Ambulatory Endocrine Surgery


Distant travel

Significant comorbidities

 ASA IV or V

 Uncompensated cardiac/pulmonary disease

 Obstructive sleep apnea

Drain placement

 Graves’ with large vascular goiters

 Antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy

 Massive goiter

 Poor hemostasis

Airway concern

Poorly tolerating anesthetic

Secondary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism

PTH <15–20 pg/mL post thyroidectomya


aOptional



In terms of complications, it is also mentionable that one benefit of an outpatient approach may be the reduction of certain in-hospital medical complications. Though this has not been studied adequately, it is conceivable that ambulatory endocrine surgery might reduce rare nosocomial infections (pneumonias, urinary tract infections, etc.) and overnight medical errors.




Ambulatory Parathyroid Surgery


Though the majority of controversy concerning ambulatory endocrine surgery involves thyroidectomy, there are several notable issues related to parathyroid surgery. Analogous to thyroidectomy, the classic approach to parathyroidectomy involved a low-collar incision, large subplatysmal flaps, and mandatory bilateral exploration, historically requiring suction drain placement and inpatient observation. With the advent of improved parathyroid adenoma localization (sestamibi localization and ultrasound imaging) and with the use of intraoperative PTH assays, limited unilateral dissections have become standard. With less dissection, surgery for well-localized adenomas is extremely well tolerated by the vast majority of patients. Virtually all healthy patients are candidates for outpatient surgery. Localized excisions are reported to be very safe even in morbidly obese and elderly patients.

Parathyroid operations that require four-gland exploration raise the risk of postoperative hypoparathyroidism and are slightly more uncomfortable than localized procedures, though they are still tolerated quite well. The majority of patients are eligible for outpatient surgery which is performed more liberally than for patients undergoing total thyroidectomy. This is because the risk of hypocalcemia (with solitary adenoma excision), hematoma, and vocal cord paralysis is significantly less following parathyroid surgery compared to total thyroidectomy.

There are several unique risks to parathyroid surgery, however. In addition to hemodilution, and parathyroid devascularization, postoperative hypocalcemia may uniquely result from hungry bone syndrome for patients with long-standing or severe hyperparathyroidism. The risk of post-parathyroidectomy hypocalcemia is directly proportional to preoperative hypercalcemia and is increased in patients with bone density scores ≤ −3 and when all four glands have been manipulated. Hypocalcemia can be quite significant, not infrequently reaching symptomatic levels, yet because calcium levels are high preoperatively, it may take 48–72 h for serum levels to reach a nadir. Therefore, overnight admission is not adequate to completely trend calcium levels. In general, we prefer outpatient management in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism, even in patients at increased risk of developing hypocalcemia. Calcium levels are drawn 48 h following surgery for patients at risk for hungry bone syndrome or when there is concern for significant devascularization. A PACU-drawn PTH level may also be helpful in this setting, though we have only found it to be predictive of hypocalcemia if PTH levels are very low or undetectable. This is because serum calcium levels typically remain high in the immediate postoperative period appropriately suppressing PTH levels.

Patients with renal failure and secondary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism also offer a unique challenge following surgery. These patients typically become hypocalcemic quickly and dramatically, following 3 ½ gland parathyroidectomy, typically requiring aggressive oral and intravenous calcium replacement. Therefore, patients with secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism should not undergo outpatient surgery and these conditions should generally be considered contraindications to an ambulatory approach.


Same-Day Discharge


Patients should meet the discharge criteria listed in Table 4.2 prior to same-day discharge. Patients must have received proper education and a discussion about risks of complications must be addressed. Education should be reinforced with written instructions provided by the surgeon or discharge nurse. Nurses must be trained to comfortably assess the neck and respiratory status of the patient if the surgeon is not present at the time of discharge. Adequate family support and adequate functional status should be assessed. The patient should receive either routine calcium therapy or supplementation based on a selective PTH protocol. Anesthesiology staff should clear the patient for discharge and assess for recalcitrant nausea and vomiting. Coordination of these steps should not be underestimated, and initially will take significant communication with anesthesiology and nursing staff. Ultimately, multidisciplinary care is paramount to successful outpatient endocrine surgery.


Table 4.2
Discharge criteria



















Patient education completed

Neck exam reassuring

Calcium supplementation provided

Appropriate functional status

Ensure family member at home

Ensure access to a skilled hospital facility

Patient understands risks of complications


Conclusion


With the advent of less invasive surgical techniques, improved calcium supplementation strategies, and lower morbidity anesthetic techniques, outpatient endocrine surgery has become safer and better tolerated. Patient satisfaction with ambulatory surgery is high, and overall, the risks of symptomatic hypocalcemia, postoperative hematoma, and airway compromise are low in experienced hands. Patient education is paramount to the successful management of outpatient complications. Patients should be given both verbal and written instructions and must be given continuous access to a physician. Ultimately, despite meticulous precautions, complications are inevitable and both patient and surgeon alike must be willing to accept the low risk of potentially devastating consequences, including hematoma formation. Despite these inherent risks, ambulatory endocrine surgery should be considered safe, cost-effective, and efficient in selected patients.


Recommended Reading



Ancona-Berk VA, Chalmers TC. An analysis of the costs of ambulatory and inpatient care. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:1102–4.PubMedCrossRef


Ayyash K, Khammash M, Tibblin S. Drain vs. no drain in primary thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Eur J Surg. 1991;157(2):113–4.PubMed


Burkey SH, van Heerden JA, Thompson GB, et al. Reexploration for symptomatic hematomas after cervical exploration. Surgery. 2001;130:914–20.PubMedCrossRef


Casalino LP, Devers KJ, Brewster LR. Focused factories? Physician-owned specialty facilities. Health Aff. 2003;22(6):56–67.CrossRef


Chin CW, Loh KS, Tan KS. Ambulatory thyroid surgery: an audit of safety and outcomes. Singapore Med J. 2007;48(8):720–4.PubMed


Colak T, Akca T, Turkmenoglu O, et al. Drainage after total thyroidectomy or lobectomy for benign thyroidal disorders. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2008;9:319–23.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 18, 2017 | Posted by in GENERAL SURGERY | Comments Off on Ambulatory Endocrine Surgery

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access