Oxcarbazepine



Oxcarbazepine


Jerzy Szaflarski





  • MECHANISM OF ACTION



    • Oxcarbazepine blocks sodium-dependent action potentials on the basis of voltage- and use-dependent limitation of action potential firing (indirect effect).


    • Monohydroxy derivative (MHD) reduces glutamatergic synaptic transmission and high-voltage N-type Ca2+ currents.


  • EFFICACY



    • Monotherapy in New-Onset Epilepsy



      • Study Type. Randomized controlled trial (RCT)1



        • Main Entry Criteria. Children and adolescents with new-onset epilepsy (5 to 18 years)


        • Comparator. Phenytoin (PHT)


        • Number of Patients. 193


        • Primary Outcome Variable. Efficacy, tolerability, and clinical utility (treatment retention)


        • Results. There were no differences in seizure freedom in patients receiving oxcarbazepine (300 to 1,350 mg/day) versus those receiving PHT (100 to 400 mg/day) (61% seizure free versus 60% seizure free, respectively). The number of premature discontinuations due to adverse effects was significantly lower in the oxcarbazepine group than in the PHT group (p = 0.002).


      • Study Type. RCT2,3



        • Main Entry Criteria. Children and adults with new-onset epilepsy (10 to 69 years)


        • Comparator. Placebo


        • Number of Patients. 67


        • Primary Outcome Variable. Time to first seizure


        • Results. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed significantly longer time to first seizure in the oxcarbazepine than in placebo group. Median seizure reduction was significantly
          higher in oxcarbazepine group compared to placebo.


      • Study Type. RCT4



        • Main Entry Criteria. Adolescents and adults with new-onset focal or generalized seizures (15 to 65 years)


        • Comparator. Valproate (VPA); patients were treated with daily doses of oxcarbazepine or VPA between 900 and 2,400 mg/day.


        • Number of Patients. 249


        • Primary Outcome Variable. Seizure freedom and tolerability


        • Results. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups with respect to seizure freedom or discontinuation due to side effects.


      • Study Type. RCT5



        • Main Entry Criteria. Adolescents and adults with new-onset focal or generalized seizures (16 to 65 years)


        • Comparator. Oxcarbazepine 600 to 2,100 mg/day or PHT 100 to 650 mg/day


        • Number of Patients. 287


        • Primary Outcome Variable. Efficacy, tolerability, and clinical utility (treatment retention)


        • Results. In the efficacy analysis, no significant differences were found between the treatment groups. The number of premature discontinuations due to adverse effects showed a significant difference in favor of oxcarbazepine. There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to the total number of premature discontinuations due to adverse events.


      • Study Type. RCT6



        • Main Entry Criteria. Patients with new-onset focal or generalized seizures (15 to 65 years)


        • Comparator. Carbamazepine (CBZ) (300 to 1,400 mg/day), oxcarbazepine (300 to 1,800 mg/day)


        • Number of Patients. 235


        • Primary Outcome Variable. Efficacy (seizure frequency) and tolerability (side effects)


        • Results. There was no significant difference in the number of seizure-free patients in the oxcarbazepine versus CBZ treatment groups.
          Oxcarbazepine caused significantly fewer “severe” side effects than CBZ did; global evaluation of tolerability demonstrated a trend toward better tolerability of oxcarbazepine.


    • Conversion to Monotherapy



      • Study Type. RCT7



        • Main Entry Criteria. Uncontrolled partial seizures in patients aged ≥12 years and weighing ≥41 kg (≥90 pounds)


        • Comparator. Oxcarbazepine 2,400 versus 300 mg/day


        • Number of Patients. 143


        • Primary Outcome Variable. Titrated on oxcarbazepine up to 2,400 mg/day (while CBZ was discontinued). Thereafter, patients entered the blinded phase, where either oxcarbazepine was continued at 2,400 mg/day or the dose of oxcarbazepine was down-titrated to 300 mg/day. The predefined exit criteria included a twofold increase in seizure frequency, a twofold increase in the highest consecutive 2-day seizure frequency, the occurrence of generalized tonic-clonic seizure if it was not present during the baseline evaluation phase, or prolonged generalized tonic-clonic seizures.


        • Results. Exit criteria were met more frequently by patients treated with oxcarbazepine monotherapy at a dosage of 300 mg/day than by patients treated with oxcarbazepine monotherapy at a dosage of 2,400 mg/day. Forty-seven patients did not progress to the blinded part of the trial because of side effects.


      • Study Type. RCT8



        • Main Entry Criteria. Patients with uncontrolled partial seizures, aged ≥12 years and weighing ≥41 kg (≥90 pounds)


        • Comparator. Oxcarbazepine 2,400 versus 300 mg/day


        • Number of Patients. 87


        • Primary Outcome Variable. Patients were titrated on oxcarbazepine 300 or 2,400 mg/day. Thereafter, patients entered the blinded phase, where other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs)
          were discontinued. Patients continued oxcarbazepine at either 300 or 2,400 mg/day. The predefined exit criteria were the same as that in the preceding text.7,8


        • Results. The percentage of patients meeting the predefined exit criteria was significantly lower for the 2,400 mg/day group than the 300 mg/day group. In addition, there was a significant difference in time to exit in favor of the 2,400 mg/day group.


      • Study Type. RCT9



        • Main Entry Criteria. Adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery evaluation in the epilepsy-monitoring unit


        • Comparator. Placebo, oxcarbazepine 1,200 mg b.i.d.


        • Number of Patients. 102


        • Primary Outcome Variable. Time to meeting one of the exit criteria (completion of the 10-day trial, four partial seizures, two new-onset generalized seizures, serial seizures, or status epilepticus)


        • Results. Significantly more number of the patients treated with oxcarbazepine completed the study in comparison with the patients treated with placebo. Logistic regression indicated that the odds of a placebo-treated patient meeting the seizure exit criterion were seven times higher than that for an oxcarbazepine-treated patient. Seventy-five percent of patients treated with oxcarbazepine reported side effects (mostly involving the nervous system, gastrointestinal system, and skin including pruritus and diplopia) versus 57% of patients who received placebo.

          Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

          Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 14, 2016 | Posted by in PHARMACY | Comments Off on Oxcarbazepine

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access