Allergy Testing and Immunotherapy

CHAPTER 219 Allergy Testing and Immunotherapy



The primary methods of allergy skin testing are (1) single skin prick tests (SPT; pricking the skin at a 45-degree angle through previously placed allergens); (2) skin puncture tests (puncturing the skin at a 90-degree angle through previously placed allergens); and (3) using preloaded multiple-allergen testing devices that apply multiple allergens simultaneously. All three of these tests are confined to the epidermis. Multiple-allergen applicators have gained in popularity because of their safety, ease of use, and test reproducibility and readability. The three that are commercially available are the Multi-Test II (Lincoln Diagnostics, Decatur, Ill; Fig. 219-1), Quintest (Hollister-Stier Laboratories, Spokane, Wash; Fig. 219-2), and Omni (Greer Laboratories, Lenoir, NC).




Although considered an SPT, Multi-Test II is comparable with an intradermal (ID) test using a 1 : 1000 dilution of allergen. Several studies have shown that a positive ID skin test (1 : 100 dilution) after a negative SPT (using 1 : 20 concentrates) has little or no clinical significance; thus it is not recommended (see later discussion).


As opposed to the prick and puncture tests, the ID test goes deeper, into the dermis.


Older scratch testing methods are not as reproducible or reliable as SPT and are not recommended.


In vitro blood tests (e.g., radioallergosorbent test [RAST[) are performed by a reference laboratory. No “kits” are available for office testing because this procedure involves just the drawing and testing of a blood sample. It is the test of choice for patients exhibiting dermographism, hyporeactive skin, poorly controlled asthma, eczema, or any skin condition limiting the placement of skin tests.


The identification of allergens helps direct patient avoidance measures and medical therapy; it also provides the basis for immunotherapy. As Nelson and colleagues (1996) state, “Immunotherapy provides the only potentially curative treatment available because of its unique ability to change the natural history of allergic respiratory disease and Hymenoptera sensitivity. Many suggest that starting immunotherapy is a reasonable option that can provide safe and cost effective management for a substantial number of patients.” Starting immunotherapy earlier in allergic conditions may prevent (rather than just reduce) the inflammatory response, prevent the development of asthma in children with rhinitis, and allow treatment to begin at lower levels of patient sensitivity. It may be the only safe modality for patients whose jobs require alertness and who cannot tolerate antihistamines (e.g., pilots, truck drivers). It is accepted that a positive SPT or in vitro test does not necessarily mean clinical sensitivity, so correlation with the clinical history is essential if immunotherapy is to be successful.




Contraindications











Screening for Allergies


It is appropriate and cost effective to screen patients for allergies with a limited set of 6 to 10 allergens before applying a complete geographic panel of allergens (Fig. 219-3). A typical screen consists of a positive (histamine) and negative (glycerol-saline) control; house dust mite mix; cat; and the most tree, grass, weed, and mold allergens of the geographic area. Physicians and patients reluctant to rely on only six allergens for screening may use a second panel of eight allergens consisting of dog; cockroach; feathers; silk; and secondary tree, grass, weed, and mold preparations.



Always check the positive and negative control sites before interpreting the response to the allergens. When all screening test sites are negative (excluding the positive control; see Fig. 219-13), the probability of allergy is less than 3%. Approximately 50% of patients with rhinitis tested by Multi-Test or an in vitro test will have negative findings. These patients have nonallergic rhinitis. Identification of nonallergic triggers is critical for medical care. Decongestants (not antihistamines), nasal steroids, and nasal astemizole are the appropriate medications indicated for nonallergic rhinitis. However, roughly 50% of patients with rhinitis have an allergic basis to their symptoms. Many patients have mixed rhinitis, meaning they have both allergic and nonallergic rhinitis simultaneously.


As noted, allergy screening can be performed using either SPT or in vitro methods. Phadiatop (Pharmacia & Upjohn Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden) and the Multiple Inhalant Allergy screen (MIA; LabCorp, Burlington, NC) are two RAST screens using 10 allergens. In vitro screens usually have ±10 of the most common allergens, including tree, grass, weed, and molds from a geographic area; house dust mite; and cat. In vitro screens are performed by the various laboratories. A blood sample is sent to the company for testing. There is no office “kit.”


When the aforementioned screening tests are negative, no further testing is needed. Screening is very cost effective in selecting out the nonallergic patient. (The Blue Cross/Blue Shield usual and customary reimbursement for SPTs is currently $7.00 per allergen. The negative and positive controls are not reimbursed, hence the $42 payment. The $15 to $25 fee for in vitro testing varies from company to company.)


A history of symptoms in early spring generally correlates with positive skin tests to tree allergens. Summer symptoms correlate with grass sensitivity, and fall symptoms correlate with weed sensitivity. In the warmer climates there is much overlap. Year-round (perennial) symptoms correlate with house dust mite, mold, or insect or animal sensitivity. Perennial symptoms with seasonal exacerbations frequently occur in the same patient.



Preprocedure Patient Preparation






Spirometry or peak expiratory flow rates are helpful to identify and follow associated asthma (see Chapter 91, Pulmonary Function Testing). Patients with poorly controlled asthma (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] <70% of their personal best effort) should not be skin tested or receive immunotherapy until treated and stable. In vitro testing, however, is safe and recommended in this situation.





Equipment





Technique




Multi-Test Applicator Method


Multi-Test II is a sterile, disposable, multiple-test applicator used to apply eight allergens simultaneously. Although considered an SPT, its reliability is comparable to ID techniques using a 1 : 1000 dilution of allergen. Laboratories that supply the allergen concentrates will help determine the most relevant allergens for the patient’s geographic area based on established patterns. The system consists of plastic applicators and the Dipwell tray (Fig. 219-7).




Loading the Dipwell Tray









Application of Multi-Test





3 Place the applicator in the loaded Dipwell tray (see Fig. 219-7). The applicator now has the allergen on the respective tips.



6 Apply panel A (screening panel) to the volar surface of the forearm (supported with a pillow to keep the arm flat) with the “T” handle toward the patient’s head (Fig. 219-9). Apply with a rocking motion, to and fro and side to side. When applied with correct pressure, a footprint of each testing head will be visible. No bleeding should occur; if it does, reduce the amount of pressure applied. The correct amount of pressure will be realized after several applications.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 14, 2017 | Posted by in GENERAL & FAMILY MEDICINE | Comments Off on Allergy Testing and Immunotherapy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access