|
Figure 1.1.2 Vestibular papillomatosis. Same case as Figure 1.1.1, higher magnification. Vestibular papilloma. Delicate papillae are lined by normal nonkeratinizing squamous epithelium. No hyperkeratosis is seen. |
Figure 1.1.4 Vestibular papillomatosis. Squamous epithelium without viral cytopathic change (koilocytosis). |
Figure 1.1.5 Condyloma acuminatum. Verrucous lesion with multiple papillary projections lined by nonkeratinizing squamous epithelium. |
Figure 1.1.6 Condyloma acuminatum. Rounded papillae with some degree of hyperkeratosis and parakeratosis. Occasional atypical, binucleate cells are present. |
Figure 1.1.7 Condyloma acuminatum. Same case as Figure 1.1.5, higher magnification. Koilocytes: large cells with abundant cytoplasm, typical perinuclear halo, and enlarged hyperchromatic nuclei with irregular contours. |
Figure 1.1.8 Same case as Figure 1.1.5. Condyloma acuminatum. Increased Ki-67 labeling in midzone and superficial epithelial layers. |
|
Figure 1.2.1 Condyloma acuminatum. Verrucous lesion with multiple papillary projections with pointed or rounded ends. |
Figure 1.2.2 Condyloma acuminatum. Same case as Figure 1.2.1, higher magnification. |
Figure 1.2.3 Condyloma acuminatum. Same case as Figure 1.2.1, higher magnification. Marked hyperkeratosis. |
Figure 1.2.4 Condyloma acuminatum. At least focal viral cytopathic change (koilocytes) is seen in the creases between the papillae. |
Figure 1.2.6 Squamous papilloma. Same case as in Figure 1.2.5. Minimal arborization is present. |
Figure 1.2.8 Squamous papilloma. Same case as in Figure 1.2.5, higher magnification. Mature squamous epithelium lacking cytologic atypia. |
|
Figure 1.3.2 Condyloma acuminatum. Hyperkeratosis, hypergranulosis, and preserved squamous maturation. Koilocytes are seen in the superficial epithelial layers. |
Figure 1.3.5 Seborrheic keratosis. Same case as Figure 1.3.3, higher magnification. Pseudohorn cyst. |
|
Figure 1.4.1 Condyloma acuminatum. Verrucous lesion with multiple papillary projections with pointed or rounded ends. Broad-based lesion with no apparent symmetry. |
Figure 1.4.2 Condyloma acuminatum. Same case as Figure 1.4.1, higher magnification. Prominent koilocytosis. |
Figure 1.4.3 Verruca vulgaris. Symmetrical lesion with peripheral rete ridges pointing toward the center of the lesion. Mature squamous epithelium with marked hyperkeratosis. |
Figure 1.4.4 Verruca vulgaris. Same case as in Figure 1.4.3, higher magnification. Filiform papillae with marked hyper- and parakeratosis. |
Figure 1.4.5 Verruca vulgaris. Same case as in Figure 1.4.3, higher magnification. Prominent hypergranulosis and thick compact hyperkeratosis. |
Figure 1.4.6 Verruca vulgaris. Same case as in Figure 1.4.3, higher magnification. Very focal koilocytotic change can be seen. |
|
Figure 1.5.1 Verrucous carcinoma. Pale lesion with verrucous architecture and “pushing-border” stromal invasion. |
Figure 1.5.2 Verrucous carcinoma. Same case as in Figure 1.5.1. |
Figure 1.5.3 Verrucous carcinoma. Same case as in Figure 1.5.1, surface. Mature bland squamous epithelium with surface hyperkeratosis. |
Figure 1.5.4 Verrucous carcinoma. Same case as in Figure 1.5.1, higher magnification. Broad epithelial nests extend into the stroma. |
Figure 1.5.5 Verrucous carcinoma. Same case as in Figure 1.5.1, higher magnification. Mature keratinocytes lacking cytologic atypia. |
Figure 1.5.6 Verrucous carcinoma. Stromal inflammatory infiltrate with eosinophils is seen at the deep edge. |
|
Figure 1.6.1 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL/VIN 2-3) with prominent condylomatous architecture. Lesion with wart-like architecture appears “blue,” immature at low power. |
Figure 1.6.2 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL/VIN 2-3) with prominent condylomatous architecture. Same case as in Figure 1.6.1, higher magnification. Full-thickness epithelial immaturity. |
Figure 1.6.3 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL/VIN 2-3) with prominent condylomatous architecture. Same case as in Figure 1.6.1, higher magnification. Epithelial immaturity and notable cytologic atypia. |
Figure 1.6.4 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL/VIN 2-3) with prominent condylomatous architecture. Hyperchromasia and atypia throughout epithelial thickness. |
Figure 1.6.5 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL/VIN 2-3) with prominent condylomatous architecture. Mitotic figures in the mid-zone and upper epithelial layers. |
Figure 1.6.6 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL/VIN 2-3) with prominent condylomatous architecture. Same case as in Figure 1.6.1. Diffuse p16 expression in at least lower one-third of the epithelial thickness (left); markedly increased Ki-67 labeling throughout epithelial thickness (right). |
Figure 1.6.7 Condyloma acuminatum. Verrucous lesion with multiple papillary projections with pointed or rounded ends. |
