Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) and Extragastrointestinal GIST





Originally viewed as smooth muscle tumors (leiomyoblastomas), it is now known that gastrointestinal stromal tumors ( GISTs ) arise from interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs) or ICC precursor cells. ICCs are pacemaker cells centered on the myenteric plexus along the entire length of the tubal gut ( Fig. 17.1 ). They function to set up a peristaltic wave that coordinates the movement of food through the digestive system. GISTs have many morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features in common with ICCs. The identification of KIT gene mutations in most GISTs has made them a paradigm for targeted therapy of oncogenic proteins and oncogene addiction in solid tumors. Many developments in GIST diagnostics in the last 20 years have accompanied genetic findings of therapeutic importance.




Fig. 17.1


Interstitial cells of Cajal within myenteric plexus of the small bowel (KIT immunohistochemical stain).


Epidemiology and Clinical Findings


Although once considered rare, GISTs are now known to be the most common human sarcoma because of increased diagnostic reliability. Population-based studies estimate the annual incidence at 10 cases per million. It should be emphasized that these are clinically significant GISTs greater than 2 cm in size that require surgical evaluation and potentially systemic therapy. MicroGISTs , less than 1 cm in diameter, are quite common. Autopsy studies have identified microGISTs, known variably as GIST tumorlets or GISTlets, in up to 22.5% of patients. However, the vast majority of microGISTs do not progress to clinically important lesions that require medical attention.


GISTs arise over a wide age range, from children to elderly persons, with a peak median age of 64 years at diagnosis. They occur with an approximately equal sex predilection (47.3% female; 52.7% male), except in children, with a clear female predominance (see pediatric GIST later). No etiologic factors related to GIST have been identified. However, although the vast majority of GISTs occur as sporadic tumors with somatic mutations, GISTs also occur rarely in various tumor syndromes (see later). They are found along the entire length of the digestive tract but are most common in the stomach (60%), jejunum and ileum (30%), duodenum (5%), and colon and rectum (<5%). GISTs also rarely involve the esophagus, appendix, and gallbladder.


A small number of GISTs have no apparent connection to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. These GISTs, known as extragastrointestinal GISTs ( EGISTs ), involve the omentum, mesentery, retroperitoneum, and perineum. The occasional finding of an omental or mesenteric GIST with a thin stalk attached to the stomach suggests that a subset of EGISTs are exophytic GISTs that arose within the GI tract but eventually lost their connection to it. This is supported by molecular findings showing that EGISTs in the omentum share molecular characteristics with gastric GISTs.


Presenting symptoms include GI bleeding, anemia, abdominal fullness, or a mass. GISTs can also present asymptomatically; because they arise from the wall of the gut, they do not become symptomatic until they erode/ulcerate the overlying mucosa or become large enough to cause masslike symptoms.


GISTs have a characteristic pattern of metastasis. Unlike epithelial neoplasms of the gut, with one specific exception, succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)–deficient GISTs (see later), they do not metastasize to lymph nodes. They metastasize to the liver or disseminate throughout the peritoneal cavity as numerous metastatic nodules. It is unusual for GIST to metastasize outside the abdomen, but dermal/subcutaneous, bone, brain, and lung metastases occur rarely.




Macroscopic Findings


GISTs range in size from 1 mm to very large tumors, occasionally measuring greater than 20 cm, with a median size of clinically significant GISTs of 6 cm in the stomach, 4.5 cm in the duodenum, and 7 cm in the jejunum/ileum. Because GISTs arise from ICCs or ICC precursors, they are centered on the wall of the gut ( Figs. 17.2 and 17.3 ). This has important clinical ramifications because endoscopic biopsies may not be deep enough to obtain suitable tissue for a diagnosis. The use of endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration overcomes this limitation by directing the biopsy needle directly into the lesion. GISTs frequently ulcerate the overlying mucosa. On cross section, they are tan and fleshy with frequent cystification and hemorrhage. Necrosis can occur but is less common. GISTs usually grow as single tumor nodules, but occasionally they are multifocal. Multifocality suggests a germline mutation or inherited disorder that predisposes to GIST or the presence of metastasis.




Fig. 17.2


Gastric GIST with typical fleshy appearance and central degeneration.



Fig. 17.3


Aggressive GIST infiltrating through wall of the small bowel.




