|
![]() Figure 1.1.2 Vestibular papillomatosis. Same case as Figure 1.1.1, higher magnification. Vestibular papilloma. Delicate papillae are lined by normal nonkeratinizing squamous epithelium. No hyperkeratosis is seen. |
![]() Figure 1.1.4 Vestibular papillomatosis. Squamous epithelium without viral cytopathic change (koilocytosis). |
![]() Figure 1.1.5 Condyloma acuminatum. Verrucous lesion with multiple papillary projections lined by nonkeratinizing squamous epithelium. |
![]() Figure 1.1.6 Condyloma acuminatum. Rounded papillae with some degree of hyperkeratosis and parakeratosis. Occasional atypical, binucleate cells are present. |
![]() Figure 1.1.7 Condyloma acuminatum. Same case as Figure 1.1.5, higher magnification. Koilocytes: large cells with abundant cytoplasm, typical perinuclear halo, and enlarged hyperchromatic nuclei with irregular contours. |
![]() Figure 1.1.8 Same case as Figure 1.1.5. Condyloma acuminatum. Increased Ki-67 labeling in midzone and superficial epithelial layers. |
|
![]() Figure 1.2.1 Condyloma acuminatum. Verrucous lesion with multiple papillary projections with pointed or rounded ends. |
![]() Figure 1.2.2 Condyloma acuminatum. Same case as Figure 1.2.1, higher magnification. |
![]() Figure 1.2.3 Condyloma acuminatum. Same case as Figure 1.2.1, higher magnification. Marked hyperkeratosis. |
![]() Figure 1.2.4 Condyloma acuminatum. At least focal viral cytopathic change (koilocytes) is seen in the creases between the papillae. |
![]() Figure 1.2.6 Squamous papilloma. Same case as in Figure 1.2.5. Minimal arborization is present. |
![]() Figure 1.2.8 Squamous papilloma. Same case as in Figure 1.2.5, higher magnification. Mature squamous epithelium lacking cytologic atypia. |
|
![]() Figure 1.3.2 Condyloma acuminatum. Hyperkeratosis, hypergranulosis, and preserved squamous maturation. Koilocytes are seen in the superficial epithelial layers. |
![]() Figure 1.3.5 Seborrheic keratosis. Same case as Figure 1.3.3, higher magnification. Pseudohorn cyst. |
|
![]() Figure 1.4.1 Condyloma acuminatum. Verrucous lesion with multiple papillary projections with pointed or rounded ends. Broad-based lesion with no apparent symmetry. |
![]() Figure 1.4.2 Condyloma acuminatum. Same case as Figure 1.4.1, higher magnification. Prominent koilocytosis. |
![]() Figure 1.4.3 Verruca vulgaris. Symmetrical lesion with peripheral rete ridges pointing toward the center of the lesion. Mature squamous epithelium with marked hyperkeratosis. |
![]() Figure 1.4.4 Verruca vulgaris. Same case as in Figure 1.4.3, higher magnification. Filiform papillae with marked hyper- and parakeratosis. |
![]() Figure 1.4.5 Verruca vulgaris. Same case as in Figure 1.4.3, higher magnification. Prominent hypergranulosis and thick compact hyperkeratosis. |
![]() Figure 1.4.6 Verruca vulgaris. Same case as in Figure 1.4.3, higher magnification. Very focal koilocytotic change can be seen. |
|
![]() Figure 1.5.1 Verrucous carcinoma. Pale lesion with verrucous architecture and “pushing-border” stromal invasion. |
![]() Figure 1.5.2 Verrucous carcinoma. Same case as in Figure 1.5.1. |
![]() Figure 1.5.3 Verrucous carcinoma. Same case as in Figure 1.5.1, surface. Mature bland squamous epithelium with surface hyperkeratosis. |
![]() Figure 1.5.4 Verrucous carcinoma. Same case as in Figure 1.5.1, higher magnification. Broad epithelial nests extend into the stroma. |
![]() Figure 1.5.5 Verrucous carcinoma. Same case as in Figure 1.5.1, higher magnification. Mature keratinocytes lacking cytologic atypia. |
![]() Figure 1.5.6 Verrucous carcinoma. Stromal inflammatory infiltrate with eosinophils is seen at the deep edge. |
|
![]() Figure 1.6.1 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL/VIN 2-3) with prominent condylomatous architecture. Lesion with wart-like architecture appears “blue,” immature at low power. |
![]() Figure 1.6.2 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL/VIN 2-3) with prominent condylomatous architecture. Same case as in Figure 1.6.1, higher magnification. Full-thickness epithelial immaturity. |
![]() Figure 1.6.3 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL/VIN 2-3) with prominent condylomatous architecture. Same case as in Figure 1.6.1, higher magnification. Epithelial immaturity and notable cytologic atypia. |
![]() Figure 1.6.4 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL/VIN 2-3) with prominent condylomatous architecture. Hyperchromasia and atypia throughout epithelial thickness. |
![]() Figure 1.6.5 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL/VIN 2-3) with prominent condylomatous architecture. Mitotic figures in the mid-zone and upper epithelial layers. |
![]() Figure 1.6.6 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL/VIN 2-3) with prominent condylomatous architecture. Same case as in Figure 1.6.1. Diffuse p16 expression in at least lower one-third of the epithelial thickness (left); markedly increased Ki-67 labeling throughout epithelial thickness (right). |
![]() Figure 1.6.7 Condyloma acuminatum. Verrucous lesion with multiple papillary projections with pointed or rounded ends. |
