Diarrhea
Hematochezia or hematemesis
Obstipation
Obstruction or pseudo-obstruction
Perforation
Malabsorption
Fig. 30.1
A patient with systemic amyloid and macroglossia. The tongue protrudes at the corners of the mouth and indentation from the teeth can be seen on the ventral surface
Fig. 30.2
Cross section of a tongue from an amyloid patient with macroglossia. The amyloid can be seen as yellow plaques within the muscle
Fig. 30.3
Biopsy from the tongue showing pink amorphous material consistent with amyloid deposited in the lamina propria
Fig. 30.4
The hyalinized deposits of amyloid are seen dissecting the skeletal muscle of the tongue
The earliest amyloid deposition in the esophagus initially involves small arterioles (Fig. 30.5) of the submucosa but later in the course the lamina propria (Fig. 30.6), muscularis mucosa, submucosa, and muscularis propria may all or individually be involved. These same sites may be involved in any part of the GI tract with basically the same appearance, only the mucosa itself being different. Typically esophageal amyloid is asymptomatic but can be seen in 13–22 % of cases based on radiologic and autopsy studies. Deposition in the submucosa and/or the muscularis propria (Fig. 30.7) may lead to achalasia-like symptoms, which can be difficult to control clinically [9].
Fig. 30.5
(a) Lower power view of an endoscopic mucosa resection from the esophagus. The arrow marks the hyalinized vasculature shown better in b. This was an incidental finding. (c) Congo red stain of the same focus as shown in b
Fig. 30.6
(a) An esophageal biopsy showing the amorphous hyalin of amyloid again deposited in the lamina propria. (b) A higher magnification showing extensive amyloid deposition in the esophagus with some attenuation of the overlying surface epithelium
Fig. 30.7
Amyloid dissecting through the muscularis propria of the esophagus. The small arteriole in the overlying submucosa does not appear to be involved. This amount of disease is typically associated with achalasia-type symptoms
Symptomatic gastric involvement is also rare (1 %), but gastric deposits have been noted in up to 12 % of cases of amyloid patients at autopsy. Symptoms include nausea, vomiting, and epigastric pain. Gastric outflow obstruction can be seen in patients with amyloid tumors, polyps, or dense mural involvement in the antrum (Fig. 30.8). Plaque-like deposits of amyloid in the mucosa often produce atrophy and damage to the capillaries producing a propensity to hemorrhage into the lumen. In the stomach, this can lead to hematemesis that can be quite difficult to control endoscopically (Fig. 30.9) [10, 11]. Emergency resection may be life saving. Involvement of the muscularis mucosae of the tubular gut often produces dysmotility disorders somewhat analogous to achalasia. In the stomach, this lack of involuntary propulsion is often associated with nausea and vomiting which can contribute to systemic wasting. Likewise involvement of the wall of the small intestine may be associated with bacterial overgrowth and malabsorption (Fig. 30.10). Polypoid deposition of amyloid in the stomach, small bowel, and colonic mucosa has been reported [12–14]. In the colon, the impairment of peristalsis may result in constipation and megacolon. Patients with familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP—mutations in the transthyretin gene) often develop colonic and enteric dysmotility secondary to amyloid deposition. Invariably the muscularis propria is involved when the patients are symptomatic. The intramuscular ganglia do not appear to contain amyloid, but it is unclear whether or not the autonomic fibers are involved Fig. 30.11). It is said by some authors that senile amyloid (wild-type transthyretin) involving the gut can be distinguished from FAP by the lack of involvement of the muscularis propria. Plaque-like involvement of the colonic mucosa can produce life-threatening hematochezia again requiring surgical intervention (Fig. 30.12). The subserosal connective tissue can also be a deposition site for amyloid (Fig. 30.13). It may extend into the adjacent mesentery where it is reminiscent of amyloid seen in abdominal fat pad aspirates (Fig. 30.14) [15–21].
