|
Figure 2.1.1 Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Widened parabasal zone and prominent koilocytotic atypia. |
Figure 2.1.2 Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Nuclear enlargement in the intermediate layers, disorganization of the parabasal zone with occasional parabasal mitosis. |
Figure 2.1.3 Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Nuclear enlargement and hyperchromasia; some cells with cytoplasmic clearing. |
Figure 2.1.5 Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, higher magnification. Nuclear enlargement, hyperchromasia, and nuclear membrane irregularities. |
Figure 2.1.6 Nondiagnostic squamous atypia. Diffuse cytoplasmic clearing in the superficial and intermediate layers. Hyperchromasia, but no nuclear enlargement. |
Figure 2.1.7 Nondiagnostic squamous atypia. The parabasal zone appears widened due to tangential sectioning. Mildly enlarged uniform nuclei in the intermediate layers. |
|
Figure 2.2.1 Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Widened parabasal zone and prominent koilocytotic atypia. |
Figure 2.2.2 Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Parabasal area appears widened around stromal papillae, but the maturation is preserved, and there is prominent koilocytotic change. |
Figure 2.2.3 Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Parabasal zone shows atypia and disorganization. Maturation is preserved in the upper 2/3 of the epithelium. |
Figure 2.2.6 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Atypical parabasal-like cells extend to the intermediate layers. Mitotic figures are seen above the parabasal zone. |
Figure 2.2.7 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Significant nuclear atypia is present throughout entire epithelial thickness, while cells retain moderate amount of eosinophilic cytoplasm. |
|
Figure 2.3.1 Papillary immature squamous metaplasia. Multiple detached papillary fragments. No extension into cervical stroma is seen in a separate fragment (left). |
Figure 2.3.2 Papillary immature squamous metaplasia. Same case as in Figure 2.3.1, higher magnification. Papillae lined by immature cells. |
Figure 2.3.3 Papillary immature squamous metaplasia. Fused papillae lined by stratified immature epithelium. |
Figure 2.3.4 Papillary immature squamous metaplasia. Same case as in Figure 2.3.1, higher magnification. Papillary frond lined by monotonous immature cells with mild atypia; mitoses are not seen. |
Figure 2.3.5 Papillary immature squamous metaplasia. Essentially absent expression of p16, left, and very low Ki-67 labeling, right. |
Figure 2.3.7 Papillary squamous cell carcinoma. Fused papillae lined by stratified immature epithelium. |
Figure 2.3.8 Papillary squamous cell carcinoma. Same case as in Figure 2.3.6, higher magnification. Stratified epithelium shows disorganization and brisk mitotic activity. |
Figure 2.3.9 Papillary squamous cell carcinoma. Thickened epithelium with increased nucleocytoplasmic ratio and nuclear pleomorphism. |
|
Figure 2.4.4 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Atypical nuclei with some degree of pleomorphism pointing in different directions. |
Figure 2.4.5 Immature squamous metaplasia. Mild atypia and some increase in nucleocytoplasmic ratio. |
Figure 2.4.6 Immature squamous metaplasia. Endocervical gland involvement with residual endocervical glandular epithelium remaining. |
Figure 2.4.7 Immature squamous metaplasia. Thickened epithelium composed of immature cells with uniform nuclei and moderate amount of cytoplasm. |
Figure 2.4.8 Immature squamous metaplasia. Same case as in Figure 2.4.7. Essentially absent expression of p16, left, and some increase in Ki-67 labeling, right. |
|
Figure 2.5.2 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Full-thickness atypical immature epithelium; occasional mitotic figure (arrow) in the intermediate zone. |
Figure 2.5.3 Attenuated high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in a suboptimally oriented epithelial fragment lacking stroma in an endocervical curettage. |
Figure 2.5.4 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Cells with atypical, hyperchromatic, and variably shaped nuclei occupy entire epithelial thickness. |
Figure 2.5.5 Transitional cell metaplasia/atrophy. Tangentially oriented cellular fragments in an endocervical curettage. |
Figure 2.5.7 Transitional cell metaplasia/atrophy. Same case as in Figure 2.5.5, higher magnification. Disorganized mildly hyperchromatic nuclei; increased nucleocytoplasmic ratio; nuclear membranes are smooth, and chromatin is fine. Mitoses are not seen. |
