Urothelial Carcinoma of the Renal Pelvis



Urothelial Carcinoma of the Renal Pelvis


Satish K. Tickoo, MD

Mahesha Vankalakunti, MD

Victor E. Reuter, MD










This gross specimen of a urothelial papillary carcinoma of the renal pelvis shows a polypoid lesion with solid, smooth surface, indicative of a histologically high-grade tumor.






Hematoxylin & eosin image shows the typical histologic features of a papillary urothelial carcinoma. At this magnification, the tumor shows discrete papillae, without any evidence of invasion.


TERMINOLOGY


Abbreviations



  • Urothelial carcinoma of renal pelvis (UCP)


Definitions



  • Malignant neoplasm of urothelial (transitional cell) origin involving renal pelvicalyceal system


ETIOLOGY/PATHOGENESIS


Risk Factors



  • Tobacco smoking is important risk factor



    • Lifetime risk increases with increased consumption and intensity of smoking


  • Long-term use of analgesics, especially phenacetin, is also implicated as independent risk factor



    • Increases risk of renal pelvis tumors 4-8x in men and 10-13x in women


    • With decrease in usage of phenacetin, it is a less significant risk factor


  • Other risk factors include Balkan nephropathy and occupational exposures



    • Petrochemicals, plastic materials, coal, asphalt, tar, and thorium-containing contrast media


  • History of previous lower urinary tract carcinoma is also well-known predisposing factor



    • > 2/3 have prior, concurrent, or subsequent bladder carcinoma


Molecular Features



  • Similar to that of urothelial carcinomas of bladder


  • Deletions of part or all of chromosome 9; common event in urothelial carcinoma



    • Occurs early in tumorigenesis



      • Present in most cases of urothelial carcinoma, both papillary and nonpapillary


  • Fibroblastic growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) gene mutations



    • Occur in > 80% of noninvasive papillary urothelial carcinomas (stage Ta)


    • Also found in 20% of lamina propria invasive (stage T1) and 15% of muscle invasive tumors


    • No such mutations in carcinoma in situ


  • Relative incidences of FGFR3 mutations suggest that noninvasive papillary tumors do progress, although infrequently



    • Papillary tumors appear to progress along pathway that is different than carcinoma in situ (CIS) in most cases


    • Tumors with FGFR3 mutations have lower risk for recurrence than those without


  • Increased gene expression of HRAS is found in CIS and high-grade tumors



    • Often associated with allelic loss of p53, which might contribute to its up-regulation


    • Mutations in p53 are found at high rate in CIS (> 70% cases)


  • Microsatellite instability and loss of mismatch repair proteins MSH2, MLH1, or MSH6 present in upper urinary tract tumors



    • Seen in up to 20-30% tumors of upper urinary tract



      • Incidence in upper tract is many times more common than in bladder tumors


    • More commonly observed in females or patients with low tumor stage, grade, or inverted tumor growth pattern


    • Upper urinary tract tumors form 3rd most common tumor with microsatellite instability



      • Colon and endometrium are 2 most common sites within hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) related tumors


CLINICAL ISSUES


Epidemiology



  • Incidence



    • 4-5% of all urothelial tumors



    • Most common type of tumor in pelvicalyceal (90%) location


  • Age



    • Mean: 67-70 years (range: 34-93 years)


  • Gender



    • More common in males; M:F = 1.7-2:1


Presentation



  • Flank pain


  • Hematuria


Treatment



  • Surgical approaches



    • Nephroureterectomy, ± removal of bladder cuff in high-grade or high-stage lesions


    • Segmental ureterectomy coupled with ureteral reimplantation in distal uretal tumors, generally of lower grade and stage


    • Renal-sparing surgery, including segmental ureterectomy and endoscopic therapy


Prognosis



  • Pathologic stage is single most important prognostic factor for urothelial carcinomas of upper urinary tract


  • On univariate analysis, significant prognostic indicators include



    • Size


    • Tumor grade


    • Pathologic stage



      • pTa: Papillary noninvasive carcinoma


      • pT1: Tumor invades subepithelial connective tissue


      • pT2: Tumor invades muscularis


      • pT3: Tumor invades (for renal pelvis): Beyond muscularis in peripelvic fat/renal parenchyma; (for ureter): Beyond muscularis in periureteric fat


      • pT4: Tumor invades adjacent organs or through kidney to perinephric fat


    • Lymphovascular invasion


  • However, on multivariate analysis, stage is only significant prognostic factor for survival



    • Based on multiple studies, 5-year survivals > 99% for pTa, 91% for pT1, 72% for pT2, 40% for pT3, and 16% for patients with metastasis


IMAGE FINDINGS


Radiographic Findings



  • Filling defect, obstructive mass associated with hydronephrosis, hydroureter, renal stones


MACROSCOPIC FEATURES


General Features



  • Either predominantly papillary or polypoid, or infiltrative mass with thickening of pelvic wall



    • Tumors that primarily appear as papillary or polypoid



      • May expand and fill pelvicalyceal system


      • Tend to be noninvasive or are associated with limited invasion


      • Systematic sampling after fixation and maintaining relationship to underlying structures important for accurate staging


    • Infiltrative mass may sometimes extensively involve renal parenchyma, mimicking primary renal parenchymal tumor



      • Occasionally may arise from minor calyx and grossly appear cortical in location


    • Equivocal radiographic localization may warrant intraoperative assessment of urothelial vs. renal parenchymal origin



      • Surgical approaches quite different in these 2 situations


      • Radical nephroureterectomy for urothelial vs. partial, total, or radical nephrectomy for renal cortical tumors



MICROSCOPIC PATHOLOGY


Histologic Features



  • Histopathological features of upper tract urothelial tumors similar to those in urinary bladder


  • However, papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential (PUNLMP) extremely uncommon in upper tract


  • Low-grade carcinoma relatively less common, compared to that in bladder


  • High-grade tumors are most common and invasion should be diligently looked for, if not obvious


  • Histopathologic diversity with morphologic variants/aberrant differentiations similar to that in bladder


  • Variant morphologies seen, among others, include



    • Micropapillary variant


    • Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma


    • Squamous differentiation and squamous cell carcinoma


    • Sarcomatoid differentiation


    • Signet ring or plasmacytoid features


    • Small cell carcinomatous features


  • Renal parenchymal invasion requires destructive invasive beyond renal tubules



    • Tumors often extend inside kidney within tubules



      • May, at times, form grossly identified expansile nodules


      • For staging purposes of renal parenchymal invasion, tumor cells have to invade out of well-defined tubular structures


Lymph Nodes



  • Overall lymph node involvement reported to be approximately 10%



    • Reported incidence is not based on cases where lymph nodes were removed at time of nephroureterectomy


    • Rates of lymph node metastasis close to 25% among cases where lymph nodes were removed at surgery


Predominant Pattern/Injury Type



  • Neoplastic


Predominant Cell/Compartment Type

Jul 7, 2016 | Posted by in PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE | Comments Off on Urothelial Carcinoma of the Renal Pelvis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access