Fig. 30.8
Amyloid deposits in the lamina propria of the gastric antrum associated with atrophy of the entrapped glands. This pattern of gastric amyloid can be associated with outlet obstruction or can appear endoscopically as a polyp
Fig. 30.9
(a) Section of stomach showing marked infiltration of amyloid in the lamina propria with overlying erosion and hemorrhage into the lumen. (b) Higher magnification of the stomach showing the hyalin material between the gastric glands. In this case, the infiltrate is denser at the muscularis propria. (c) In other foci, the amyloid produced is distortion of the usual gastric gland pattern. (d) Congo red stain of the stomach. The amyloid has an orange-red appearance while the fibrin and hemorrhage into the lumen show a grayish tinge
Fig. 30.10
(a) A section of small intestine showing dense deposition of amyloid in submucosa that completely spares the mucosa. (b) Another section of small intestine showing amyloid infiltrating the muscularis mucosae. The smooth muscle fibers are splayed by the lighter tinged vaguely globular hyalin material. (c) This section of small intestine shows infiltration of the lamina propria producing some mild blunting of the villi, a finding that may be associated with malabsorption
Fig. 30.11
Section of muscularis propria showing amyloid deposition between the inner and outer layers. The amyloid isolates the ganglion neural plexus but does not appear to infiltrate it in this section. This pattern of deposition is typically associated with dysmotility
Fig. 30.12
(a) A section of colon from a patient with amyloidosis who presented with bright red blood per rectum. There are two serpiginous red patches of eroded mucosa among the yellow amyloid plaques. (b) A section of colon showing the amyloid infiltrating the lower portion of the mucosa, the muscularis mucosa, and the submucosa. The submucosa also exhibits acute hemorrhage. (c) A Congo red stain highlighting the amyloid in the lamina propria and muscularis mucosa
Fig. 30.13
Amyloid deposition in subserosal space that would be visible on the peritoneum
Fig. 30.14
Mesenteric fat with amyloid deposition in the intercellular septum reminiscent of abdominal fat pad biopsies
Amyloid in the colon may also be deposited in the subepithelial space of the mucosa reminiscent of collagenous colitis (Fig. 30.15). However, this finding is usually not associated with watery diarrhea. Also, unlike collagenous colitis, there is no increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes involving the crypt and surface epithelium and the surface epithelium shows little or no sloughing (Table 30.2). The collagenous colitis pattern of amyloid deposition is usually not present in isolation so amyloid deposition in other parts of the specimen is a clue to the correct interpretation. Special stains will also be useful in distinguishing one from the other [22, 23].
Fig. 30.15
(a) Amyloid deposition in the subepithelial reminiscent of collagenous colitis. This is the same patient who is illustrated in Fig. 30.12b, c. (b) Collagenous colitis which shows a subepithelial hyalin layer similar to amyloid but not congophilic. Also note the numerous lymphocytes within the gland and surface epithelium as well as the marked surface epithelial sloughing compared to the amyloid
Table 30.2
Collagenous colitis vs. amyloid
Subepithelial band | Trichrome | Congo red | IEL | Surface Sl | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CC | ++ | ++ | − | ++ | ++ |
Amyloid | ++ | + | ++ | − | ++ |
Rarely, mucosal deposition can produce polyps that may be mistaken from more typical colonic polyps by the endoscopist. Histologically, the main differential diagnosis includes the fibromuscular proliferation seen in mucosal prolapse type polyps (MPT) (Fig. 30.16) that may also have an elastic component [24]. These can easily be distinguished by Congo red staining which will be absent in the MPT polyps. Incidental vascular involvement may also be seen in otherwise classic tubular adenoma or hyperplastic polyps (Fig. 30.17). Involvement of the appendix has also been reported [25].
Fig. 30.16
(a) Mucosal prolapse polyps are typically seen in the rectum and exhibit fibromuscular hyperplasia involving the lamina propria. The fibromuscular foci have a hyalin appearance and could be confused for amyloid. (b) A desmin stain highlighting the fibromuscular hyperplasia and a mucosal type prolapse polyp. (c) Colonic biopsy showing deposition of amyloid in the lamina propria (arrows) reminiscent of a mucosal prolapse type polyp. Note that there is infiltration into the submucosa, a finding not always seen; one that would identify the hyalin material is amyloid rather than a mucosal prolapse type polyp
Fig. 30.17
A colonic tubular adenoma (adenomatous portion not shown) showing incidental amyloid involving a vessel
Treatment of GI amyloid is largely supportive—surgery for perforation or bleeding, medication for dysmotility, and antibiotics for bacterial overgrowth. Successful treatment of the underlying etiology of the amyloid may result in significant improvements in the GI symptomatology [26, 27].