Microscopic Findings


GISTs are centered on the muscularis propria and are usually circumscribed and tend to respect the muscularis mucosae ( Fig. 17.4 ). When GISTs invade across the muscularis mucosae to involve the overlying mucosa, the lesional cells infiltrate among the glands. It is important to distinguish true invasion from simple erosion of the overlying mucosa, because true invasion is associated with a worse prognosis and is almost always associated with aggressive clinical behavior. Lymphovascular invasion is very uncommon except in SDH-deficient GISTs, approximately 50% of which metastasize to lymph nodes.




Fig. 17.4


Typical spindle cell GIST with smooth, noninfiltrative interface with muscularis mucosae.


GISTs can have predominantly epithelioid (20%) or spindle cell (70%) cytomorphology, or a combination of both (10%), and range from hypocellular to densely cellular lesions. The spindle cells have elongated nuclei with fine chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli, and a moderate amount of pale eosinophilic and fibrillary cytoplasm. Whereas epithelioid GISTs can be arranged in a sheetlike or nested growth pattern ( Figs. 17.5 and 17.6 ), spindle cell GISTs are always arranged in fascicles ( Figs. 17.7 to 17.9 ). The stroma varies from hyalinized to occasionally myxoid. Coarse calcifications and stromal hyalinization are typical of small, clinically insignificant microGISTs ( Fig. 17.10 ). GISTs of all types are usually monomorphic with minimal cytologic pleomorphism. They also tend to have minimal mitotic activity. Atypical mitotic figures are rare and are usually a harbinger of high-grade or dedifferentiated GIST.




Fig. 17.5


Epithelioid GIST with nested growth pattern.



Fig. 17.6


Epithelioid GIST with diffuse growth pattern.



Fig. 17.7


Hypocellular spindle cell GIST.



Fig. 17.8


Moderately cellular spindle cell GIST.



Fig. 17.9


Hypercellular spindle cell GIST.



Fig. 17.10


Hyalinized microGIST with coarse calcifications.


GISTs are well vascularized, and in occasional examples the blood vessels can be hyalinized, mimicking schwannoma ( Fig. 17.11 ). Gastric GISTs can have striking nuclear palisading, also mimicking schwannoma ( Fig. 17.12 ). Ironically, gastric schwannomas are uniformly cellular and do not usually exhibit obvious nuclear palisading. Gastric GISTs can also have prominent cytoplasmic vacuolization ( Fig. 17.13 ). Another interesting histologic feature frequently encountered in GIST is the presence of so-called skeinoid fibers, prominent deposits of collagen that are periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) positive ( Fig. 17.14 ), which occur almost exclusively in small intestine GISTs.




Fig. 17.11


Spindle cell GIST with prominent hyalinized blood vessels mimicking a schwannoma.



Fig. 17.12


Gastric spindle cell GIST with nuclear palisading mimicking a schwannoma.



Fig. 17.13


Gastric GIST with prominent cytoplasmic vacuolization.



Fig. 17.14


Skeinoid fibers in jejunal GIST.


Dedifferentiated GISTs are characterized by the presence of morphologically typical GIST juxtaposed with high-grade sarcoma. These lesions are very rare, but the high-grade sarcomatous component loses KIT and/or DOG1 immunoreactivity, is more mitotically active including atypical mitotic figures, and is clinically more aggressive than usual GIST ( Figs. 17.15 and 17.16 ). Dedifferentiated GIST can be seen de novo or as a result of prolonged anti-KIT tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.




Fig. 17.15


Dedifferentiated GIST (conventional component on left with abrupt transition to dedifferentiated component on right ).



Fig. 17.16


Conventional spindle cell component ( A ) and dedifferentiated component with rhabdoid morphology ( B ) of dedifferentiated GIST. KIT immunohistochemical stain ( C ) shows abrupt loss of staining in dedifferentiated component ( upper right ).






Immunohistochemical Findings


GISTs are diffusely and strongly positive for KIT (CD117, c-kit) in approximately 95% of cases. Immunoreactivity can be cytoplasmic ( Fig. 17.17 ), membranous ( Fig. 17.18 ), dotlike perinuclear ( Fig. 17.19 ), or a combination of all these patterns. There is no clinical significance to the different staining patterns. Because other GI neoplasms, such as leiomyoma and schwannoma, can mimic GIST, it is important to confirm the histologic impression of GIST by confirmation with KIT immunohistochemistry (IHC).




Fig. 17.17


Cytoplasmic KIT immunoreactivity.