![]() Figure 1.6.8 Condyloma acuminatum. Same case as Figure 1.6.7, higher magnification. Preserved epithelial maturation. Focal koilocytosis on the surface. |
|
![]() Figure 1.7.1 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (high-grade VIN). Acanthosis, broadening of the rete ridges. |
![]() Figure 1.7.2 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (high-grade VIN). Hyperchromatic/basophilic epithelium with acanthosis and broadening of the rete ridges. |
![]() Figure 1.7.3 Focal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (high-grade VIN). Expanded parabasal zone (center). |
![]() Figure 1.7.4 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (high-grade VIN). Same case as in Figure 1.7.1, higher magnification. Expansion of parabasal zone. Maturation is preserved in upper epithelial layers. |
![]() Figure 1.7.5 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (high-grade VIN). Same case as in Figure 1.7.2, higher magnification. Loss of epithelial maturation; however, granular and corneal layers are still present. |
![]() Figure 1.7.6 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (high-grade VIN). Same case as in Figure 1.7.3, higher magnification. Expansion of the parabasal zone, atypical keratinocytes with increased nucleocytoplasmic ratio, and frequent mitotic figures above the parabasal zone. |
![]() Figure 1.7.7 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (high-grade VIN). Same case as in Figure 1.7.1. Diffuse “block-like” expression of p16 in at least two-thirds of epithelial thickness (left) and increased Ki-67 labeling above the parabasal layers (right). |
![]() Figure 1.7.8 Normal (nonlesional) skin adjacent to HSIL in a vulvar excision specimen. Acanthosis, broadening of the rete ridges, and hyperkeratosis. |
![]() Figure 1.7.9 Normal (nonlesional) skin adjacent to HSIL in a vulvar excision specimen. Acanthosis, broadening of the rete ridges, and basophilic-appearing epithelium. |
![]() Figure 1.7.10 Normal (nonlesional) skin near the margin in a vulvar excision for squamous cell carcinoma. Parabasal zone appears expanded due to tangential sectioning; no cytologic atypia is seen. |
![]() Figure 1.7.11 Normal (nonlesional) skin. Same case as in Figure 1.7.9, higher magnification. Normal epithelial maturation; keratinocytes lack cytologic atypia. |
![]() Figure 1.7.12 Normal (nonlesional) skin adjacent to HSIL in a vulvar excision specimen. Same case as in Figure 1.7.8. No expression of p16 (left) and low Ki-67 proliferative activity limited to parabasal zone (right). |
|
![]() Figure 1.8.1 Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (simplex VIN). Prominent acanthosis and hyperkeratosis. |
![]() Figure 1.8.3 Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Thickened rete ridges; prominent intercellular bridges. Parabasal zone appears disorganized. |
![]() Figure 1.8.4 Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Same case as in Figure 1.8.1, higher magnification. Atypical parabasal keratinocytes with prominent nucleoli. Cytoplasmic hypereosinophilia (right). |
![]() Figure 1.8.5 Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Atypical parabasal keratinocytes with cytoplasmic keratinization (hypereosinophilia). |
![]() Figure 1.8.6 Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Basal and parabasal atypia and brisk mitotic activity. |
![]() Figure 1.8.7 Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Same case as in Figure 1.8.1. Increased p53 labeling (left) and only mildly increased Ki-67 proliferative activity (right). |
![]() Figure 1.8.8 Vulvar skin with reactive changes at the edge of erosion. Interface and dermal mixed inflammatory infiltrate. |
![]() Figure 1.8.9 Vulvar skin with reactive changes. Neutrophils in the epidermis. Notable intercellular bridges. Nuclear enlargement and some degree of pleomorphism in the middle epithelial layers. |
![]() Figure 1.8.10 Vulvar skin with reactive changes at the edge of erosion. Same case as in Figure 1.8.8, higher magnification. Keratinocytes with uniform enlarged nuclei and inconspicuous nucleoli. |
![]() Figure 1.8.11 Vulvar skin with reactive changes at the edge of an ulcer. Basal and parabasal hyperchromasia, but no significant atypia. |
![]() Figure 1.8.12 Vulvar skin with reactive changes at the edge of erosion. Same case as in Figure 1.8.8. Rare cells in basal/parabasal layers staining for p53 (left) and mild increase in Ki-67 labeling (right). |
|
![]() Figure 1.9.1 Basal cell carcinoma. Nodular growth pattern with epidermal connection. Loose stroma surrounding the nests. |
![]() Figure 1.9.2 Basal cell carcinoma. Irregular epithelial nests in the stroma with focal epithelial connection and peripheral clefting. Overlying epidermis is uninvolved. |
![]() Figure 1.9.3 Basal cell carcinoma. Superficial growth pattern. Overlying epidermis is uninvolved.
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree
Get Clinical Tree app for offline access
|






































































