.4 Fresh or inadequately prepared cascara bark should not be used because severe vomiting and intestinal spasm can result.2 | |
Interactions | Anthraquinone glycoside–containing laxatives may potentially decrease the transit time of concomitantly administered oral drugs and thereby decrease their absorption.5 Excessive use of cascara can cause disturbance of fluid and electrolyte balance (especially potassium deficiency). Potassium deficiency potentiates the action of cardiac glycosides5 and interferes with antiarrhythmic drugs.2 Simultaneous application of thiazide diuretics, corticosteroids, or licorice will increase potassium loss.2,4 Speculations suggest that abuse of laxatives such as senna (Cassia spp.) may potentiate the development of analgesic nephropathy (resulting from dehydration).5 | |
Use in Pregnancy and Lactation | According to the British Herbal Compendium, cascara is contraindicated in pregnancy and lactation.1 However, this caution seems excessive provided that the dosage recommendations here are observed. Doses that cause an excessively loose stool should not be used during pregnancy. | |
Side Effects | Cramplike discomfort of the gastrointestinal tract may occur at normal therapeutic doses. These cases require a dose reduction.2 Diarrhea resulting from abuse of cascara has been reported.6 Long-term use or abuse may cause disturbances of electrolyte balance, including potassium deficiency, which can lead to disorders of heart function and muscular weakness. A harmless pigmentation of the intestinal mucosa (pseudomelanosis coli) may occur with chronic use and usually reverses after discontinuing cascara.2 Chronic intake of anthraquinone laxatives has been associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer,3 although this connection has been debated.7,8 | |
Dosage | Dose per day** | Dose per week** |
3–8 ml of 1:2 liquid extract | 20–55 ml of 1:2 liquid extract |
* Cascara has also been used in traditional herbal medicine for treating constipation and dyspepsia and is recommended by both the Commission E and ESCOP for the short-term treatment of constipation. (4,5)
** This dose range is extrapolated from the British Pharmaceutical Codex 1934, the British Pharmacopoeia 1932, and the author’s education and experience.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
1 British Herbal Medicine Association. British herbal compendium. Bournemouth: BHMA, 1992.
2 Blumenthal M, et al, editors. The complete German Commission E monographs: therapeutic guide to herbal medicines. Austin: American Botanical Council, 1998.
3 van Gorkom BA, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999;13(4):443-452.
4 Scientific Committee of the European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy [ESCOP]. ESCOP monographs: Rhamni purshiani cortex. Argyle House, Gandy Street, Exeter, Devon, EX4 3LS, United Kingdom: European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy, ESCOP Secretariat, June 1997.
5 de Smet PAGM, et al, editors. Adverse effects of herbal drugs. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1993.
6 Cummings JH, et al. Br Med J. 1974;1:537-541.
7 Nusko G, et al. Gut. 2000;46(5):651-655.
8 Mascolo N, et al. Phytother Res. 1998;12(supp 1):S143-S145.
9 Nadir A, Reddy D, Van Thiel DH. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(12):3634-3637.
10 British Herbal Medicine Association’s Scientific Committee. British herbal pharmacopoeia. Bournemouth: BHMA, 1983.
11 Felter HW, Lloyd JU. King’s American dispensatory, ed 18. Portland: Eclectic Medical Publications, 1905. rev 3, reprinted 1983
12 Ellingwood F, Lloyd JU. American materia medicam, therapeutics and pharmacognosy, ed 11. Portland: Eclectic Medical Publications, 1983.
13 Vogel VJ. American Indian medicine. Norman, Okla: University of Oklahoma Press, 1970.
14 Wagner H, Bladt S. Plant drug analysis: a thin layer chromatography atlas, ed 2. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1996.
15 de Witte P, Lemli L. Hepatogastroenterol. 1990;37(6):601-605.