Fig. 17.18


Membranous KIT immunoreactivity.



Fig. 17.19


Dotlike KIT immunoreactivity.


Approximately 5% of GISTs are negative for KIT on IHC. Virtually all these GISTs are found to be PDGFRA mutant GISTs ( Table 17.1 ; see later section).



Table 17.1

Immunohistochemistry According to GIST Genotype






















































Immunohistochemistry Genotype
KIT Mutation PDGFRA Mutation BRAF Mutation NF1 Mutation SDHB, SDHC, or SDHD Mutation SDHA Mutation
KIT + − (weak) + + + +
DOG1 + + + + + +
SDHB Retained Retained Retained Retained Lost Lost
SDHA Retained Retained Retained Retained Retained Lost
BRAF V600E +

GIST, Gastrointestinal stromal tumor.


DOG1 (discovered on GIST 1), also known as ANO1 (anoctamin-1), is strongly expressed in ICC and is very sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of GIST. DOG1 is strongly expressed in more than 99% of GISTs ( Fig. 17.20 ). Importantly, it is positive in most KIT-negative GISTs and therefore is useful in confirming the diagnosis of GIST in this subgroup ( Fig. 17.21 ). To ensure that a diagnosis of GIST is not missed, it is recommended that both KIT and DOG1 IHC be used in all cases of suspected GIST.




Fig. 17.20


DOG1 immunohistochemistry in spindle cell GIST.



Fig. 17.21


KIT ( A ) and DOG1 ( B ) immunohistochemistry in KIT-negative GIST.


GISTs are also positive for CD34 (70%), but this immunohistochemical marker is no longer useful for the diagnosis of GIST. Before the advent of KIT IHC, CD34 was the “go-to” marker for diagnosing GIST. GISTs are also positive for smooth muscle actin (SMA) in 30% to 40% of cases. In general, staining is more focal than seen in leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas . However, it is important to keep SMA immunoreactivity in mind for the possible pitfall of misdiagnosing a GIST as a smooth muscle tumor. GISTs are occasionally positive for S-100 (5%), desmin (2%), and cytokeratins (2%), which is helpful in distinguishing GIST from schwannoma (KIT negative, diffusely S-100 positive), smooth muscle tumor (KIT negative, desmin positive), and metaplastic (sarcomatoid) carcinoma (KIT negative, keratin positive). S-100, desmin, and cytokeratins, when positive, are usually only focally positive in GIST. Also, melanoma , which occasionally metastasizes to the bowel, is both S-100 and KIT positive, although the degree of KIT immunoreactivity is typically less than seen in GIST. For the differential diagnosis of GIST, the most useful basic immunohistochemical panel is KIT, DOG1, S-100, and desmin ( Table 17.2 ).



Table 17.2

Immunohistochemistry in Differential Diagnosis of GIST








































Diagnosis KIT DOG1 Desmin S-100
GIST +++ (95%) +++ (99%) − (2%) Focal − (5%) Focal
Leiomyoma +++ (100%) Uniform
Leiomyosarcoma ++ (50%)
Schwannoma +++ (100%) Uniform
Desmoid Fibromatosis

GIST, Gastrointestinal stromal tumor.




Ultrastructural Findings


Electron microscopy (EM) analysis of GIST reveals an organelle-poor undifferentiated phenotype or neural features, such as synaptic-type structures, perhaps as a result of their origin as ICCs, which have neuronlike functions ( Figs. 17.22 and 17.23 ). The subset of GIST with poorly formed synaptic-like structures was previously known as gastrointestinal autonomic nerve tumor (GANT) or plexosarcoma . Although GANT was formerly thought to be a distinct entity defined by unique EM features, more recent work has demonstrated that GANT is merely part of the spectrum of GIST, without distinct clinical or molecular features. Because of its characteristic histologic, immunohistochemical, and genetic features, EM no longer plays a role in the diagnosis of GIST.




Fig. 17.22


Electron micrograph of GIST with neuronal and synapse-like structures containing dense-core neurosecretory granules and microtubules (X17700).

Courtesy of Dr. Robert Erlandson.



Fig. 17.23


Electron micrograph of GIST illustrating details of synapse-like structures. Note the neurosecretory granules and vesicles. A portion of a neurite is also present [X35700]).

Courtesy of Dr. Robert Erlandson.




