Lobular Neoplasia and Its Distinction from Other Epithelial Proliferative Lesions



Lobular Neoplasia and Its Distinction from Other Epithelial Proliferative Lesions






3.1 FLORID HYPERPLASIA WITH CLEAR CELLS VS. ATYPICAL LOBULAR HYPERPLASIA













































Florid Hyperplasia with Clear Cells


Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia (ALH)


Age


Adult women


Adult women, incidence drops following menopause


Imaging findings


Incidental finding or associated with calcifications


Incidental finding, rarely associated with calcifications


Etiology


Unknown


Unknown


Histology




  1. Lobular unit expanded by a proliferation of nonuniform epithelial cells with residual secondary lumens (Fig. 3.1.1)



  2. Secondary spaces are irregular, with a slit-like arrangement (Figs. 3.1.2, 3.1.3, 3.1.4)



  3. Nuclear variability and overlap are evident (Figs. 3.1.2, 3.1.3, 3.1.4)



  4. Indistinct cell borders (Figs. 3.1.3 and 3.1.4)




  1. Lobular units contain a uniform cell population, with some filling of acini by small cells with a dyshesive growth pattern (Figs. 3.1.5 and 3.1.6)



  2. Acini contain characteristic cells, but are not fully distended, and are not distorted (Figs. 3.1.5, 3.1.6, 3.1.7, 3.1.8)



  3. Residual luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells are present (Figs. 3.1.7 and 3.1.8)



  4. Intracytoplasmic inclusions are common (Fig. 3.1.8)


Special studies


None; CK5/6 may be variably expressed


None; E-cadherin is usually not expressed; p120 expression maintained


Genetic abnormalities


None


Mutations of CDH1 (chromosome 16q22.1)


Treatment


None


Excision not required if incidental finding on core biopsy; mammographic follow-up ± antiestrogen therapy


Clinical implication


Slightly increased risk of later cancer development (1.5×); magnitude of risk insufficient to affect patient management


Moderately increased risk of later cancer development (4-5×); bilateral risk with ipsilateral breast at greater (3:1) risk







Figure 3.1.1 A lobular unit is expanded by an epithelial proliferation with irregular secondary spaces characteristic of florid hyperplasia.






Figure 3.1.5 Four lobular units and a terminal duct are mildly expanded by a uniform population of cells in this example of ALH.







Figure 3.1.2 Uneven cell placement and peripheral slit-like spaces define florid hyperplasia without atypia; cells are polarized with respect to the basement membrane.






Figure 3.1.3 Many of the epithelial cells have clear cytoplasm which may suggest cellular monotony.






Figure 3.1.4 Indistinct cell borders, nuclear variability, and uneven cell placement are features of florid hyperplasia without atypia.






Figure 3.1.6 The acini contain a uniform population of cells that are evenly placed. A dyshesive growth pattern is evident, as well as a few residual lumina in some acini. The involved spaces are minimally expanded, and there is no distortion.






Figure 3.1.7 Residual myoepithelial cells as well as some luminal epithelial cells remain which are admixed with ALH cells.






Figure 3.1.8 Many of the ALH cells contain intracytoplasmic inclusions.



3.2 USUAL HYPERPLASIA WITH PROMINENT MYOEPITHELIAL CELLS VS. ATYPICAL LOBULAR HYPERPLASIA













































Usual Hyperplasia with Prominent Myoepithelial Cells


ALH


Age


Adult women


Adult women, incidence drops following menopause


Imaging findings


Incidental finding, or associated with calcifications


Incidental finding, rarely associated with calcifications


Etiology


Unknown


Unknown


Histology




  1. Nonuniform cellular proliferation involving clustered lobular units (Fig. 3.2.1)



  2. Mixture of cell types; myoepithelial cells are recognized by clear cytoplasm and peripheral location while central luminal epithelial cells have eosinophilic cytoplasm (Figs. 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4)



  3. Nuclear variability and overlap are present in both cell populations (Figs. 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4)



  4. Irregular secondary spaces and myoepithelial cells with clear cytoplasm (Figs. 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4)



  5. Myoepithelial cells lack intracytoplasmic inclusions (Figs. 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4)




  1. Lobular units are variably populated by uniform cells with a dyshesive growth pattern (Figs. 3.2.5 and 3.2.6)



  2. Evenly placed, uniform cells lack welldefined cellular borders, and acini are not filled or distended (Figs. 3.2.6, 3.2.7, 3.2.8)



  3. Intracytoplasmic inclusions are frequent (Fig. 3.2.8)



  4. Acini are closely opposed, but intervening stroma is evident (Fig. 3.2.8)


Special studies


None; CK5/6, and E-cadherin diffusely expressed


None; E-cadherin is usually not expressed, intact p120 expression


Genetic abnormalities


None


Mutations of CDH1 (chromosome 16q22.1)


Treatment


Excision unnecessary if detected in core biopsy specimen


Excision not required if incidental finding on core biopsy; mammographic follow-up ± antiestrogen therapy


Clinical implication


Risk implications apply only when present admixed with florid hyperplasia, the latter being the risk-indicator lesion; slightly increased risk of later cancer development (1.5×); risk is bilateral. Risk level is insufficient to affect patient management.


Moderately increased risk of later cancer development (4-5×); bilateral risk with ipsilateral breast at greater (3:1) risk

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 23, 2018 | Posted by in PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE | Comments Off on Lobular Neoplasia and Its Distinction from Other Epithelial Proliferative Lesions

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access