CHAPTER 130 Barrier Contraceptives
Cervical Caps, Condoms, and Diaphragms
Cervical barriers are relatively safe and inexpensive options for contraception. They are immediately effective and reversible and have few side effects. Barrier methods are options for women who have contraindications to hormonal contraceptives, cannot tolerate intrauterine devices, or are not ready for sterilization. Additional benefits include ease of transportability, safety during lactation, and the convenience of flexible timing of insertion. Current barrier methods are 80% effective in preventing pregnancy when used correctly and consistently. Table 130-1 lists various barrier options, contraceptive failure rates, and costs.
Cervical Caps
Cervical caps are small, firm silicone cups that adhere to the cervix by suction. Four types of cervical cap are available internationally. The Prentif cap was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in May 1988, but was voluntarily removed from the U.S. market by the manufacturer in March 2005. The only cervical cap currently available in the United States is the FemCap (Fig. 130-1). The FemCap is silicone based and shaped like a sailor’s hat. Initial efficacy studies of the FemCap were based on the first-generation product, which is no longer available. A Cochrane Database Review comparing the first-generation FemCap with the diaphragm found that the FemCap was less effective in preventing pregnancy. Fourteen percent of nulliparous women using the FemCap became pregnant during the first year with typical use; parous women had a 29% failure rate. The first-generation FemCap is now considered obsolete and has been replaced with a second-generation design. Although research on the effectiveness of the second-generation FemCap is limited, the typical failure rate is estimated to be 7.6%. Failure rates with perfect use are 2% to 4%. Dislodgement of the first-generation device occurred in one third of users; the second-generation FemCap dislodgement rate is estimated at 2%. Future studies should better clarify long-term efficacy. The cap has a high level of patient acceptability, and FemCap users may have decreased risk of urinary tract infections compared with women using a diaphragm. The Prentif cap was associated with cervical dysplasia when the device was used for longer than 3 months. Although small trials do not link cytologic abnormalities with FemCap use, baseline Papanicolaou screening (Pap smear) and annual surveillance are reasonable in women choosing this method.
Anatomy
The FemCap has a dome that fits over the cervix. An asymmetric brim flares outward to fit against the vaginal fornices (see Fig. 130-1).
Precautions
Patient Education: Cervical Cap Use for Contraception
Procedure
Complications
Shield
Lea’s shield is a one-size silicone barrier (Fig. 130-3). It has a valve that allows for passage of cervical secretions while the shield is in place. The device was FDA approved in 2002; data on efficacy of Lea’s shield are limited to one 6-month clinical trial. The 6-month pregnancy rate in this study was 5.6 per 100 when spermicide was used and 9.3 per 100 without spermicide. Women who are parous have slightly higher failure rates with this method. Shield dislodgement occurs in less than 3% of users.