Genetic Findings


Approximately 70% to 80% of GISTs contain constitutively activating mutations in KIT , which encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase that is strongly expressed in ICCs and is critical for ICC development and maintenance ( Fig. 17.24 ). KIT mutations are found in the smallest, subcentimeter GISTs, suggesting that KIT mutation is the initiating tumorigenic event in most GISTs. This has been confirmed in mouse models where oncogenic KIT activation is all that is necessary to drive GIST tumorigenesis. However, additional secondary changes are required to develop GISTs that are clinically aggressive. KIT mutations are scattered along hot spots, including KIT exons 9, 11, 13, and 17 ( Fig. 17.24 and Table 17.3 ). Whereas most mutations are found throughout the length of the GI tract, KIT exon 9 mutant tumors arise predominantly in the small bowel. Approximately 67% of KIT mutations involve exon 11, 10% in exon 9, and 1% each in exons 13 and 17. Other KIT mutations are identified rarely in exons 8, 12, 14, and 18. Mutations can be missense mutations, insertions, duplications, or deletions. Most KIT mutations are heterozygous. However, hemizygous and homozygous KIT mutations occur infrequently and are associated with aggressive clinical behavior.




Fig. 17.24


Schematic representation of KIT and PDGFRA with mutational hot spots.


Table 17.3

Genetics of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs)

Modified from Corless CL, Barnett CM, and Heinrich MC. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: origin and molecular oncology. Nat Rev Cancer . 2011; 11 :865–878.































































































Genetic Type Relative Frequency Anatomic Distribution Germline Examples
KIT Mutation (relative frequency: 75%–80%)
Exon 8 Rare Small bowel One kindred
Exon 9 insertion AY502-503 10% Small bowel and colon None
Exon 11 (deletions, single nucleotide substitutions and insertions) 67% All sites Several kindreds
Exon 13 K642E 1% All sites Two kindreds
Exon 17 D820Y, N822K, and Y823D 1% All sites Five kindreds
PDGFRA Mutation (relative frequency: 5%–8%)
Exon 12 (e.g., V561D) 1% All sites Two kindreds
Exon 14 N659K <1% Stomach None
Exon 18 D842V 5% Stomach, mesentery, and omentum None
Exon 18 (e.g., deletion of amino acids IMHD 842-846) 1% All sites One kindred
KIT and PDGFRA Wild Type (relative frequency: 12%–15%)
BRAF V600E 3% Stomach and small bowel None
SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD mutations 3% Stomach and small bowel Carney-Stratakis syndrome
Sporadic pediatric GISTs ∼1% Stomach Not heritable
GISTs as part of Carney triad ∼1% Stomach Not heritable
NF1 related Rare Small bowel Numerous
ETV6-NTRK3 Very rare Too few None
FGFR1 gene fusions Very rare Too few None

NF1, Neurofibromatosis type 1; PDGFRA, platelet-derived growth factor receptor α; SDH, succinate dehydrogenase.


About 7% to 15% of GISTs have mutations in PDGFRA (platelet-derived growth factor receptor α gene), which encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase related to KIT ( Fig. 17.24 and Table 17.3 ). Both KIT and PDGFRA reside next to each other on chromosome 4q, suggesting that one of them was created through a gene duplication event from the other. KIT and PDGFRA mutations are mutually exclusive and mechanistically drive GIST tumorigenesis in the same way. PDGFRA has one more exon than KIT, so the numbering system is offset by one. PDGFRA mutations occur in exons 12 (<1%), 14 (<1%), and 18 (5%–10%) ( Fig. 17.24 and Table 17.3 ). Exons 12, 14, and 18 of PDGFRA are homologous to exons 11, 13, and 17 of KIT . Most PDGFRA mutant GISTs arise in the stomach or omentum and have a specific morphology that is readily recognizable. PDGFRA mutant GISTs are negative or weakly positive for KIT IHC (see Table 17.1 ) and have epithelioid cytomorphology with prominent cell membranes, frequent binucleation, more pleomorphism than usual in KIT mutant GIST, and focally myxoid stroma ( Figs. 17.25 and 17.26 ). Interestingly, whereas 15% of GISTs had PDGFRA mutations in a prospective study, only 2.1% of metastatic GISTs had PDGFRA mutations. This suggests that PDGFRA mutant GISTs exhibit less aggressive clinical behavior than KIT mutant GISTs in general.


Mar 10, 2020 | Posted by in PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE | Comments Off on Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) and Extragastrointestinal GIST

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access