Approach to the Patient with Liver Disease
A Guide to Commonly Used Liver Tests
This chapter is designed to discuss a useful way of thinking about liver tests. It emphasizes limitations of and alternative explanations for isolated abnormalities of common liver test results. Information in this chapter should be combined with discussions of specific liver diseases elsewhere in this section. A final caveat relates to terminology. Tests done in clinical laboratories do not measure any functional capacity of the liver. Hence, the commonly used term liver function tests is inaccurate, and the term liver tests is used in this chapter. Guidelines on the interpretation and evaluation of abnormal liver test results have been published.1,2 Useful algorithms are presented that parallel the recommendations in this chapter.
ISOLATED ABNORMALITIES IN LIVER TEST RESULTS
An isolated elevation of just one test result should raise suspicion that a source other than the liver is the cause. Table 1 indicates nonhepatic sources of elevated values for certain tests commonly considered as liver tests. When several liver test results are simultaneously out of the normal range, consideration of nonhepatic sources becomes irrelevant.
Test | Nonhepatic Source |
---|---|
Bilirubin | Red blood cells (e.g., hemolysis, intra-abdominal bleed, hematoma) |
AST | Skeletal muscle, cardiac muscle |
LDH | Heart, red blood cells |
Alkaline phosphatase | Bone, first-trimester placenta, kidneys, intestines |
AST, aspartate transaminase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.
Special note should be made of the GGTP and LDH as liver tests. The GGTP level is too sensitive, frequently elevated when no liver disease is apparent. The only usefulness of the GGTP test is that it confers liver specificity to an elevated alkaline phosphatase level. An isolated elevation of the GGTP level does not need to be further evaluated unless there are additional clinical risk factors for liver disease.3 The LDH assay is insensitive and nonspecific because LDH is present in tissues throughout the body.
EVALUATION OF LIVER DISEASE BASED ON ENZYME LEVELS
Mild elevations of the AST level, less than two times the upper limit of normal, are common. In part, this is explained by how normal values are calculated; normal is defined as the mean of the distribution ± 2 standard deviations (SDs). By this definition, 2.5% of normal persons have values above the normal range.2 Common causes of mild increases in AST and ALT levels include reduction effect (e.g., status) and fatty liver disease seen most often in those with obesity, diabetes, or elevated blood lipid levels. Fatty liver is also seen in those who drink alcohol.
Serum alkaline phosphatase is comprised of a heterogeneous group of enzymes. Hepatic alkaline phosphatase is most densely represented near the canalicular membrane of the hepatocyte. Accordingly, diseases that predominately affect hepatocyte secretion (e.g., obstructive diseases) will be accompanied by elevations of alkaline phosphatase levels. Bile duct obstruction, primary sclerosing cholangitis and primary biliary cirrhosis, are some examples of diseases in which elevated alkaline phosphatase levels are often predominant over transaminase level elevations (Table 2).
Bilirubin Level Elevations
Most laboratories report only total bilirubin levels, the sum of the conjugated and unconjugated portions. It is sometimes useful to determine the fraction of total serum bilirubin that is unconjugated versus conjugated, usually referred to as fractionation of bilirubin. The main clinical situation in which this is useful is when all the standard liver test results are normal, except the total bilirubin. Laboratories report the total bilirubin as well as the conjugated and unconjugated portions. To make matters more confusing, the conjugated bilirubin is sometimes referred to as the direct-reacting bilirubin and the unconjugated as the indirect-reacting bilirubin (Table 3).
Elevations of the unconjugated bilirubin level, when the conjugated bilirubin level remains normal, may also indicate an increased load of bilirubin caused by hemolysis. Anemia and an elevated reticulocyte count are usually present in such cases (Table 4).
Many mistakenly interpret elevations of direct-reacting bilirubin to indicate that cholestatic (obstructive) liver disease is present. It is apparent from Table 2 that the serum bilirubin level plays no useful role in categorizing a case as hepatocellular, cholestatic, or infiltrative. The bilirubin level may be normal or elevated in each type of disorder. Viral hepatitis A, a prototypic hepatocellular disease, may frequently be associated with bilirubin levels that are high, whereas primary biliary cirrhosis, a prototypic cholestatic disorder, is associated with a normal serum bilirubin level except in later stage disease. Serum bilirubin levels should be disregarded when trying to decide whether the liver test pattern is more suggestive of hepatocellular or cholestatic disease.