16 Geboes K. Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 1995;57(1):51-74.
17 Izzo AA, Mascolo N, Capasso F. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43(8):1605-1620.
18 Beynen AC. Artery. 1987;14(4):190-197.
19 Borgia M, et al. Curr Ther Res. 1981;29(3):525-536.
CAT’S CLAW
Other Common Name: | Uña de gato |
Botanical Name: | Uncaria tomentosa |
Family: | Rubiaceae |
Plant Part Used: | Stem bark |
PRESCRIBING INFORMATION
Actions | Immune enhancing, antiinflammatory, antioxidant | |
Potential Indications | Based on appropriate evaluation of the patient, practitioners should consider prescribing cat’s claw in formulations in the context of: | |
As cat’s claw has been traditionally used as a tonic (6) and may also be used to treat other health issues requiring this action, including chronic fatigue syndrome. | ||
Contraindications | None known. | |
Warnings and Precautions | None required. | |
Interactions | None known. | |
Use in Pregnancy and Lactation | Cat’s claw should be used with caution in pregnancy and lactation. (The root of Uncaria tomentosa has been used traditionally as a contraceptive; pharmacologic results have demonstrated an antifertility effect in one animal model.1 Oral use of the bark decoction is traditionally prescribed in Bolivia for irregular menstruation.2) | |
Side Effects | Diarrhea and indigestion have occurred in several patients taking cat’s claw. In one case, a high (undefined) dose had been consumed.3 Acute renal failure caused by “cat’s claw” was reported in a 35-year-old Peruvian female with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The contents of the capsules were not analyzed, and the duration of treatment was not stated. One month after discontinuing the herbal preparation, her condition had improved. The patient in all likelihood experienced an idiosyncratic adverse reaction to the herbal preparation.4 | |
Dosage | Dose per day* | Dose per week* |
4.5–11.0 ml of 1:2 liquid extract | 30–75 ml of 1:2 liquid extract | |
It is recommended that only the pentacyclic oxindole alkaloid-predominant type of cat’s claw be used in therapy. |
* This dose range is extrapolated from traditional use of decoction of the bark.3
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
1 Jones K. Cat’s claw: healing vine of Peru. Seattle: Sylvan Press, 1995.
2 Bourdy G, et al. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000;70(2):87.
3 Obregón Vilches, Lida E. Cat’s claw: Uncaria genus. Botanical, chemical, and pharmacological studies of Uncaria tomentosa and Uncaria guianensis. Lima: Instituto de Fitoterapia Americano, 1995.
4 Hilepo JN, Bellucci AG, Mossey RT. Nephron. 1997;77(3):361.
5 Maxwell N. Witch doctor’s apprentice, ed 3. New York: Citadel Press, 1990.
6 Keplinger K, et al. J Ethnopharmacol. 1999;64:23.
7 Laus G, Brossner D, Keplinger K. Phytochemistry. 1997;45(4):855.
8 Desmarchelier C, et al. Phytother Res. 1997;11(3):254.
9 Sandoval M, et al. Ailment Pharmacol Ther. 1998;12(12):1279-1289.
10 Miller MJS, et al. Peditr Res. 1999;45:114A.
11 Aquino R, et al. J Nat Prod. 1991;54(2):453-459.
12 Sandoval M, et al. Free Radic Biol Med. 2000;29(1):71-78.
13 LeMaire I, et al. J Ethnopharmacol. 1999;64(2):109-115.
14 Wagner H, et al. Planta Med. 1985;51(2):139.
15 Wagner H, Kreutzkamp B, Jurcic K. Planta Med. 1985;51(5):419.
16 United States Patent 5302611, April 12, 1994.
17 Wurm M, et al. Planta Med. 1998;64(8):701-704.
18 Stuppner H, et al. Planta Med. 1993;59(Suppl):A583.
19 Salazar EL, Jayme V. Proc West Pharmacol Soc. 1998;41:123-124.
CELERY SEED
Botanical Name: | Apium graveolens |
Family: | Umbelliferae |
Plant Part Used: | Fruit (sometimes referred to as seed) |
PRESCRIBING INFORMATION
Actions | Diuretic, antiinflammatory, antirheumatic | |
Potential Indications | Based on appropriate evaluation of the patient, practitioners should consider prescribing celery seed in formulations in the context of: | |
Contraindications | No evidence has been found that celery seed is contraindicated in pregnancy. This attribution comes from the mistaken assumption that the essential oil contains significant levels of apiol. | |
Warnings and Precautions | Caution is advised in kidney disorders, in particular inflammation of the kidneys, because the essential oil may increase the inflammation by causing epithelial irritation.1,2 | |
Interactions | None known. | |
Use in Pregnancy and Lactation | No adverse effects expected. | |
Side Effects | Allergic reaction is possible but rare.1 The furanocoumarins in combination with ultraviolet light may cause photodermatitis.2 | |
Dosage | Dose per day* | Dose per week* |
4.5–8.5 ml of 1:2 liquid extract | 30–60 ml of 1:2 liquid extract |
* This dose range is extrapolated from the British Pharmaceutical Codex 1934, the British Herbal Pharmacopoeia 1983, the British Herbal Compendium 1992, and the author’s education and experience.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Traditional Prescribing | |
The Eclectics considered celery seed as a nervine tonic.4 | |
Pharmacologic Research | Apium graveolens seeds contain an essential oil consisting of terpenes and phthalides (especially 3-n-butyl phthalide).1 • Oral celery seed oil significantly elevated glutathione S-transferase activity in vivo compared with controls.6,7 Two groups of components within celery seed oil (limonene-type monoterpenes and butyl phthalides) appeared to be responsible for this activity. Further testing showed that the phthalide compounds were more active than the limonene-type monoterpenes.8 • Celery seed oil administered orally increased liver tissue regeneration.9 Methanolic extract of celery seed demonstrated significant hepatoprotective activity after oral administration in acetominophen (paracetamol)-induced and thioacetamide-induced hepatotoxicity.10
![]() Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel![]() Full access? Get Clinical Tree![]() ![]() ![]() |