Liver
The liver is frequently involved in patients with systematic amyloid, up to 90 % in some studies [28]. Signs related to liver involvement can be seen in up to one-half of patients, but symptomatic dysfunction due to amyloid is uncommon and typically a late manifestation of the disease (Table 30.3). Alkaline phosphates’ elevation may be detected early, but it is a relatively nonspecific finding with a wide differential diagnosis—amyloidosis being very far down on the list. It is unclear why the hepatic deposition of amyloid results in the elevation of the serum alkaline phosphates. Hepatomegaly is also commonly noted, but the amount of protein deposition may not correlate directly with liver size. Some of the liver enlargement may be due to passive congestion related to amyloid-induced cardiac failure. As the functioning hepatic parenchyma becomes further compromised by the deposits, jaundice, encephalopathy, and hepatic failure may ensue. Jaundice is a poor sign with most patients succumbing within 6 months of its development.
Table 30.3
Clinical presentation of hepatic amyloid
Elevated alkaline phosphatase |
Hepatomegaly |
Jaundice (late sign) |
Portal hypertension |
Encephalopathy |
Hepatic failure |
Fibroscan has been suggested as a noninvasive modality that can be employed to diagnose hepatic amyloid; however, its sensitivity and specificity remain to be determined in everyday clinical use [29]. In the meantime, the liver biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis [30–32]. When pathologists think about amyloid deposition in the liver, they typically know about the sinusoidal pattern—by far the most common pattern. The term parenchymal has been used for this pattern by the Japanese; others have called it linear. It is the pattern of amyloid deposition that is present when the patient is symptomatic. However, it is important to remember that there are three other basic patterns of amyloid deposition that can be seen in the liver (Table 30.4). Failure to appreciate these uncommon patterns can greatly complicate the patient’s clinical course. Like the GI tract, the type of amyloid in general does not dictate the pattern of deposition with some exceptions that will be noted. In the sinusoidal pattern, hyalinized material is deposited in the space between the sinusoidal lining endothelium and the hepatocyte cytoplasm (Fig. 30.18). As with all amyloid depositions it generally has a pinkish tint on H&E stain, but in some preparations it may exhibit a blue-gray tint. This deposition begins in the sinus around the central veins (zone 3) and then spreads throughout the lobule (Fig. 30.19). As the amount of amyloid deposition increases, there is corresponding atrophy of the hepatic plates. In its most extreme form, the underlying liver is almost unrecognizable (Fig. 30.20). Amyloid deposition can also spread into the portal tract. The involvement of the tract can be variable from case to case and also from tract to tract within the same biopsy specimen. Branches of the hepatic artery may also be involved, but again, this is variable (Fig. 30.21). The differential diagnosis includes entities that produce sinusoidal fibrosis including the hepatitis, vitamin A toxicity, venous outflow obstruction, and congenital syphilis as well as light chain deposition disease (Table 30.5). Trichrome stains are a routine part of liver biopsy interpretation and they stain the amyloid in basically the same fashion as fibrosis (Fig. 30.22). This may lead to further confusion if the subtleties of the appearance of amyloid in H&E-stained sections are not appreciated.
Table 30.4
Patterns of hepatic amyloid
Sinusoidal |
Globular |
Arteriolar and/or capsular |
Portal |
Fig. 30.18
(a) A section of liver showing linear or sinusoidal amyloid deposits in a pan-acinar distribution as well as involving the portal tract. (b) The amyloid is deposited between the sinusoidal lining endothelium and the hepatic plate. There is some atrophy of the hepatocyte cells in the sinusoidal spaces that are difficult to identify
Fig. 30.19
(a) A panoramic view of liver with early sinusoidal amyloid deposition. It is much more difficult to detect than that seen in Fig. 30.18. (b) Higher power view showing a hyalin membrane preferentially lining the sinuses around central vein
Fig. 30.20
(a) Advanced sinusoidal amyloid deposition almost completely effacing the underlying hepatocytes; (b) even the portal tracts can be difficult to identify in cases with advanced sinusoidal amyloid deposition
Fig. 30.21
(a) Sinusoidal amyloid with involvement of the hepatic artery branch (arrow). (b) The same liver as seen in part a showing no involvement of the hepatic artery in this particular portal tract (arrow). The location of amyloid deposits can be somewhat variable from case to case and even in the same organ
Table 30.5
Differential diagnosis of sinusoidal hyaline
Amyloid |
Steatohepatitis |
Vitamin A toxicity |
Venous outflow obstruction |
Congenital syphilis |
Light chain deposition disease |
Fig. 30.22
A trichrome stain of sinusoidal amyloid deposits in the liver. Trichrome stain is not helpful in distinguishing amyloid from fibrosis