Figure 1.6.8 Condyloma acuminatum. Same case as Figure 1.6.7, higher magnification. Preserved epithelial maturation. Focal koilocytosis on the surface. |
|
Figure 1.7.1 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (high-grade VIN). Acanthosis, broadening of the rete ridges. |
Figure 1.7.2 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (high-grade VIN). Hyperchromatic/basophilic epithelium with acanthosis and broadening of the rete ridges. |
Figure 1.7.3 Focal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (high-grade VIN). Expanded parabasal zone (center). |
Figure 1.7.4 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (high-grade VIN). Same case as in Figure 1.7.1, higher magnification. Expansion of parabasal zone. Maturation is preserved in upper epithelial layers. |
Figure 1.7.5 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (high-grade VIN). Same case as in Figure 1.7.2, higher magnification. Loss of epithelial maturation; however, granular and corneal layers are still present. |
Figure 1.7.6 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (high-grade VIN). Same case as in Figure 1.7.3, higher magnification. Expansion of the parabasal zone, atypical keratinocytes with increased nucleocytoplasmic ratio, and frequent mitotic figures above the parabasal zone. |
Figure 1.7.7 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (high-grade VIN). Same case as in Figure 1.7.1. Diffuse “block-like” expression of p16 in at least two-thirds of epithelial thickness (left) and increased Ki-67 labeling above the parabasal layers (right). |
Figure 1.7.8 Normal (nonlesional) skin adjacent to HSIL in a vulvar excision specimen. Acanthosis, broadening of the rete ridges, and hyperkeratosis. |
Figure 1.7.9 Normal (nonlesional) skin adjacent to HSIL in a vulvar excision specimen. Acanthosis, broadening of the rete ridges, and basophilic-appearing epithelium. |
Figure 1.7.10 Normal (nonlesional) skin near the margin in a vulvar excision for squamous cell carcinoma. Parabasal zone appears expanded due to tangential sectioning; no cytologic atypia is seen. |
Figure 1.7.11 Normal (nonlesional) skin. Same case as in Figure 1.7.9, higher magnification. Normal epithelial maturation; keratinocytes lack cytologic atypia. |
Figure 1.7.12 Normal (nonlesional) skin adjacent to HSIL in a vulvar excision specimen. Same case as in Figure 1.7.8. No expression of p16 (left) and low Ki-67 proliferative activity limited to parabasal zone (right). |
|
Figure 1.8.1 Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (simplex VIN). Prominent acanthosis and hyperkeratosis. |
Figure 1.8.3 Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Thickened rete ridges; prominent intercellular bridges. Parabasal zone appears disorganized. |
Figure 1.8.4 Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Same case as in Figure 1.8.1, higher magnification. Atypical parabasal keratinocytes with prominent nucleoli. Cytoplasmic hypereosinophilia (right). |
Figure 1.8.5 Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Atypical parabasal keratinocytes with cytoplasmic keratinization (hypereosinophilia). |
Figure 1.8.6 Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Basal and parabasal atypia and brisk mitotic activity. |
Figure 1.8.7 Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Same case as in Figure 1.8.1. Increased p53 labeling (left) and only mildly increased Ki-67 proliferative activity (right). |
Figure 1.8.8 Vulvar skin with reactive changes at the edge of erosion. Interface and dermal mixed inflammatory infiltrate. |
Figure 1.8.9 Vulvar skin with reactive changes. Neutrophils in the epidermis. Notable intercellular bridges. Nuclear enlargement and some degree of pleomorphism in the middle epithelial layers. |
Figure 1.8.10 Vulvar skin with reactive changes at the edge of erosion. Same case as in Figure 1.8.8, higher magnification. Keratinocytes with uniform enlarged nuclei and inconspicuous nucleoli. |
Figure 1.8.11 Vulvar skin with reactive changes at the edge of an ulcer. Basal and parabasal hyperchromasia, but no significant atypia. |
Figure 1.8.12 Vulvar skin with reactive changes at the edge of erosion. Same case as in Figure 1.8.8. Rare cells in basal/parabasal layers staining for p53 (left) and mild increase in Ki-67 labeling (right). |
|
Figure 1.9.1 Basal cell carcinoma. Nodular growth pattern with epidermal connection. Loose stroma surrounding the nests. |
Figure 1.9.2 Basal cell carcinoma. Irregular epithelial nests in the stroma with focal epithelial connection and peripheral clefting. Overlying epidermis is uninvolved. |
Figure 1.9.3 Basal cell carcinoma. Superficial growth pattern. Overlying epidermis is uninvolved.
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channelFull access? Get Clinical TreeGet Clinical Tree app for offline access |