Figure 2.5.8 Transitional cell metaplasia/atrophy. Same case as in Figure 2.5.6, higher magnification. Mildly hyperchromatic elongated nuclei with occasional nuclear grooves. |
Figure 2.5.9 Transitional cell metaplasia/atrophy. Same case as in Figure 2.5.6. No expression of p16, left, and absent Ki-67 labeling, right. |
|
Figure 2.6.1 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). Attenuated hyperchromatic poorly oriented fragments in an endocervical curettage. |
Figure 2.6.2 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Same case as in Figure 2.6.1, higher magnification. Full-thickness epithelial immaturity, hyperchromasia, and atypia in suboptimally oriented epithelial fragments without underlying stroma. |
Figure 2.6.3 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Disorganized immature cell proliferation with atypia and hyperchromasia. |
Figure 2.6.5 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Same case as in Figure 2.6.1. Diffuse p16 expression (left); markedly increased Ki-67 labeling throughout epithelial thickness (right). |
Figure 2.6.6 Atypical immature squamous metaplasia. Hyperchromatic squamous epithelial fragments in an endocervical curettage. |
Figure 2.6.7 Atypical immature squamous metaplasia. Same case as in Figure 2.6.6, higher magnification. The morphologic features raise concern for HSIL. |
Figure 2.6.9 Atypical immature squamous metaplasia. Same case as Figure 2.6.7, patchy expression of p16, left, and some increase in Ki-67 labeling, right. Compare to Figure 2.6.5. |
|
Figure 2.7.1 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) with extension into endocervical glands. Nests of lesional epithelium with rounded outlines. |
Figure 2.7.3 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) with extension into endocervical glands. Same case as in Figure 2.7.1, higher magnification. Nests of atypical epithelium with smooth contours. Residual glandular epithelium (arrow) confirms gland involvement. |
Figure 2.7.4 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) with extension into endocervical glands. Same case as in Figure 2.7.1, higher magnification. Atypical epithelium forming round nest with morphologic features similar to HSIL on the surface. Numerous mitotic figures are noted. |
Figure 2.7.6 Superficially invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Irregular nests of carcinoma within the stroma (left). Compare to HSIL involving endocervical glands (right). |
Figure 2.7.7 Superficially invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Small eosinophilic nest of carcinoma (arrow) with adjacent HSIL involving endocervical glands (left). |
|
Figure 2.8.1 Adenoid basal epithelioma. Proliferation of basophilic epithelial nests in the stroma below the level of normal endocervical glands. |
Figure 2.8.6 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) with extension into endocervical glands. Note residual endocervical glandular epithelium in the deep aspects of the glands. |
Figure 2.8.8 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) with extension into endocervical glands. Epithelial nests with smooth contours and adjacent endocervical gland. |
Figure 2.8.9 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) with extension into endocervical glands. Residual endocervical glandular epithelium remains at the periphery of the involved gland. |
|
Figure 2.9.2 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) with endocervical gland involvement. Basaloid nests of lesional cells with residual glandular epithelium at the deep aspects. |
Figure 2.9.3 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) with endocervical gland involvement. Lesional cells have moderate amounts of eosinophilic cytoplasm and oval hyperchromatic nuclei. |
Figure 2.9.4 Stratified mucin-producing intraepithelial lesion (SMILE). Endocervical curettage; fragment of cellular mucosa at low power. |
Figure 2.9.5 Stratified mucin-producing intraepithelial lesion (SMILE). Intraepithelial proliferation of cells with pale cytoplasm. |
Figure 2.9.6 Stratified mucin-producing intraepithelial lesion (SMILE). Same case as in Figure 2.9.5, higher magnification. Cells with pale mucinous cytoplasm are present within surface epithelium and extend into endocervical gland.
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channelFull access? Get Clinical TreeGet Clinical Tree app for offline access |